Not a Team but Learning as One: The Impact of Consistent Attendance on Discourse Diversification in Math Group Modeling
Pages 120 - 131
Abstract
This work investigates relationships between consistent attendance —attendance rates in a group that maintains the same tutor and students across the school year— and learning in small group tutoring sessions. We analyzed data from two large urban districts consisting of 206 9th-grade student groups (3 − 6 students per group) for a total of 803 students and 75 tutors. The students attended small group tutorials approximately every other day during the school year and completed a pre and post-assessment of math skills at the start and end of the year, respectively. First, we found that the attendance rates of the group predicted individual assessment scores better than the individual attendance rates of students comprising that group. Second, we found that groups with high consistent attendance had more frequent and diverse tutor and student talk centering around rich mathematical discussions. Whereas we emphasize that changing tutors or groups might be necessary, our findings suggest that consistently attending tutorial sessions as a group with the same tutor might lead the group to implicitly learn as a team despite not being one.
References
[1]
Mark Abdelshiheed, Tiffany Barnes, and Min Chi. 2023. How and When: The Impact of Metacognitive Knowledge Instruction and Motivation on Transfer across Intelligent Tutoring Systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (2023), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00371-0
[2]
Mark Abdelshiheed, John W. Hostetter, Tiffany Barnes, and Min Chi. 2023. Bridging Declarative, Procedural, and Conditional Metacognitive Knowledge Gap Using Deep Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 45th annual conference of the cognitive science society. 333–340.
[3]
Mark Abdelshiheed, John W. Hostetter, Tiffany Barnes, and Min Chi. 2023. Leveraging deep reinforcement learning for metacognitive interventions across intelligent tutoring systems. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_24
[4]
Mark Abdelshiheed, Jennifer K. Jacobs, and Sidney K. D’Mello. 2024. Aligning Tutor Discourse Supporting Rigorous Thinking with Tutee Content Mastery for Predicting Math Achievement. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
[5]
Mark Abdelshiheed, Robert Moulder, John W. Hostetter, Tiffany Barnes, and Min Chi. 2024. Example, Nudge, or Practice? Assessing Metacognitive Knowledge Transfer of Factual and Procedural Learners. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (2024).
[6]
Mark Abdelshiheed, Guojing Zhou, Mehak Maniktala, Tiffany Barnes, and Min Chi. 2020. Metacognition and Motivation: The Role of Time-Awareness in Preparation for Future Learning. In Proceedings of the 42nd annual conference of the cognitive science society. 945–951.
[7]
Robin Alexander. 2020. A dialogic teaching companion. Routledge, Philadelphia, PA, US.
[8]
Vic Alexander and Richard E Hicks. 2016. Does class attendance predict academic performance in first year psychology tutorials?International Journal of Psychological Studies 8, 1 (2016), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v8n1p28
[9]
Ruel F Ancheta1i, Deny Daniel, and Reshma Ahmad. 2021. Effect of Class Attendance on Academic Performance. European Journal of Education Studies 8, 9 (2021), 116. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i9.3887
[10]
Douglas Barnes. 2008. Exploratory talk for learning. Exploring talk in school 1 (2008), 1–15.
[11]
Sarah B Berenson, Glenda Carter, and Karen S Norwood. 1992. The at-risk student in college developmental algebra. School Science and Mathematics 92, 2 (1992), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1992.tb12141.x
[12]
Marvin W Berkowitz and John C Gibbs. 1985. The process of moral conflict resolution and moral development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1985, 29 (1985), 71–84.
[13]
Desmond Bonner, Stephen Gilbert, Michael C Dorneich, Eliot Winer, Anne M Sinatra, Anna Slavina, Anastacia MacAllister, and Joseph Holub. 2016. The challenges of building intelligent tutoring systems for teams. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 60. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, CA, 1981–1985.
[14]
Brandon M Booth, Jennifer Jacobs, Jeffrey B Bush, Brent Milne, Tom Fischaber, and Sidney K DMello. 2024. Human-tutor Coaching Technology (HTCT): Automated Discourse Analytics in a Coached Tutoring Model. In Proceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1145/3636555.3636937
[15]
Kenneth A Bruffee. 1993. Collaborative learning: higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, US.
[16]
Gaowei Chen, Carol KK Chan, Kennedy KH Chan, Sherice N Clarke, and Lauren B Resnick. 2020. Efficacy of video-based teacher professional development for increasing classroom discourse and student learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences 29, 4-5 (2020), 642–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1783269
[17]
Nancy J Cooke, Myke C Cohen, Walter C Fazio, Laura H Inderberg, Craig J Johnson, Glenn J Lematta, Matthew Peel, and Aaron Teo. 2023. From Teams to Teamness: Future Directions in the Science of Team Cognition. Human Factors (2023), 00187208231162449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720823116244
[18]
Richard Correnti, Mary Kay Stein, Margaret S Smith, James Scherrer, Margaret McKeown, James Greeno, and Kevin Ashley. 2015. Improving teaching at scale: Design for the scientific measurement and learning of discourse practice. Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (2015), 303–320.
[19]
Marcus Credé, Sylvia G Roch, and Urszula M Kieszczynka. 2010. Class attendance in college: A meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research 80, 2 (2010), 272–295. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310362998
[20]
Richard P Deane and Deirdre J Murphy. 2013. Student attendance and academic performance in undergraduate obstetrics/gynecology clinical rotations. Jama 310, 21 (2013), 2282–2288. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.282228
[21]
Kamile Demir and Yasemin Akman Karabeyoglu. 2015. Factors associated with absenteeism in high schools. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 16, 62 (2015), 37–56.
[22]
Stephen Devadoss and John Foltz. 1996. Evaluation of factors influencing student class attendance and performance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78, 3 (1996), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243268
[23]
Pierre Dillenbourg. 1999. What do you mean by collaborative learning?
[24]
Sidney K D’Mello and Art Graesser. 2023. Intelligent tutoring systems: How computers achieve learning gains that rival human tutors. In Handbook of educational psychology. Routledge, UK, 603–629.
[25]
Ge Gao, Song Ju, Markel Sanz Ausin, and Min Chi. 2023. HOPE: Human-Centric Off-Policy Evaluation for E-Learning and Healthcare. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1504–1513.
[26]
Ge Gao, Xi Yang, and Min Chi. 2024. Get a Head Start: On-Demand Pedagogical Policy Selection in Intelligent Tutoring. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 38. AAAI, Washington, DC, USA, 12136–12144.
[27]
P Gendron and Paul Pieper. 2005. Does attendance matter? Evidence from an Ontario ITAL.
[28]
Arthur C Graesser, Sidney D’Mello, and Whitney Cade. 2011. Instruction based on tutoring. Handbook of research on learning and instruction 1 (2011), 422–440.
[29]
James G Greeno, Allan M Collins, Lauren B Resnick, 1996. Cognition and learning. Handbook of educational psychology 77 (1996), 15–46.
[30]
PM Horn and AI Jansen. 2009. An investigation into the impact of tutorials on the performance of economics students. South African Journal of Economics 77, 1 (2009), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.2009.01194.x
[31]
John W. Hostetter, Mark Abdelshiheed, Tiffany Barnes, and Min Chi. 2023. A self-organizing neuro-fuzzy q-network: Systematic design with offline hybrid learning. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1248–1257.
[32]
John W. Hostetter, Cristina Conati, Xi Yang, Mark Abdelshiheed, Tiffany Barnes, and Min Chi. 2023. XAI to increase the effectiveness of an Intelligent Pedagogical Agent. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3570945.3607301
[33]
Richard M Hyde and DJ Flournoy. 1986. A case against mandatory lecture attendance. Academic Medicine 61, 3 (1986), 175–6.
[34]
Md Mirajul Islam, Xi Yang, John W. Hostetter, Adittya S. Saha, and Min Chi. 2024. A Generalized Apprenticeship Learning Framework for Modeling Heterogeneous Student Pedagogical Strategies. In Educational Data Mining.
[35]
Jennifer Jacobs, Karla Scornavacco, Charis Harty, Abhijit Suresh, Vivian Lai, and Tamara Sumner. 2022. Promoting rich discussions in mathematics classrooms: Using personalized, automated feedback to support reflection and instructional change. Teaching and Teacher Education 112 (2022), 103631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103631
[36]
Steve WJ Kozlowski and Georgia T Chao. 2012. The dynamics of emergence: Cognition and cohesion in work teams. Managerial and Decision Economics 33, 5-6 (2012), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2552
[37]
Ann Cale Kruger. 1993. Peer collaboration: Conflict, cooperation, or both?Social Development 2, 3 (1993), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1993.tb00012.x
[38]
Marjan Laal and Seyed Mohammad Ghodsi. 2012. Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences 31 (2012), 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
[39]
Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press, Cambridge, England.
[40]
Judith R Levine. 1992. The Effect of Different Attendance Policies on Student Attendance and Achievement. In Meeting of the American Psychological Association. ERIC, Boston, MA, US.
[41]
Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 (2019).
[42]
Anna Lukkarinen, Paula Koivukangas, and Tomi Seppälä. 2016. Relationship between class attendance and student performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 228 (2016), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.051
[43]
General Stanley McChrystal, Tantum Collins, David Silverman, and Chris Fussell. 2015. Team of teams: New rules of engagement for a complex world. Penguin, Broadway, NY, US.
[44]
Neil Mercer, Sara Hennessy, and Paul Warwick. 2019. Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research 97 (2019), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007
[45]
Neil Mercer and Karen Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge, Philadelphia, PA, US.
[46]
Sarah Michaels and Catherine O’Connor. 2015. Conceptualizing talk moves as tools: Professional development approaches for academically productive discussion. Socializing intelligence through talk and dialogue (2015), 347–362.
[47]
Sarah Michaels, Catherine O’Connor, and Lauren B Resnick. 2008. Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in philosophy and education 27 (2008), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
[48]
Randy Moore. 2003. Attendance and performance. Journal of College Science Teaching 32, 6 (2003), 367.
[49]
Sarah Moore, Claire Armstrong, and Jill Pearson. 2008. Lecture absenteeism among students in higher education: A valuable route to understanding student motivation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 30, 1 (2008), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800701457848
[50]
Rudolf H Moos and Bernice S Moos. 1978. Classroom social climate and student absences and grades. Journal of educational psychology 70, 2 (1978), 263. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.70.2.263
[51]
Alec Ostrander, Desmond Bonner, Jamiahus Walton, Anna Slavina, Kaitlyn Ouverson, Adam Kohl, Stephen Gilbert, Michael Dorneich, Anne Sinatra, and Eliot Winer. 2020. Evaluation of an intelligent team tutoring system for a collaborative two-person problem: Surveillance. Computers in human behavior 104 (2020), 105873.
[52]
Catherine O’Connor and Sarah Michaels. 2019. Supporting teachers in taking up productive talk moves: The long road to professional learning at scale. International Journal of Educational Research 97 (2019), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.11.003
[53]
Catherine O’Connor, Sarah Michaels, and Suzanne Chapin. 2015. "Scaling down" to explore the role of talk in learning: From district intervention to controlled classroom study. Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (2015), 111–126.
[54]
Lauren B Resnick, Christa SC Asterhan, and Sherice N Clarke. 2018. Accountable Talk: Instructional Dialogue That Builds the Mind.
[55]
Lauren B Resnick, Sarah Michaels, and Catherine O’Connor. 2010. How (well structured) talk builds the mind. Innovations in educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching and human development 163 (2010), 194.
[56]
David Romer. 1993. Do students go to class? Should they?Journal of economic perspectives 7, 3 (1993), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.3.167
[57]
Eduardo Salas, Terry L. Dickinson, Sharolyn A. Converse, and Scott I. Tannenbaum. 1992. Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In Teams: Their training and performance.Ablex Publishing, Westport, CT, US, 3–29.
[58]
Eduardo Salas and Stephen M Fiore. 2004. Why team cognition? An overview. In Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance, Eduardo Salas and Stephen M Fiore (Eds.). American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/10690-001
[59]
Henk G. Schmidt and Jos H. C. Moust. 2000. Factors affecting small-group tutorial learning: A review of research. In Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, US, 19–51.
[60]
Claude Elwood Shannon. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell system technical journal 27, 3 (1948), 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
[61]
Barbara Leigh Smith and Jean T MacGregor. 1992. What is collaborative learning.
[62]
Karen L St. Clair. 1999. A case against compulsory class attendance policies in higher education. Innovative Higher Education 23 (1999), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022942400812
[63]
Glenda S Stump, Jonathan C Hilpert, Jenefer Husman, Wen-ting Chung, and Wonsik Kim. 2011. Collaborative learning in engineering students: Gender and achievement. Journal of engineering education 100, 3 (2011), 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00023.x
[64]
Abhijit Suresh, Jennifer Jacobs, Charis Harty, Margaret Perkoff, James H Martin, and Tamara Sumner. 2022. The TalkMoves dataset: K-12 mathematics lesson transcripts annotated for teacher and student discursive moves. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. European Language Resources Association, Marseille, France.
[65]
Aurora AC Teixeira. 2016. The impact of class absenteeism on undergraduates’ academic performance: evidence from an elite Economics school in Portugal. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 53, 2 (2016), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.937730
[66]
Patrick T Terenzini, Alberto F Cabrera, Carol L Colbeck, John M Parente, and Stefani A Bjorklund. 2001. Collaborative learning vs. lecture/discussion: Students’ reported learning gains. Journal of Engineering Education 90, 1 (2001), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00579.x
[67]
Lev Vygotsky 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[68]
Noreen M Webb, Megan L Franke, Marsha Ing, Jacqueline Wong, Cecilia H Fernandez, Nami Shin, and Angela C Turrou. 2014. Engaging with others’ mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices, and learning. International Journal of Educational Research 63 (2014), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.001
[69]
Mikyung Kim Wolf, Amy C Crosson, and Lauren B Resnick. 2006. Accountable Talk in Reading Comprehension Instruction. CSE Technical Report 670.National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) (2006).
[70]
Steven Yamarik. 2007. Does cooperative learning improve student learning outcomes?The journal of economic education 38, 3 (2007), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.38.3.259-277
Index Terms
- Not a Team but Learning as One: The Impact of Consistent Attendance on Discourse Diversification in Math Group Modeling
Recommendations
The Exploring Computer Science Course, Attendance and Math Achievement
ITiCSE '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science EducationExploring Computer Science (ECS) is a high school curriculum that was designed to be more inclusive and engaging for all students, especially women and students of color who have typically been under-represented in the discipline. The course uses an ...
Math link: linking curriculum, instructional strategies, and technology to enhance teaching and learning
Math Link was a professional development project involving Louisiana State University and the West Feliciana Parish School District in the United States. Math Link focused on teachers in grades three through six in the entire district and included over ...
Math link: linking curriculum, instructional strategies, and technology to enhance teaching and learning
ITiCSE '99: Proceedings of the 4th annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE ITiCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science educationMath Link was a professional development project involving Louisiana State University and the West Feliciana Parish School District in the United States. Math Link focused on teachers in grades three through six in the entire district and included over ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2024
338 pages
ISBN:9798400704338
DOI:10.1145/3627043
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 22 June 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- National Science Foundation
- Learning Engineering Virtual Institute (LEVI)
Conference
UMAP '24: 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
July 1 - 4, 2024
Cagliari, Italy
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%
Upcoming Conference
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 92Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)92
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View allView Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format