Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3374920.3374937acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing Ritual Artifacts for Technology-Mediated Relationship Transitions

Published: 09 February 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Rituals are ubiquitous but not commonplace, help people to make sense of their life, and cultivate personal or social meaning. Although secularization and digitalization impact the occurrence of formal rituals, the need for marking life's transitions remains unchanged. New rituals emerge, such as marking relationship status by hanging love locks on bridges. Tangible technologies hold great potential for augmenting, changing, or enhancing ritual practices which often involve enactments and symbolic props. In this paper, we analyze individual stories of hanging love locks and derive six pointers for designing technology-mediated relationship transition rituals. We applied the pointers in the design of El Corazón, a tangible artifact for relationship transition rituals. The results of an evaluation with 20 sweethearts show that relationship rituals can be designed deliberately, that tangibles can shape ritual experiences and that technology-mediated rituals can provide people with new means of coping with relationship uncertainty.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (teifp1077.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Aloha Hufana Ambe, Margot Brereton, Alessandro Soro, and Paul Roe. 2017. Technology individuation: The foibles of augmented everyday objects. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6632--6644. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025770
[2]
Zygmunt Bauman. 2013. Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. John Wiley & Sons.
[3]
Catherine M Bell. 1997. Ritual: Perspectives and dimensions. Oxford University Press on Demand.
[4]
Margot Brereton, Min Zhen Chai, Alessandro Soro, Aloha Hufana Ambe, Daniel Johnson, Peta Wyeth, Paul Roe, and Yvonne Rogers. 2017. Make and Connect: Enabling People to Connect through their Things. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 612--616. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152771.3156182
[5]
Wei-Chi Chien, Sarah Diefenbach, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2013. The whisper pillow: a study of technology-mediated emotional expression in close relationships. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. ACM, 51--59.
[6]
Wei-Chi Chien and Marc Hassenzahl. 2017. Technology-mediated relationship maintenance in romantic long-distance relationships: An autoethnographical research through design. Human--Computer Interaction: 1--48. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1401927
[7]
Hyemin Chung, Chia-Hsun Jackie Lee, and Ted Selker. 2006. Lover's cups: drinking interfaces as new communication channels. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 375--380. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125532
[8]
Bernard Cooke and Gary Macy. 2005. Christian symbol and ritual: an introduction. Oxford University Press.
[9]
Carla Crespo, Isabel N Davide, M Emilia Costa, and Garth JO Fletcher. 2008. Family rituals in married couples: Links with attachment, relationship quality, and closeness. Personal Relationships, 15: 191--203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475--6811.2008.00193.x
[10]
Sara Eriksson and Preben Hansen. 2017. HeartBeats: A Speculative Proposal For Ritualization of Digital Objects. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 218--222.
[11]
Jordan Eschler, Arpita Bhattacharya, and Wanda Pratt. 2018. Designing a Reclamation of Body and Health: Cancer Survivor Tattoos as Coping Ritual. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174084
[12]
Ronald L. Grimes. 2013. The craft of ritual studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
[13]
Marc Hassenzahl, Stephanie Heidecker, Kai Eckoldt, Sarah Diefenbach, and Uwe Hillmann. 2012. All you need is love: Current strategies of mediating intimate relationships through technology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 19, 4: https://doi.org/10.1145/2395131.2395137
[14]
Karen Holtzblatt and Hugh Beyer. 2016. Contextual design: Design for life. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA, USA.
[15]
Eva Hornecker and Jacob Buur. 2006. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 437--446. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124838
[16]
Evan Imber-Black. 1999. Creating meaningful rituals for new life cycle transitions. In: The Expanded Family Life Cycle, Pearson Education, Boston, 202--214.
[17]
Joseph'Jofish' Kaye. 2006. I just clicked to say I love you: rich evaluations of minimal communication. In CHI'06 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 363--368.
[18]
Jina Kim, Young-Woo Park, and Tek-Jin Nam. 2015. BreathingFrame: An Inflatable Frame for Remote Breath Signal Sharing. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 109--112. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680606
[19]
David S Kirk, David Chatting, Paulina Yurman, and Jo-Anne Bichard. 2016. Ritual Machines I & II: Making Technology at Home. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2474--2486. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858424
[20]
Cristine H Legare and André L Souza. 2012. Evaluating ritual efficacy: Evidence from the supernatural. Cognition, 124, 1: 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.004
[21]
Hong Li, Jonna Häkkilä, and Kaisa Väänänen. 2018. Review of unconventional user interfaces for emotional communication between long-distance partners. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229467
[22]
Michael Massimi, Richard Harper, and Abigail J Sellen. 2014. Real, but glossy: technology and the practical pursuit of magic in modern weddings. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 854--865. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531682
[23]
Ilona Nord. 2017. Fest des Glaubens oder Folklore? Praktisch-theologische Erkundungen zur kirchlichen Trauung. Kohlhammer Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.
[24]
F Kursat Ozenc. 2014. Modes of transitions: Designing interactive products for harmony and well-being. Design Issues, 30, 2: 30--41. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00260
[25]
Daniela Petrelli and Ann Light. 2014. Family Rituals and the Potential for Interaction Design: A Study of Christmas. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 21, 3: https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2617571
[26]
Roy A Rappaport. 1999. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[27]
Matt J Rossano. 2012. The essential role of ritual in the transmission and reinforcement of social norms. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 3: 529--549. 10.1037/a0027038
[28]
Corina Sas, Steve Whittaker, and John Zimmerman. 2016. Design for rituals of letting go: An embodiment perspective on disposal practices informed by grief therapy. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 23, 4: 21.
[29]
Petr Slovák, Joris Janssen, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2012. Understanding heart rate sharing: towards unpacking physiosocial space. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 859--868. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208526
[30]
Hans-Georg Soeffner. 2010. Symbolische Formung. Eine Soziologie des Symbols und des Rituals. Velbrück, Weilerswist, Germany.
[31]
Alessandro Soro, Margot Brereton, and Paul Roe. 2016 of Conference. Towards an Analysis Framework of Technology Habituation by Older Users. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 1021--1033. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901806
[32]
Liza Stark. 2017. Data vows: reimagining ritual through eTextile practice. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 244--248.
[33]
Erika Summers-Effler. 2006. Ritual theory. In: Handbook of the sociology of emotions, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 135--154.
[34]
Theo Sundermeier. 1998. Ritus I: Religionswissenschaftlich. TRE, 29: 259--265.
[35]
Victor Turner. 2017. The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Routledge, Abingdon, UK.
[36]
Daisuke Uriu and Naohito Okude. 2010. ThanatoFenestra: photographic family altar supporting a ritual to pray for the deceased. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 422--425.
[37]
Daisuke Uriu, William Odom, Mei-Kei Lai, Sai Taoka, and Masahiko Inami. 2018. SenseCenser: An Interactive Device for Sensing Incense Smoke And Supporting Memorialization Rituals in Japan. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '18 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 315--318. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3205394
[38]
Onno Van der Hart. 1978. Rituals in psychotherapy: Transition and continuity. Irvington Publishers, New York, NY, USA.
[39]
Wouter van der Hoog, Pieter Jan Stappers, and Ianus Keller. 2004. Connecting mothers and sons: a design using routine affective rituals. interactions, 11, 5: 68--69.
[40]
Arnold Van Gennep. 1961. The rites of passage. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
[41]
Rachel E Watson-Jones and Cristine H Legare. 2016. The functions of ritual in social groups. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15000564
[42]
Joanna Wojtkowiak. 2018. Towards a psychology of ritual: A theoretical framework of ritual transformation in a globalising world. Culture & Psychology, 24, 4: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X18763797
[43]
John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 493--502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring the Roles of Artifacts in Speculative Futures: Perspectives in HCISystems10.3390/systems1206019412:6(194)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Navigating Intersections of Religion/Spirituality and Human-Computer InteractionAdjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3677045.3685453(1-4)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Intersecting Liminality: Acquiring a Smartphone as a Blind or Low Vision Older AdultProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675622(1-14)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Designing Ritual Artifacts for Technology-Mediated Relationship Transitions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    TEI '20: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
    February 2020
    978 pages
    ISBN:9781450361071
    DOI:10.1145/3374920
    • General Chairs:
    • Elise van den Hoven,
    • Lian Loke,
    • Program Chairs:
    • Orit Shaer,
    • Jelle van Dijk,
    • Andrew Kun
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 09 February 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. design for well-being
    2. human-centered design
    3. interaction design
    4. love
    5. relationship
    6. ritual

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    TEI '20
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    TEI '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 37 of 132 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

    Upcoming Conference

    TEI '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)125
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Exploring the Roles of Artifacts in Speculative Futures: Perspectives in HCISystems10.3390/systems1206019412:6(194)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Navigating Intersections of Religion/Spirituality and Human-Computer InteractionAdjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3677045.3685453(1-4)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Intersecting Liminality: Acquiring a Smartphone as a Blind or Low Vision Older AdultProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675622(1-14)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Materialising affective experiences: Designing for personal domestic grief practicesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660753(685-698)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Mediating the Sacred: Configuring a Design Space for Religious and Spiritual Tangible Interactive ArtifactsProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633353(1-22)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Rethinking the Design of Human-Data Interaction through a Study of Older Adults’ WellbeingProceedings of the 35th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference10.1145/3638380.3638451(266-279)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Designing for Uncontrollability: Drawing Inspiration from the Blessing CompanionProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581421(1-14)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Message Ritual: A Posthuman Account of Living with LampProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581363(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)‘I Did Digital Tidying up for a More Adult Stage of Life’: Ritualistic Technology Appropriations During Life TransitionsInteracting with Computers10.1093/iwc/iwad00134:5(117-128)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2023
    • (2022)Spirituality at the Breakfast Table: Experiences of Christian Online Worship ServicesCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts10.1145/3491101.3519856(1-7)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2022

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media