research-article

Identifying student misconceptions of programming

Authors:

Lisa C. Kaczmarczyk,

Elizabeth R. Petrick,

J. Philip East,

Geoffrey L. HermanAuthors Info & Claims

SIGCSE '10: Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education

Pages 107 - 111

https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734299

Published: 10 March 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Computing educators are often baffled by the misconceptions that their CS1 students hold. We need to understand these misconceptions more clearly in order to help students form correct conceptions. This paper describes one stage in the development of a concept inventory for Computing Fundamentals: investigation of student misconceptions in a series of core CS1 topics previously identified as both important and difficult. Formal interviews with students revealed four distinct themes, each containing many interesting misconceptions. Three of those misconceptions are detailed in this paper: two misconceptions about memory models, and data assignment when primitives are declared. Individual misconceptions are related, but vary widely, thus providing excellent material to use in the development of the CI. In addition, CS1 instructors are provided immediate usable material for helping their students understand some difficult introductory concepts.

References

[1]

Almstrum, V. L., Henderson, P. B., Harvey, V., Heeren, C., Marion, W., Riedesel, C., Soh, L., and Tew, A. E. 2006. Concept inventories in computer science for the topic discrete mathematics. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38, 4 (Dec. 2006), 132--145.

Digital Library

[2]

Bayman, P. and Mayer, R. E. 1983. A diagnosis of beginning programmers' misconceptions of BASIC programming statements. Commun. ACM 26, 9 (Sep. 1983), 677--679.

Digital Library

[3]

Bonar, J. and Soloway, E. 1985. Preprogramming knowledge: a major source of misconceptions in novice programmers. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, 2 (Jun. 1985), 133--161.

Digital Library

[4]

Bowen, C. W. 1994. Think-Aloud Methods in Chemistry Education. In Journal of Chemical Education. 71, 3 (Mar. 1994), 184--190.

[5]

Confrey, J. 1990. A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science, and programming. Review of Research in Education, 16, 3 (1990), 3--56.

[6]

Fleury, A. E. 1991. Parameter passing: the rules the students construct. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (San Antonio, Texas, United States, March 07 - 08, 1991).

Digital Library

[7]

Goldman, K., Gross, P., Heeren, C., Herman, G., Kaczmarczyk, L., Loui, M. C. and Zilles, C. 2008. Identifying important and difficult concepts in introductory computing courses using a Delphi process. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Portland, OR, United States, March 12-15, 2008).

Digital Library

[8]

Herman, G. L., Kaczmarczyk, L., Loui, M. C., and Zilles, C. 2008. Proof by incomplete enumeration and other logical misconceptions. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Computing Education Research (Sydney, Australia, Sep. 06 - 07, 2008).

Digital Library

[9]

Herman, G. L., Loui, M. C., and Zilles, C., Creating the Digital Logic Concept Inventory. In Proceedings of the Forty-First ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Milwaukee, WI, March 10-13, 2010.

Digital Library

[10]

Hestenes, D., Wells, M., and Swackhamer, G. 1992. Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30 (Mar. 1992), 141--158.

[11]

Holland, S., Griffiths, R., and Woodman, M. 1997. Avoiding Object misconceptions. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (San Jose, California, United States, February 27 - March 01, 1997).

Digital Library

[12]

Kolikant, Y. B.-D. and Mussai, M. 2008. "So my program doesn't run!" Definition, origins, and practical expressions of students' (mis)conceptions of correctness, Computer Science Education, 18, 2 (Jun. 2008), 135--151.

[13]

Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Inquiry. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

[14]

Ma, L., Ferguson, J., Roper, M., and Wood, M. 2007. Investigating the viability of mental models held by novice programmers. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Covington, Kentucky, United States, March 07 - 11, 2007). SIGCSE '07.

Digital Library

[15]

Madison, A. and Gifford, J. 2003. Modular programming: Novice misconceptions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 3 (Spr. 2003), 217--229.

[16]

Mayer, R. E. 1981. The Psychology of How Novices Learn Computer Programming. ACM Comput. Surv. 13, 1 (Mar. 1981), 121--141.

Digital Library

[17]

Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd Edition. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

[18]

Pea, R. D. 1986. Language-independent conceptual "bugs" in novice programming. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2, 1 (1986), 25--36.

[19]

Sanders, K. and Thomas, L. 2007. Checklists for grading Object-oriented CS1 programs: concepts and misconceptions. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Dundee, Scotland, June 25 - 27, 2007).

Digital Library

[20]

Spohrer, J. C. and Soloway, E. 1986. Alternatives to construct-based programming misconceptions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, United States, April 13 - 17, 1986).

Digital Library

[21]

Stanovich, K. E. 2003. The Fundamental Computational Biases of Human Cognition: Heuristics That (Sometimes) Impair Decision Making and Problem Solving. In The Psychology of Problem Solving, J. E. Davidson and R. J. Sternberg, Eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 291--342.

[22]

Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

Cited By

Zhang ATang XOney SChen YJoyner DKim MWang XXia M(2024)CFlow: Supporting Semantic Flow Analysis of Students' Code in Programming Problems at ScaleProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3657604.3662025(188-199)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3657604.3662025
Fwa HRoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey MGama KSiegmund J(2024)Experience Report: Identifying common misconceptions and errors of novice programmers with ChatGPTProceedings of the 46th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training10.1145/3639474.3640059(233-241)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3639474.3640059
Ali MRao PMai YXie B(2024)Using Benchmarking Infrastructure to Evaluate LLM Performance on CS Concept Inventories: Challenges, Opportunities, and CritiquesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671097(452-468)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632620.3671097
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Identifying student misconceptions of programming
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education

Recommendations

Exploring programming misconceptions: an analysis of student mistakes in visual program simulation exercises
Koli Calling '12: Proceedings of the 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research

Visual program simulation (VPS) is a form of interactive program visualization in which novice programmers practice tracing computer programs: using a graphical interface, they are expected to correctly indicate each consecutive stage in the execution ...
Comparing loops misconceptions in block-based and text-based programming languages at the K-12 level

Novice programmers are facing many difficulties while learning to program. Most studies about misconceptions in programming are conducted at the undergraduate level, yet there is a lack of studies at the elementary school (K-12) level, reasonably ...
The blue waters student internship program: promoting competence and confidence for next generation researchers in high-performance computing
EduHPC '14: Proceedings of the Workshop on Education for High-Performance Computing

The Blue Waters Student Internship Program (BWSIP), a year-long program funded for three years by the National Science Foundation, motivates and trains the next generation of supercomputing researchers. A community engagement partnership of the Blue ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SIGCSE '10: Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education

March 2010

618 pages

ISBN:9781450300063

DOI:10.1145/1734263

General Chairs:
Gary Lewandowski
Xavier University
,
Steven Wolfman
University of British Columbia
,
Program Chairs:
Thomas J. Cortina
Carnegie Mellon University
,
Ellen L. Walker
Hiram College

Copyright © 2010 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 March 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SIGCSE10

Sponsor:

SIGCSE

SIGCSE10: The 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

March 10 - 13, 2010

Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE Virtual 2024

Sponsor:
sigcse

1st ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference

December 5 - 8, 2024

Virtual Event , NC , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

14
Total Citations
View Citations
4,395
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)413
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)122

Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Zhang ATang XOney SChen YJoyner DKim MWang XXia M(2024)CFlow: Supporting Semantic Flow Analysis of Students' Code in Programming Problems at ScaleProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3657604.3662025(188-199)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3657604.3662025
Fwa HRoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey MGama KSiegmund J(2024)Experience Report: Identifying common misconceptions and errors of novice programmers with ChatGPTProceedings of the 46th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training10.1145/3639474.3640059(233-241)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3639474.3640059
Ali MRao PMai YXie B(2024)Using Benchmarking Infrastructure to Evaluate LLM Performance on CS Concept Inventories: Challenges, Opportunities, and CritiquesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671097(452-468)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632620.3671097
Mazumder SPérez Quiñones MStephenson BStone JBattestilli LRebelsky SShoop L(2024)The Correctness of the Mental Model of Arrays After Instruction for CS1 StudentsProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630943(806-811)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626252.3630943
Singh AFariha ABrooks CSoares GHenley ATiwari AM CChoi HGulwani SStephenson BStone JBattestilli LRebelsky SShoop L(2024)Investigating Student Mistakes in Introductory Data Science ProgrammingProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630884(1258-1264)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626252.3630884
Evans AWang ZLiu JZheng MLaakso MMonga MSimon Sheard J(2023)SIDE-lib: A Library for Detecting Symptoms of Python Programming MisconceptionsProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3587102.3588838(159-165)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3587102.3588838
Ali MGhosh SRao PDhegaskar RJawort SMedler AShi MDasgupta S(2023)Taking Stock of Concept Inventories in Computing Education: A Systematic Literature ReviewProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600120(397-415)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568813.3600120
Lewis C(2023)Examples of Unsuccessful Use of Code Comprehension Strategies: A Resource for Developing Code Comprehension PedagogyProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600116(15-28)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568813.3600116
Vieira CChiu JVelasquez B(2023)Towards a learning progression of sequencing and algorithm design for five- and six-years-old children engaging with an educational robotComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2023.225505834:4(596-616)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2255058
Othman MJazlan SYamin FAman SMohamad FAnuar NSaleh AAbdul Manaf A(2022)Mapping Computational Thinking Skills Through Digital Games Co-Creation Activity Amongst Malaysian Sub-urban ChildrenJournal of Educational Computing Research10.1177/0735633122112110661:2(355-389)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221121106
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents