Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3419249.3420140acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

Making Tactful Objects for Sensitive Settings: A Research through Design Process

Published: 26 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

This contribution illustrates the Research through Design process of Mr.V the Spaceman, a tactful object meant to support families of children with cancer maintain a healthy domestic life during stressful times. By recounting insights from the field and unfolding changes to the original artifact over a period of two years, the paper illuminates how an understanding of tactfulness has emerged and developed into a key design quality for this work. This complex and entangled process of making is surfaced and illustrated by a rich and scrupulous annotation of the artisanal craft and technological explorations that led from the original Mr.V prototype to what is now Mr.V the Spaceman.

References

[1]
Melissa A. Alderfer and Anne E. Kazak. 2006. Family issues when a child is on treatment for cancer. Comprehensive handbook of childhood cancer and sickle cell disease: A biopsychosocial approach: 53–74.
[2]
Jo Aldridge. 2016. Participatory research: Working with vulnerable groups in research and practice. Policy Press.
[3]
Godwin S. Ashiabi and Keri K. O'Neal. 2015. Child Social Development in Context: An Examination of Some Propositions in Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological Theory. SAGE Open 5, 2: 2158244015590840.
[4]
Kelly L.A. van Bindsbergen, Patrizia D'Olivo, Marco C. Rozendaal, Johannes H.M. Merks, and Martha A. Grootenhuis. Support for Families at Home during Childhood Cancer Treatment: A Pilot Study with Mr.V the Astronaut. To appear in Supportive Care in Cancer.
[5]
Boudewijn Boon, Marco C. Rozendaal, and Pieter J. Stappers. 2018. Ambiguity and open-endedness in behavioural design. DRS 20185.
[6]
Albert Borgmann. 1987. Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
[7]
Nazli Cila, Iskander Smit, Elisa Giaccardi, and Ben Kröse. 2017. Products as agents: Metaphors for designing the products of the IoT age. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 448–459.
[8]
Patrizia D'Olivo, Kelly L. A. van Bindsbergen, Jaap Huisman, Martha A. Grootenhuis, and Marco C. Rozendaal. 2020. Designing tactful objects for sensitive settings: A case study on families dealing with childhood cancer. International Journal of Design 14, 2: 103–124.
[9]
Patrizia D'Olivo, Marco C. Rozendaal, and Elisa Giaccardi. 2017. AscoltaMe: Retracing the Computational Expressivity of a Tactful Object for Sensitive Settings. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 943–955.
[10]
Patrizia D'Olivo, Marco C. Rozendaal, Elisa Giaccardi, Martha A. Grootenhuis, and Jaap Huisman. 2018. Reconfiguring a New Normal: A Socio-Ecological Perspective for Design Innovation in Sensitive Settings. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 4, 4: 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SHEJI.2018.10.003
[11]
Hilary Davis and Jenny Waycott. 2015. Ethical encounters: HCI research in sensitive and complex settings. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction, 667–669.
[12]
Pieter Desmet and Paul Hekkert. 2007. Framework of product experience. International journal of design 1, 1: 57–66.
[13]
Virginia Dickson-Swift, Erica L. James, and Pranee Liamputtong. 2008. Undertaking sensitive research in the health and social sciences: Managing boundaries, emotions and risks.
[14]
Steven Dorrestijn and Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2013. Technology, wellbeing, and freedom: The legacy of utopian design. International Journal of Design 7, 3.
[15]
William Gaver, Phoebe Sengers, Tobie Kerridge, Joseph Kaye, and John Bowers. 2007. Enhancing ubiquitous computing with user interpretation: Field testing the home health horoscope. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240711
[16]
Elisa Giaccardi. 2019. Histories and futures of research through design: From prototypes to connected things. International Journal of Design 13, 3: 139–155.
[17]
Elisa Giaccardi. 2019. Casting things as partners in design: Towards a more-than-human design practice. In Relating to Things: Design, Technology and the Artificial. London: Bloomsbury, forthcoming.
[18]
Elisa Giaccardi, Lenneke Kuijer, Louis Neven, and others. 2016. Design for resourceful ageing: Intervening in the ethics of gerontechnology. Proceedings of DRS: 1–14.
[19]
Elisa Giaccardi and Johan Redström. 2020. Technology and More-Than-Human Design. Design Issues 36, 4.
[20]
Sabrina Hauser, Doenja Oogjes, Ron Wakkary, and Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2018. An annotated portfolio on doing postphenomenology through research products. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 459–471.
[21]
Lotte Haverman, Vivian Engelen, Marion A.J. van Rossum, Hugo S.A. Heymans, and Martha A. Grootenhuis. 2011. Monitoring health-related quality of life in paediatric practice: Development of an innovative web-based application. BMC Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-11-3
[22]
John Helmes, Caroline Hummels, and Abigail Seilen. 2009. The other brother: Re-experiencing spontaneous moments from domestic life. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, TEI’09. https://doi.org/10.1145/1517664.1517715
[23]
Don Ihde. 1990. Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth.
[24]
Lars-Erik Janlert and Erik Stolterman. 1997. The character of things. Design Studies 18, 3: 297–314.
[25]
Jaap Jelsma. 2000. Design of behaviour steering technology.
[26]
Flavius Kehr, Marc Hassenzahl, Matthias Laschke, and Sarah Diefenbach. 2012. A transformational product to improve self-control strength: the chocolate machine. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 689–694.
[27]
David S. Kirk, David Chatting, Paulina Yurman, and Jo-Anne Bichard. 2016. Ritual machines I & II: making technology at home. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2474–2486.
[28]
Lenneke Kuijer and Elisa Giaccardi. 2018. Co-performance: Conceptualizing the role of artificial agency in the design of everyday life. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 125.
[29]
Matthias Laschke, Marc Hassenzahl, and Sarah Diefenbach. 2011. Things with attitude: Transformational Products. Create ’11 Conference: 1–2.
[30]
Meghan L Marsac, Aimee K Hildenbrand, Kathleen Clawson, Leela Jackson, Kristen Kohser, Lamia Barakat, Nancy Kassam-Adams, Richard Aplenc, Anne Vinsel, and Melissa A Alderfer. 2012. Acceptability and feasibility of family use of The Cellie Cancer Coping Kit. Supportive Care in Cancer 20, 12: 3315–3324.
[31]
Michael Massimi, Jill P. Dimond, and Christopher A Le Dantec. 2012. Finding a new normal: the role of technology in life disruptions. In Proceedings of the acm 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work, 719–728.
[32]
Michael Massimi, Will Odom, David Kirk, and Richard Banks. 2010. HCI at the end of life: understanding death, dying, and the digital. In CHI’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4477–4480.
[33]
Cosmin Munteanu, Heather Molyneaux, and Susan O'Donnell. 2014. Fieldwork with vulnerable populations. interactions 21, 1: 50–53.
[34]
William T. Odom, Abigail J. Sellen, Richard Banks, David S. Kirk, Tim Regan, Mark Selby, Jodi L. Forlizzi, and John Zimmerman. 2014. Designing for Slowness, Anticipation and Re-visitation: A Long Term Field Study of the Photobox. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14), 1961–1970. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557178
[35]
William Odom, Ron Wakkary, Ishac Bertran, Matthew Harkness, Garnet Hertz, Jeroen Hol, Henry Lin, Bram Naus, Perry Tan, and Pepijn Verburg. 2018. Attending to slowness and temporality with olly and slow game: A design inquiry into supporting longer-term relations with everyday computational objects. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13.
[36]
Daniel Orth, Clementine Thurgood, and Elise van den Hoven. 2018. Designing objects with meaningful associations. International Journal of Design 12, 2: 91–104.
[37]
Joän M. Patterson, Kristen E. Holm, and James G. Gurney. 2004. The impact of childhood cancer on the family: A qualitative analysis of strains, resources, and coping behaviors. Psycho-Oncology: Journal of the Psychological, Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer 13, 6: 390–407.
[38]
Ann Petermans and Rebecca Cain. 2019. Design for Wellbeing: An Applied Approach. Routledge.
[39]
Johan Redström. 2008. Tangled interaction: On the expressiveness of tangible user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)15, 4: 1–17.
[40]
Marco Rozendaal. 2016. Objects with intent: a new paradigm for interaction design. interactions 23, 3: 62–65.
[41]
Marco C. Rozendaal, Boudewijn Boon, and Victor Kaptelinin. 2019. Objects with Intent: Designing Everyday Things as Collaborative Partners. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)26, 4: 26.
[42]
Susana Santos, Carla Crespo, M Cristina Canavarro, and Anne E Kazak. 2015. Family rituals and quality of life in children with cancer and their parents: The role of family cohesion and hope. Journal of pediatric psychology 40, 7: 664–671.
[43]
Pieter Stappers and Elisa Giaccardi. 2017. Research through Design. The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd ed.; Idea Group Reference: Hershey, PA, USA: 1–94.
[44]
Anja Thieme, John Vines, Jayne Wallace, Rachel Elizabeth Clarke, Petr Slovák, John McCarthy, Michael Massimi, and Andrea Grimes Grimes Parker. 2014. Enabling Empathy in Health and Care: Design Methods and Challenges. In CHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’14), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2559237
[45]
John Vines, Róisín McNaney, Stephen Lindsay, Jayne Wallace, and John McCarthy. 2014. Special Topic: Designing for and with Vulnerable People. interactions 21, 1: 44–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/2543490
[46]
Torben Wallbaum, Janko Timmermann, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2015. Forget me not: Connecting palliative patients and their loved ones. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1403–1408.
[47]
Jenny Waycott, Greg Wadley, Stefan Schutt, Arthur Stabolidis, and Reeva Lederman. 2015. The Challenge of Technology Research in Sensitive Settings: Case Studies in'ensitive HCI’. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction, 240–249.
[48]
Michael Wooldridge and Nicholas R. Jennings. 1995. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The knowledge engineering review 10, 2: 115–152.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Tactful Feminist Sensing: Designing for Touching Vaginal FluidsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3595966(2642-2656)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • (2021)Ritual DronesCompanion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3434074.3446363(562-564)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2021

Index Terms

  1. Making Tactful Objects for Sensitive Settings: A Research through Design Process
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    NordiCHI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society
    October 2020
    1177 pages
    ISBN:9781450375795
    DOI:10.1145/3419249
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 October 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Childhood Cancer
    2. Objects with Intent
    3. Research Through Design
    4. Sensitive Settings
    5. Tactful Objects
    6. Tactfulness

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    NordiCHI '20
    NordiCHI '20: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society
    October 25 - 29, 2020
    Tallinn, Estonia

    Acceptance Rates

    NordiCHI '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 89 of 399 submissions, 22%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)236
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Tactful Feminist Sensing: Designing for Touching Vaginal FluidsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3595966(2642-2656)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
    • (2021)Ritual DronesCompanion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3434074.3446363(562-564)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2021

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media