Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3450267.3450541acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccpsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

CAN coach: vehicular control through human cyber-physical systems

Published: 19 May 2021 Publication History

Abstract

This work addresses whether a human-in-the-loop cyber-physical system (HCPS) can be effective in improving the longitudinal control of an individual vehicle in a traffic flow. We introduce the CAN Coach, which is a system that gives feedback to the human-in-the-loop using radar data (relative speed and position information to objects ahead) that is available on the controller area network (CAN). Using a cohort of six human subjects driving an instrumented vehicle, we compare the ability of the human-in-the-loop driver to achieve a constant time-gap control policy using only human-based visual perception to the car ahead, and by augmenting human perception with audible feedback from CAN sensor data. The addition of CAN-based feedback reduces the mean time-gap error by an average of 73%, and also improves the consistency of the human by reducing the standard deviation of the time-gap error by 53%. We remove human perception from the loop using a ghost mode in which the human-in-the-loop is coached to track a virtual vehicle on the road, rather than a physical one. The loss of visual perception of the vehicle ahead degrades the performance for most drivers, but by varying amounts. We show that human subjects can match the velocity of the lead vehicle ahead with and without CAN-based feedback, but velocity matching does not offer regulation of vehicle spacing. The viability of dynamic time-gap control is also demonstrated. We conclude that (1) it is possible to coach drivers to improve performance on driving tasks using CAN data, and (2) it is a true HCPS, since removing human perception from the control loop reduces performance at the given control objective.

References

[1]
Genya Abe and John Richardson. 2006. Alarm timing, trust and driver expectation for forward collision warning systems. Applied ergonomics 37, 5 (2006), 577--586.
[2]
P. Bazilinskyy, J. Stapel, C. de Koning, H. Lingmont, TS de Lint, TC van der Sijs, FC van den Ouden, F. Anema, and JCF de Winter. 2018. Graded auditory feedback based on headway: An on-road pilot study, In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter 2017 Annual Conference. Varieties of interaction: from User Experience to Neuroergonomics 2018, 115--126.
[3]
P Breton, A Hegyi, B De Schutter, and H Hellendoorn. 2002. Shock wave elimination/reduction by optimal coordination of variable speed limits. In Proceedings. The IEEE 5th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE, IEEE, Singapore, 225--230.
[4]
J. Carmona, F. García, D. Martín, A. de la Escalera, and J. M. Armingol. 2015. Data fusion for driver behaviour analysis. Sensors 15, 10 (2015), 25968--25991.
[5]
M. L. Delle Monache, J. Sprinkle, R. Vasudevan, and D. Work. 2019. Autonomous vehicles: From vehicular control to traffic control. In 2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE, IEEE, Nice, France, 4680--4696.
[6]
Stephen H Fairclough, Andrew J May, and C Carter. 1997. The effect of time headway feedback on following behaviour. Accident Analysis & Prevention 29, 3 (1997), 387--397.
[7]
M. Forster, R. Frank, M. Gerla, and T. Engel. 2014. A Cooperative Advanced Driver Assistance System to mitigate vehicular traffic shock waves. In IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, Toronto, Canada, 1968--1976.
[8]
Umberto Fugiglando, Emanuele Massaro, Paolo Santi, Sebastiano Milardo, Kacem Abida, Rainer Stahlmann, Florian Netter, and Carlo Ratti. 2018. Driving behavior analysis through CAN bus data in an uncontrolled environment. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 20, 2 (2018), 737--748.
[9]
A Hamish Jamson, Frank CH Lai, and Oliver MJ Carsten. 2008. Potential benefits of an adaptive forward collision warning system. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies 16, 4 (2008), 471--484.
[10]
Li Li, Ding Wen, Nan-Ning Zheng, and Lin-Cheng Shen. 2011. Cognitive cars: A new frontier for ADAS research. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 13, 1 (2011), 395--407.
[11]
Amara Loulizi, Youssef Bichiou, and Hesham Rakha. 2019. Steady-state car-following time gaps: an empirical study using naturalistic driving data. Journal of advanced transportation 2019 (2019), 8.
[12]
Vicente Milanés, Steven E Shladover, John Spring, Christopher Nowakowski, Hiroshi Kawazoe, and Masahide Nakamura. 2013. Co-operative adaptive cruise control in real traffic situations. IEEE Transactions on intelligent transportation systems 15, 1 (2013), 296--305.
[13]
Gerrit JL Naus, Rene PA Vugts, JeroenPloeg, Marinus JG van De Molengraft, and Maarten Steinbuch. 2010. String-stable CACC design and experimental validation: A frequency-domain approach. IEEE Transactions on vehicular technology 59, 9 (2010), 4268--4279.
[14]
M. Quigley, K. Conley, B. Gerkey, J. Faust, T. Foote, Jeremy Leibs, R. Wheeler, and A. Ng. 2009. ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System. In ICRA workshop on open source software. ICRA, Kobe, Japan, 5.
[15]
M. Risto and M. Martens. 2014. Supporting driver headway choice: The effects of discrete headway feedback when following headway instructions. Applied ergonomics 45, 4 (2014), 1167--1173.
[16]
E. Santana and G. Hotz. 2016. Learning a Driving Simulator. arXiv:1608.01230 [cs.LG]
[17]
JJ Scott and R. Gray. 2008. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving. Human factors 50, 2 (2008), 264--275.
[18]
B. Seppelt and J. Lee. 2007. Making adaptive cruise control (ACC) limits visible. International journal of human-computer studies 65, 3 (2007), 192--205.
[19]
R. Stern, S. Cui, M. L. Delle Monache, R. Bhadani, M. Bunting, M. Churchill, N. Hamilton, et al. 2017. Dissipation of stop-and-go waves via control of autonomous vehicles: Field experiments. Transportation Research Part C 89, April 2018 (2017), 205--221.
[20]
M. Sullman, L. Dorn, and P. Niemi. 2015. Eco-driving training of professional bus drivers-Does it work? Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 58 (2015), 749--759.
[21]
The University of Arizona 2020. Libpanda: A software library and utilities for interfacing with vehicle hardware systems. The University of Arizona.
[22]
E. Vinitsky, K. Parvate, A. Kreidieh, C. Wu, and A. Bayen. 2018. Lagrangian Control through Deep-RL: Applications to Bottleneck Decongestion. In 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, Maui, Hawaii, USA, 759--765.
[23]
T. Wakita, K. Ozawa, C. Miyajima, K. Igarashi, K. Itou, K. Takeda, and F. Itakura. 2006. Driver identification using driving behavior signals. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems 89, 3 (2006), 1188--1194.
[24]
Y. Wang, G. Gunter, M. Nice, M. L. Delle Monache, and D. Work. 2020. Online parameter estimation methods for adaptive cruise control systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 2020 (2020), 1--1.
[25]
Z. Wang, Y. Hsu, A. Vu, F. Caballero, P. Hao, G. Wu, K. Boriboonsomsin, M. J. Barth, A. Kailas, P. Amar, E. Garmon, and S. Tanugula. 2019. Early Findings from Field Trials of Heavy-Duty Truck Connected Eco-Driving System. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC). IEEE, Auckland, New Zealand, 3037--3042.
[26]
H.-P. Wu, W.-H. Shen, Y.-L. Wei, H.-M. Tsai, and Q. Xie. 2016. Traffic Shockwave Mitigation with Human-Driven Vehicles: Is It Feasible?. In Proceedings of the First ACM International Workshop on Smart, Autonomous, and Connected Vehicular Systems and Services (New York City, New York) (CarSys '16). ACM, New York City, New York, 38--43.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Fuzzing CAN vs. ROS: An Analysis of Single-Component vs. Dual-Component Fuzzing of Automotive SystemsSAE Technical Paper Series10.4271/2024-01-2795Online publication date: 16-Apr-2024
  • (2024)From Sim to Real: A Pipeline for Training and Deploying Traffic Smoothing Cruise ControllersIEEE Transactions on Robotics10.1109/TRO.2024.346340740(4490-4505)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Integrated Analysis of Coarse-Grained Guidance for Traffic Flow StabilityIEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems10.1109/TCNS.2023.333823411:3(1382-1394)Online publication date: Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICCPS '21: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 12th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems
May 2021
242 pages
ISBN:9781450383530
DOI:10.1145/3450267
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • IEEE-CS\TCRT: TC on Real-Time Systems

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 May 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. controller area network
  2. cyber-physical systems
  3. human-in-the-loop
  4. vehicles

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

ICCPS '21
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 25 of 91 submissions, 27%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)76
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Fuzzing CAN vs. ROS: An Analysis of Single-Component vs. Dual-Component Fuzzing of Automotive SystemsSAE Technical Paper Series10.4271/2024-01-2795Online publication date: 16-Apr-2024
  • (2024)From Sim to Real: A Pipeline for Training and Deploying Traffic Smoothing Cruise ControllersIEEE Transactions on Robotics10.1109/TRO.2024.346340740(4490-4505)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Integrated Analysis of Coarse-Grained Guidance for Traffic Flow StabilityIEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems10.1109/TCNS.2023.333823411:3(1382-1394)Online publication date: Sep-2024
  • (2024)A Middle Way to Traffic Enlightenment2024 ACM/IEEE 15th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS)10.1109/ICCPS61052.2024.00020(147-156)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)A multisensory Interaction Framework for Human-Cyber–Physical System based on Graph Convolutional NetworksAdvanced Engineering Informatics10.1016/j.aei.2024.10248261(102482)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2022)CANClassify: Automated Decoding and Labeling of CAN Bus SignalsJournal of Engineering Research and Sciences10.55708/js01100021:10(5-12)Online publication date: Oct-2022
  • (2022)$\mathtt {Radar}$: Adversarial Driving Style Representation Learning With Data AugmentationIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2022.320826522:12(7070-7085)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2022
  • (undefined)Cooperative Advisory Residual Policies for Congestion MitigationACM Journal on Autonomous Transportation Systems10.1145/3699519

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media