GameFlow Affordances: Towards a Tool for Designing Gameful Experiences
Article No.: 174, Pages 1 - 7
Abstract
Following publication in 2005, the original GameFlow model has seen thousands of citations and hundreds of applications to designing and evaluating games and gameful experiences. In the intervening years, the GameFlow model has been put to the test and validated by applying it to different game experiences to further understand those experiences and to expose any weaknesses of the model. This paper builds upon the history of applications, validation, and interrogation of the GameFlow model to redevelop and propose a new version of GameFlow, called GameFlow Affordances. GameFlow Affordances shifts GameFlow from a prescriptive list of low-level criteria, to a modernised, high-level model for affording enjoyable experiences. We review the previous commentary and recommendations on the GameFlow model, propose a new model in response to previous work, and outline next steps in developing a design tool for using GameFlow Affordances in the design of games and gameful experiences.
Supplemental Material
- Download
- 57.30 MB
- Transcript
References
[1]
Vero Vanden Abeele, Katta Spiel, Lennart Nacke, Daniel Johnson, and Kathrin Gerling. 2020. Development and validation of the player experience inventory: A scale to measure player experiences at the level of functional and psychosocial consequences. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 135 (2020), 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.102370
[2]
Christine M. Bachen and Chad Raphael. 2011. Social Flow and Learning in Digital Games:A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda. Springer London, London, 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9_5
[3]
Lizzy Bleumers, An Jacobs, and Tim Van Lier. 2010. Criminal Cities and Enchanted Forests: A User-Centred Assessment of the Applicability of the Pervasive GameFlow Model. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games (Leuven, Belgium) (Fun and Games ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/1823818.1823822
[4]
Matthew Bond and Russell Beale. 2009. What Makes a Good Game? Using Reviews to Inform Design. In Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (BCS-HCI ’09). BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, GBR, 418–422.
[5]
Jeanne H. Brockmyer, Christine M. Fox, Kathleen A. Curtiss, Evan McBroom, Kimberly M. Burkhart, and Jacquelyn N. Pidruzny. 2009. The development of the Game Engagement Questionnaire: A measure of engagement in video game-playing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45, 4 (2009), 624 – 634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.016
[6]
Loïc Caroux and Morgane Pujol. 2023. Player Enjoyment in Video Games: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Game Design Choices. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction (2023), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2210880
[7]
Isaac Cheah, Anwar Sadat Shimul, and Ian Phau. 2022. Motivations of playing digital games: A review and research agenda. Psychology and Marketing 39, 5 (2022), 937–950. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21631
[8]
M.-T. Cheng, H.-C. She, and L.A. Annetta. 2015. Game immersion experience: its hierarchical structure and impact on game-based science learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 31, 3 (2015), 232–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12066
[9]
J Clement. 2023. Video game market revenue worldwide 2017-2027. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1344668/revenue-video-game-worldwide/
[10]
Ben Cowley, Darryl Charles, Michaela Black, and Ray Hickey. 2008. Toward an Understanding of Flow in Video Games. Comput. Entertain. 6, 2, Article 20 (July 2008), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1371216.1371223
[11]
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 1975. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. Jossey-Bass Publishers, Washington.
[12]
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 1991. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial, New York.
[13]
Yvonne A. W. De Kort and Wijnand A. Ijsselsteijn. 2008. People, Places, and Play: Player Experience in a Socio-Spatial Context. Comput. Entertain. 6, 2, Article 18 (July 2008), 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1371216.1371221
[14]
Sha Ding, Ningjiu Tang, Tao Lin, and Shiyuan Zhao. 2009. RTS-GameFlow: A New Evaluation Framework for RTS Games. In 2009 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISE.2009.5363526
[15]
Fong-Ling Fu, Rong-Chang Su, and Sheng-Chin Yu. 2009. EGameFlow: A scale to measure learners’ enjoyment of e-learning games. Computers & Education 52, 1 (2009), 101 – 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.004
[16]
Tracy Fullerton. 2019. Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games, Fourth Edition (4 ed.). A K Peters/CRC Press, Milton.
[17]
Sven Heidenreich, Franziska Handrich, and Tobias Kraemer. 2023. Flawless victory! Investigating search and experience qualities as antecedent predictors of video game success. Electronic Markets 33, 1 (2023), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00647-2
[18]
Sarah Hudson, Sheila Matson-Barkat, Nico Pallamin, and Guillaume Jegou. 2019. With or without you? Interaction and immersion in a virtual reality experience. Journal of Business Research 100 (2019), 459 – 468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.062
[19]
W.A. IJsselsteijn, Y.A.W. Kort, de, K. Poels, A. Jurgelionis, and F. Bellotti. 2007. Characterising and measuring user experiences in digital games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE 2007), June 13-15, 2007, R. Bernhaupt and M. Tscheligi (Eds.). 1–4.
[20]
Kalle Jegers. 2007. Pervasive Game Flow: Understanding Player Enjoyment in Pervasive Gaming. Comput. Entertain. 5, 1 (Jan. 2007), 9–es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1236224.1236238
[21]
Kalle Jegers. 2009. Elaborating Eight Elements of Fun: Supporting Design of Pervasive Player Enjoyment. Comput. Entertain. 7, 2, Article 25 (June 2009), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541895.1541905
[22]
Charlene Jennett, Anna L. Cox, Paul Cairns, Samira Dhoparee, Andrew Epps, Tim Tijs, and Alison Walton. 2008. Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66, 9 (2008), 641 – 661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.04.004
[23]
Daniel Johnson, John Gardner, and Penelope Sweetser. 2016. Motivations for videogame play: Predictors of time spent playing. Computers in Human Behavior 63 (2016), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.028
[24]
Madison Klarkowski, Daniel Johnson, Peta Wyeth, Simon Smith, and Cody Phillips. 2015. Operationalising and Measuring Flow in Video Games. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (Parkville, VIC, Australia) (OzCHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838826
[25]
Hannu Korhonen, Markus Montola, and Juha Arrasvuori. 2009. Understanding playful user experience through digital games. In International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, Vol. 2009. Citeseer.
[26]
Andrew P. Macvean and Mark O. Riedl. 2011. An Enjoyment Metric for the Evaluation of Alternate Reality Games. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (Bordeaux, France) (FDG ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 277–279. https://doi.org/10.1145/2159365.2159411
[27]
Andrew P. Macvean and Mark O. Riedl. 2011. Evaluating Enjoyment within Alternate Reality Games. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) (Sandbox ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2018556.2018558
[28]
Jeanne Nakamura and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2014. The Concept of Flow. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_16
[29]
Anne Ozdowska, Penny Sweetser, and Mahsuum Daiiani. 2023. A Scoping Review of Heuristics in Videos Games Research: Definitions, Development, Application, and Operationalisation. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, CHI PLAY, Article 389 (oct 2023), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3611035
[30]
Karolien Poels, Yvonne de Kort, and Wijnand Ijsselsteijn. 2007. “It is Always a Lot of Fun!”: Exploring Dimensions of Digital Game Experience Using Focus Group Methodology. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play (Toronto, Canada) (Future Play ’07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1145/1328202.1328218
[31]
Katelyn Procci, Allysa R. Singer, Katherine R. Levy, and Clint Bowers. 2012. Measuring the flow experience of gamers: An evaluation of the DFS-2. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 6 (2012), 2306–2312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.039
[32]
Richard M. Ryan, C. Scott Rigby, and Andrew Przybylski. 2006. The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. Motivation and Emotion 30, 4 (2006), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8
[33]
Penny Sweetser. 2021. GameFlow 2020: 15 Years of a Model of Player Enjoyment. In Proceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Sydney, NSW, Australia) (OzCHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 705–711. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441000.3441048
[34]
Penny Sweetser and Daniel Johnson. 2019. Evaluating the GameFlow Model with Different Stakeholders. In Extended Abstracts of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts (Barcelona, Spain) (CHI PLAY ’19 Extended Abstracts). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 697–703. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341215.3356286
[35]
Penny Sweetser and Daniel Johnson. 2019. GameFlow and Player Experience Measures: An Initial Comparison of Conceptual Constructs. In Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction (Fremantle, WA, Australia) (OZCHI’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369457.3369486
[36]
Penny Sweetser, Daniel Johnson, and Jay Kyburz. 2020. Evaluating GameFlow in a Multiplayer Online Strategy Game Under Development. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference (Melbourne, VIC, Australia) (ACSW ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 47, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373017.3373068
[37]
Penelope Sweetser, Daniel Johnson, and Peta Wyeth. 2013. Revisiting the GameFlow Model with Detailed Heuristics. The Journal of Creative Technologies3 (May 2013). https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/journal-of-creative-technologies/index.php/JCT/article/view/16
[38]
Penelope Sweetser, Daniel Johnson, Peta Wyeth, Aiman Anwar, Yan Meng, and Anne Ozdowska. 2017. GameFlow in Different Game Genres and Platforms. Comput. Entertain. 15, 3, Article 1 (April 2017), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3034780
[39]
Penelope Sweetser, Daniel Johnson, Peta Wyeth, and Anne Ozdowska. 2012. GameFlow Heuristics for Designing and Evaluating Real-Time Strategy Games. In Proceedings of The 8th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Playing the System (Auckland, New Zealand) (IE ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2336727.2336728
[40]
Penny Sweetser and Zane Rogalewicz. 2020. Affording Enjoyment in VR Games: Possibilities, Pitfalls, and Perfection. In Proceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction (Sydney, NSW, Australia) (OZCHI’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA.
[41]
Penny Sweetser, Zane Rogalewicz, and Qingyang Li. 2019. Understanding Enjoyment in VR Games with GameFlow. In 25th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Parramatta, NSW, Australia) (VRST ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 96, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359996.3364800
[42]
Penelope Sweetser and Peta Wyeth. 2005. GameFlow: A Model for Evaluating Player Enjoyment in Games. Comput. Entertain. 3, 3 (July 2005), 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/1077246.1077253
[43]
Jean Lee Tan, Dion Hoe-Lian Goh, Rebecca P Ang, and Vivien S Huan. 2010. Usability and Playability Heuristics for Evaluation of an Instructional Game. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010, Jaime Sanchez and Ke Zhang (Eds.). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Orlando, Florida, USA, 363–373. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/35570
[44]
Nurul Hidayah Mat Zain, Azizah Jaafar, and Fariza Hanis Abdul Razak. 2016. Enjoyable game design: validation of motor-impaired user GameFlow model. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering 8, 2 (2016), 116.
Index Terms
- GameFlow Affordances: Towards a Tool for Designing Gameful Experiences
Recommendations
GameFlow 2020: 15 Years of a Model of Player Enjoyment
OzCHI '20: Proceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer InteractionThe original GameFlow model was first published in 2005 and in the last 15 years it has seen thousands of citations and hundreds of applications to designing and evaluating games and gameful experiences. Previous work has sought to test and validate ...
GameFlow in Different Game Genres and Platforms
Theoretical and Practical Computer Applications in EntertainmentThe GameFlow model strives to be a general model of player enjoyment, applicable to all game genres and platforms. Derived from a general set of heuristics for creating enjoyable player experiences, the GameFlow model has been widely used in evaluating ...
GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games
Theoretical and Practical Computer Applications in EntertainmentAlthough player enjoyment is central to computer games, there is currently no accepted model of player enjoyment in games. There are many heuristics in the literature, based on elements such as the game interface, mechanics, gameplay, and narrative. ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 2024
4761 pages
ISBN:9798400703317
DOI:10.1145/3613905
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 11 May 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Work in progress
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%
Upcoming Conference
CHI '25
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 155Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)155
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21
Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderFull Text
View this article in Full Text.
Full TextHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format