demonstration

Prototypes for E-government Websites to support the Digital Sovereignty of Citizens

Authors:

Moreen HeineAuthors Info & Claims

MuC '22: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2022

Pages 615 - 617

https://doi.org/10.1145/3543758.3547514

Published: 15 September 2022 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

Given the increasingly digital interactions between citizens and public administration, E-government websites provide an opportunity to support the digital sovereignty of citizens. They can lead by example by making their data sharing processes transparent, and in turn, even raise awareness to data sharing practices in the private sector. In this demonstration we would like to present the first prototypes to achieve this end. Developed by implementing a human-centered design process, these prototypes cover three major life events that require interaction with the government and aim to show how and why data is shared between government agencies.

Supplementary Material

Slide (muc22-33_slide.pdf)

Download
2.07 MB

MP4 File (muc22-33_video.mp4)

Supplemental video

Download
11.50 MB

References

[1]

Susanne Barth and Menno D. T. de Jong. 2017. The privacy paradox – Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – A systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics 34, 7 (2017), 1038–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

Stephanie Carretero, Riina Vuorikari, and Yves Punie. 2017. DigComp 2.1 The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. With eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Technical Report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

Google Scholar

[3]

DIN EN ISO 9241-210. 2020. Ergonomie Der Mensch-System-Interaktion - Teil 210: Menschzentrierte Gestaltung Interaktiver Systeme. Beuth, Berlin.

Google Scholar

[4]

Initiative D21 e. V. and fortiss gemeinnützige GmbH. 2018. eGovernment Monitor 2018. Technical Report. Initiative D21 e. V. & fortiss gemeinnützige GmbH, Berlin, Germany. https://initiatived21.de/publikationen/egovernment-monitor-2018/

Google Scholar

[5]

Sachverständigenrat für Verbraucherfragen. 2017. Digitale Souveränität. Gutachten des Sachverständigenrats für Verbraucherfragen. Technical Report. Sachverständigenrat für Verbraucherfragen, Berlin, Germany. https://www.bmj.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/PDF/SVRV_Gutachten_DigitaleSouveraenitaet.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2

Google Scholar

[6]

Sirko Hunnius, Tino Schuppan, and Dirk Stocksmeier. 2016. Lebenslagenorientiertes E-Government. VM Verwaltung & Management 22, 4 (2016), 187–193.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[7]

Jake Knapp, John Zeratsky, and Branden Kowitz. 2016. Sprint. How to solve big problems and test new ideas in just five days.Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, New York.

Google Scholar

[8]

Spyros Kokolakis. 2017. Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security 64(2017), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

Ida Lindgren, Christian Østergaard Madsen, Sara Hofmann, and Ulf Melin. 2019. Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Government Information Quarterly 36, 3 (2019), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.002

Crossref

Google Scholar

[10]

Ines Mergel. 2021. Digital Transformation of the German State. In Public Administration in Germany, Sabine Kuhlmann, Isabella Proeller, Dieter Schimanke, and Jan Ziekow (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8_19

Crossref

Google Scholar

[11]

Hendrik Scholta, Willem Mertens, Marek Kowalkiewicz, and Jörg Becker. 2019. From one-stop shop to no-stop shop: An e-government stage model. Government Information Quarterly 36, 1 (2019), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.010

Crossref

Google Scholar

[12]

Daniel J. Solove. 2020. The Myth of the Privacy Paradox. SSRN Electronic Journal 89, 1 (2020), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3536265

Crossref

Google Scholar

[13]

Sabine Trepte and Doris Teutsch. 2016. Privacy Paradox. In Medienpsychologie. Schlüsselbegriffe und Konzepte (2nd ed.), Nicole C Krämer, Stephan Schwan, Dagmar Unz, and Monika Suckfüll (Eds.). Verlag W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, 372–378.

Google Scholar

[14]

Riina Vuorikari, Yves Punie, Stephanie Carretero, and Lieve van den Brande. 2016. DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Technical Report. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Lawo DNeifer TEsau-Held MStevens G(2023)Digital Sovereignty: What it is and why it matters for HCIExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585834(1-7)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544549.3585834
Lawo DNeifer TEsau MStevens G(2023)Human-Centred Digital Sovereignty: Explorative Conceptual Model and Ways ForwardComputer-Human Interaction Research and Applications10.1007/978-3-031-49368-3_6(84-103)Online publication date: 23-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49368-3_6

Index Terms

Prototypes for E-government Websites to support the Digital Sovereignty of Citizens

Recommendations

E-government and citizen's engagement with local affairs through e-websites

Highlights Spanish municipalities have embarked upon a wave of e-government initiatives that make use of ICT. With ICT being introduced in organisations, managers could build on an existing culture of awareness of and sensitivity to information and ...
Citizens versus the Government or Citizens with the Government: a Tale of Two e-Participation Portals in One City - a Case Study of St. Petersburg, Russia
ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance

E-participation is a two-way process, comprising government-led projects and citizens' initiatives. Although the cooperation between them is the best outcome, they usually compete for popularity and efficiency, representing conflicting views on ...
Engaging Citizens and Delivering Services: The Housing Corporation in Trinidad and Tobago

Globally, governments are attempting to transform their societies with the widespread use of information and communication technologies (ICTs). Public agencies consider ICTs as powerful tools to deliver services to citizens and encourage engagement. ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

MuC '22: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2022

September 2022

624 pages

ISBN:9781450396905

DOI:10.1145/3543758

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 September 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Demonstration
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

MuC '22

MuC '22: Mensch und Computer 2022

September 4 - 7, 2022

Darmstadt, Germany

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
61
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)30
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Lawo DNeifer TEsau-Held MStevens G(2023)Digital Sovereignty: What it is and why it matters for HCIExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585834(1-7)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544549.3585834
Lawo DNeifer TEsau MStevens G(2023)Human-Centred Digital Sovereignty: Explorative Conceptual Model and Ways ForwardComputer-Human Interaction Research and Applications10.1007/978-3-031-49368-3_6(84-103)Online publication date: 23-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49368-3_6

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Abstract

Supplementary Material

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

E-government and citizen's engagement with local affairs through e-websites

Citizens versus the Government or Citizens with the Government: a Tale of Two e-Participation Portals in One City - a Case Study of St. Petersburg, Russia

Engaging Citizens and Delivering Services: The Housing Corporation in Trinidad and Tobago

Comments

Information

Published In

Publisher

Publication History

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

eReader

HTML Format

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations