Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour

Published: 01 January 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Do people really care about their privacy? Surveys show that privacy is a primary concern for citizens in the digital age. On the other hand, individuals reveal personal information for relatively small rewards, often just for drawing the attention of peers in an online social network. This inconsistency of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour is often referred to as the "privacy paradox". In this paper, we present the results of a review of research literature on the privacy paradox. We analyse studies that provide evidence of a paradoxical dichotomy between attitudes and behaviour and studies that challenge the existence of such a phenomenon. The diverse research results are explained by the diversity in research methods, the different contexts and the different conceptualisations of the privacy paradox. We also present several interpretations of the privacy paradox, stemming from social theory, psychology, behavioural economics and, in one case, from quantum theory. We conclude that current research has improved our understanding of the privacy paradox phenomenon. It is, however, a complex phenomenon that requires extensive further research. Thus, we call for synthetic studies to be based on comprehensive theoretical models that take into account the diversity of personal information and the diversity of privacy concerns. We suggest that future studies should use evidence of actual behaviour rather than self-reported behaviour.

References

[1]
A. Acquisti, Privacy in electronic commerce and the economics of immediate gratification, 2004.
[2]
A. Acquisti, J. Grossklags, Losses, gains, and hyperbolic discounting: an experimental approach to information security attitudes and behavior, 2003.
[3]
A. Acquisti, J. Grossklags, Privacy and rationality in individual decision making, IEEE Secur Priv, 2 (2005) 24-30.
[4]
A. Acquisti, J. Grossklags, What can behavioral economics teach us about privacy, in: Digital privacy: theory, technology, and practices, Auerbach Publications, 2007, pp. 363-377.
[5]
D. boyd, E. Hargittai, Facebook privacy settings: who cares?, First Monday, 15 (2010).
[6]
Y.M. Baek, Solving the privacy paradox: a counter-argument experimental approach, Comput Human Behav, 38 (2014) 33-42.
[7]
Y.M. Baek, E.M. Kim, Y. Bae, My privacy is okay, but theirs is endangered: why comparative optimism matters in online privacy concerns, Comput Human Behav, 31 (2014) 48-56.
[8]
A. Bandura, Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective, Annu Rev Psychol, 52 (2001) 1-26.
[9]
S.B. Barnes, A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States, First Monday, 11 (2006).
[10]
A.R. Beresford, D. Kübler, S. Preibusch, Unwillingness to pay for privacy: a field experiment, Econ Lett, 117 (2012) 25-27.
[11]
G. Blank, G. Bolsover, E. Dubois, A new privacy paradox, 2014.
[12]
J.L. Boyles, A. Smith, M. Madden, Privacy and data management on mobile devices. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Mobile-Privacy.aspx
[13]
L. Brandimarte, A. Acquisti, G. Loewenstein, Misplaced confidences privacy and the control paradox, Soc Psychol Pers Sci, 4 (2013) 340-347.
[14]
B. Brown, Studying the internet experience. HP Laboratories Technical Report (HPL-2001-49). http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2001/HPL-2001-49.pdf
[15]
C. Buck, C. Horbel, C.C. Germelmann, T. Eymann, The unconscious app consumer: discovering and comparing the information-seeking patterns among mobile application consumers, 2014.
[16]
C. Camerer, Bounded rationality in individual decision making, Exp Econ, 1 (1998) 163-183.
[17]
J.P. Carrascal, C. Riederer, V. Erramilli, M. Cherubini, R. de Oliveira, Your browsing behavior for a Big Mac: economics of personal information online, 2013.
[18]
H. Cho, J.S. Lee, S. Chung, Optimistic bias about online privacy risks: testing the moderating effects of perceived controllability and prior experience, Comput Human Behav, 26 (2010) 987-995.
[19]
E. Christofides, A. Muise, S. Desmarais, Information disclosure and control on Facebook: are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes?, Cyber Psychol Behav, 12 (2009) 341-345.
[20]
B. Debatin, J.P. Lovejoy, A.K. Horn, B.N. Hughes, Facebook and online privacy: attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences, J Comput-Med Commun, 15 (2009) 83-108.
[21]
T. Dienlin, S. Trepte, Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors, Eur J Soc Psychol, 45 (2015) 285-297.
[22]
T. Dinev, P. Hart, An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions, Inform Syst Res, 17 (2006) 61-80.
[23]
G. D'Souza, J.E. Phelps, The privacy paradox: the case of secondary disclosure, Rev Market Sci, 7 (2009).
[24]
S. Egelman, A.P. Felt, D. Wagner, Choice architecture and smartphone privacy: there's a price for that, 2012.
[25]
N.B. Ellison, J. Vitak, C. Steinfield, R. Gray, C. Lampe, Negotiating privacy concerns and social capital needs in a social media environment, in: Privacy online, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 19-32.
[26]
C. Flender, G. Müller, Type indeterminacy in privacy decisions: the privacy paradox revisited, in: Quantum interaction, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 148-159.
[27]
A. Giddens, The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration, University of California Press, 1984.
[28]
Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment, in: Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[29]
I.H. Hann, K.L. Hui, S.Y.T. Lee, I.P. Png, Overcoming online information privacy concerns: an information-processing theory approach, J Manage Inform Syst, 24 (2007) 13-42.
[30]
J. Holvast, Vulnerability and privacy: are we on the way to a risk-free society?, 1993.
[31]
B.A. Huberman, E. Adar, L.R. Fine, Valuating privacy, IEEE Secur Priv, 3 (2005) 22-25.
[32]
T. Hughes-Roberts, Privacy and social networks: is concern a valid indicator of intention and behaviour?, 2013.
[33]
C. Jensen, C. Potts, C. Jensen, Privacy practices of Internet users: self-reports versus observed behavior, Int J Hum Comput Stud, 63 (2005) 203-227.
[34]
Z. Jiang, C.S. Heng, B.C. Choi, Research note: privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions, Inform Syst Res, 24 (2013) 579-595.
[35]
F. Kehr, D. Wentzel, P. Mayer, Rethinking the privacy calculus: on the role of dispositional factors and affect, 2013.
[36]
F. Kehr, D. Wentzel, T. Kowatsch, Privacy paradox revised: pre-existing attitudes, psychological ownership, and actual disclosure, 2014.
[37]
F. Kehr, T. Kowatsch, D. Wentzel, E. Fleisch, Blissfully ignorant: the effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus, Inform Syst J (2015).
[38]
H. Krasnova, O. Günther, S. Spiekermann, K. Koroleva, Privacy concerns and identity in online social networks, Ident Inform Soc, 2 (2009) 39-63.
[39]
H. Lee, H. Park, J. Kim, Why do people share their context information on Social Network Services? A qualitative study and an experimental study on users' behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk, Int J Hum Comput Stud, 71 (2013) 862-877.
[40]
C. Lutz, P. Strathoff, Privacy concerns and online behavior - not so paradoxical after all? Viewing the privacy paradox through different theoretical lenses.
[41]
C.L. Miltgen, D. Peyrat-Guillard, Cultural and generational influences on privacy concerns: a qualitative study in seven European countries, Eur J Inform Syst, 23 (2014) 103-125.
[42]
F. Morando, R. Iemma, E. Raiteri, Privacy evaluation: what empirical research on users' valuation of personal data tells us, Internet Policy Rev, 3 (2014) 1-11.
[43]
D.L. Mothersbaugh, W.K. Foxx, S.E. Beatty, S. Wang, Disclosure antecedents in an online service context: the role of sensitivity of information, J Serv Res, 15 (2012) 76-98.
[44]
P.A. Norberg, D.R. Horne, D.A. Horne, The privacy paradox: personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors, J Consum Aff, 41 (2007) 100-126.
[45]
M.C. Oetzel, T. Gonja, The online privacy paradox: a social representations perspective, 2011.
[46]
I. Oomen, R. Leenes, Privacy risk perceptions and privacy protection strategies, in: Policies and research in identity management, Springer, USA, 2008, pp. 121-138.
[47]
Pew Research Center, Public perceptions of privacy and security in the post-snowden era. http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/11/12/public-privacy-perceptions/
[48]
B. Reynolds, J. Venkatanathan, J. Gonçalves, V. Kostakos, Sharing ephemeral information in online social networks: privacy perceptions and behaviours, 2011.
[49]
R. Rosenberg, The social impact of computers, Academic Press Inc, 1992.
[50]
S. Sayre, D. Horne, Trading secrets for savings: how concerned are consumers about club cards as a privacy threat?, Adv Consum Res, 27 (2000) 151-155.
[51]
T. Sharot, A.M. Riccardi, C.M. Raio, E.A. Phelps, Neural mechanisms mediating optimism bias, Nature, 450 (2007) 102-105.
[52]
P. Slovic, M. Finucane, E. Peters, D.G. MacGregor, The affect heuristic, in: Heuristics and biases, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 397-420.
[53]
D.J. Solove, A taxonomy of privacy, Univ PA Law Rev, 154 (2006) 477-560.
[54]
J.Y. Son, S.S. Kim, Internet users' information privacy-protective responses: a taxonomy and a nomological model, MIS Quart, 32 (2008) 503-529.
[55]
S. Spiekermann, J. Grossklags, B. Berendt, E-privacy in 2nd generation e-commerce: privacy preferences versus actual behavior, 2001.
[56]
J. Staddon, A. Acquisti, K. LeFevre, Self-reported social network behavior: accuracy predictors and implications for the privacy paradox, 2013.
[57]
F. Stutzman, J. Vitak, N.B. Ellison, R. Gray, C. Lampe, Privacy in Interaction: exploring disclosure and social capital in Facebook, 2012.
[58]
S.S. Sundar, H. Kang, M. Wu, E. Go, B. Zhang, Unlocking the privacy paradox: do cognitive heuristics hold the key?, 2013.
[59]
J. Sutanto, E. Palme, C.-H. Tan, C.W. Phang, Addressing the personalization-privacy paradox: an empirical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users, MIS Quart, 37 (2013) 1141-1164.
[60]
M. Taddicken, The 'privacy paradox' in the social web: the impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on different forms of self-disclosure, J Comput-Med Commun, 19 (2014) 248-273.
[61]
F. Tönnies, Community and society, Dover Publications Inc, New York, 2003.
[62]
TRUSTe, Consumer opinion and business impact. http://info.truste.com/lp/truste/Web-Resource-HarrisConsumerResearchUS-ReportQ12014_LP.html
[63]
J.Y. Tsai, S. Egelman, L. Cranor, A. Acquisti, The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: an experimental study, Inform Syst Res, 22 (2011) 254-268.
[64]
Z. Tufekci, Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites, Bull Sci Technol Soc, 28 (2008) 20-36.
[65]
R. Wakefield, The influence of user affect in online information disclosure, J Strat Inform Syst, 22 (2013) 157-174.
[66]
D. Wilson, J.S. Valacich, Unpacking the privacy paradox: irrational decision-making within the privacy calculus, 2012.
[67]
H. Xu, X.R. Luo, J.M. Carroll, M.B. Rosson, The personalization privacy paradox: an exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing, Dec Support Syst, 51 (2011) 42-52.
[68]
A.L. Young, A. Quan-Haase, Privacy protection strategies on Facebook: the Internet privacy paradox revisited, Inform Commun Soc, 16 (2013) 479-500.
[69]
A.M. Zafeiropoulou, D.E. Millard, C. Webber, K. O'Hara, Unpicking the privacy paradox: can structuration theory help to explain location-based privacy decisions?, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Explaining Privacy Paradox on WeChatInternational Journal of Information Security and Privacy10.4018/IJISP.35725018:1(1-24)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Uncovering the Neural Processes of PrivacyInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2021.055035:2(727-746)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Designing Privacy-Protecting System with Visual Masking Based on Investigation of Privacy Concerns in Virtual Screen Sharing EnvironmentsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981338:ISS(165-188)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Computers and Security
    Computers and Security  Volume 64, Issue C
    January 2017
    136 pages

    Publisher

    Elsevier Advanced Technology Publications

    United Kingdom

    Publication History

    Published: 01 January 2017

    Author Tags

    1. Information privacy
    2. Personal information
    3. Privacy
    4. Privacy behaviour
    5. Privacy paradox

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Explaining Privacy Paradox on WeChatInternational Journal of Information Security and Privacy10.4018/IJISP.35725018:1(1-24)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Uncovering the Neural Processes of PrivacyInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2021.055035:2(727-746)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Designing Privacy-Protecting System with Visual Masking Based on Investigation of Privacy Concerns in Virtual Screen Sharing EnvironmentsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981338:ISS(165-188)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Exploring Determinants of Parental Engagement in Online Privacy Protection: A Qualitative ApproachProceedings of the 2024 European Symposium on Usable Security10.1145/3688459.3688476(94-111)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Exploring Users' Mental Models and Privacy Concerns During Interconnected InteractionsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36765048:MHCI(1-23)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Designing Interactive Privacy Labels for Advanced Smart Home Device Configuration OptionsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661527(3372-3388)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Collective Privacy Sensemaking on Social Media about Period and Fertility Tracking post Roe v. WadeProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410008:CSCW1(1-35)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)On Being an Expert: Habitus as a Lens for Understanding Privacy ExpertiseProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373798:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Trust Through Recommendation in E-commerceProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3627508.3638294(87-96)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Which Artificial Intelligences Do People Care About Most? A Conjoint Experiment on Moral ConsiderationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642403(1-11)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media