Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3587103.3594143acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

From Misconceptions to Mastery: Addressing Novice Students' Misconceptions in Recursive Algorithm Learning

Published: 29 June 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Recursion is a fundamental concept in computer science education, but many students struggle to understand its underlying principles and common implementation strategies. This study aims to investigate the most common misconceptions that novice students have about recursive algorithms, the formulation of mental models, as well as the factors that contribute to their development. Using a combination of surveys, interviews, and analysis of student work, I will collect data on students' prior knowledge, experiences, and attitudes toward recursion, as well as their understanding of specific recursive problems. I will also test the impact of specific variables, the use of different teaching pedagogies on students' understanding of recursion through experimental studies. Based on the results of these analyses, I will identify effective teaching strategies and interventions that can help students overcome misconceptions and better understand recursion.

References

[1]
Kahney, H. (1983). What do novice programmers know about recursion. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '83). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 235--239.
[2]
Anderson, J. R., Pirolli, P., & Farrel, R. (1988). Learning to program recursive functions. In M. T. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 153--183). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
[3]
Booth, S. (1993). The experience of learning to program. Example: Recursion. In Fifth Annual Psychology of Programming Interest Group workshop (pp. 122--145). Paris: INRIA.
[4]
Benander, A. C., Benander, B. A., & Pu, H. (1996). Recursion vs. iteration: An empirical study of comprehension. Journal of Systems and Software, 32, 73--82.
[5]
Benander, A. C., Benander, B. A., & Sang, J. (2000). An empirical analysis of debugging performance -- Differences between iterative and recursive constructs. Journal of Systems and Software, 54, 17--28.
[6]
Ginat, D. (2005). The suitable way is backwards, but they work forward. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24, 73--88. Norfolk, VA: AACE.
[7]
Segal, J. (1995). Empirical studies of functional programming learners evaluating recursive functions. Instructional Science, 22, 385--411.
[8]
Renée McCauley, Scott Grissom, Sue Fitzgerald & Laurie Murphy (2015) Teaching and learning recursive programming: a review of the research literature, Computer Science Education, 25:1, 37--66.
[9]
McCracken, D. D. (1987, January). Ruminations on computer science curricula, viewpoint column. Communications of the ACM, 30, 3--5.
[10]
Malcolm Corney, Sue Fitzgerald, Brian Hanks, Raymond Lister, Renee McCauley, and Laurie Murphy. 2014. 'Explain in plain English' questions revisited: data structures problems. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 591--596. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538911

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)The Role of Working Memory Capacity in Recursive Problem-Solving: A Study on Novice ProgrammersProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 210.1145/3568812.3603456(99-101)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ITiCSE 2023: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2
June 2023
694 pages
ISBN:9798400701399
DOI:10.1145/3587103
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 June 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. algorithms
  2. mental models
  3. misconceptions
  4. recursion
  5. stack data structure

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Conference

ITiCSE 2023
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)40
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)The Role of Working Memory Capacity in Recursive Problem-Solving: A Study on Novice ProgrammersProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 210.1145/3568812.3603456(99-101)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media