Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3533406.3533408acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiworkConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How Do You Zoom?: A Survey Study of How Users Configure Video-Conference Tools for Online Meetings

Published: 08 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Many knowledge workers now spend prolonged hours on video calls each day. However, it is unclear how people set up their videoconferencing tools now that they are highly accustomed to this communication medium. To investigate this, we distributed an online questionnaire that explored 115 users’ videoconferencing setup preferences, asking them about their typical video and camera setup for meetings. We structure the reporting of results around four themes: (1) video layout preferences, (2) camera preferences, (3) self-view window preferences, and (4) multitasking behaviour during meetings. Results show that participants preferred using the active speaker view when joining large meetings with a single key presenter, and the grid view when on social calls and meetings requiring collaboration. Regarding the self-view window — most of the survey respondents reported that they have the self-view window enabled during meetings so that they could check on their own appearance throughout meetings. That said, many left this feature on because they were unaware that the self-view window could be disabled while still sharing their video with others. We discuss the implications of these findings for improving our understanding of how people use and configure their online video meeting tools.

References

[1]
Yoana Ahmetoglu, Duncan P. Brumby, and Anna L. Cox. 2021. Disengaged From Planning During the Lockdown? An Interview Study in an Academic Setting. IEEE Pervasive Computing 20, 4 (2021), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2021.3118900
[2]
Omer Azriel, Amit Lazarov, Adva Segal, and Yair Bar-Haim. 2020. Visual attention patterns during online video-mediated interaction in socially anxious individuals. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 69 (2020), 101595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2020.101595
[3]
Karolína Balogová. 2021. Looking At Yourself on Zoom. Master’s thesis. University College London, London, UK. https://uclic.ucl.ac.uk/content/2-study/4-current-taught-course/1-distinction-projects/15-21/balogova_karolina_2021.pdf
[4]
Nancy Baym, Rachel Bergmann, Adam Coleman, Ricardo Reyna Fernandez, Sean Rintel, Abigail Sellen, and Tiffany Smith. 2021. Collaboration and Meetings - Chapter 1 of the 2021 New Future of Work report. Microsoft. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/collaboration-and-meetings/
[5]
Hancheng Cao, Chia-Jung Lee, Shamsi Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski, Priscilla N Y Wong, Sean Rintel, Brent Hecht, Jaime Teevan, and Longqi Yang. 2021. Large Scale Analysis of Multitasking Behavior During Remote Meetings. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 448, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445243
[6]
Jose Eurico de Vasconcelos Filho, Kori M. Inkpen, and Mary Czerwinski. 2009. Image, Appearance and Vanity in the Use of Media Spaces and Video Conference Systems. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1145/1531674.1531712
[7]
Martin D. Hassell and John L. Cotton. 2017. Some things are better left unseen: Toward more effective communication and team performance in video-mediated interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 73 (2017), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.039
[8]
Mansoor Iqbal. 2022. Zoom Revenue and Usage Statistics (2022). Retrieved March 4, 2022 from https://www.businessofapps.com/data/zoom-statistics/
[9]
Matthew K. Miller, Martin Johannes Dechant, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2021. Meeting You, Seeing Me: The Role of Social Anxiety, Visual Feedback, and Interface Layout in a Get-to-Know-You Task via Video Chat. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 339, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445664
[10]
Matthew K. Miller, Regan L. Mandryk, Max V. Birk, Ansgar E. Depping, and Tushita Patel. 2017. Through the Looking Glass: The Effects of Feedback on Self-Awareness and Conversational Behaviour during Video Chat. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5271–5283. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025548
[11]
Joseph W. Newbold, Anna Rudnicka, David Cook, Marta E. Cecchinato, Sandy J.J. Gould, and Anna L. Cox. 2021. The new normals of work: a framework for understanding responses to disruptions created by new futures of work. Human–Computer Interaction(2021), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1982391
[12]
Mark Powers and Jasminder Thind. 2020. Lessons from China: A return to the office, but not to the old way of working. Retrieved March 4, 2022 from https://workplaceinsights.microsoft.com/workplace-analytics/lessons-from-china-a-return-to-the-office-but-not-to-the-old-way-of-working/
[13]
Jaime Teevan. 2021. The New Future of Work: Research from Microsoft into the Pandemic’s Impact on Work Practices. Retrieved March 4, 2022 from http://teevan.org/publications/papers/msr21-nfw.pdf
[14]
Thomaz Teodorovicz, Raffaella Sadun, Andrew L. Kun, and Orit Shaer. 2021. How does working from home during COVID-19 affect what managers do? Evidence from time-Use studies. Human–Computer Interaction(2021), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1987908
[15]
Noortje Vriends, Yasemin Meral, Javier A. Bargas-Avila, Christina Stadler, and Susan M. Bögels. 2017. How do I look? Self-focused attention during a video chat of women with social anxiety (disorder). Behaviour Research and Therapy 92 (2017), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.02.008
[16]
Jürgen Wegge. 2006. Communication via Videoconference: Emotional and Cognitive Consequences of Affective Personality Dispositions, Seeing One’s Own Picture and Disturbing Events. Human-Computer Interaction 21, 3 (sep 2006), 273–318. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci2103_1

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The CoExplorer Technology Probe: A Generative AI-Powered Adaptive Interface to Support Intentionality in Planning and Running Video MeetingsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661507(1638-1657)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Meeting Effectiveness and Inclusiveness: Large-scale Measurement, Identification of Key Features, and Prediction in Real-world Remote MeetingsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373708:CSCW1(1-39)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Small talk in videoconferencing improves conversational experience and fosters relationshipsCognition and Emotion10.1080/02699931.2024.2392178(1-13)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
CHIWORK '22: Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work
June 2022
215 pages
ISBN:9781450396554
DOI:10.1145/3533406
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 June 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. remote work
  2. self-view window
  3. survey study design
  4. video-mediated communication

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

CHIWORK 2022

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)181
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 24 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The CoExplorer Technology Probe: A Generative AI-Powered Adaptive Interface to Support Intentionality in Planning and Running Video MeetingsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661507(1638-1657)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Meeting Effectiveness and Inclusiveness: Large-scale Measurement, Identification of Key Features, and Prediction in Real-world Remote MeetingsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373708:CSCW1(1-39)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Small talk in videoconferencing improves conversational experience and fosters relationshipsCognition and Emotion10.1080/02699931.2024.2392178(1-13)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024
  • (2024)The Impact of Video Meeting Systems on Psychological User StatesInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103178182:COnline publication date: 1-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Exploring how gender-anonymous voice avatars influence women’s performance in online computing group workInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103146181:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Semantic configuration model with natural transformationsCognitive Systems Research10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.10118583:COnline publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • (2024)An Investigation into the Stress-Buffering Effects of Nature Virtual Backgrounds in Video CallsApplied Psychology Readings10.1007/978-981-97-4802-0_10(169-180)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Combating Videoconference Fatigue: A Pilot Study on the Effects of Video LayoutsInformation Systems and Neuroscience10.1007/978-3-031-58396-4_27(309-317)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Taking a look in the virtual mirror: Implications of self-observation by White individuals during online intergroup exchanges for their own and their racialized partners’ experienceGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations10.1177/13684302231208102Online publication date: 16-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Meet me in VR! Can VR space help remote teams connectInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103104179:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2023

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media