Was This Helpful?: Analysis of Satisfaction Evaluation Instruments in Public Service Applications
Authors: 
Patrick de Araújo, Rute Pereira, Georgia Pereira, 
Ingrid Monteiro, Davi RomeroAuthors Info & Claims
Article No.: 53, Pages 1 - 7
Abstract
With the expansion of digital public services, the need for understanding the quality of these services and the level of satisfaction of the citizens served grows. To this end, web and mobile applications have used various instruments that aim to measure, during or right after the use, how satisfactory the experience of these users has been. Through exploratory research, to understand how these evaluations have been carried out and the variety of tools used, a data gathering was carried out in 25 web portals and 9 mobile applications of Brazilian state governments. Elements of standardization and adequacy of the instruments were observed in relation to the evaluated services. As partial results of the ongoing study, it was noticed, from qualitative and comparative analysis, an inconsistency in the occurrence of these instruments, including in the same portal or application, a lack of clarity as to what is sought to be evaluated with the included tools, which reveals a poorly defined methodology.
References
[1]
BRASIL. 2016. Decreto no 8.935, de 19 de dezembro de 2016.
[2]
Bianor Scelza Cavalcanti and Roberto Bevilacqua Otero. 1997. Novos Padrões Gerenciais no Setor Público: medidas do governo americano. Enap.
[3]
J Joseph Cronin Jr and Steven A Taylor. 1992. Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. Journal of marketing 56, 3: 55--68.
[4]
Geoff Dinsdale, Brian Marson, Faye Schmidt, and Teresa Strickland. 2000. Metodologia para medir a satisfação do usuário no Canadá: desfazendo mitos e redesenhando roteiros.
[5]
Sigfried Vasques Dominguez. 2000. O valor percebido como elemento estratégico para obter a lealdade dos clientes. Caderno de pesquisas em administração 7, 4: 53--64.
[6]
Monique Esperidião and Leny Alves Bomfim Trad. 2005. Avaliação de satisfação de usuários. Ciência \& Saúde Coletiva 10: 303--312.
[7]
João Paulo Alves Ferreira. 2018. Avaliação de qualidade de serviços governamentais digitizados.
[8]
Antonio Carlos Gil and others. 2002. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. Atlas São Paulo.
[9]
Governo Digital. 2020. Plataforma de Avaliação de Serviços. Retrieved June 10, 2021 from https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/transformacao-digital/ferramentas/plataforma-de-avaliacao-de-servicos
[10]
David Martin Johnston. 1995. Mensuração da qualidade de serviços através da escala SERVQUAL: sua operacionalização no setor de serviços bancários business-to-business.
[11]
Severino Domingos da Silva Júnior and Francisco José Costa. 2014. Mensuração e escalas de verificação: uma análise comparativa das escalas de Likert e Phrase Completion. PMKT--Revista Brasileira de Pesquisas de Marketing, Opinião e Mídia 15, 1--16: 61.
[12]
A Parasuraman, Valarie A Zeithaml, and L Berry. 1988. SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. 1988 64, 1: 12--40.
[13]
Government Digital Service. 2021. Get a GOV.UK feedback page. GOV.UK. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/service-assessments/get-feedback-page
[14]
Wander Cleber Pereira da Silva, Marília Miranda Forte Gomes, Glauco Vitor Pedrosa, Vanessa de Andrade Soares, Gabriela Iwama, Vítor Gomes Menezes, Daniele de Paiva Vaz, Débora Janini Campos Guedes, and Rejane Maria da Costa Figueiredo. 2019. Avaliação da qualidade em serviços públicos: relatório técnico.
[15]
Wander Cleber Pereira da Silva, Glauco Vitor Pedrosa, and Marília Miranda Forte Gomes. 2020. Proposta de modelo de avaliação da satisfação de usuários de serviços públicos.
[16]
Marianne Nassuno, M. 2000. A administração com foco no usuário-cidadão: realizações no governo federal brasileiro nos últimos 5 anos. Revista do Serviço Público, 51(4), 61--98.
[17]
Mariana Morgado Magalhães. 2021. UX research para as Smart Cities-como o meio digital influencia a experiência do cidadão (Doctoral dissertation).
[18]
Maria Laura Gontijo Tolentino and Simone Cristina Dufloth. 2019. Avaliação de satisfação dos usuários dos serviços públicos: análise aplicada aos mecanismos de avaliação dos serviços prestados nas unidades de atendimento integrado do estado de Minas Gerais. Ciências Gerenciais em Foco 10, 7: 17--42.
[19]
Barbara Ubaldi, Felipe González-Zapata, and Mariane Piccinin Barbieri. 2020. Digital Government Index: 2019 results.
[20]
Pieter Verdegem and Gino Verleye. 2009. User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government information quarterly 26, 3: 487--497.
[21]
Meng Seng Wong and Stephen Jackson. 2017. User satisfaction evaluation of Malaysian e-government education services. In 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 531--537.
[22]
2021. Measuring user satisfaction. GOV.UK. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/measuring-success/measuring-user-satisfaction
Index Terms
- Was This Helpful?: Analysis of Satisfaction Evaluation Instruments in Public Service Applications
Recommendations
Evaluating the Impact of Trust in Government on Satisfaction with Public Services
Electronic GovernmentAbstractUser satisfaction with public services has been monitored by several countries. Although many studies relate satisfaction with perceived quality, indirect aspects may also influence satisfaction. In this paper, we investigate the impact of trust ...
A case study with high education student about e-gov in Portugal
EATIS '07: Proceedings of the 2007 Euro American conference on Telematics and information systemsIn Portugal, e-Gov is considered to be a key feature in the process of continuously developing an Information Society becoming itself a vital process in the context of modernizing public administration. Its higher priority it's to improve the quality of ...
e-governance diffusion in Nigeria: the case for citizens' demand
ICEGOV '09: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governanceSince the formal adoption of electronic governance in 2004, efforts have been made to diffuse e-government strategies and practices within the public sector notably through the passage of the National Information Technology Policy, institutional ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2021
523 pages
ISBN:9781450386173
DOI:10.1145/3472301
- General Chairs:
- Ingrid Teixeira Monteiro,
- Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues,
- Ticianne de Gois Ribeiro Darin,
- Program Chairs:
- André Pimenta Freire,
- Marcelle Pereira Mota
Copyright © 2021 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
In-Cooperation
- SBC: Brazilian Computer Society
- SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 18 October 2021
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
IHC '21
IHC '21: XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
October 18 - 22, 2021
Virtual Event, Brazil
Acceptance Rates
IHC '21 Paper Acceptance Rate 29 of 77 submissions, 38%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 331 of 973 submissions, 34%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 47Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)9
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 19 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in