Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3568294.3580034acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Nature-Robot Interaction

Published: 13 March 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Up until now, Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) has been largely defined by the influences both humans and robots exert on each other across various interaction modes. Robots follow human purpose and serve goals determined by humans with various degrees of agency. Humans act, respond, and adapt to robot behaviors while simultaneously advancing technology to increase robot's affordances. Abstracted by this dyad, HRI has left out the material background making this exchange possible: Nature. The current planetary crisis forces us to reconsider the importance of contextualizing HRI within a larger picture, and invites us to ask ourselves how this relationship can be better served by considering Nature as the driving agent in this binary relationship. In response to this reflection, we present a first attempt of a speculative paradigm in HRI: Nature-Robot Interaction. We discuss ethical and design underpinnings of this approach to HRI, introduce initial guiding principles, as well as examples of potential affordances, embodiments and interactions. While we begin in the realm of the speculative and recognize the infancy of our proposal, we invite the HRI community to it as a serious design principle moving forward.

References

[1]
Alberto Acosta and Esperanza Martínez. 2009. El buen vivir: una vía para el desarrollo. Editorial Abya-Yala.
[2]
Fenda A Akiwumi and Arthur O Hollist. 2016. The new kid on the old block: Coltan, conflict-prone minerals, and post-war reconstruction in Sierra Leone. The Extractive Industries and Society 3, 2 (2016), 316--319.
[3]
Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Juan F Maestre, Manuhuia Barcham, Marilyn Iriarte, Marisol Wong-Villacres, Oscar A Lemus, Palak Dudani, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Ruotong Wang, and Teresa Cerratto Pargman. 2021. Decolonial pathways: our manifesto for a decolonizing agenda in HCI research and design. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--9.
[4]
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente 2008. Constitución de la República del Ecuador 2008. Decreto Legislativo 0. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008.
[5]
Isaac Asimov. 1942. Runaround. Astounding Science Fiction 29, 1 (1942), 94--103.
[6]
Isaac Asimov. 2012. Foundation and earth. Vol. 5. Del Rey.
[7]
Eric Awere, Peter Appiah Obeng, Alessandra Bonoli, and Panin Asirifua Obeng. 2020. E-waste recycling and public exposure to organic compounds in devel- oping countries: a review of recycling practices and toxicity levels in Ghana. Environmental Technology Reviews 9, 1 (2020), 1--19.
[8]
Michael Begon, John L Harper, Colin R Townsend, et al . 1986. Ecology. Individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell scientific publications.
[9]
Emily M Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021. On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 610--623.
[10]
David M Blersch. 2010. Towards an autonomous algal turf scrubber: Development of an ecologically-engineered technoecosystem. University of Maryland, College Park.
[11]
Jason Borenstein. 2012. Robotics, ethics, and the environment. International Journal of Technoethics (IJT) 3, 2 (2012), 17--29.
[12]
Éva Bozó, Henri Ervasti, Niina Halonen, Seyed Hossein Hosseini Shokouh, Jarkko Tolvanen, Olli Pitkänen, Topias Järvinen, Petra S. Pálvölgyi, Ákos Szamosvölgyi, András Sápi, Zoltan Konya, Marta Zaccone, Luana Montalbano, Laurens De Brauwer, Rakesh Nair, Vanesa Martínez-Nogués, Leire San Vi- cente Laurent, Thomas Dietrich, Laura Fernández de Castro, and Krisztian Kordas. 2021. Bioplastics and Carbon-Based Sustainable Materials, Compo- nents, and Devices: Toward Green Electronics. ACS Applied Materials & In- terfaces 13, 41 (2021), 49301--49312. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c13787 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c13787 34609829.
[13]
Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender shades: Intersectional accu- racy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. 77--91.
[14]
Amaya Carrasco-Torrontegui, Carlos Andres Gallegos-Riofrío, Florencio Delgado-Espinoza, and Mark Swanson. 2021. Climate Change, Food Sovereignty, and Ancestral Farming Technologies in the Andes. Current Developments in Nutrition 5, Supplement_4 (2021), 54--60.
[15]
Álvaro Castro-González, José Carlos Castillo, Fernando Alonso-Martín, Olmer V Olortegui-Ortega, Victor González-Pacheco, María Malfaz, and Miguel A Salichs. 2016. The effects of an impolite vs. a polite robot playing rock-paper-scissors. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 306--316.
[16]
Vincent Chan, Kidong Park, Mitchell B. Collens, Hyunjoon Kong, Taher A. Saif, and Rashid Bashir. 2012. Development of Miniaturized Walking Biological Machines. Scientific Reports 2, 1 (2012), 857--. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00857
[17]
Jeong-gun Choi and Myungsuk Kim. 2009. The usage and evaluation of anthro- pomorphic form in robot design. (2009).
[18]
Matteo Cianchetti, Cecilia Laschi, Arianna Menciassi, and Paolo Dario. 2018. Biomedical applications of soft robotics. Nature Reviews Materials 3 (2018), 143--153. Issue 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0022-y
[19]
Carlos A. Cifuentes, Maria J. Pinto, Nathalia Céspedes, and Marcela Múnera. 2020. Social Robots in Therapy and Care. Current Robotics Reports 1, 3 (2020), 59--74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-020-00009-2
[20]
Gastone Ciuti, R. Caliò, D. Camboni, L. Neri, F. Bianchi, A. Arezzo, A. Koulaouzidis, S. Schostek, D. Stoyanov, C. M. Oddo, B. Magnani, A. Menciassi, M. Morino, M. O. Schurr, and P. Dario. 2016. Frontiers of robotic endoscopic capsules: a review. Journal of Micro-Bio Robotics 11 (2016), 1--18.
[21]
Hermínio Cossa, Rahel Scheidegger, Andrea Leuenberger, Priska Ammann, Khátia Munguambe, Jürg Utzinger, Eusébio Macete, and Mirko S Winkler. 2021. Health studies in the context of artisanal and small-scale mining: a scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 4 (2021), 1555.
[22]
Brian Czech. 2008. Prospects for Reconciling the Conflict between Economic Growth and Biodiversity Conservation with Technological Progress. Conservation Biology 22, 6 (2008), 1389--1398. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20183550
[23]
Débora de Castro Leal, Ana Maria Bustamante Duarte, Max Krüger, and Angelika Strohmayer. 2021. Into the mine: Wicked reflections on decolonial thinking and technologies. In C&T'21: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Communities & Technologies-Wicked Problems in the Age of Tech. 269--280.
[24]
Marisol De la Cadena. 2015. Earth beings: Ecologies of practice across Andean worlds. Duke University Press.
[25]
Marloes de Valk. 2021. A pluriverse of local worlds: A review of Computing within Limits related terminology and practices. In LIMITS Workshop on Computing within Limits. PubPub.
[26]
Justin Donhauser, Aimee van Wynsberghe, and Alexander Bearden. 2021. Steps Toward an Ethics of Environmental Robotics. Philosophy & Technology 34 (2021), 507--524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00399-3
[27]
Jorge Duro-Royo, Josh Van Zak, Andrea Ling, Yen-Ju Tai, Nicolas Hogan, Barrak Darweesh, and Neri Oxman. 2018. Designing a Tree: Fabrication Informed Digital Design and Fabrication of Hierarchical Structures. In Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia, Vol. 2018. International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS), 1--7.
[28]
Virginia Eubanks. 2014. Want to predict the future of surveillance? Ask poor communities. The American Prospect 15 (2014).
[29]
Julia Fink. 2012. Anthropomorphism and human likeness in the design of robots and human-robot interaction. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 199--208.
[30]
Damian Fischer, Fatima Seidu, Jennie Yang, Michael K Felten, Cyryl Garus, Thomas Kraus, Julius N Fobil, and Andrea Kaifie. 2020. Health consequences for e-waste workers and bystanders-a comparative cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, 5 (2020), 1534.
[31]
Terrence Fong, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2003. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and autonomous systems 42, 3--4 (2003), 143--166.
[32]
Vanessa Forti, Cornelis Peter Baldé, Ruediger Kuehr, and Garam Bel. 2020. The global e-waste monitor 2020. Quantities, flows, and the circular economy potential (2020), 1--119.
[33]
S. Frey and S. Lemmens. 2017. Status of the space environment: current level of adherence to the space debris mitigation policy. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Space Debris. ESA, 1338--1343.
[34]
Tony Fry. 1999. A new design philosophy: an introduction to defuturing. UNSW Press.
[35]
Megan Garcia. 2016. Racist in the Machine: The Disturbing Implications of Algorithmic Bias. World Policy Journal 33, 4 (2016), 111--117. Issue winter. https://doi.org/
[36]
Natalia Gutiérrez Garrido. 2020. El río Atrato es declarado como sujeto de dere- chos. Retrieved February 2, 2023 from https://www.asuntoslegales.com.co/ consultorio/el-rio-atrato-es-declarado-como-sujeto-de-derechos-2994253
[37]
Luke Gibson, Elspeth N Wilman, and William F Laurance. 2017. How green is ?green'energy? Trends in ecology & evolution 32, 12 (2017), 922--935.
[38]
Steve Gliessman. 2013. Agroecology: Growing the roots of resistance. Agroecology and sustainable food systems 37, 1 (2013), 19--31.
[39]
Rachel Gockley, Allison Bruce, Jodi Forlizzi, Marek Michalowski, Anne Mundell, Stephanie Rosenthal, Brennan Sellner, Reid Simmons, Kevin Snipes, Alan C Schultz, et al. 2005. Designing robots for long-term social interaction. In 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 1338--1343.
[40]
María Amparo Grau Ruiz and Fiachra O'Brolchain. 2022. Environmental robotics for a sustainable future in circular economies. Nature Machine Intelligence 4, 1 (2022), 3--4.
[41]
David Grémillet, William Puech, Véronique Garçon, Thierry Boulinier, and Yvon Le Maho. 2012. Robots in Ecology: Welcome to the Machine. Open Journal of Ecology 2, 2 (2012), 49--57. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2012.22006
[42]
Environment Guide. 2017. Te Urewera Act. Retrieved February 2, 2023 from https://www.environmentguide.org.nz/regional/te-urewera-act/
[43]
Nguyen Ngoc Ha, Tetsuro Agusa, Karri Ramu, Nguyen Phuc Cam Tu, Satoko Murata, Keshav A Bulbule, Peethmbaram Parthasaraty, Shin Takahashi, An- namalai Subramanian, and Shinsuke Tanabe. 2009. Contamination by trace elements at e-waste recycling sites in Bangalore, India. Chemosphere 76, 1 (2009), 9--15.
[44]
Martin Hagele. 2016. Robots conquer the world [turning point]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 23, 1 (2016), 120--118.
[45]
Florian Hartmann, Melanie Baumgartner, and Martin Kaltenbrunner. 2020. Be- coming Sustainable, The New Frontier in Soft Robotics. Advanced Materials (2020), 2004413. https://doi.org/
[46]
Florian Hartmann, Melanie Baumgartner, and Martin Kaltenbrunner. 2021. Becoming sustainable, the new frontier in soft robotics. Advanced Materials 33, 19 (2021), 2004413.
[47]
Karen Hayes and Richard Burge. 2003. Coltan Mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo: How tantalum-using industries can commit to the reconstruction of the DRC. Fauna & Flora International Cambridge.
[48]
Martin Heidegger. 1954. The question concerning technology. Technology and values: Essential readings 99 (1954), 113.
[49]
Julia Hollingsworth. 2020. This river in New Zealand is legally a person. Here's how it happened. Retrieved February 2, 2023 from https://www.cnn.com/2020/ 12/11/asia/whanganui-river-new-zealand-intl-hnk-dst/index.html
[50]
Ivan Illich and Anne Lang. 1973. Tools for conviviality. (1973).
[51]
Dmitry Ivanov. 2021. Supply Chain Viability and the COVID-19 pan- demic: a conceptual and formal generalisation of four major adap- tation strategies. International Journal of Production Research 59, 12 (2021), 3535--3552. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1890852 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1890852
[52]
Nancy S Jecker. 2021. Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities. Journal of Medical Ethics 47, 1 (2021), 26--32. https://doi.org/10.1136/ medethics-2020-106645 arXiv:https://jme.bmj.com/content/47/1/26.full.pdf
[53]
Sooyeon Jeong, Cynthia Breazeal, Deirdre Logan, and Peter Weinstock. 2018. Huggable: the impact of embodiment on promoting socio-emotional interactions for young pediatric inpatients. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[54]
Malte F Jung, Jin Joo Lee, Nick DePalma, Sigurdur O Adalgeirsson, Pamela J Hinds, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2013. Engaging robots: easing complex human-robot teamwork using backchanneling. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 1555--1566.
[55]
Craig M Kauffman and Pamela L Martin. 2018. When rivers have rights: case comparisons of New Zealand, Colombia, and India. In International Studies Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, Vol. 4.
[56]
Merata Kawharu. 2000. Kaitiakitanga: a Maori anthropological perspective of the Maori socio-environmental ethic of resource management. The Journal of the Polynesian Society 109, 4 (2000), 349--370.
[57]
Rajiv Khosla, Mei-Tai Chu, and Khanh Nguyen. 2013. Enhancing Emotional Well Being of Elderly Using Assistive Social Robots in Australia. In 2013 International Conference on Biometrics and Kansei Engineering. 41--46. https://doi.org/10.1109/ ICBAKE.2013.9
[58]
Allison Koenecke, Andrew Nam, Emily Lake, Joe Nudell, Minnie Quartey, Zion Mengesha, Connor Toups, John R Rickford, Dan Jurafsky, and Sharad Goel. 2020. Racial disparities in automated speech recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 14 (2020), 7684--7689.
[59]
Bruno Latour. 2012. We have never been modern. Harvard university press.
[60]
Kwan Min Lee, Wei Peng, Seung-A Jin, and Chang Yan. 2006. Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human--robot interaction. Journal of communication 56, 4 (2006), 754--772.
[61]
Anna O. W. Leung, William J. Luksemburg, Anthony S. Wong, and Ming H. Wong. 2007. Spatial Distribution of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers and Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans in Soil and Combusted Residue at Guiyu, an Electronic Waste Recycling Site in Southeast China. Environmental Science & Technology 41, 8 (2007), 2730--2737. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0625935 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1021/es0625935 17533831.
[62]
Jason Edward Lewis, Angie Abdilla, Noelani Arista, Kaipulaumakaniolono Baker, Scott Benesiinaabandan, Michelle Brown, Melanie Cheung, Meredith Coleman, Ashley Cordes, Joel Davison, et al. 2020. Indigenous protocol and artificial intelligence position paper. (2020).
[63]
Huiru Li, Liping Yu, Guoying Sheng, Jiamo Fu, and Ping'an Peng. 2007. Severe PCDD/F and PBDD/F pollution in air around an electronic waste dismantling area in China. Environmental Science & Technology 41, 16 (2007), 5641--5646.
[64]
Yan Li, Xijin Xu, Kusheng Wu, Gangjian Chen, Junxiao Liu, Songjian Chen, Chengwu Gu, Bao Zhang, Liangkai Zheng, Minghao Zheng, et al. 2008. Monitoring of lead load and its effect on neonatal behavioral neurological assessment scores in Guiyu, an electronic waste recycling town in China. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 10, 10 (2008), 1233--1238.
[65]
Andrea Shin Ling. 2018. Design by decay, decay by design. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[66]
Lian Liu, Xijin Xu, Taofeek Akangbe Yekeen, Kun Lin, Weiqiu Li, and Xia Huo. 2015. Assessment of association between the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) polymorphism and neurodevelopment of children exposed to lead. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22, 3 (2015), 1786--1793.
[67]
Qian Luo, Minghung Wong, and Zongwei Cai. 2007. Determination of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in freshwater fishes from a river polluted by e-wastes. Talanta 72, 5 (2007), 1644--1649.
[68]
Yong Luo, Xiao-Jun Luo, Zhen Lin, She-Jun Chen, Juan Liu, Bi-Xian Mai, and Zhong-Yi Yang. 2009. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in road and farmland soils from an e-waste recycling region in Southern China: concentrations, source profiles, and potential dispersion and deposition. Science of the Total Environment 407, 3 (2009), 1105--1113.
[69]
Pauline Madge. 1997. Ecological Design: A New Critique. Design Issues 13, 2 (1997), 44--54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1511730
[70]
David Uahikeaikalei?ohu Maile. 2019. Threats of Violence: Refusing the Thirty Meter Telescope and Dakota Access Pipeline. Standing with Standing Rock: Voices from the# NoDAPL Movement (2019), 328--43.
[71]
Suvradip Maitra. 2020. Artificial Intelligence and Indigenous Perspectives: Protecting and Empowering Intelligent Human Beings. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 320--326.
[72]
Puru Malhotra and Nimesh Shahdadpuri. 2020. Nano-robotic based Thromboly- sis: Dissolving Blood Clots using Nanobots. In 2020 IEEE 17th India Council International Conference (INDICON). 1--4. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDICON49873. 2020.9342510
[73]
Jeffrey W Mantz. 2008. Improvisational economies: Coltan production in the eastern Congo. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale 16, 1 (2008), 34--50.
[74]
Frédéric Massé and Johanna Camargo. 2012. Actores armados ilegales y sector extractivo en Colombia. V Informe (2012).
[75]
Yuya Morimoto, Hiroaki Onoe, and Shoji Takeuchi. 2018. Biohybrid ro- bot powered by an antagonistic pair of skeletal muscle tissues. Science Robotics 3, 18 (2018), eaat4440. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat4440 arXiv:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/scirobotics.aat4440
[76]
Omar Mubin, Catherine J Stevens, Suleman Shahid, Abdullah Al Mahmud, and Jian-Jie Dong. 2013. A review of the applicability of robots in education. Journal of Technology in Education and Learning 1, 209-0015 (2013), 13.
[77]
Renee Obringer, Benjamin Rachunok, Debora Maia-Silva, Maryam Arbabzadeh, Roshanak Nateghi, and Kaveh Madani. 2021. The overlooked environmental footprint of increasing Internet use. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 167 (2021), 105389.
[78]
Erin L O'Donnell and Julia Talbot-Jones. 2018. Creating legal rights for rivers. Ecology and Society 23, 1 (2018).
[79]
Anastasia K Ostrowski, Daniella DiPaola, Erin Partridge, Hae Won Park, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2019. Older adults living with social robots: Promoting social connectedness in long-term communities. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 26, 2 (2019), 59--70.
[80]
Hae Won Park, Mirko Gelsomini, Jin Joo Lee, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2017. Telling stories to robots: The effect of backchanneling on a child's storytelling. In 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI. IEEE, 100--108.
[81]
Jungyul Park, Jaewook Ryu, Seung Kyu Choi, Eunseok Seo, Jae Min Cha, Seokchang Ryu, Jinseok Kim, Byungkyu Kim, and Sang Ho Lee. 2005. Real-Time Measurement of the Contractile Forces of Self-Organized Cardiomyocytes on Hybrid Biopolymer Microcantilevers. Analytical Chemistry 77, 20 (2005), 6571--6580. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0507800 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0507800 16223242.
[82]
Jerry Patchell and Roger Hayter. 2021. Greening the cloud: oligopoly-driven institutional transformations of the US electricity grid for commercial and industrial power purchases. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 14, 2 (2021), 253--282.
[83]
Oleg B. Pichkov, Alexander A. Ulanov, and Olga S. Vinokurova. 2022. How does green robotics differ from conventional robotics: comparative analysis. In Industry4.0. Fighting Climate Change in the Economy of the Future, Elena B. Zavyalova and Elena G. Popkova (Eds.). Palgrave Macmillan, 337--345.
[84]
Andrew Pickering. 2017. The ontological turn: Taking different worlds seriously. Social Analysis 61, 2 (2017), 134--150.
[85]
Pandora Pound and Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga. 2018. Is it possible to overcome issues of external validity in preclinical animal research? Why most animal models are bound to fail. Journal of Translational Medicine 16, 1 (2018), 304. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1678-1
[86]
E. Rahimy, J. Wilson, T-C Tsao, S. Schwartz, and J-P Hubschman. 2013. Robot- assisted intraocular surgery: development of the IRISS and feasibility studies in an animal model. Eye 27, 8 (2013), 972--978. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2013.105
[87]
Ian Redmond. 2001. Coltan boom, gorilla bust. Report for the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund (Europe) and Born Free (2001).
[88]
Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar. 2018. The role of social robots in fostering human empathy: a cross-cultural exploration. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[89]
Brett H Robinson. 2009. E-waste: an assessment of global production and environmental impacts. Science of the total environment 408, 2 (2009), 183--191.
[90]
Donato Romano and Cesare Stefanini. 2021. Animal-robot interaction and biohybrid organisms., 2 pages.
[91]
Ana C Rorato, Gilberto Camara, Maria Isabel S Escada, Michelle CA Picoli, Tiago Moreira, and Judith A Verstegen. 2020. Brazilian amazon indigenous peoples threatened by mining bill. Environmental Research Letters 15, 10 (2020), 1040a3.
[92]
David Christian Rose, Jessica Lyon, Auvikki de Boon, Marc Hanheide, and Simon Pearson. 2021. Responsible development of autonomous robotics in agriculture. Nature Food 2, 5 (2021), 306--309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00287-9
[93]
Matthew Rueben, Alexander Mois Aroyo, Christoph Lutz, Johannes Schmölz, Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel, Andrea Corti, Siddharth Agrawal, and William D Smart. 2018. Themes and research directions in privacy-sensitive robotics. In 2018 IEEE workshop on advanced robotics and its social impacts (ARSO). IEEE, 77--84.
[94]
Maha Salem, Micheline Ziadee, and Majd Sakr. 2014. Marhaba, how may I help you? Effects of politeness and culture on robot acceptance and anthropo- morphization. In 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 74--81.
[95]
Sigal Samuel. 2019. This country gave all its rivers their own legal rights. Retrieved February 2, 2023 from https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/8/18/20803956/ bangladesh-rivers-legal-personhood-rights-nature
[96]
Nikitha Sattiraju. 2020. Secret cost of google's data centers: Billions of gallons of water.
[97]
Fitria Nurbaidah Soetrisno and Juana Maria Delgado-Saborit. 2020. Chronic exposure to heavy metals from informal e-waste recycling plants and children's attention, executive function and academic performance. Science of the Total Environment 717 (2020), 137099.
[98]
David St-Onge, Nicolas Reeves, and Nataliya Petkova. 2017. Robot-human interaction: A human speaker experiment. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 30--38.
[99]
Walter Dan Stiehl, Cynthia Breazeal, Kuk-Hyun Han, Jeff Lieberman, Levi Lalla, Allan Maymin, Jonathan Salinas, Daniel Fuentes, Robert Toscano, Cheng Hau Tong, et al. 2006. The huggable: a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 emerging technologies. 15-es.
[100]
Erik Stokstad. 2022. This lagoon is effectively a person, new Spanish law says. Science (New York, NY) 378, 6615 (2022), 15--16.
[101]
Marilyn Strathern. 2005. Partial connections. Rowman Altamira.
[102]
Emma Strubell, Ananya Ganesh, and Andrew McCallum. 2019. Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.02243 (2019).
[103]
Jun tao Li and Hong jian Liu. 2016. Design Optimization of Amazon Robotics. Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems 4, 2 (2016), 48--52. https://doi.org/
[104]
Rachael Tatman. 2017. Gender and dialect bias in YouTube's automatic captions. In Proceedings of the First ACL Workshop on Ethics in Natural Language Processing. 53--59.
[105]
Marc Teulieres, Jonathan Tilley, Lea Bolz, Peter Manuel Ludwig-Dehm, and Susanne Wägner. 2019. Industrial robotics: Insights into the sector's future growth dynamics. (2019).
[106]
Zoe Todd. 2016. An indigenous feminist's take on the ontological turn:?Ontology'is just another word for colonialism. Journal of historical sociology 29, 1 (2016), 4--22.
[107]
Renée J. F. van den Heuvel, Monique A. S. Lexis, Gert Jan Gelderblom, Rianne M. L. Jansens, and Luc P. de Witte. 2016. Robots and ICT to support play in children with severe physical disabilities: a systematic review. Disability and Re- habilitation: Assistive Technology 11, 2 (2016), 103--116. https://doi.org/10.3109/ 17483107.2015.1079268 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2015.1079268 26330097.
[108]
Aimee Van Wynsberghe and Justin Donhauser. 2018. The dawning of the ethics of environmental robots. Science and engineering ethics 24, 6 (2018), 1777--1800.
[109]
Robert W Venables. 2010. The clearings and the woods: The Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) landscape-gendered and balanced. In Archaeology and preservation of gendered landscapes. Springer, 21--55.
[110]
David W. Orr. 2004. In The Nature of Design: Ecology, Culture, and Human Intention. Oxford University Press Inc.
[111]
Feng Wang, Jaco Huisman, Kees Baldé, and Ab Stevels. 2012. A systematic and compatible classification of WEEE. In 2012 Electronics Goes Green 2012. IEEE, 1--6.
[112]
Victoria A Webster, Emma L Hawley, Ozan Akkus, Hillel J Chiel, and Roger D Quinn. 2016. Effect of actuating cell source on locomotion of organic living machines with electrocompacted collagen skeleton. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 11, 3 (may 2016), 036012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/11/3/036012
[113]
Kyle Whyte. 2017. The Dakota access pipeline, environmental injustice, and US colonialism. Red Ink: An International Journal of Indigenous Literature, Arts, & Humanities 19.1 (2017).
[114]
Anne-Marie Willis. 2006. Ontological designing. Design philosophy papers 4, 2 (2006), 69--92.
[115]
Sarah Woods, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Christina Kaouri, Renete Boekhorst, and Kheng Lee Koay. 2005. Is this robot like me? Links between human and robot personality traits. In 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2005. IEEE, 375--380.
[116]
Jiang-Ping Wu, Xiao-Jun Luo, Ying Zhang, Yong Luo, She-Jun Chen, Bi-Xian Mai, and Zhong-Yi Yang. 2008. Bioaccumulation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in wild aquatic species from an electronic waste (e-waste) recycling site in South China. Environment international 34, 8 (2008), 1109--1113.
[117]
Long Xu, Xia Huo, Yu Liu, Yuling Zhang, Qilin Qin, and Xijin Xu. 2020. Hearing loss risk and DNA methylation signatures in preschool children following lead and cadmium exposure from an electronic waste recycling area. Chemosphere 246 (2020), 125829.
[118]
Guang-Zhong Yang, Peer Fischer, and Bradley Nelson. 2017. New materials for next-generation robots. Science Robotics 2, 10 (2017), eaap9294. https: //doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aap9294
[119]
Karla Yohannessen, Daniela Pinto-Galleguillos, Denisse Parra-Giordano, Ama- ranta Agost, Macarena Valdés, Lauren M Smith, Katherine Galen, Aubrey Arain, Felipe Rojas, Richard L Neitzel, et al. 2019. Health assessment of electronic waste workers in chile: Participant characterization. International journal of environmental research and public health 16, 3 (2019), 386.
[120]
Mohammad Zarei, Giwon Lee, Seung Goo Lee, and Kilwon Cho. 2022. Advances in Biodegradable Electronic Skin: Material Progress and Recent Applications in Sensing, Robotics, and Human--Machine Interfaces. Advanced Materials (2022), 2203193. https://doi.org/
[121]
Xiang Zeng, Xijin Xu, Qilin Qin, Kai Ye, Weidong Wu, and Xia Huo. 2019. Heavy metal exposure has adverse effects on the growth and development of preschool children. Environmental geochemistry and health 41, 1 (2019), 309--321.
[122]
Milin Zhang, Zijian Tang, Xilin Liu, and Jan Van der Spiegel. 2020. Electronic neural interfaces. Nature Electronics 3 (2020), 191--200.
[123]
Gaofeng Zhao, Ying Xu, Guanggen Han, and Bo Ling. 2006. Biotransfer of persistent organic pollutants from a large site in China used for the disassembly of electronic and electrical waste. Environmental geochemistry and health 28, 4 (2006), 341--351.
[124]
Hongyu Zhou, Xing Wang, Wesley Au, Hanwen Kang, and Chao Chen. 2022. Intelligent robots for fruit harvesting: recent developments and future challenges. Precision Agriculture 23, 5 (2022), 1856--1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-022-09913-3

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Value of Specific, Expansive Imaginary Scenarios: an Exploration of Recent Science Fiction Literature Through the Lens of Robotics2024 21st International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR)10.1109/UR61395.2024.10597476(525-531)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '23: Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 2023
612 pages
ISBN:9781450399708
DOI:10.1145/3568294
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 March 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. human-robot interaction
  2. nature
  3. speculative design, interaction paradigms, nature-robot interaction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

HRI '23
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)436
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)60
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Value of Specific, Expansive Imaginary Scenarios: an Exploration of Recent Science Fiction Literature Through the Lens of Robotics2024 21st International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR)10.1109/UR61395.2024.10597476(525-531)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media