Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3695652.3695675acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimmsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Study of Factors Influencing Customers' Online Knowledge Purchase Intention in the Context of Live-Streaming

Published: 15 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

With the information explosion and the advent of the era of knowledge economy, knowledge payment has ushered in a new stage of progress in the context of the prevalence of live streaming. However, the connections between trust (including trust in seller and trust in platform), perceived fee, perceived risk, perceived value and intention to purchase remain unclear. Additionally, the study of knowledge payment is rarely discussed in the context of living streaming environment. Thus, this research is dedicated to probing the relationships between trust, perceived fee, perceived risk, perceived value and intention to purchase, using the Value-Based Adoption Model (VAM). Firstly, factors influencing customers’ purchase intention and their relationships are discussed. Secondly, recommendations are provided for current living-streaming platforms to capture the needs of customers by improving the knowledge payment experience. The results of the study are as follows: (a) Trust and perceived fee have a negative influence on perceived risk and perceived value respectively; (b) Perceived usefulness and perceived value have a positive influence on perceived value and intention to purchase respectively. (c) Perceived risk has a negative influence on perceived value. Regarding the contribution, the paper provides a new research perspective on factors affecting willingness to pay in the area of knowledge payment, which broadens the research scope of knowledge payment.

References

[1]
Nel, J.D. and Badenhorst, A. (2020a) ‘A conceptual framework for reverse logistics challenges in e-commerce’, International Journal of Business Performance Management, 21(1/2), p. 114.
[2]
Luo, X. et al. (2023) ‘Live Streaming Commerce: A review and research agenda’, Journal of Computer Information Systems, pp. 1–24.
[3]
Pavlou, P.A. and Gefen, D. (2004) ‘Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust’, Information Systems Research, 15(1), pp. 37–59.
[4]
de Araújo, A.C. et al. (2017) ‘An exploratory study on the returns management process in an online retailer’, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 21(3), pp. 345–362.
[5]
Li, Q., Zhao, C. and Cheng, R. (2023) ‘How the characteristics of live-streaming environment affect consumer purchase intention: The mediating role of presence and perceived trust’, IEEE Access, 11, pp. 123977–123988.
[6]
Shah, S.K. et al. (2021) ‘Consumer's intention to purchase 5G: Do environmental awareness, environmental knowledge and health consciousness attitude matter?’, Technology in Society, 65, p. 101563.
[7]
Wang, L. (2020) ‘Resumptive knowledge anxiety of youth groups in the context of knowledge payment: Complication and solutions’, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities - Philosophy of Being Human as the Core of Interdisciplinary Research (ICCESSH 2020) [Preprint].
[8]
Zhang, M. et al. (2020) ‘What drives online course sales? signaling effects of user-generated information in the paid knowledge market’, Journal of Business Research, 118, pp. 389–397.
[9]
Taherdoost, H. (2018a) ‘A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories’, Procedia Manufacturing, 22, pp. 960–967.
[10]
Kim S, Bae J, Jeon H. Continuous Intention on Accommodation Apps: Integrated Value-Based Adoption and Expectation–Confirmation Model Analysis[J]. Sustainability, 2019,11(6).
[11]
Kim, H.-W., Chan, H.C. and Gupta, S. (2007) ‘Value-based adoption of mobile internet: An empirical investigation’, Decision Support Systems, 43(1), pp. 111–126.
[12]
Kim, Y., Park, Y. and Choi, J. (2017) ‘A study on the adoption of IOT Smart Home Service: Using value-based adoption model’, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(9–10), pp. 1149–1165.
[13]
Davis, F.D. (1989) ‘Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of Information Technology’, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), p. 319.
[14]
Zeithaml, V.A. (1988) ‘Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence’, Journal of Marketing, 52(3), pp. 2–22.
[15]
Mitchell, V. (1999) ‘Consumer perceived risk: Conceptualisations and Models’, European Journal of Marketing, 33(1/2), pp. 163–195.
[16]
Dowling, G.R. and Staelin, R. (1994) ‘A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity’, Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), p. 119.
[17]
Daradkeh, M., Gawanmeh, A. and Mansoor, W. (2022) ‘Information adoption patterns and online knowledge payment behavior: The moderating role of product type’, Information, 13(9), p. 414.
[18]
Su, L., Li, Y. and Li, W. (2019) ‘Understanding consumers’ purchase intention for online paid knowledge: A customer value perspective’, Sustainability, 11(19), p. 5420.
[19]
Agag, G.M. and El-Masry, A.A. (2016) ‘Why do consumers trust online travel websites? drivers and outcomes of Consumer Trust toward online travel websites’, Journal of Travel Research, 56(3), pp. 347–369.
[20]
Kim, H.-W., Xu, Y. and Gupta, S. (2012) ‘Which is more important in internet shopping, perceived price or trust?’, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(3), pp. 241–252.
[21]
Milne, S., Sheeran, P. and Orbell, S. (2000) ‘Prediction and intervention in health‐related behavior: A Meta‐analytic review of Protection Motivation Theory’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(1), pp. 106–143.
[22]
Witte, K. (1992) ‘Putting the fear back into Fear Appeals: The Extended Parallel Process Model’, Communication Monographs, 59(4), pp. 329–349.
[23]
He, Y., Chen, Q. and Kitkuakul, S. (2018) ‘Regulatory focus and technology acceptance: Perceived ease of use and usefulness as efficacy’, Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), p. 1459006.
[24]
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) ‘Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica, 47(2), p. 263.
[25]
Thaler, R. (1985) ‘Mental Accounting and consumer choice’, Marketing Science, 4(3), pp. 199–214.
[26]
Dodds, W.B., Monroe, K.B. and Grewal, D. (1991) ‘Effects of price, Brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations’, Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), p. 307.
[27]
Chang, T.-Z. and Wildt, A.R. (1994) ‘Price, product information, and purchase intention: An empirical study’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(1), pp. 16–27.
[28]
Kim, D.J., Ferrin, D.L. and Rao, H.R. (2008) ‘A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents’, Decision Support Systems, 44(2), pp. 544–564.
[29]
Voss, G.B., Parasuraman, A. and Grewal, D. (1998) ‘The roles of Price, performance, and expectations in determining satisfaction in service exchanges’, Journal of Marketing, 62(4), p. 46.
[30]
Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J. and Sabol, B. (2002) ‘Consumer Trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges’, Journal of Marketing, 66(1), pp. 15–37.
[31]
Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W. (2004) ‘Consumer Trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in E-products and e-services’, Omega, 32(6), pp. 407–424.

Index Terms

  1. A Study of Factors Influencing Customers' Online Knowledge Purchase Intention in the Context of Live-Streaming
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IMMS '24: Proceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Information Management and Management Science
    August 2024
    465 pages
    ISBN:9798400716997
    DOI:10.1145/3695652
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 October 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. intention to purchase
    2. knowledge payment
    3. live-streaming
    4. perceived value

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    IMMS 2024

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 7
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media