Towards Designing a Pet Robot for Older Adults by Young Adults
Authors: 
Sarah Yousef Alhouli, Nora Abdullah Almania, Muneeb Ahmad, 
Deepak Ranjan SahooAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 408 - 410
Abstract
Social robots such as companion or pet robots are increasingly being used for older adults’ mental well-being. Pet robot touch interactions could have positive effects on well-being similar to those observed in natural interactions with real animals. Designing pet robot interactions for an elderly family member with young adults could create gratitude and memory, thereby improving attitudes towards social robots. To this end, we conducted a preliminary user identification study with five young adults to determine their elderly family members’ preferences for sound/voice responses to touch inputs, using JoyForAll pet robots as technology probes. We report users’ likability of the preferred positive touch interactions, themes that emerged from the think-aloud design for touch interactions, and agreement rates of the robots’ sound/voice responses.
References
[1]
Abdullah X. Ali, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2019. Crowdlicit: A System for Conducting Distributed End-User Elicitation and Identification Studies(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300485.
[2]
Marian R Banks, Lisa M Willoughby, and William A Banks. 2008. Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 9, 3 (2008), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2007.11.007
[3]
Virginia Bernabei, Diana De Ronchi, Teresa La Ferla, Fransesca Moretti, Letizia Tonelli, Barbara Ferrari, Martina Forlani, and ANNA-RITA Atti. 2013. Animal-assisted interventions for elderly patients affected by dementia or psychiatric disorders: A review. Journal of psychiatric research 47, 6 (2013), 762–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.12.014
[4]
Hannah Bradwell, Katie Edwards, Rhona Winnington, Serge Thill, Victoria Allgar, and Ray Jones. 2022. Exploring the effect of implementing affordable socially assistive pet robots in eight care homes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a stratified cluster randomised controlled trial and mixed-method study. (2022). https://doi.org/10.2196/38864
[5]
Hannah Louise Bradwell, Katie Jane Edwards, Rhona Winnington, Serge Thill, and Ray B Jones. 2019. Companion robots for older people: importance of user-centred design demonstrated through observations and focus groups comparing preferences of older people and roboticists in South West England. BMJ open 9, 9 (2019), e032468. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032468
[6]
Hannah L. Bradwell, Rhona Winnington, Serge Thill, and Ray B. Jones. 2020. Longitudinal Diary Data: Six Months Real-World Implementation of Affordable Companion Robots for Older People in Supported Living. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 148–150. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378256
[7]
Ramzi Abou Chahine, Steven Vasquez, Pooyan Fazli, and Hasti Seifi. 2023. Clustering Social Touch Gestures for Human-Robot Interaction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.01334 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.01334
[8]
Jill Chonody and Donna Wang. 2013. Connecting older adults to the community through multimedia: An intergenerational reminiscence program. Activities, Adaptation & Aging 37, 1 (2013), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2012.760140
[9]
William J Chopik, Nicky J Newton, Lindsay H Ryan, Todd B Kashdan, and Aaron J Jarden. 2019. Gratitude across the life span: Age differences and links to subjective well-being. The journal of positive psychology 14, 3 (2019), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1414296
[10]
Anna Flagg and Karon MacLean. 2013. Affective touch gesture recognition for a furry zoomorphic machine. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (Barcelona, Spain) (TEI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460625.2460629
[11]
M. Fujita. 2004. On activating human communications with pet-type robot AIBO. Proc. IEEE 92, 11 (2004), 1804–1813. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2004.835364
[12]
Shihui Guo, Lishuang Zhan, Yancheng Cao, Chen Zheng, Guyue Zhou, and Jiangtao Gong. 2023. Touch-and-Heal: Data-driven Affective Computing in Tactile Interaction with Robotic Dog. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 7, 2, Article 56 (jun 2023), 33 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3596258
[13]
Long-Jing Hsu, Janice K Bays, Katherine M. Tsui, and Selma Sabanovic. 2023. Co-designing Social Robots with People Living with Dementia: Fostering Identity, Connectedness, Security, and Autonomy. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (DIS ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2672–2688. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3595987
[14]
Janella Hudson, Rachel Ungar, Laurie Albright, Rifky Tkatch, James Schaeffer, and Ellen R Wicker. 2020. Robotic pet use among community-dwelling older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B 75, 9 (2020), 2018–2028. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa119
[15]
Merel M. Jung. 2014. Towards Social Touch Intelligence: Developing a Robust System for Automatic Touch Recognition. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (Istanbul, Turkey) (ICMI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1145/2663204.2666281
[16]
Merel M Jung, Lisa Van der Leij, and Saskia M Kelders. 2017. An exploration of the benefits of an animallike robot companion with more advanced touch interaction capabilities for dementia care. Frontiers in ICT 4 (2017), 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00016
[17]
Wei Qi Koh, Faith Xin Hui Ang, and Dympna Casey. 2021. Impacts of low-cost robotic pets for older adults and people with dementia: scoping review. JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies 8, 1 (2021), e25340. https://doi.org/10.2196/25340
[18]
Agnieszka Barbara Kolasinska, Myrte Thoolen, Sebastiaan Peek, Yuan Lu, and Rens Brankaert. 2021. Co-creating design opportunities for social technology in the context of dementia. In Dementia Lab Conference. Springer, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70293-9_11
[19]
Yun-Kai Li, Qing-Hao Meng, and Hong-Wei Zhang. 2021. Touch gesture recognition using spatiotemporal fusion features. IEEE Sensors Journal 22, 1 (2021), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3090576
[20]
Sean McGlynn, Braeden Snook, Shawn Kemple, Tracy L. Mitzner, and Wendy A. Rogers. 2014. Therapeutic Robots for Older Adults: Investigating the Potential of Paro. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Bielefeld, Germany) (HRI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 246–247. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559846
[21]
Janni Nielsen, Torkil Clemmensen, and Carsten Yssing. 2002. Getting access to what goes on in people’s heads? Reflections on the think-aloud technique. In Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction. 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/572020.572033
[22]
Lihui Pu, Wendy Moyle, Cindy Jones, and Michael Todorovic. 2019. The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. The gerontologist 59, 1 (2019), e37–e51. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny046
[23]
Valeria Righi, Sergio Sayago, and Josep Blat. 2017. When we talk about older people in HCI, who are we talking about? Towards a ‘turn to community’in the design of technologies for a growing ageing population. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 108 (2017), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.06.005
[24]
Robert Roberts and Daniel Telech. 2019. The moral psychology of gratitude. Rowman & Littlefield.
[25]
Hayley Robinson, Bruce MacDonald, and Elizabeth Broadbent. 2015. Physiological effects of a companion robot on blood pressure of older people in residential care facility: a pilot study. Australasian journal on ageing 34, 1 (2015), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12099
[26]
Randy A Sansone and Lori A Sansone. 2010. Gratitude and well being: the benefits of appreciation. Psychiatry (edgmont) 7, 11 (2010), 18.
[27]
Yasaman S. Sefidgar, Karon E. MacLean, Steve Yohanan, H.F. Machiel Van der Loos, Elizabeth A. Croft, and E. Jane Garland. 2016. Design and Evaluation of a Touch-Centered Calming Interaction with a Social Robot. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 7, 2 (2016), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2015.2457893
[28]
Elaine Schaertl Short, Katelyn Swift-Spong, Hyunju Shim, Kristi M Wisniewski, Deanah Kim Zak, Shinyi Wu, Elizabeth Zelinski, and Maja J Matarić. 2017. Understanding social interactions with socially assistive robotics in intergenerational family groups. In 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172308
[29]
Barbara Sienkiewicz, Zuzanna Radosz-Knawa, and Bipin Indurkhya. 2024. A participatory design approach to using social robots for elderly care. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14134 (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.14134
[30]
Marijke Span, Marike Hettinga, Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, Jan Eefsting, and Carolien Smits. 2013. Involving people with dementia in the development of supportive IT applications: a systematic review. Ageing research reviews 12, 2 (2013), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2013.01.002
[31]
Walter Dan Stiehl, Jeff Lieberman, Cynthia Breazeal, Louis Basel, Levi Lalla, and Michael Wolf. 2005. Design of a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. In ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. IEEE, 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513813
[32]
Denise Tanner. 2013. Identity, selfhood and dementia: Messages for social work. European Journal of Social Work 16, 2 (2013), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2011.611795
[33]
Radu-Daniel Vatavu and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2015. Formalizing Agreement Analysis for Elicitation Studies: New Measures, Significance Test, and Toolkit. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1325–1334. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702223.
[34]
Kazuyoshi Wada and Takanori Shibata. 2007. Living With Seal Robots—Its Sociopsychological and Physiological Influences on the Elderly at a Care House. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 23, 5 (2007), 972–980. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2007.906261
[35]
Gubing Wang, Chiara Marradi, Armagan Albayrak, and Tischa JM van der Cammen. 2019. Co-designing with people with dementia: A scoping review of involving people with dementia in design research. Maturitas 127 (2019), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.06.003
[36]
Jacob O. Wobbrock, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2009. User-defined gestures for surface computing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1083–1092. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518866
[37]
Steve Yohanan and Karon E MacLean. 2012. The role of affective touch in human-robot interaction: Human intent and expectations in touching the haptic creature. International Journal of Social Robotics 4 (2012), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-011-0126-7
Index Terms
- Towards Designing a Pet Robot for Older Adults by Young Adults
Recommendations
Robot-Assisted Training with Swedish and Israeli Older Adults
Social RoboticsAbstractThis paper explores robot-assisted training in a cross-cultural context with older adults. We performed user studies with 28 older adults with two different assistive training robots: an adaptive robot, and a non-adaptive robot, in two countries (...
Co-Designing with Older Adults, for Older Adults: Robots to Promote Physical Activity
HRI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionLack of physical activity has severe negative health consequences for older adults and limits their ability to live independently. Robots have been proposed to help engage older adults in physical activity (PA), albeit with limited success. There is a ...
Recruiting Older Adults in the Wild: Reflections on Challenges and Lessons Learned from Research Experience
PervasiveHealth '18: Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for HealthcareIt is important to understand the older adults prior to the design process. The understanding can better facilitate design conversations between the researchers and the older adults. In this paper, we discussed our experiences of building a relationship ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2024
502 pages
ISBN:9798400711787
DOI:10.1145/3687272
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 24 November 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Poster
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
HAI '24
Sponsor:
HAI '24: International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
November 24 - 27, 2024
Swansea, United Kingdom
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 121 of 404 submissions, 30%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 30Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)30
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format