Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1109/ICIP.2017.8296862guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Perceptual evaluation of single-image super-resolution reconstruction

Published: 17 September 2017 Publication History

Abstract

In recent years, single-image super-resolution (SR) reconstruction has aroused wide attention. Massive SR enhancement algorithms have been proposed. However, much less work has been down on the perceptual evaluation of SR enhanced images and the corresponding enhancement algorithms. In this work, we create a Super-resolution Reconstructed Image Database (SRID), which consists of images produced by two interpolation methods and six popular SR image enhancement algorithms at different amplification factors. Then, subjective experiment is conducted to collect the subjective scores by using the single-stimulus method. The performances of the SR image enhancement algorithms are then evaluated by the obtained subjective scores. Finally, the performances of the general-purpose no-reference (NR) image quality metrics are investigated on the SRID database. This study shows that it is difficult for the state-of-the-art NR image quality metrics to predict the quality of SR enhanced images.

6. References

[1]
T. S. Huang and P. Y. Tsai, “Multi-frame image restoration and registration,” Adv. Comput. Vis. Image Process., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 317–339, 1984.
[2]
Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 35–44, 2004.
[3]
L. Zhang, L. Zhang, X. Q. Mou and D. Zhang, “FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 2378–2386, 2011.
[4]
L. Li, H. Cai, Y. Zhang, W. Lin, A. C. Kot and X. Sun, “Sparse Representation-Based Image Quality Index With Adaptive Sub-Dictionaries,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 3775–3786, 2016.
[5]
K. Gu, L. Li, H. Lu, X. Min and W. Lin, “A Fast Reliable Image Quality Predictor by Fusing Micro- and Macro-Structures,” IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 3903–3912, 2017.
[6]
H. S. Hou and H. C. Andrews, “Cubic splines for image interpolation and digital filtering,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 508–517, 1978.
[7]
A. Giachetti and N. Asuni, “Real-time artifact-free image upscaling,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 2760–2768, 2011.
[8]
J. Yang, Z. Wang, Z. Lin, S. T. Cohen and T. S. Huang, “Coupled dictionary training for image super-resolution,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 3467–3478, 2012.
[9]
H. H and W. C. Siu, “Single image super-resolution using Gaussian process regression,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), pp. 449–456, 2011.
[10]
L. Wang, S. Xiang, G. Meng, H. Wu and C. H. Pan, “single-image super-resolution via adaptive gradient magnitude self-interpolation,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1289–1299, 2013.
[11]
H. Xu, G. Zhai and X. K. Yang, “Single image super-resolution with detail enhancement based on local fractal analysis of gradient,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1740–1299, 2013.
[12]
P. Purkait, N. R. Pal and B. Chanda, “A fuzzy-rule-based approach for single frame super resolution,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2277–2290, 2014.
[13]
L. Li, W. Lin, X. Wang, G. Yang, K. Bahrami and A. C. Kot, “No-reference image blur assessment based on discrete orthogonal moments,” IEEE Trans. Cybernetics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 2016.
[14]
L. Li, H. Zhu, G. Yang and J. Qian, “Referenceless Measure of Blocking Artifacts by Tchebichef Kernel Analysis,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 122–125, 2014.
[15]
ITU, “Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures,” Recommendation, International Telecommunication Union/ITU Radio communication Sector, 2009.
[16]
L. Li, Y. Zhou, W. Lin, J. Wu, X. Zhang and B. Chen, “No-reference quality assessment of deblocked images,” Neurocomputing, vol. 177, pp. 572–584, 2016.
[17]
(Aug. 2003). Final Report from the Video Quality Experts Group on the Validation of Objective Models of Video Quality Assessment, phase II. [Online]. Available: http://www.vqeg.org.
[18]
A. Mittal, A. K. Moorthy and A. C. Bovik, “No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 4695–4708, 2012.
[19]
A. Mittal, R. Soundararajan and A. C. Bovik, “Making a completely blind image quality analyzer,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 209–212, 2013.
[20]
K. Gu, G. Zhai, X. K. Yang and W. J. Zhang, “Using free energy principle for blind image quality assessment,” IEEE Trans. Mulultimedia, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 50–63, 2015.
[21]
A. K. Moorthy and A. C. Bovik, “A two-step framework for constructing blind image quality indices,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 513–516, 2010.
[22]
M. A. Saad and A. C. Bovik, “Blind image quality assessment: A natural scene statistics approach in the DC-T domain,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 3339–3352, 2012.
[23]
P. Ye, J. Kumar, L. Kang and D. Doermann, “Unsuper-vised feature learning framework for no-reference image quality assessment,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), pp. 1098–1105, 2012.
[24]
Y. Zhang and D. M. Chandler, “No-reference image quality assessment based on log derivative statistics of natural scenes,” Journal of Electronic Imaging, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 451–459, 2013.
[25]
A. K. Moorthy and A. C. Bovik, “Blind image quality assessment: From natural scene statistics to perceptual quality,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 3350–3364, 2011.
[26]
L. Zhang, L. Zhang and A. C. Bovik, “A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 2579–2591, 2015.
[27]
K. Gu, G. Zhai, X. Yang and W. Zhang, “Hybrid No-Reference Quality Metric for Singly and Multiply Distorted Images,” IEEE Trans. Broadcasting, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 555–567, 2014.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Exploring the Potential of High-Resolution Drone Imagery for Improved 3D Human Avatar Reconstruction: A Comparative Study with Mobile ImagesImage and Video Technology10.1007/978-981-97-0376-0_13(167-181)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2023
  • (2022)Quality Assessment of Image Super-Resolution: Balancing Deterministic and Statistical FidelityProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia10.1145/3503161.3547899(934-942)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2022

Index Terms

  1. Perceptual evaluation of single-image super-resolution reconstruction
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Guide Proceedings
      2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)
      Sep 2017
      4869 pages

      Publisher

      IEEE Press

      Publication History

      Published: 17 September 2017

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 02 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Exploring the Potential of High-Resolution Drone Imagery for Improved 3D Human Avatar Reconstruction: A Comparative Study with Mobile ImagesImage and Video Technology10.1007/978-981-97-0376-0_13(167-181)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2023
      • (2022)Quality Assessment of Image Super-Resolution: Balancing Deterministic and Statistical FidelityProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia10.1145/3503161.3547899(934-942)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2022

      View Options

      View options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media