Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3501247.3531573acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

The Disinformation Dozen: An Exploratory Analysis of Covid-19 Disinformation Proliferation on Twitter

Published: 26 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Shortly after the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (Covid-19), the United Nations declared an infodemic due to an unprecedented amount of false information spreading about Covid-19. A study made by the center for countering digital hate found out that twelve individuals, referred to as Disinformation Dozen (Disinfo12), were responsible for 65% of Covid-19 misinformation circulating on social media. Given the Disinfo12’s detrimental impact in spreading misinformation, in this work, we perform an exploratory analysis on Disinfo12’s activity on Twitter aiming at identifying their sharing strategies, favorite sources of information, and potential secondary actors contributing to the proliferation of questionable narratives. In our study, we uncovered the distinctive facets that allowed Disinfo12 to act as primary sources of information, and we recognized that YouTube represent one of the favorite information sources to spread questionable narratives and conspiracy theories. Finally, we recognized that right-leaning accounts are embedded in Disinfo12’s community and represent the main spreaders of content generated by the Disinformation Dozen.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (WS22_S6_103.mp4)
Presentation video

References

[1]
Edmund Andrews. 2019. How fake news spreads like a real virus. https://engineering.stanford.edu/magazine/article/how-fake-news-spreads-real-virus
[2]
Zapan Barua, Sajib Barua, Salma Aktar, Najma Kabir, and Mingze Li. 2020. Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Progress in Disaster Science 8 (07 2020), 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100119
[3]
Staci L Benoit and Rachel F. Mauldin. 2021. The “anti-vax” movement: a quantitative report on vaccine beliefs and knowledge across social media. BMC Public Health 21 (11 2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12114-8
[4]
Zack Budryk. 2020. Conspiracy theorists who claim 5G linked to coronavirus believed to burn cell towers in Europe. https://thehill.com/policy/technology/493927-arsonists-falsely-linking-5g-to-coronavirus-burn-cell-towers-in-europe
[5]
Emily Chen, Kristina Lerman, and Emilio Ferrara. 2020. Tracking Social Media Discourse About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development of a Public Coronavirus Twitter Data Set. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 6 (05 2020), e19273. https://doi.org/10.2196/19273
[6]
Wen Chen, Diogo Pacheco, Kai-Cheng Yang, and Filippo Menczer. 2021. Neutral bots probe political bias on social media. Nature Communications 12 (09 2021), 5580. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25738-6
[7]
Jose Yunam Cuan-Baltazar, Maria José Muñoz-Perez, Carolina Robledo-Vega, Maria Fernanda Pérez-Zepeda, and Elena Soto-Vega. 2020. Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 6 (04 2020), e18444. https://doi.org/10.2196/18444
[8]
Sarah Evanega, Mark Lynas, Jordan Adams, and Karinne Smolenyak. 2020. Coronavirus misinformation: quantifying sources and themes in the COVID-19 ’infodemic’. https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Evanega-et-al-Coronavirus-misinformation-submitted_07_23_20-1.pdf
[9]
Emilio Ferrara, Herbert Chang, Emily Chen, Goran Muric, and Jaimin Patel. 2020. Characterizing social media manipulation in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. First Monday 25 (10 2020). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i11.11431
[10]
Emilio Ferrara, Stefano Cresci, and Luca Luceri. 2020. Misinformation, manipulation, and abuse on social media in the era of COVID-19. Journal of Computational Social Science 3 (11 2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00094-5
[11]
Center for Countering Digital Hate. 2021. The disinformation dozen: Why platforms must act on twelve leading online anti‐vaxxers.https://www.counterhate.com/_files/ugd/f4d9b9_b7cedc0553604720b7137f8663366ee5.pdf
[12]
Sheera Frenkel, Davey Alba, and Raymond Zhong. 2020. Surge of Virus Misinformation Stumps Facebook and Twitter. The New York Times (03 2020). https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/08/technology/coronavirus-misinformation-social-media.html
[13]
Nir Grinberg, Kenneth Joseph, Lisa Friedland, Briony Swire-Thompson, and David Lazer. 2019. Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science 363 (01 2019), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2706
[14]
Peter Hotez. 2022. Communicating science and protecting scientists in a time of political instability. Trends in Molecular Medicine 28 (03 2022), 173–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2022.01.001
[15]
Mathieu Jacomy, Tommaso Venturini, Sebastien Heymann, and Mathieu Bastian. 2014. ForceAtlas2, a Continuous Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization Designed for the Gephi Software. PLoS ONE 9 (06 2014), e98679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679
[16]
EM Lederer. 2020. UN Chief Antonio Guterres: Misinformation About Covid-19 is the New Enemy. https://time.com/5811939/un-chief-coronavirus-misinformation/
[17]
Luca Luceri, Felipe Cardoso, and Silvia Giordano. 2021. Down the bot hole: Actionable insights from a one-year analysis of bot activity on Twitter. First Monday (2021).
[18]
Luca Luceri, Ashok Deb, Adam Badawy, and Emilio Ferrara. 2019. Red bots do it better: Comparative analysis of social bot partisan behavior. In Companion proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web conference. 1007–1012.
[19]
Luca Luceri, Ashok Deb, Silvia Giordano, and Emilio Ferrara. 2019. Evolution of bot and human behavior during elections. First Monday (2019).
[20]
Benjamin E. Mabrey. 2021. The Disinformation Dozen and Media Misinformation on Science and Vaccinations. Ph. D. Dissertation. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/honors_college_theses/n009w8842?locale=en
[21]
Thomas Macaulay. 2020. Social media firms will use more AI to combat coronavirus misinformation. https://thenextweb.com/neural/2020/03/17/social-media-firms-will-use-more-ai-to-combat-coronavirus-misinformation-even-if-it-makes-more-mistakes/
[22]
Raina M. Merchant and Nicole Lurie. 2020. Social Media and Emergency Preparedness in Response to Novel Coronavirus. JAMA 323 (03 2020). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.4469
[23]
Panagiotis Metaxas, Eni Mustafaraj, Kily Wong, Laura Zeng, Megan O’Keefe, and Samantha Finn. 2015. What Do Retweets Indicate? Results from User Survey and Meta-Review of Research. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 9(2015), 658–661. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14661#:~:text=Our%20findings%20indicate%20that%20retweeting
[24]
Sophie Mylan and Charlotte Hardman. 2021. COVID-19, cults, and the anti-vax movement. The Lancet 397 (03 2021), 1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00443-8
[25]
Taylor Nelson, Nicole Kagan, Claire Critchlow, Alan Hillard, and Albert Hsu. 2020. The Danger of Misinformation in the COVID-19 Crisis. Missouri Medicine 117(2020), 510–512. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7721433/
[26]
Dimitar Nikolov, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2021. Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to misinformation. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review (02 2021). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-55
[27]
Jonathan Oppenheim. 2020. Jonathan Oppenheim - Covid-19 trusted tweeters. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/oppenheim/Covid-19_tweeps.shtml
[28]
Francesco Pierri, Brea Perry, Matthew R. DeVerna, Kai-Cheng Yang, Alessandro Flammini, Filippo Menczer, and John Bryden. 2021. Online misinformation is linked to early COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and refusal. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021arXiv210410635P/abstract
[29]
Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning 2011. Sparse Additive Generative Models of Text. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning. https://icml.cc/2011/papers/534_icmlpaper.pdf
[30]
Jayaseelan R, Brindha D, and Kades Waran. 2020. Social Media Reigned by Information or Misinformation About COVID-19: A Phenomenological Study. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3596058
[31]
Jon Roozenbeek, Claudia R. Schneider, Sarah Dryhurst, John Kerr, Alexandra L. J. Freeman, Gabriel Recchia, Anne Marthe van der Bles, and Sander van der Linden. 2020. Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. Royal Society Open Science 7 (10 2020), 201199. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199
[32]
Marietje Schaake. 2020. Coronavirus shows Big Tech can fight ‘infodemic’ of fake news. Financial Times (03 2020). https://www.ft.com/content/b2e2010e-6cf8-11ea-89df-41bea055720b
[33]
SERRC. 2021. Covid Information Struggles, Brian Martin. https://social-epistemology.com/2021/07/12/covid-information-struggles-brian-martin/
[34]
Chengcheng Shao, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Onur Varol, Kai-Cheng Yang, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2018. The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nature Communications 9 (11 2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7
[35]
Clea Skopeliti and Bethan John. 2020. Coronavirus: How are the social media platforms responding to the ’infodemic’?https://firstdraftnews.org/articles/how-social-media-platforms-are-responding-to-the-coronavirus-infodemic/
[36]
Reuters Staff. 2020. False claim: A COVID-19 vaccine will genetically modify humans. Reuters (05 2020). https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-covid-19-vaccine-modify-idUSKBN22U2BZ
[37]
Massimo Stella, Emilio Ferrara, and Manlio De Domenico. 2018. Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (11 2018), 12435–12440. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803470115
[38]
Samia Tasnim, Md Mahbub Hossain, and Hoimonty Mazumder. 2020. Impact of Rumors or Misinformation on Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Social Media. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 53 (04 2020), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.094
[39]
Emily K. Vraga, Melissa Tully, and Leticia Bode. 2020. Empowering Users to Respond to Misinformation about Covid-19. Media and Communication 8 (06 2020), 475. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3200
[40]
David Wemer. 2020. Addressing the coronavirus ”infodemic”. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/addressing-the-coronavirus-infodemic/
[41]
Martin Whitehead, Niall Taylor, Alex Gough, Danny Chambers, Mike Jessop, and Phil Hyde. 2019. The anti-vax phenomenon. Veterinary Record 184 (06 2019), 744.1–744. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.l4027
[42]
Harry Yaojun Yan, Kai-Cheng Yang, Filippo Menczer, and James Shanahan. 2020. Asymmetrical perceptions of partisan political bots. New Media & Society 23 (07 2020), 146144482094274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820942744
[43]
Kai-Cheng Yang, Francesco Pierri, Pik-Mai Hui, David Axelrod, Christopher Torres-Lugo, John Bryden, and Filippo Menczer. 2021. The COVID-19 Infodemic: Twitter versus Facebook. Big Data & Society 8 (01 2021), 205395172110138. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211013861

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. The Disinformation Dozen: An Exploratory Analysis of Covid-19 Disinformation Proliferation on Twitter
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WebSci '22: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022
        June 2022
        479 pages
        ISBN:9781450391917
        DOI:10.1145/3501247
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 26 June 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. covid-19
        2. disinformation
        3. misinformation
        4. social media

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Funding Sources

        • SNSF

        Conference

        WebSci '22
        Sponsor:
        WebSci '22: 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022
        June 26 - 29, 2022
        Barcelona, Spain

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)3,869
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)616
        Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Multimodal Hateful Meme Classification Based on Transfer Learning and a Cross-Mask MechanismElectronics10.3390/electronics1314278013:14(2780)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2024
        • (2024)Understanding anti-immigration sentiment spreading on TwitterPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030791719:9(e0307917)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2024
        • (2024)Identifying and characterizing superspreaders of low-credibility content on TwitterPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030220119:5(e0302201)Online publication date: 22-May-2024
        • (2024)Facebook’s shared articles on HPV vaccination: analysis of persuasive strategiesBMC Public Health10.1186/s12889-024-19099-024:1Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
        • (2024)Sowing “seeds of doubt”: Cottage industries of election and medical misinformation in Brazil and the United StatesNew Media & Society10.1177/14614448241255379Online publication date: 14-Jun-2024
        • (2024)YouTube and Conspiracy Theories: A Longitudinal Audit of Information PanelsProceedings of the 35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media10.1145/3648188.3675128(273-284)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
        • (2024)Detecting coordinated and bot-like behavior in Twitter: the Jürgen Conings caseEPJ Data Science10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00477-y13:1Online publication date: 5-Jun-2024
        • (2024)Developing Techniques to Support Technological Solutions to Disinformation by Analyzing Four Conspiracy Networks During COVID-19IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management10.1109/TEM.2023.327319171(13327-13344)Online publication date: 2024
        • (2024)(Mis)leading the COVID-19 Vaccination Discourse on Twitter: An Exploratory Study of Infodemic Around the PandemicIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2022.322521611:1(352-362)Online publication date: Feb-2024
        • (2024)Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance: The Role of Trust and the Influence of Social MediaSocial Work in Public Health10.1080/19371918.2024.231686939:1(20-35)Online publication date: 21-Feb-2024
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media