Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3391403.3399447acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

One Dollar Each Eliminates Envy

Published: 13 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

We study the fair division of a collection of mindivisible goods amongst a set of nagents. Whilst envy-free allocations typically do not exist in the indivisible-goods setting, envy-freeness can be achieved if some amount of a divisible good (money) is introduced. Specifically, Halpern and Shah (SAGT 2019, pp.374-389) showed that, given additive valuation functions where the marginal value of each good is at most one dollar for each agent, there always exists an envy-free allocation requiring a subsidy of at most (n-1)·m dollars. The authors also conjectured that a subsidy of $n-1$ dollars is sufficient for additive valuations. We prove this conjecture. In fact, a subsidy of at most one dollar per agent is sufficient to guarantee the existence of an envy-free allocation. Further, we prove that for general monotonic valuation functions an envy-free allocation always exists with a subsidy of at most 2(n-1) dollars per agent. In particular, the total subsidy required for monotonic valuations is independent of the number of goods.

References

[1]
A. Alkan, G. Demange, and D. Gale. 1991. Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods and Criteria of Justice. Econometrica, Vol. 59, 4 (1991), 1023--1039.
[2]
N. Alon. 1987. Splitting Necklaces. Advances in Mathematics, Vol. 63 (1987), 241--253.
[3]
E. Aragones. 1995. A derivation of the money Rawlsian solution. Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 12, 3 (1995), 267--276.
[4]
Haris Aziz and Simon Mackenzie. 2016. A Discrete and Bounded Envy-Free Cake Cutting Protocol for Four Agents. In Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 454--464.
[5]
V. Bilò, I. Caragiannis, M. Flammini, A. Igarashi, G. Monaco, D. Peters, C. Vinci, and W. Zwicker. 2019. Almost Envy-Free Allocations with Connected Bundles. In Proceedings of 10th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS). Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany, 14:1--14:21.
[6]
S. Brams and A. Taylor. 1995. An Envy-Free Cake Division Protocol. The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 102, 1 (1995), 9--18.
[7]
E. Budish. 2011. The Combinatorial Assignment Problem: Approximate Competitive Equilibrium from Equal Incomes. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 119, 6 (2011), 1061--1103.
[8]
I. Caragiannis, D. Kurokawa, H. Moulin, A. Procaccia, N. Shah, and J. Wang. 2019. The Unreasonable Fairness of Maximum Nash Welfare. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput., Vol. 7, 3, Article 12 (2019), 32 pages.
[9]
D. Foley. 1967. Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Econ Essays, Vol. 7, 1 (1967), 45--98.
[10]
M. Ghodsi, M. Hajiaghayi, M. Seddighin, S. Seddighin, and H. Yami. 2018. Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods: Improvements and Generalizations. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 539--556.
[11]
C-J. Haake, M. Raith, and F. Su. 2002. Bidding for envy-freeness: A procedural approach to n-player fair-division problems. Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 19, 4 (2002), 723--749.
[12]
D. Halpern and N. Shah. 2019. Fair Division with Subsidy. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 374--389.
[13]
F. Klijn. 2000. An algorithm for envy-free allocations in an economy with indivisible objects and money. Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 17 (2000), 201--215.
[14]
D. Kurokawa, A. Procaccia, and J. Wang. 2018. Fair Enough: Guaranteeing Approximate Maximin Shares. J. ACM, Vol. 65, 2 (2018), 8:1--27.
[15]
R. Lipton, E. Markakis, E. Mossel, and A. Saberi. 2004. On Approximately Fair Allocations of Indivisible Goods. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 125--131.
[16]
Eric S. Maskin. 1987. On the Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods .Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, 341--349.
[17]
H. Steinhaus. 1948. The Problem of Fair Division. Econometrica, Vol. 16, 1 (1948), 101--104.
[18]
F. Su. 1999. Rental Harmony: Sperner's Lemma in Fair Division. The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 106, 10 (1999), 930--942.
[19]
L-G. Svensson. 1983. Large Indivisibles: An Analysis with Respect to Price Equilibrium and Fairness. Econometrica, Vol. 51, 4 (1983), 939--954.
[20]
K. Tadenuma and W. Thomson. 1993. The fair allocation of an indivisible good when monetary compensations are possible. Mathematical Social Sciences, Vol. 25, 2 (1993), 117--132.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Envy-free house allocation with minimum subsidyOperations Research Letters10.1016/j.orl.2024.107103(107103)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2024)A fair and truthful mechanism with limited subsidyGames and Economic Behavior10.1016/j.geb.2023.12.006Online publication date: Jan-2024
  • (2023)Fast online value-maximizing prediction sets with conformal cost controlProceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3618408.3619281(21182-21203)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
EC '20: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
July 2020
937 pages
ISBN:9781450379755
DOI:10.1145/3391403
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 July 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. envy free
  2. fair division
  3. indivisible goods
  4. subsidy

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

EC '20
Sponsor:
EC '20: The 21st ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
July 13 - 17, 2020
Virtual Event, Hungary

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 664 of 2,389 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)53
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Envy-free house allocation with minimum subsidyOperations Research Letters10.1016/j.orl.2024.107103(107103)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2024)A fair and truthful mechanism with limited subsidyGames and Economic Behavior10.1016/j.geb.2023.12.006Online publication date: Jan-2024
  • (2023)Fast online value-maximizing prediction sets with conformal cost controlProceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3618408.3619281(21182-21203)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Efficient Nearly-Fair Division with Capacity ConstraintsProceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3545946.3598638(206-214)Online publication date: 30-May-2023
  • (2023)Fair division of indivisible goods: Recent progress and open questionsArtificial Intelligence10.1016/j.artint.2023.103965322(103965)Online publication date: Sep-2023
  • (2023)One Quarter Each (on Average) Ensures ProportionalityWeb and Internet Economics10.1007/978-3-031-48974-7_33(582-599)Online publication date: 31-Dec-2023
  • (2022)Fair and Truthful Mechanism with Limited SubsidyProceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3535850.3535911(534-542)Online publication date: 9-May-2022
  • (2022)Algorithmic fair allocation of indivisible itemsACM SIGecom Exchanges10.1145/3572885.357288720:1(24-40)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2022
  • (2021)On Interim Envy-Free Allocation LotteriesProceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation10.1145/3465456.3467648(264-284)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2021
  • (2021)Maximin fairness with mixed divisible and indivisible goodsAutonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems10.1007/s10458-021-09517-735:2Online publication date: 30-Jun-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media