Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3350768.3353816acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Experimenting with the Peanut Butter and Jelly Sandwich Challenge to Introduce Algorithmic Thinking and Test Case Writing

Published: 23 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

New approaches that offer good learning experiences driven to computer science education have been applied in different places. One of the ways adopted is the application of dynamics in classrooms that challenge students to work in groups and make relations to situations of their lives. Besides, to improve content retention and students engagement, humor is one good element that should be applied in these dynamics. The "Peanut butter and jelly sandwich challenge" is an example that allows including the idea of challenging students using humor as a support to instructional content. This paper explains how that dynamic was applied to two students' groups. The first experience was offered in a mobile programming course that follows a boot camp style and involved a multidisciplinary group with students from three universities. The dynamic applied was used to present the relevance of algorithmic thinking. The second experience used the first case as motivation, adapting it to cover contents focused on test case writing applied to students of computer science. In both cases we present results gathered, such as learning impact for the students.

References

[1]
Karen Anewalt. 2008. Making CS0 fun: an active learning approach using toys, games and Alice. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 23, 3 (2008), 98--105.
[2]
Ali Basiri, Niosha Behnam, Ruud de Rooij, Lorin Hochstein, Luke Kosewski, Justin Reynolds, and Casey Rosenthal. 2016. Chaos Engineering. IEEE Software 33, 3 (2016), 35--41.
[3]
Dennis J Bouvier. 2003. Pilot study: living flowcharts in an introduction to programming course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 35, 1 (2003), 293--295.
[4]
Code.Org. 2019. Code.Org. https://code.org Last accessed 15 May 2019.
[5]
Software & Systems Engineering Committee et al. 2008. IEEE standard for software and system test documentation. Fredericksburg, VA, USA: IEEE Computer Society (2008).
[6]
Lee Copeland. 2004. A practitioner's guide to software test design. Artech House.
[7]
Cheryl L Coyle and Heather Vaughn. 2008. Making Peanut Butter and Jelly Sandwiches: Do Students from Different Disciplines Approach This Exercise Differently?. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 52. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 624--628.
[8]
Janet Davis and Samuel A Rebelsky. 2007. Food-first computer science: starting the first course right with PB&J. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39, 1 (2007), 372--376.
[9]
Stephen H Edwards and Zalia Shams. 2014. Do student programmers all tend to write the same software tests?. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education. ACM, 171--176.
[10]
Sigrid Eldh, Hans Hansson, and Sasikumar Punnekkat. 2011. Analysis of mistakes as a method to improve test case design. In 2011 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation. IEEE, 70--79.
[11]
Vahid Garousi and Mika V Mäntylä. 2016. When and what to automate in software testing? A multi-vocal literature review. Information and Software Technology 76 (2016), 92--117.
[12]
Juan Pablo Hourcade, Olga I Garcia, and Keith B Perry. 2007. Learning observation skills by making peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. In CHI'07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1753--1758.
[13]
Apple Inc. 2019. Swift Playgrounds. https://www.apple.com/swift/playgrounds/ Last accessed 15 May 2019.
[14]
Cem Kaner. 2003. What is a good test case. In Software Testing Analysis & Review Conference (STAR) East.
[15]
Tarun Khanna, Ranjay Gulati, and Nitin Nohria. 1998. The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic management journal 19, 3 (1998), 193--210.
[16]
Neelam Kher, Susan Molstad, and Roberta Donahue. 1999. Using humor in the college classroom to enhance teaching effectiveness in'dread courses'. College Student Journal 33, 3 (1999).
[17]
Debra Korobkin. 1988. Humor in the classroom: Considerations and strategies. College teaching 36, 4 (1988), 154--158.
[18]
Gary Lewandowski and Amy Morehead. 1998. Computer science through the eyes of dead monkeys: learning styles and interaction in CS I. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 30. ACM, 312--316.
[19]
Glenford J Myers, Corey Sandler, and Tom Badgett. 2011. The art of software testing. John Wiley & Sons.
[20]
Rudolf Ramler and Klaus Wolfmaier. 2006. Economic perspectives in test automation: balancing automated and manual testing with opportunity cost. In Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Automation of software test. ACM, 85--91.
[21]
Yolanda A Rankin and Jakita O Thomas. 2016. Leveraging food to achieve 100% student retention in an intro CS course. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 32, 2 (2016), 127--134.
[22]
Samuel A Rebelsky. 2005. The new science students in too much, too soon an abbreviated, accelerated, constructivist, collaborative, introductory experience in CS. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 37. ACM, 312--316.
[23]
Susan H Rodger. 2002. Introducing computer science through animation and virtual worlds. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 34. ACM, 186--190.
[24]
Melissa B Wanzer, Ann B Frymier, and Jeffrey Irwin. 2010. An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education 59, 1 (2010), 1--18.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021) Designing eHealth Tutorials with and for Older Adults Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/pra2.43958:1(92-103)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Development of an unfolding model of procedures for programming learning of novice programmersComputer Applications in Engineering Education10.1002/cae.2243729:6(1911-1930)Online publication date: 24-May-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SBES '19: Proceedings of the XXXIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering
September 2019
583 pages
ISBN:9781450376518
DOI:10.1145/3350768
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • SBC: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 September 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Algorithmic Thinking
  2. Humor in Classroom
  3. Software Testing
  4. Test cases

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SBES 2019

Acceptance Rates

SBES '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 67 of 153 submissions, 44%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 147 of 427 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021) Designing eHealth Tutorials with and for Older Adults Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/pra2.43958:1(92-103)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Development of an unfolding model of procedures for programming learning of novice programmersComputer Applications in Engineering Education10.1002/cae.2243729:6(1911-1930)Online publication date: 24-May-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media