Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3550355.3552409acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodelsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Digital twin as risk-free experimentation aid for techno-socio-economic systems

Published: 24 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Environmental uncertainties and hyperconnectivity force technosocio-economic systems to introspect and adapt to succeed and survive. Current practices in decision-making are predominantly intuition-driven with attendant challenges for precision and rigor. We propose to use the concept of digital twins by combining results from Modelling & Simulation, Artificial Intelligence, and Control Theory to create a risk free 'in silico' experimentation aid to help: (i) understand why a system is the way it is, (ii) be prepared for possible outlier conditions, and (iii) identify plausible solutions for mitigating the outlier conditions in an evidence-backed manner. We use reinforcement learning to systematically explore the digital twin solution space. Our proposal is significant because it advances the effective use of digital twins to new problem domains that have new potential for impact. Our approach contributes an original meta model for simulatable digital twin of industry scale techno-socioeconomic systems, agent-based implementation of the digital twin, and an architecture that serves as a risk-free experimentation aid to support simulation-based evidence-backed decision-making. We also discuss the rigor of our validation of the proposed approach and associated technology infrastructure through a representative sample of industry-scale real-world use cases.

References

[1]
Alferes, J.J., Banti, F. and Brogi, A., 2006, September. An event-condition-action logic programming language. In European workshop on logics in artificial intelligence (pp. 29--42). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[2]
Armstrong, J., 2013. Programming Erlang: software for a concurrent world. Pragmatic Bookshelf.
[3]
Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, T. M., and Venkatesan, V. P., 2013. A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. American Journal of Information Systems, 1(1), 31--43.
[4]
Barat, S. et al., 2019. Actor based simulation for closed loop control of supply chain using reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 1802--1804).
[5]
Barat, S., et al., 2021. An Agent-Based Digital Twin for Exploring Localized Non-pharmaceutical Interventions to Control COVID-19 Pandemic. Transactions of the Indian National Academy of Engineering 6.2: 323--353.
[6]
Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M. and Ignatius, J., 2012. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with applications, 39(17), 13051--13069.
[7]
Brix, J., 2019. Ambidexterity and organizational learning: revisiting and reconnecting the literatures. The Learning Organization.
[8]
Camus, B., Bourjot, C. and Chevrier, V., 2015. Combining devs with multi-agent concepts to design and simulate multi-models of complex systems.
[9]
Clark, T., Barn, B., Kulkarni, V. and Barat, S., 2017. Querying histories of organisation simulations.
[10]
Clark, T., et al, 2017. ESL: an actor-based platform for developing emergent behaviour organisation simulations. In International conference on practical applications of agents and multi-agent systems (pp. 311--315). Springer, Cham.
[11]
Daft, R.L., 2015. Organization theory and design. Cengage learning.
[12]
Dantzig, G.B. and Thapa, M.N., 2006. Linear programming 1: introduction. Springer Science & Business Media.
[13]
Dursun, M. and Karsak, E. E., 2010. A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection. Expert Systems with applications, 37(6), 4324--4330.
[14]
Enders, M.R. and Hoßbach, N., 2019. Dimensions of digital twin applications-a literature review.
[15]
Frank, U., 2011. The MEMO meta modelling language (MML) and language architecture (No. 43). ICB-research report.
[16]
Glaessgen, E. and Stargel, D., 2012, April. The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US Air Force vehicles. In 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, 14th AIAA (p. 1818).
[17]
Grieves, M. and Vickers, J., 2017. Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems (pp. 85--113). Springer, Cham.
[18]
Hewitt, C., 2010. Actor model of computation: scalable robust information systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1008.1459.
[19]
Horkoff, J. and Yu, E., 2010. Visualizations to support interactive goal model analysis. In 2010 Fifth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering Visualization (pp. 1--10). IEEE.
[20]
Iacob, M.E., Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M., Proper, E. and Quartel, D.A.C., 2012. ArchiMate 2.0 Specification.
[21]
Kerremans, M. and Kopcho, J., 2019. Create a digital twin of your organization to optimize your digital transformation program. Research Note G00379226.
[22]
Kohavi, R. and Longbotham, R., 2017. Online Controlled Experiments and A/B Testing. Encyclopedia of machine learning and data mining, 7(8), 922--929.
[23]
Marchau, V.A., Walker, W.E., Bloemen, P.J. and Popper, S.W., 2019. Decision making under deep uncertainty: from theory to practice (p. 405). Springer Nature.
[24]
Mangel, M. and Samaniego, F. J., 1984. Abraham Wald's work on aircraft survivability. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(386), 259--267.
[25]
Meadows, D.H., 2008. Thinking in systems: A primer. chelsea green publishing.
[26]
Robinson, S., 1999. Simulation verification, validation and confidence: a tutorial. Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation, 16(2), 63--69.
[27]
Rumsfeld, D., 2011. Known and unknown: a memoir. Penguin.
[28]
Rosenblatt, F., 1958. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological review, 65(6), 386.
[29]
Sargent, R. G., 2010. Verification and validation of simulation models. In Proceedings of the 2010 winter simulation conference (pp. 166--183). IEEE.
[30]
Teece, D., Peteraf, M. and Leih, S., 2016. Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California management review, 58(4), 13--35.
[31]
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods. In Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study (pp. 5--21). Springer, Boston, MA.
[32]
White, S.A., 2004. Introduction to BPMN. Ibm Cooperation, 2(0), p.0.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)AI Simulation by Digital Twins: Systematic Survey of the State of the Art and a Reference FrameworkProceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems10.1145/3652620.3688253(401-412)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Digital Twins of Socio-Technical Ecosystems to Drive Societal ChangeProceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems10.1145/3652620.3686248(275-286)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2024)System dynamics applied in enterprise engineering – a systematic literature reviewJournal of Modelling in Management10.1108/JM2-05-2023-008220:1(1-29)Online publication date: 14-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Digital twin as risk-free experimentation aid for techno-socio-economic systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MODELS '22: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems
    October 2022
    412 pages
    ISBN:9781450394666
    DOI:10.1145/3550355
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    • Univ. of Montreal: University of Montreal
    • IEEE CS

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 October 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. agent model
    2. decision making
    3. digital twin
    4. simulatable model

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    MODELS '22
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    MODELS '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 35 of 125 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 144 of 506 submissions, 28%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)56
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)AI Simulation by Digital Twins: Systematic Survey of the State of the Art and a Reference FrameworkProceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems10.1145/3652620.3688253(401-412)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Digital Twins of Socio-Technical Ecosystems to Drive Societal ChangeProceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems10.1145/3652620.3686248(275-286)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
    • (2024)System dynamics applied in enterprise engineering – a systematic literature reviewJournal of Modelling in Management10.1108/JM2-05-2023-008220:1(1-29)Online publication date: 14-May-2024
    • (2024)Decision support for personalized therapy in implantable medical devicesExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122883243:COnline publication date: 25-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Uncertainty-aware environment simulation of medical devices digital twinsSoftware and Systems Modeling10.1007/s10270-024-01223-8Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Model-Based Engineering of Multi-Purpose Digital Twins in ManufacturingDigital Twin10.1007/978-3-031-67778-6_5(89-126)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Model‐based digital twins of medicine dispensers for healthcare IoT applicationsSoftware: Practice and Experience10.1002/spe.331154:6(1172-1192)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2024
    • (2023)Symbiotic Use of Digital Twin, Simulation and Design Thinking Approach for Resilient Enterprise2023 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)10.1109/WSC60868.2023.10408559(686-697)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Digital Twins for Cyber-Biophysical Systems: Challenges and Lessons Learned2023 ACM/IEEE 26th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS)10.1109/MODELS58315.2023.00014(1-12)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023
    • (2023)A Model-Driven Platform for Engineering Holistic Digital Twins2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C)10.1109/MODELS-C59198.2023.00045(179-185)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media