research-article

"It's your private information. it's your life.": young people's views of personal data use by online technologies

Authors:

Liz Dowthwaite,

Helen Creswick,

Virginia Portillo,

Elvira Perez Vallejos,

Marina JirotkaAuthors Info & Claims

IDC '20: Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference

Pages 121 - 134

https://doi.org/10.1145/3392063.3394410

Published: 21 June 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Children and young people make extensive and varied use of digital and online technologies, yet issues about how their personal data may be collected and used by online platforms are rarely discussed. Additionally, despite calls to increase awareness, schools often do not cover these topics, instead focusing on online safety issues, such as being approached by strangers, cyberbullying or access to inappropriate content. This paper presents the results of one of the activities run as part of eleven workshops with 13-18 year olds, using co-designed activities to encourage critical thinking. Sets of 'data cards' were used to stimulate discussion about sharing and selling of personal data by online technology companies. Results highlight the desire and need for increased awareness about the potential uses of personal data amongst this age group, and the paper makes recommendations for embedding this into school curriculums as well as incorporating it into interaction design, to allow young people to make informed decisions about their online lives.

References

[1]

Alessandro Acquisti, Laura Brandimarte, and George Loewenstein. 2015. Privacy and Human Behavior in the Age of Information. Science 347, 6221 (January 2015), 509--514.

[2]

Rebecca Balebako, Jaeyeon Jung, Wei Lu, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Carolyn Nguyen. 2013. "Little Brothers Watching You": Raising Awareness of Data Leaks on Smartphones. In SOUPS'13 Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, ACM Press, Newcastle, United Kingdom, Article No. 12.

Digital Library

[3]

Aral Balkan. 2014. Free is a Lie. RSA House, London. Retrieved September 7, 2018 from https://www.thersa.org/discover/videos/event-videos/2014/04/free-is-a-lie

[4]

David Barnard-Wills and Debi Ashenden. 2015. Playing with Privacy: Games for Education and Communication in the Politics of Online Privacy. Political Studies 63, 1 (March 2015), 142--160.

[5]

Tilde Bekker and Alissa N Antle. 2011. Developmentally Situated Design (DSD): Making Theoretical Knowledge Accessible to Designers of Children's Technology. In CHI '11 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2531--2540.

Digital Library

[6]

Igor Bilogrevic and Martin Ortlieb. 2016. "If You Put All the Pieces Together...": Attitudes Towards Data Combination and Sharing Across Services and Companies. In CHI '16 Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, San Jose, California, USA, 5215--5227.

Digital Library

[7]

Reuben Binns, Jun Zhao, Max Van Kleek, Nigel Shadbolt, Ilaria Liccardi, and Daniel Weitzner. 2017. My Bank Already Gets this Data: Exposure Minimisation and Company Relationships in Privacy Decision-Making. In CHI EA '17 Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2403--2409.

Digital Library

[8]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (January 2006), 77--101.

[9]

Juan Pablo Carrascal, Christopher Riederer, Vijay Erramilli, Mauro Cherubini, and Rodrigo de Oliveira. 2013. Your Browsing Behavior for a Big Mac: Economics of Personal Information Online. In WWW '13 Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web Pages 189--200, ACM, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 189--200. Retrieved September 3, 2018 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.6098

Digital Library

[10]

Brendan Cassidy, Dipti Saurabh Antani, and Janet C C. Read. 2013. Using an open card sort with children to categorize games in a mobile phone application store. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13, ACM Press, Paris, France, 2287.

Digital Library

[11]

Children's Commissioner for England. 2017. Life in "Likes": Children's Commissioner Report into Social Media Use Among 8-12 Year Olds.

[12]

Children's Commissioner for England. 2017. Growing Up Digital: A Report of the Growing Up Digital Taskforce.

[13]

Stephen Coleman, Kruakae Pothong, Elvira Perez Vallejos, and Ansgar Koene. 2017. The Internet on Our Own Terms: How Children and Young People Deliberated About Their Digital Rights.

[14]

Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés. 2019. Shaping Choices in the Digital World. From dark patterns to data protection: the influence of ux/ui design on user empowerment. Retrieved January 23, 2020 from https://linc.cnil.fr/sites/default/files/atoms/files/cnil_ip_report_06_shaping_choices_in_the_digital_world.pdf

[15]

Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and The Rt Hon Matt Hancock MP. 2017. Children to be Given Extra Protection Online. Gov.uk. Retrieved September 13, 2018 from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/children-to-be-given-extra-protection-online

[16]

Liz Dowthwaite, Helen Creswick, Virginia Portillo, Monica Cano, Elvira Perez Vallejos, Ansgar Koene, and Menisha Patel. 2018. Work-in-Progress: UnBias Youth Juries. In #SMSociety18 Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media & Society, ACM, Copenhagen, Denmark, 276--280.

Digital Library

[17]

Allison Druin. 2002. The Role of Children in the Design of New Technology. Behaviour & Information Technology 21, 1 (2002), 1--25.

[18]

Casey Fiesler and Blake Hallinan. 2018. "We Are the Product": Public Reactions to Online Data Sharing and Privacy Controversies in the Media. In CHI '18 Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Montreal QC, Canada, Paper No. 53.

Digital Library

[19]

Batya Friedman and David Hendry. 2012. The Envisioning Cards: a Toolkit for Catalyzing Humanistic and Technical Imaginations. In CHI '12 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, ACM, Austin, Texas, USA, 1145--1148.

Digital Library

[20]

Jenna K. Gillett-Swan and Jonathon Sargeant. 2018. Voice Inclusive Practice, Digital Literacy and Children's Participatory Rights. Children & Society 32, 1 (2018), 38--49.

[21]

Michael Golembewski and Mark Selby. 2010. Ideation Decks: a Card-Based Design Ideation Tool. In DIS '10 Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM, Aarhus, Denmark, 89--92.

Digital Library

[22]

José González Cabañas, Ángel Cuevas, and Rubén Cuevas. 2017. FDVT: Data Valuation Tool for Facebook Users. In CHI '17 Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Denver, Colorado, USA, 3799--3809.

Digital Library

[23]

Horizon Digital Economy Research Institute, UnBias, and CaSMa. 2018. Response to Information Commissioner's Office "Age Appropriate Design Code" consultation.

[24]

House of Lords Select Committee on Communications. 2017. Growing up with the internet. 2nd Report of Seesion 2016-2017. Retrieved January 23, 2020 from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201617/ldselect/ldcomuni/130/13002.htm

[25]

Jeremy Hunt. 2011. Letter to Sonia Livingstone. Retrieved September 19, 2018 from https://www.scribd.com/document/54695321/Hunt-Letter-to-Livingstone-Media-Literacy

[26]

Information Commisioner's Office. 2020. Age appropriate design: a code of practice for online services. Retrieved January 23, 2020 from https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/key-data-protection-themes/age-appropriate-design-a-code-of-practice-for-online-services/

[27]

Baroness Kidron, Alexandra Evans, and Jenny Afia. 2018. Disrupted Childhood: The Cost of Persuasive Design. 5Rights Foundation.

[28]

Beeban Kidron and Angharad Rudkin. 2017. Digital Childhood: Addressing childhood development milestones in the digital environment. 5Rights Foundation.

[29]

Ansgar Koene. 2017. Algorithmic Decision-Making: Fairness, Bias and the Role of Ethics Standards. In European Big Data Value Forum. Versailles, France.

[30]

Ansgar Koene. 2017. Response to Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee "Fake News" inquiry.

[31]

Ansgar Koene, Elvira Perez Vallejos, Helena Webb, and Menisha Patel. 2017. Human Agency on Algorithmic Systems. In AoIR2017 Association of Internet Researchers Conference, AoIR, Tartu, Estonia.

[32]

Priya Kumar, Shalmali Milind Naik, Utkarsha Ramesh Devkar, Marshini Chetty, Tamara L. Clegg, and Jessica Vitak. 2017. "No Telling Passcodes Out Because They're Private": Understanding Children's Mental Models of Privacy and Security Online. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (November 2017), Article No. 64.

Digital Library

[33]

Priya Kumar, Jessica Vitak, Marshini Chetty, Tamara L. Clegg, Jonathan Yang, Brenna McNally, and Elizabeth Bonsignore. 2018. Co-designing online privacy-related games and stories with children. In IDC '18 Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, Trondheim, Norway, 67--79.

Digital Library

[34]

Gry Hasselbalch Lapenta and Rikke Frank Jørgensen. 2015. Youth, privacy and online media: Framing the right to privacy in public policy-making. First Monday 20, 3 (March 2015). Retrieved September 4, 2018 from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5568

[35]

Linda Naeun Lee, Richard Chow, and Al M. Rashid. 2017. User Attitudes Towards Browsing Data Collection. In CHI EA '17 Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Denver, Colorado, USA, 1816--1823.

Digital Library

[36]

Pedro Giovanni Leon, Ashwini Rao, Florian Schaub, Abigail Marsh, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Norman Sadeh. 2015. Privacy and Behavioral Advertising: Towards Meeting Users' Preferences. In SOUPS'15 Proceedings of the Eleventth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, ACM, Ottowa, Canada, 1--15.

[37]

Pedro Giovanni Leon, Blase Ur, Yang Wang, Manya Sleeper, Rebecca Balebako, Richard Shay, Lujo Bauer, Mihai Christodorescu, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2013. What matters to users?: factors that affect users' willingness to share information with online advertisers. In SOUPS '13 Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, ACM, Newcastle, United Kingdom, Article No. 7.

Digital Library

[38]

Ilaria Liccardi, Alfie Abdul-Rahman, and Min Chen. 2016. I Know Where You Live: Inferring Details of People's Lives by Visualizing Publicly Shared Location Data. In CHI '16 Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, San Jose, California, USA, 1--12.

Digital Library

[39]

Sonia Livingstone, John Carr, and Jasmina Byrne. 2015. One in Three: Internet Governance and Children's Rights. Global Commission on Internet Governance. Retrieved from https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/no22_2.pdf

[40]

Ewa Luger, Lachlan Urquhart, Tom Rodden, and Michael Golembewski. 2015. Playing the Legal Card: Using Ideation Cards to Raise Data Protection Issues within the Design Process. In CHI '15 Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 457--466.

Digital Library

[41]

Miguel Malheiros, Sören Preibusch, and M. Angela Sasse. 2013. "Fairly Truthful": The Impact of Perceived Effort, Fairness, Relevance, and Sensitivity on Personal Data Disclosure. In Trust and Trustworthy Computing: 6th International Conference, TRUST 2013, London, UK, June 17-19, 2013. Proceedings, Michael Huth, N. Asokan, Srdjan Čapkun, Ivan Flechais and Lizzie Coles-Kemp (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 250--266.

[42]

Helia Marreiros, Richard Gomer, Michael Vlassopoulos, Mirco Tonin, and MC Schraefel. 2015. Scared or naïve? An exploratory study on users perceptions of online privacy disclosures. IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet 13, 2 (2015), 1--16.

[43]

Derek McAuley, Ansgar Koene, Elvira Perez Vallejos, Virginia Portillo, Helen Creswick, Liz Dowthwaite, and Monica Cano. 2018. Response to Commons Science and Technology Committee "Impact of social media and screen-use on young people's health inquiry" inquiry.

[44]

Roisin McNaney, John Vines, Jamie Mercer, Leon Mexter, Daniel Welsh, and Tony Young. 2017. DemYouth: Co-Designing and Enacting Tools to Support Young People's Engagement with People with Dementia. In CHI '17 Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Denver, Colorado, USA, 1313--1325.

Digital Library

[45]

Kathryn C. Montgomery, Jeff Chester, and Tijana Milosevic. 2017. Children's Privacy in the Big Data Era: Research Opportunities. Pediatrics 140, Supplement 2 (November 2017), S117--S121.

[46]

Simone Mora, Francesco Gianni, and Monica Divitini. 2017. Tiles: A Card-based Ideation Toolkit for the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '17, ACM Press, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 587--598.

Digital Library

[47]

Patricia A. Norberg, Daniel R. Horne, and David A. Horne. 2007. The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 41, 1 (June 2007), 100--126.

[48]

Ofcom. 2017. Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report.

[49]

Luci Pangrazio and Neil Selwyn. 2017. "My Data, My Bad ...": Young People's Personal Data Understandings and (Counter)Practices. In #SMSociety17 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society, ACM, Toronto, ON, Canada, Article No. 52.

Digital Library

[50]

Elvira Perez Vallejos, Ansgar Koene, Chris James Carter, Ramona Statache, Tom Rodden, Derek McAuley, Monica Cano, Svenja Adolphs, Claire O'Malley, Kruakae Pothong, and Stephen Coleman. 2015. Juries: acting out digital dilemmas to promote digital reflections. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society - Special Issue on Ethicomp 45, 3 (September 2015), 84--90.

[51]

Elvira Perez Vallejos, Ansgar Koene, Virginia Portillo, Liz Dowthwaite, and Monica Cano. 2017. Young People's Policy Recommendations on Algorithm Fairness. In WebSci '17 Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference, ACM, Troy, New York, USA, 247--251.

Digital Library

[52]

Virginia Portillo, Elvira Perez Vallejos, Monica Cano, Liz Dowthwaite, and Ansgar Koene. 2017. Algorithmic Taste Management: Young People's Perspectives and Recommendations. ECREA, Stockholm, Sweden.

[53]

ResourcEd. 2017. Digital Literacy in the Classroom. How Important Is It? ResourcEd. Retrieved September 18, 2018 from https://resourced.prometheanworld.com/digital-literacy-classroom-important/

[54]

Fuming Shih, Ilaria Liccardi, and Daniel Weitzner. 2015. Privacy Tipping Points in Smartphones Privacy Preferences. In CHI '15 Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 807--816.

Digital Library

[55]

Irina Shklovski, Scott D. Mainwaring, Halla Hrund Skúladóttir, and Höskuldur Borgthorsson. 2014. Leakiness and Creepiness in App Space: Perceptions of Privacy and Mobile App Use. In CHI '14 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2347--2356.

Digital Library

[56]

Cristiana S. Silva, Glívia A.R. Barbosa, Ismael S. Silva, Tatiane S. Silva, Fernando Mourão, and Flávio Coutinho. 2017. Privacy for Children and Teenagers on Social Networks from a Usability Perspective: A Case Study on Facebook. In WebSci '17 Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference, ACM, Troy, New York, USA, 63--71.

Digital Library

[57]

Stephanie Solomon and Julia Abelson. 2012. Why and when should we use public deliberation. Hasting Centre Report 42, 2 (2012), 17--20.

[58]

Jess Staufenberg. 2018. The New Computer Science GCSE is Already Being Reviewed. Schools Week. Retrieved September 19, 2018 from https://schoolsweek.co.uk/low-uptake-for-computer-science-gcse-spurs-review/

[59]

The UnBias Team. UnBias Youth Juries: An Online Educational Resource. Retrieved April 17, 2020 from https://uyj.wp.horizon.ac.uk/

[60]

Zeynep Tufekci. 2008. Can You See Me Now? Audience and Disclosure Regulation in Online Social Network Sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 28, 1 (February 2008), 20--36.

[61]

June Eric Udorie. 2015. Social Media is Harming the Mental Health of Teenagers. The State has to Act. The Guardian. Retrieved September 19, 2018 from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/16/social-media-mental-health-teenagers-government-pshe-lessons

[62]

UK Council for Child Internet Safety. 2015. Child Safety Online: A Practical Guide for Providers of Social Media and Interactive Services.

[63]

UK Council for Child Internet Safety. 2018. Education for a Connected World: A Framework to Equip Children and Young People for Digital Life.

[64]

unicef. 2010. A Summary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

[65]

Sonja Utz and Nicole C. Krämer. 2009. The Privacy Paradox on Social Network Sites Revisited: The Role of Individual Characteristics and Group Norms. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 3, 2 (2009), Article 2.

[66]

Max Van Kleek, Ilaria Liccardi, Reuben Binns, Jun Zhao, Daniel J. Weitzner, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2017. Better the Devil You Know: Exposing the Data Sharing Practices of Smartphone Apps. In CHI '17 Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Denver, Colorado, USA, 5208--5220.

Digital Library

[67]

Which? Team. 2011. ICO wants UK Schools to Teach Data Privacy. Which? News. Retrieved September 18, 2018 from https://www.which.co.uk/news/2011/08/ico-wants-uk-schools-to-teach-data-privacy-264587/

[68]

Heng Xu, Xin (Robert) Luo, John M. Carroll, and Mary Beth Rosson. 2011. The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Exploratory Study of Decision Making Process for Location-Aware Marketing. Decision Support Systems 51, 1 (2011), 42--52.

Digital Library

[69]

Sarita Yardi and Amy Bruckman. 2011. Social and Technical Challenges in Parenting Teens' Social Media Use. In CHI '11 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3237--3246.

Digital Library

[70]

Leah Zhang-Kennedy, Christine Mekhail, Yomna Abdelaziz, and Sonia Chiasson. 2016. From Nosy Little Brothers to Stranger-Danger: Children and Parents' Perception of Mobile Threats. In IDC '16 Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, Manchester, United Kingdom, 388--399.

Digital Library

Cited By

Höper LSchulte CMühling AMonga MLonati VBarendsen ESheard JPaterson J(2024)Students' Motivation and Intention to Engage with Data-Driven Technologies from a CS Perspective in Everyday LifeProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653625(646-652)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3649217.3653625
Höper LSchulte CMühling A(2024)Learning an Explanatory Model of Data-Driven Technologies can Lead to Empowered Behavior: A Mixed-Methods Study in K-12 Computing EducationProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671118(326-342)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632620.3671118
Morales-Navarro LKafai YKonda VMetaxa D(2024)Youth as Peer Auditors: Engaging Teenagers with Algorithm Auditing of Machine Learning ApplicationsProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655752(560-573)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3655752
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

"It's your private information. it's your life.": young people's views of personal data use by online technologies

Recommendations

Gifting Interpretations of Personal Data
CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Research on physical representations of data has often used personal data as its focus. Core aim of making personal data physical is to provoke self-reflections through a felt experience. In this paper, we present a preliminary study which employs the ...
Self-Reflection and Personal Physicalization Construction
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Self-reflection is a central goal of personal informatics systems, and constructing visualizations from physical tokens has been found to help people reflect on data. However, so far, constructive physicalization has only been studied in lab ...
Juries: acting out digital dilemmas to promote digital reflections
Special Issue on Ethicomp

A quick journey through prevention science (e.g., substance misuse prevention) and a comparison between online and offline risks, harm, and vulnerability in children suggests that new approaches and interventions are needed to promote Internet safety ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

IDC '20: Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference

June 2020

642 pages

ISBN:9781450379816

DOI:10.1145/3392063

General Chairs:
Elisa Rubegni
University of Lancaster, UK
,
Asimina Vasalou
University College London, UK
,
Program Chairs:
Narcís Parés
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain
,
Nitin Sawhney
Aalto University, Finland

Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 June 2020

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Conference

IDC '20

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

IDC '20: Interaction Design and Children

June 21 - 24, 2020

London, United Kingdom

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

20
Total Citations
View Citations
373
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)68
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 01 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Höper LSchulte CMühling AMonga MLonati VBarendsen ESheard JPaterson J(2024)Students' Motivation and Intention to Engage with Data-Driven Technologies from a CS Perspective in Everyday LifeProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653625(646-652)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3649217.3653625
Höper LSchulte CMühling A(2024)Learning an Explanatory Model of Data-Driven Technologies can Lead to Empowered Behavior: A Mixed-Methods Study in K-12 Computing EducationProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671118(326-342)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632620.3671118
Morales-Navarro LKafai YKonda VMetaxa D(2024)Youth as Peer Auditors: Engaging Teenagers with Algorithm Auditing of Machine Learning ApplicationsProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655752(560-573)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3655752
Gennari RMatera MMelonio ARizvi M(2024)How to enable young teens to design responsiblyFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2023.09.004150:C(303-316)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.future.2023.09.004
Portillo VGreenhalgh CCraigon PTen Holter C(2023)Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Prompts and Practice Cards: a Tool to Support Responsible PracticeProceedings of the First International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems10.1145/3597512.3599721(1-4)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3597512.3599721
Kumar PO'Connell FLi LByrne VChetty MClegg TVitak J(2023)Understanding Research Related to Designing for Children's Privacy and Security: A Document AnalysisProceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3585088.3589375(335-354)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3585088.3589375
Mehta VGooch DBandara APrice BNuseibeh B(2023)A Card-based Ideation Toolkit to Generate Designs for Tangible Privacy Management ToolsProceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3569009.3572903(1-13)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569009.3572903
Wang GZhao JVan Kleek MShadbolt N(2023)12 Ways to Empower: Designing for Children’s Digital AutonomyProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580935(1-27)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3580935
Höper LSchulte C(2023)The data awareness framework as part of data literacies in K-12 educationInformation and Learning Sciences10.1108/ILS-06-2023-0075125:7/8(491-512)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2023-0075
Bilstrup KKaspersen MLunding MSchaper MVan Mechelen MTamashiro MSmith RIversen OPetersen M(2022)Supporting Critical Data Literacy in K-9 Education: Three Principles for Enriching Pupils’ Relationship to DataProceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3501712.3530783(225-236)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3501712.3530783
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents