Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3503161.3547899acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quality Assessment of Image Super-Resolution: Balancing Deterministic and Statistical Fidelity

Published: 10 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in developing image super-resolution (SR) algorithms that convert low-resolution (LR) to higher resolution images, but automatically evaluating the visual quality of super-resolved images remains a challenging problem. Here we look at the problem of SR image quality assessment (SR IQA) in a two-dimensional (2D) space of deterministic fidelity (DF) versus statistical fidelity (SF). This allows us to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of existing SR algorithms, which produce images at different clusters in the 2D space of (DF, SF). Specifically, we observe an interesting trend from more traditional SR algorithms that are typically inclined to optimize for DF while losing SF, to more recent generative adversarial network (GAN) based approaches that by contrast exhibit strong advantages in achieving high SF but sometimes appear weak at maintaining DF. Furthermore, we propose an uncertainty weighting scheme based on content-dependent sharpness and texture assessment that merges the two fidelity measures into an overall quality prediction named the Super Resolution Image Fidelity (SRIF) index, which demonstrates superior performance against state-of-the-art IQA models when tested on subject-rated datasets.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (MM22-fp0606.mp4)
Presentation video of SRIF. For more technical details, please refer to our paper.

References

[1]
Peter Burt and Edward Adelson. 1983. The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Transactions on Communications 31, 4 (1983), 532--540.
[2]
Hong Chang, Dit-Yan Yeung, and Yimin Xiong. 2004. Super-resolution through neighbor embedding. In CVPR. I--I.
[3]
William T Freeman, Thouis R Jones, and Egon C Pasztor. 2002. Example-based super-resolution. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 22, 2 (2002), 56--65.
[4]
Jingcai Guo, Shiheng Ma, Jie Zhang, Qihua Zhou, and Song Guo. 2020. Dual-view attention networks for single image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 2728--2736.
[5]
Rania Hassen, Zhou Wang, and Magdy MA Salama. 2013. Image sharpness assessment based on local phase coherence. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 22, 7 (2013), 2798--2810.
[6]
Mahdi S Hosseini, Yueyang Zhang, and Konstantinos N Plataniotis. 2019. Encoding visual sensitivity by maxpol convolution filters for image sharpness assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 28, 9 (2019), 4510--4525.
[7]
Robert Keys. 1981. Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 29, 6 (1981), 1153--1160.
[8]
Jiwon Kim, Jung Kwon Lee, and Kyoung Mu Lee. 2016. Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional networks. In CVPR. 1646--1654.
[9]
Wei-Sheng Lai, Jia-Bin Huang, Narendra Ahuja, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. 2017. Deep laplacian pyramid networks for fast and accurate super-resolution. In CVPR. 624--632.
[10]
Christian Ledig, Lucas Theis, Ferenc Huszár, Jose Caballero, Andrew Cunningham, Alejandro Acosta, Andrew Aitken, Alykhan Tejani, Johannes Totz, Zehan Wang, et al. 2017. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. In CVPR. 4681--4690.
[11]
Anmin Liu, Weisi Lin, and Manish Narwaria. 2011. Image quality assessment based on gradient similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 21, 4 (2011), 1500--1512.
[12]
Chao Ma, Chih-Yuan Yang, Xiaokang Yang, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. 2017. Learning a no-reference quality metric for single-image super-resolution. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 158 (2017), 1--16.
[13]
Kede Ma, Wentao Liu, Tongliang Liu, Zhou Wang, and Dacheng Tao. 2017. dipIQ: Blind image quality assessment by learning-to-rank discriminable image pairs. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 26, 8 (2017), 3951--3964.
[14]
Kede Ma, Wentao Liu, Kai Zhang, Zhengfang Duanmu, Zhou Wang, and Wangmeng Zuo. 2017. End-to-end blind image quality assessment using deep neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 27, 3 (2017), 1202--1213.
[15]
Anish Mittal, Anush Krishna Moorthy, and Alan Conrad Bovik. 2012. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 21, 12 (2012), 4695--4708.
[16]
Anish Mittal, Rajiv Soundararajan, and Alan C Bovik. 2012. Making a "completely blind" image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 20, 3 (2012), 209--212.
[17]
Anush Krishna Moorthy and Alan Conrad Bovik. 2011. Blind image quality assessment: From natural scene statistics to perceptual quality. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 20, 12 (2011), 3350--3364.
[18]
Sung Cheol Park, Min Kyu Park, and Moon Gi Kang. 2003. Super-resolution image reconstruction: a technical overview. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 20, 3 (2003), 21--36.
[19]
Amy R Reibman, Robert M Bell, and Sharon Gray. 2006. Quality assessment for super-resolution image enhancement. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. 2017--2020.
[20]
Ann Marie Rohaly, Philip J Corriveau, John M Libert, Arthur A Webster, Vittorio Baroncini, John Beerends, Jean-Louis Blin, Laura Contin, Takahiro Hamada, David Harrison, et al . 2000. Video quality experts group: Current results and future directions. In Visual Communications and Image Processing, Vol. 4067. SPIE, 742--753.
[21]
Michele A Saad, Alan C Bovik, and Christophe Charrier. 2012. Blind image quality assessment: A natural scene statistics approach in the DCT domain. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 21, 8 (2012), 3339--3352.
[22]
Mehul P Sampat, Zhou Wang, Shalini Gupta, Alan Conrad Bovik, and Mia K Markey. 2009. Complex wavelet structural similarity: A new image similarity index. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 18, 11 (2009), 2385--2401.
[23]
Hamid R Sheikh and Alan C Bovik. 2006. Image information and visual quality. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15, 2 (2006), 430--444.
[24]
Hamid R Sheikh, Alan C Bovik, and Gustavo De Veciana. 2005. An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 14, 12 (2005), 2117--2128.
[25]
Guangming Shi, Wenfei Wan, Jinjian Wu, Xuemei Xie, Weisheng Dong, and Hong Ren Wu. 2019. SISRSet: Single image super-resolution subjective evaluation test and objective quality assessment. Neurocomputing 360 (2019), 37--51.
[26]
Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014).
[27]
Wen Sun, Qingmin Liao, Jing-Hao Xue, and Fei Zhou. 2018. SPSIM: A superpixel-based similarity index for full-reference image quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 27, 9 (2018), 4232--4244.
[28]
Ying Tai, Jian Yang, and Xiaoming Liu. 2017. Image super-resolution via deep recursive residual network. In CVPR. 3147--3155.
[29]
Cuong T Vu, Thien D Phan, and Damon M Chandler. 2011. S3: A spectral and spatial measure of local perceived sharpness in natural images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 21, 3 (2011), 934--945.
[30]
Guangcheng Wang, Leida Li, Qiaohong Li, Ke Gu, Zhaolin Lu, and Jiansheng Qian. 2017. Perceptual evaluation of single-image super-resolution reconstruction. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. 3145--3149.
[31]
Qing Wang and Rabab Kreidieh Ward. 2007. A new orientation-adaptive interpolation method. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 16, 4 (2007), 889--900.
[32]
Shenlong Wang, Lei Zhang, Yan Liang, and Quan Pan. 2012. Semi-coupled dictionary learning with applications to image super-resolution and photo-sketch synthesis. In CVPR. 2216--2223.
[33]
Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13, 4 (2004), 600--612.
[34]
Zhihao Wang, Jian Chen, and Steven CH Hoi. 2020. Deep learning for image super-resolution: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 43, 10 (2020), 3365--3387.
[35]
Zhou Wang and Qiang Li. 2010. Information content weighting for perceptual image quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 20, 5 (2010), 1185--1198.
[36]
Zhou Wang, Eero P Simoncelli, and Alan C Bovik. 2003. Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003, Vol. 2. IEEE, 1398--1402.
[37]
Jinjian Wu, Weisi Lin, Guangming Shi, and Anmin Liu. 2012. Perceptual quality metric with internal generative mechanism. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 22, 1 (2012), 43--54.
[38]
Qingbo Wu, Zhou Wang, and Hongliang Li. 2015. A highly efficient method for blind image quality assessment. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. 339--343.
[39]
Jun Xiao, Qian Ye, Rui Zhao, Kin-Man Lam, and Kao Wan. 2021. Self-feature Learning: An Efficient Deep Lightweight Network for Image Super-resolution. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 4408--4416.
[40]
Wufeng Xue, Lei Zhang, Xuanqin Mou, and Alan C Bovik. 2013. Gradient magnitude similarity deviation: A highly efficient perceptual image quality index. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 23, 2 (2013), 684--695.
[41]
Jin Yamanaka, Shigesumi Kuwashima, and Takio Kurita. 2017. Fast and accurate image super resolution by deep CNN with skip connection and network in network. In International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Springer, 217--225.
[42]
Chih-Yuan Yang, Chao Ma, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. 2014. Single-image super-resolution: A benchmark. In ECCV. 372--386.
[43]
Chih-Yuan Yang and Ming-Hsuan Yang. 2013. Fast direct super-resolution by simple functions. In ICCV. 561--568.
[44]
Jianchao Yang, John Wright, Thomas S Huang, and Yi Ma. 2010. Image super-resolution via sparse representation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 19, 11 (2010), 2861--2873.
[45]
Wenming Yang, Yapeng Tian, Fei Zhou, Qingmin Liao, Hai Chen, and Chenglin Zheng. 2016. Consistent coding scheme for single-image super-resolution via independent dictionaries. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 18, 3 (2016), 313--325.
[46]
Hojatollah Yeganeh, Mohammad Rostami, and Zhou Wang. 2015. Objective quality assessment of interpolated natural images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 24, 11 (2015), 4651--4663.
[47]
Zhenqiang Ying, Haoran Niu, Praful Gupta, Dhruv Mahajan, Deepti Ghadiyaram, and Alan Bovik. 2020. From patches to pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the perceptual space of picture quality. In CVPR. 3575--3585.
[48]
Lin Zhang, Lei Zhang, Xuanqin Mou, and David Zhang. 2011. FSIM: A feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 20, 8 (2011), 2378--2386.
[49]
Fei Zhou, Rongguo Yao, Bozhi Liu, and Guoping Qiu. 2019. Visual quality assessment for super-resolved images: database and method. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 28, 7 (2019), 3528--3541.
[50]
Wei Zhou, Zhou Wang, and Zhibo Chen. 2021. Image super-resolution quality assessment: Structural fidelity versus statistical naturalness. In IEEE International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience. 61--64.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)A survey of super-resolution image quality assessmentNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2024.129279621(129279)Online publication date: Mar-2025
  • (2025)Image super-resolution based on improved ESRGAN and its application in camera calibrationMeasurement10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115899242(115899)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2024)Revolutionizing Prostate Whole-Slide Image Super-Resolution: A Comparative Journey from Regression to Generative Adversarial NetworksUro10.3390/uro40300074:3(89-103)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Quality Assessment of Image Super-Resolution: Balancing Deterministic and Statistical Fidelity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MM '22: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
    October 2022
    7537 pages
    ISBN:9781450392037
    DOI:10.1145/3503161
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 October 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. deterministic fidelity
    2. image super-resolution
    3. perceptual image quality assessment
    4. statistical fidelity
    5. uncertainty weighting

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    MM '22
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,145 of 8,556 submissions, 25%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)78
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)A survey of super-resolution image quality assessmentNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2024.129279621(129279)Online publication date: Mar-2025
    • (2025)Image super-resolution based on improved ESRGAN and its application in camera calibrationMeasurement10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115899242(115899)Online publication date: Jan-2025
    • (2024)Revolutionizing Prostate Whole-Slide Image Super-Resolution: A Comparative Journey from Regression to Generative Adversarial NetworksUro10.3390/uro40300074:3(89-103)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Review of Image Quality Assessment Methods for Compressed ImagesJournal of Imaging10.3390/jimaging1005011310:5(113)Online publication date: 8-May-2024
    • (2024)Underwater Image Restoration through Color Correction and UW-NetElectronics10.3390/electronics1301019913:1(199)Online publication date: 2-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Adversarial Example Quality Assessment: A Large-scale Dataset and Strong BaselineProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia10.1145/3664647.3681101(4786-4794)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Saliency and Depth-Aware Full Reference 360-Degree Image Quality AssessmentInternational Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence10.1142/S021800142351022938:01Online publication date: 9-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Non-Subsampled Contourlet Transform and Ground-Truth Score Generation Based Quality Assessment for DIBR-Synthesized ViewsIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2024.337283726(7873-7886)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Perception-Driven Similarity-Clarity Tradeoff for Image Super-Resolution Quality AssessmentIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology10.1109/TCSVT.2023.334162634:7(5897-5907)Online publication date: Jul-2024
    • (2024)A Database and Model for the Visual Quality Assessment of Super-Resolution VideosIEEE Transactions on Broadcasting10.1109/TBC.2024.338294970:2(516-532)Online publication date: Jun-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media