Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3304221.3319758acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Making Computer Science Education Mandatory: Exploring a Demographic Shift in Switzerland.

Published: 02 July 2019 Publication History

Abstract

A promising approach to make K-12 Computer Science education more systemic could arise from a strategy focusing mostly on pre-service teachers educated through mandatory courses instead of self-selected in-service teachers. When employing mandatory courses, schools of education can reach all future teachers, but what are potential consequences resulting from this demographic shift? Pre-service teachers may not expect to acquire programming skills and may not be convinced of the relevance of Computer Science. In 2017, one of the first mandatory Computer Science education courses for pre-service K-12 teachers was introduced at the School of Education of northwestern Switzerland (PH FHNW). The mandatory nature of the course was possible because of the introduction of Computer Science as a subject in a new national curriculum. The course, based on Scalable Game Design, was taken by over 600, mostly female (75%), pre-service elementary school teachers. This paper explores the characteristics of this new audience and investigates the consequences of mandatory pre-service teacher Computer Science education. While our research shows that the course was successful, with regards to improving the students' skills, it reveals significant gender effects concerning attitudes towards Computer Science and self-efficacy.

References

[1]
Repenning, A., Scale or Fail: Moving beyond self-selected computer science education in Switzerland. Communications of the ACM, 2018. 61(5): p. 40--42.
[2]
Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of innovations (1st ed.). 1962, New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
[3]
Alexander, R., Scalable Game Design: Broadening Participation by Integrating Game Design and Science Simulation Building into Middle School Curricula, in Future Directions in Computing Education, Summit Meeting. 2014: Orlado, Florida.
[4]
Repenning, A., Transforming "Hard and Boring" into "Accessible and Exciting", in NordiCHI 2016, Workshop on Cultures of Participation in the Digital Age: From "Have to" to "Want to" Participate. 2016: Gothenburg, Sweden.
[5]
Papert, S., An exploration in the space of mathematics educations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1996. 1(1): p. 95--123.
[6]
Repenning, A., Moving Beyond Syntax: Lessons from 20 Years of Blocks Programing in AgentSheets. Journal of Visual Languages and Sentient Systems, 2017. 3(July): p. 68--89.
[7]
Basawapatna, A., et al., The Zones of Proximal Flow: Guiding Students Through A Space Of Computational Thinking Skills and Challenges, in International Computing Education Research (ICER 2013). 2013, ACM Press.: San Diego, CA, USA.
[8]
Bradshaw, P. and J. Woollard, Computing at school: an emergent community of practice for a re-emergent subject. 2012.
[9]
Lamprou, A., A. Repenning, and N.A. Escherle, The Solothurn Project - Bringing Computer Science Education to Primary Schools in Switzerland, in 22nd Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2017). 2017: Bologna, Italy. p. 218--223.
[10]
Association, C.T. 2005 {cited 2018 May 20 2018}; Available from: https://www.csteachers.org/.
[11]
Huett, K.C. and M.A. Varga. Building Pre-Service Teacher Interest in Computer Science Education through Mentoring Experiences. in Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. 2016. ACM.
[12]
Yadav, A., et al., Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 2014. 14(1): p. 5.
[13]
Döbeli Honegger, B. and M. Hielscher, Vom Lehrplan zur LehrerInnenbildung-Erste Erfahrungen mit obligatorischer Informatikdidaktik für angehende Schweizer PrimarlehrerInnen. Informatische Bildung zum Verstehen und Gestalten der digitalen Welt, 2017.
[14]
Lamprou, A. and A. Repenning. Teaching How to Teach Computational Thinking. in ITiCSE 2018. Larnaca, Cyprus: ACM.
[15]
Darling-Hammond, L. and J. Bransford, Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. 2007: John Wiley & Sons.
[16]
Yadav, A., C. Stephenson, and H. Hong, Computational thinking for teacher education. Commun. ACM, 2017. 60(4): p. 55--62.
[17]
Teo, T., Pre-service teachers' attitudes towards computer use: A Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2008. 24(4).
[18]
Beyer, S. and S. Haller, Gender differences and intragender differences in computer science students: Are female CS majors more similar to male CS majors or female nonmajors? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 2006. 12(4).
[19]
He, J. and L. Freeman, Are men more technology-oriented than women? The role of gender on the development of general computer self-efficacy of college students. AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, 2009: p. 672.
[20]
Katz, S., et al., Gender and race in predicting achievement in computer science. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 2003. 22(3): p. 20--27.
[21]
Schmidt, F.L., A theory of sex differences in technical aptitude and some supporting evidence. Perspectives on psychological science, 2011. 6(6): p. 560--573.
[22]
Margolis, J. and A. Fisher, Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. 2003: MIT press.
[23]
Beyer, S., Women and science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). 2015: Oxford University Press.
[24]
Beyer, S., Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education, 2014. 24(2--3): p. 153--192.
[25]
Beyer, S., The accuracy of academic gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 1999. 40(9--10): p. 787--813.
[26]
Beyer, S., Predictors of Female and Male Computer Science Students' Grades. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 2008. 14(4).
[27]
Beyer, S., Gender Differences and Intra-Gender Differences amongst Management Information Systems Students. Journal of Information Systems Education, 2008. 19(3).
[28]
Durndell, A. and Z. Haag, Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computers in human behavior, 2002. 18(5): p. 521--535.
[29]
Syzmanowicz, A. and A. Furnham, Gender differences in self-estimates of general, mathematical, spatial and verbal intelligence: Four meta analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 2011. 21(5): p. 493--504.
[30]
Watt, H.M., The role of motivation in gendered educational and occupational trajectories related to maths. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2006. 12(4): p. 305--322.
[31]
Ziegler, A., M. Dresel, and B. Schober, Prädiktoren des Selbstvertrauens von Mädchen und Jungen vor dem erstmaligen Chemieunterricht am Gymnasium. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 2000.
[32]
Harrington, B., et al. Gender, confidence, and mark prediction in CS examinations. in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2018. ACM.
[33]
Wing, J.M., Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 2006. 49(3): p. 33--35.
[34]
Repenning, A., et al., Scalable Game Design: A Strategy to Bring Systemic Computer Science Education to Schools through Game Design and Simulation Creation. Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 2015. 15(2): p. 1--31.
[35]
Papert, S., Instructionism versus Constructionism, in The Children's Machine. 1993, BasicBooks. p. 137--156.
[36]
Women Who Choose Computer Science -- What Really Matters, The Critical Role of Encouragement and Exposure. 2014, Google: Google Report. p. 9.
[37]
Repenning, A., et al., AgentCubes: Enabling 3D Creativity by Addressing Cognitive and Affective Programming Challenges, in World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, EdMedia 2012. 2012: Denver, Colorado, USA. p. 2762--2771.
[38]
CollegeBoard. AP Computer Science Principles. 2017 {cited 2017 01.11.2017}; Available from: https://apstudent.collegeboard.org/apcourse/ap-computer-science-principles/course-details.
[39]
Bandura, A., Self-efficacy: Encyclopedia of Human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71--81). 1994, New York: Academic Press.
[40]
Bandura, A., Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 2006. 5(1): p. 307--337.
[41]
Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd. 1988, Hillsdale, NJ: erlbaum.
[42]
Berkeley, BJC. "The BJC Curriculum." accessed May 20 2018. https://bjc.berkeley.edu/curriculum/
[43]
SGD. "Scalable Game Design Summer Institutes." accessed May 23 2018. https://sgd.cs.colorado.edu/wiki/Summer_Institutes.
[44]
Duncan, C. and T. Bell, A Pilot Computer Science and Programming Course for Primary School Students, in Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education. 2015, ACM: London, United Kingdom. p. 39--48.
[45]
Repenning, A., A. Basawapatna, and N. Escherle, Computational Thinking Tools, in IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing. 2016, IEEE Press: Cambridge, UK.
[46]
Benjamini, Y. and Y. Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the royal statistical society. Series B (Methodological), 1995: p. 289--300.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)FalconCode: A Multiyear Dataset of Python Code Samples from an Introductory Computer Science CourseProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569822(938-944)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Engineering Student Perspectives of a New Required Programming Course2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343028(1-9)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Modelling the sustainability of a primary school digital education curricular reform and professional development programEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-11653-429:3(2857-2904)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ITiCSE '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
July 2019
583 pages
ISBN:9781450368957
DOI:10.1145/3304221
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 July 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. computer science education
  2. gender issues in computer science education
  3. k-12
  4. mandatory computer science education
  5. pre-service teacher education
  6. self -efficacy

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ITiCSE '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)45
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)FalconCode: A Multiyear Dataset of Python Code Samples from an Introductory Computer Science CourseProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569822(938-944)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Engineering Student Perspectives of a New Required Programming Course2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343028(1-9)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Modelling the sustainability of a primary school digital education curricular reform and professional development programEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-11653-429:3(2857-2904)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2023
  • (2022)Design and Analysis of a Disciplinary Computer Science Course for Pre-service Primary TeachersInformatics in Schools. A Step Beyond Digital Education10.1007/978-3-031-15851-3_11(125-137)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2022
  • (2021)Programming for Children and Teenagers in BrazilProceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3408877.3432554(411-417)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2021
  • (2021)Measuring in-service teacher self-efficacy for teaching computational thinking: development and validation of the T-STEM CTEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-021-10487-2Online publication date: 18-Mar-2021
  • (2020)This History and Evolution of Virtual RealityCurrent and Prospective Applications of Virtual Reality in Higher Education10.4018/978-1-7998-4960-5.ch001(1-20)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2020
  • (2020)Die ersten 1000: Computational Thinking als obligatorische Ausbildung für Primarschullehrpersonen in der Schweiz1000 Teachers trained: Computational Thinking as mandatory Education of Preservice Elementary School Teachers in SwitzerlandMedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung10.21240/mpaed/jb17/2020.05.23.X(595-616)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2020
  • (2020)Policy implications on ICT integration in namibian basic education ecosystemProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications10.1145/3415088.3415102(1-7)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2020
  • (2020)Attitudinal Trajectories in an Online CS1 Class: Demographic and Performance TrendsProceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3341525.3387429(335-341)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media