Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3678884.3681883acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Optimizing Medical Device Training: The Role of Multi-User VR and Expert Guidance

Published: 13 November 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Before medical professionals are permitted to operate a medical device, they require appropriate training. The conventional training method, carried out on-site by an expert, has been shown to be deficient for years, posing a risk to healthcare professionals and patients. In contrast, single-user virtual reality (VR) training provides interactive priming of medical devices without the involvement of an expert but with increased training success. As multi-user VR training could offer the benefits of both methods, we investigate its potential for improving medical device training by designing, implementing, and comparing different training methods - 1) conventional training under the guidance of an instructor for a group of people, 2) interactive VR training for single users, and 3) interactive VR training for multiple users with an instructor - we aim to address the existing problem of insufficient medical device training. Although the methods differ in terms of visual representation and interaction, the identical learning content in all methods allows for a valid comparison. Our findings demonstrate that Multi-User VR Training has the potential to be a useful, if not superior, alternative to conventional training.

References

[1]
Davide Calandra, Filippo Gabriele Pratticò, Massimo Migliorini, Vittorio Verda, Fabrizio Lamberti, et al. 2021. A Multi-Role, Multi-User, Multi-Technology Virtual Reality-Based Road Tunnel Fire Simulator for Training Purposes. In Proc. 16th International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (GRAPP 2021), Vol. 1. SciTePress, 96--105. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010319400960105
[2]
Jeffrey B Cooper, Ronald S Newbower, and Richard J Kitz. 1984. An Analysis of Major Errors and Equipment Failures in Anesthesia Management: Considerations for Prevention and Detection. Anesthesiology 60, 1 (1984), 34--42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542--198401000-00008
[3]
Vernon R Curran, Xiaolin Xu, Mustafa Yalin Aydin, and Oscar Meruvia-Pastor. 2023. Use of extended reality in medical education: an integrative review. Medical Science Educator 33, 1 (2023), 275--286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01698--4
[4]
Felicitas J. Detmer, Julian Hettig, Daniel Schindele, Martin Schostak, and Christian Hansen. 2017. Virtual and Augmented Reality Systems for Renal Interventions: A Systematic Review. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 10 (2017), 78--94. https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2017.2749527
[5]
Poshmaal Dhar, Tetyana Rocks, Rasika Samarasinghe, Garth Stephenson, and Craig Smith. 2021. Augmented Reality in Medical Education: Students? Experiences and Learning Outcomes. Medical Education Online 26 (12 2021), 1953953. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1953953
[6]
Renee Garrick and Rishikesh Morey. 2015. Dialysis Facility Safety: Processes and Opportunities. Seminars in Dialysis 28, 5 (2015), 514--524. https://doi.org/10. 1111/sdi.12395
[7]
Norman Geissler, Trevor Byrnes, Wolfgang Lauer, Klaus Radermacher, Susanne Kotzsch, Werner Korb, and Uvo M. Hölscher. 2013. Patient Safety Related to the Use of Medical Devices: A Review and Investigation of the Current Status in the Medical Device Industry. Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering 58, 1 (2013), 67--78. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2012-0040
[8]
Sandra G. Hart. 2006. Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50, 9, 904--908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909
[9]
U.M. Hölscher, W. Laurig, M. Lindenthal, N. Hoffmeier, and J. Lamers. 2016. Sicherer Umgang mit Medizinprodukten in Kliniken. ecomed Medizin. ISNB:978--3--609--10056--2.
[10]
Joseph J. LaViola Jr. 2000. A Discussion of Cybersickness in Virtual Environments. ACMSigchi Bulletin 32, 1 (01 January 2000), 47--56. https://doi.org/10.1145/333329. 333344
[11]
Alan S Kliger. 2015. Maintaining Safety in the Dialysis Facility. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology: CJASN 10, 4 (2015), 688--695. https: //doi.org/10.2215/CJN.08960914
[12]
Dieter Lerner, Stefan Mohr, Jonas Schild, Martin Göring, Thomas Luiz, et al. 2020. An Immersive Multi-User Virtual Reality for Emergency Simulation Training: Usability Study. JMIR serious games 8, 3 (07 2020), e18822. https://doi.org/10.2196/18822
[13]
Wei Liu, Elizabeth Manias, and Marie Gerdtz. 2014. The Effects of Physical Environments in Medical Wards on Medication Communication Processes Affecting Patient Safety. Health & Place 26 (2014), 188--198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.12.017
[14]
Ritwika Mallik, Mayank Patel, Dr Atkinson, and Prof Kar. 2021. Exploring the Role of Virtual Reality to Support Clinical Diabetes Training-A Pilot Study. Journal of diabetes science and technology 16 (07 2021), 19322968211027847. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968211027847
[15]
Kyra J.W. Mendez, Rebecca J. Piasecki, Krysia Hudson, Susan Renda, Nicole Mollenkopf, Brenda Smith Nettles, and Hae-Ra Han. 2020. Virtual and Augmented Reality: Implications for the Future of Nursing Education. Nurse Education Today 93 (2020), 104531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104531
[16]
José Miguel Padilha, Paulo Puga Machado, Ana Ribeiro, José Ramos, and Patrício Costa. 2019. Clinical Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 21, 3 (18 Mar 2019), e11529. https://doi.org/10.2196/11529
[17]
Jack Pottle. 2019. Virtual Reality and the Transformation of Medical Education. Future Healthcare Journal 6, 3 (10 2019), 181--185. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2019-0036
[18]
Eric D. Ragan. 2010. The Effects of Higher Levels of Immersion on Procedure Memorization Performance and Implications for Educational Virtual Environments. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 19, 6 (2010), 527--543. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00016 MIT Press One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142--1209, USA journals-info . . . .
[19]
Maximilian Rettinger, Sebastian Berndt, Gerhard Rigoll, and Christoph Schmaderer. 2023. Collaborative VR: Conveying a Complex Disease and Its Treatment. In 2023 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) (Shanghai, China). 581--582. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW58643.2023.00133
[20]
Maximilian Rettinger, Michael Hug, Hassan Kamel, Yashita Saxena, and Gerhard Rigoll. 2023. Enhancing VR Training: Impact of Information Transfer Methods. In 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct) (Sydney, Australia). 513--518. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMARAdjunct60411.2023.00111
[21]
Maximilian Rettinger, Michael Hug, Hassan Kamel, Yashita Saxena, and Gerhard Rigoll. 2024. Visual Perception in VR Training: Impact of Information Transfer Methods. In 2024 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) (Orlando, FL, USA). 785--786. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00189
[22]
Maximilian Rettinger, Niklas Müller, Christopher Holzmann-Littig, Marjo Wijnen-Meijer, Gerhard Rigoll, and Christoph Schmaderer. 2021. VR-Based Equipment Training for Health Professionals. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI EA '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 252, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451766
[23]
Maximilian Rettinger, Christoph Schmaderer, and Gerhard Rigoll. 2022. Do You Notice Me? How Bystanders Affect the Cognitive Load in Virtual Reality. In 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (Christchurch, New Zealand). 77--82. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR51125.2022.00025
[24]
Christian Schäfer, Wolfram Mittelmeier, Katrin Osmanski-Zenk, and Martin Ellenrieder. 2020. Medical Device Training in Arthroplasty: National Practice and Quality Standards. Der Orthopäde 49 (2020), 1072--1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-020-04024--1
[25]
Jonas Schild, Dieter Lerner, Sebastian Misztal, and Thomas Luiz. 2018. EPICSAVE ? Enhancing Vocational Training for Paramedics With Multi-User Virtual Reality. In 2018 IEEE 6th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH) (Vienna, Austria). 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1109/SeGAH.2018.8401353
[26]
John Sweller. 1994. Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty, and Instructional Design. Learning and Instruction 4, 4 (1994), 295--312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959--4752(94)90003--5
[27]
C Williams and J Lefever. 2000. Reducing the Risk of User Error With Infusion Pumps. Professional nurse (London, England) 15, 6 (March 2000), 382384. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11144182 11144182.
[28]
D. Wright, S.J. Mackenzie, I. Buchan, C.S. Cairns, and L.E. Price. 1991. Critical Incidents in the Intensive Therapy Unit. The Lancet 338, 8768 (1991), 676--678. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140--6736(91)91243-N Originally published as Volume 2, Issue 8768.
[29]
Jonas Wrigstad, Johan Bergström, and Pelle Gustafson. 2014. Mind the Gap Between Recommendation and ImplementationPrinciples and Lessons in the Aftermath of Incident Investigations: A Semi-quantitative and Qualitative Study of Factors Leading to the Successful Implementation of Recommendations. BMJ

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSCW Companion '24: Companion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
November 2024
755 pages
ISBN:9798400711145
DOI:10.1145/3678884
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 November 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. assembly task
  2. computer-based training
  3. dialysis
  4. instruction manual
  5. medical training
  6. multi-user
  7. telepresence
  8. virtual reality

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CSCW '24
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 139
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)139
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)57
Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media