Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3336294.3336321acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Applying Product Line Engineering Concepts to Deep Neural Networks

Published: 09 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are increasingly being used as a machine learning solution thanks to the complexity of their architecture and hyperparameters-weights. A drawback is the excessive demand for massive computational power during the training process. Not only as a whole but parts of neural networks can also be in charge of certain functionalities. We present a novel challenge in an intersection between machine learning and variability management communities to reuse modules of DNNs without further training. Let us assume that we are given a DNN for image processing that recognizes cats and dogs. By extracting a part of the network, without additional training a new DNN should be divisible with the functionality of recognizing only cats. Existing research in variability management can offer a foundation for a product line of DNNs composing the reusable functionalities. An ideal solution can be evaluated based on its speed, granularity of determined functionalities, and the support for adding variability to the network. The challenge is decomposed in three subchallenges: feature extraction, feature abstraction, and the implementation of a product line of DNNs.

References

[1]
Sven Apel, Don Batory, Christian Kästner, and Gunter Saake. 2016. Feature-oriented software product lines. Springer.
[2]
François Chollet. 2017. Keras Documentation. 2016.
[3]
François Chollet. 2017. Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. arXiv preprint (2017), 1610--02357.
[4]
Krzysztof Czarnecki, Paul Grünbacher, Rick Rabiser, Klaus Schmid, and Andrzej Wąsowski. 2012. Cool features and tough decisions: a comparison of variability modeling approaches. In Proceedings of the sixth international workshop on variability modeling of software-intensive systems. ACM, 173--182.
[5]
Jeff Dean. 2017. AIFrontiers:Trends and Developments in Deep Learning Research. https://www.slideshare.net/AIFrontiers/jeff-dean-trends-and-developments-in-deep-learning-research
[6]
Kai Olav Ellefsen, Jean-Baptiste Mouret, and Jeff Clune. 2015. Neural modularity helps organisms evolve to learn new skills without forgetting old skills. PLoS computational biology 11, 4 (2015), e1004128.
[7]
Frédéric Gruau. 1994. Automatic definition of modular neural networks. Adaptive behavior 3, 2 (1994), 151--183.
[8]
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770--778.
[9]
Andrew G Howard, Menglong Zhu, Bo Chen, Dmitry Kalenichenko, Weijun Wang, Tobias Weyand, Marco Andreetto, and Hartwig Adam. 2017. Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861 (2017).
[10]
Kyo C Kang, Sholom G Cohen, James A Hess, William E Novak, and A Spencer Peterson. 1990. Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Technical Report. Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh Pa Software Engineering Inst.
[11]
Kyo C Kang, Jaejoon Lee, and Patrick Donohoe. 2002. Feature-oriented product line engineering. IEEE software 19, 4 (2002), 58--65.
[12]
ChristianKastner, Thomas Thum, GunterSaake, JanetFeigenspan, Thomas Leich, Fabian Wielgorz, and Sven Apel. 2009. FeatureIDE: A tool framework for feature-oriented software development. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, 611--614.
[13]
Jacob Krüger, Wolfram Fenske, Thomas Thüm, Dirk Aporius, Gunter Saake, and Thomas Leich. 2018. Apo-games: a case study for reverse engineering variability from cloned Java variants. In Proceeedings of the 22nd International Conference on Systems and Software Product Line-Volume 1. ACM, 251--256.
[14]
Michael McCloskey and Neal J Cohen. 1989. Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem. In Psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 24. Elsevier, 109--165.
[15]
Sinno Jialin Pan, Qiang Yang, et al. 2010. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering 22, 10 (2010), 1345--1359.
[16]
Klaus Pohl, Günter Böckle, and Frank J van Der Linden. 2005. Software product line engineering: foundations, principles and techniques. Springer Science & Business Media.
[17]
Roger Ratcliff. 1990. Connectionist models of recognition memory: constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological review 97, 2 (1990), 285.
[18]
Jürgen Schmidhuber. 2015. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural networks 61 (2015), 85--117.
[19]
David Sculley, Gary Holt, Daniel Golovin, Eugene Davydov, Todd Phillips, Dietmar Ebner, Vinay Chaudhary, Michael Young, Jean-Francois Crespo, and Dan Dennison. 2015. Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 2503--2511.
[20]
Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014).
[21]
Christian Szegedy, Vincent Vanhoucke, Sergey Ioffe, Jon Shlens, and Zbigniew Wojna. 2016. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2818--2826.
[22]
Lisa Torrey and Jude Shavlik. 2010. Transfer learning. In Handbook of Research on Machine Learning Applications and Trends: Algorithms, Methods, and Techniques. IGI Global, 242--264.
[23]
David M Weiss and Chi Tau Robert Lai. 1999. Software product-line engineering: a family-based software development process. Vol. 12. Addison-Wesley Reading.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring the Use of Software Product Lines for the Combination of Machine Learning ModelsProceedings of the 28th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference10.1145/3646548.3676599(26-29)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
  • (2024)VaryMinions: leveraging RNNs to identify variants in variability-intensive systems’ logsEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-024-10473-529:4Online publication date: 15-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Software Product Lines for Development of Evolutionary RobotsProceedings of the 27th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B10.1145/3579028.3609018(77-84)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SPLC '19: Proceedings of the 23rd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A
September 2019
356 pages
ISBN:9781450371384
DOI:10.1145/3336294
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 September 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. deep neural networks
  2. machine learning
  3. software product lines
  4. transfer learning
  5. variability

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Conference

SPLC 2019

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 167 of 463 submissions, 36%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring the Use of Software Product Lines for the Combination of Machine Learning ModelsProceedings of the 28th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference10.1145/3646548.3676599(26-29)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
  • (2024)VaryMinions: leveraging RNNs to identify variants in variability-intensive systems’ logsEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-024-10473-529:4Online publication date: 15-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Software Product Lines for Development of Evolutionary RobotsProceedings of the 27th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B10.1145/3579028.3609018(77-84)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
  • (2022)Asset Management in Machine Learning: State-of-research and State-of-practiceACM Computing Surveys10.1145/354384755:7(1-35)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2022
  • (2020)Automated Requirements Extraction and Product Configuration Verification for Software Product LineAutomated Software Testing10.1007/978-981-15-2455-4_2(27-51)Online publication date: 4-Feb-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media