Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3430524.3442446acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Comparing Understanding and Memorization in Physicalization and VR Visualization

Published: 14 February 2021 Publication History

Abstract

We investigate whether presenting data in a VR visualization or as a physicalization impacts understanding and recollection. Two equivalent representations of the same data set, one in physical form and one in VR, were created. Participants answered understanding questions while they had access to the model, and were subsequently asked about the data after the model was removed. We recorded time needed to answer understanding questions and correctness rates for recollection questions. The results favour the conclusion that the virtual representation and the technical VR setup significantly inhibit participants’ ability to work with the data set. Reflecting on our study setup and participants’ comments, we discuss recommendations for future studies aiming at a systematic and comprehensive comparison of the differences in interacting with purely virtual and with physical data representations.

References

[1]
Ciro Donalek, S. George Djorgovski, Scott Davidoff, Alex Cioc, Anwell Wang, Giuseppe Longo, Jeffrey S. Norris, Jerry Zhang, Elizabeth Lawler, Stacy Yeh, Ashish Mahabal, Matthew J. Graham, and Andrew J. Drake. 2014. Immersive and collaborative data visualization using virtual reality platforms. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). 609–614. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2014.7004282
[2]
Pierre Dragicevic, Yvonne Jansen, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2019. Data Physicalization. In Springer Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, Jean Vanderdonckt (Ed.). Springer.
[3]
Tim Dwyer, Kim Marriott, Tobias Isenberg, Karsten Klein, Nathalie Riche, Falk Schreiber, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, and Bruce H. Thomas. 2018. Immersive Analytics: An Introduction. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01388-2_1
[4]
Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2013. Evaluating the Efficiency of Physical Visualizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2593–2602. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481359
[5]
Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, Petra Isenberg, Jason Alexander, Abhijit Karnik, Johan Kildal, Sriram Subramanian, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Opportunities and Challenges for Data Physicalization. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3227–3236. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702180
[6]
Yvonne Jansen and Kasper Hornbæk. 2016. A Psychophysical Investigation of Size as a Physical Variable. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22 (2016), 479–488. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467951
[7]
Tamara Munzner. 2015. Visualization Analysis and Design. A K Peters/CRC Press.
[8]
NASA. 2019. Meteorite Landing| NASA Open Data Portal. Retrieved 2020-02-16 from https://data.nasa.gov/Space-Science/Meteorite-Landings/gh4g-9sfh/data
[9]
NASA. 2020. About NASA Open Data Portal. Retrieved 2020-02-16 from https://data.nasa.gov/stories/s/e3dt-gtde
[10]
Richard Skarbez, Nicholas F. Polys, J. Todd Ogle, Chris North, and Doug A. Bowman. 2019. Immersive Analytics: Theory and Research Agenda. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 6 (2019), 82. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00082
[11]
Simon Stusak, Jeannette Schwarz, and Andreas Butz. 2015. Evaluating the Memorability of Physical Visualizations. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3247–3250. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702248

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Comparing the Effects of Visual, Haptic, and Visuohaptic Encoding on Memory Retention of Digital Objects in Virtual RealityProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685349(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)A Systematic Literature Review of User Evaluation in Immersive AnalyticsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1511143:3Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Enhancing Color Scales for Active Data PhysicalizationsApplied Sciences10.3390/app1401016614:1(166)Online publication date: 24-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Comparing Understanding and Memorization in Physicalization and VR Visualization
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          TEI '21: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
          February 2021
          908 pages
          ISBN:9781450382137
          DOI:10.1145/3430524
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 14 February 2021

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. Immersive Visualization
          2. InfoViz
          3. Information Visualization
          4. VR
          5. data understanding
          6. user study

          Qualifiers

          • Work in progress
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Conference

          TEI '21

          Acceptance Rates

          TEI '21 Paper Acceptance Rate 40 of 136 submissions, 29%;
          Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)82
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
          Reflects downloads up to 01 Oct 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2024)Comparing the Effects of Visual, Haptic, and Visuohaptic Encoding on Memory Retention of Digital Objects in Virtual RealityProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685349(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
          • (2024)A Systematic Literature Review of User Evaluation in Immersive AnalyticsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1511143:3Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024
          • (2023)Enhancing Color Scales for Active Data PhysicalizationsApplied Sciences10.3390/app1401016614:1(166)Online publication date: 24-Dec-2023
          • (2023)Validating Design Choices of a Bio-Inspired Histogram to Support a Shared Practice of Clean Energy at the WorkplaceProceedings of the 34th Conference on l'Interaction Humain-Machine10.1145/3583961.3583965(1-20)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2023
          • (2023)DataLev: Mid-air Data Physicalisation Using Acoustic LevitationProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581016(1-14)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
          • (2023)Visualization in virtual reality: a systematic reviewVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-023-00753-827:2(1447-1480)Online publication date: 17-Jan-2023
          • (2022)Put a Label On It! Approaches for Constructing and Contextualizing Bar Chart PhysicalizationsProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501952(1-15)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022

          View Options

          Get Access

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media