Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3209415.3209498acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessing the Readability of Policy Documents: The Case of Terms of Use of Online Services

Published: 04 April 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Whether for using online services or dealing with legal issues, citizens are often requested to sign/accept policy documents that are intended to commit them to specific rights and duties. Usually such documents are difficult to read due to their nature, the length of sentences, complex terms used, etc. Since understanding is a prerequisite to making an informed decision, it is important to assess whether citizens, on average, would have the ability to comprehend those texts. We consider here that the authors of those documents should keep in mind their target audience and tailor their texts to their profiles. A good indicator that can be used in this context is the average education level of the citizens of a country. On the other hand, readability measures/scores of texts have been used to assess if educational material is suitable for the intended students' level of education attainment. In this paper, we use this information to assess the readability of terms of use of online services and correlate this information with the education attainment of the countries of their target audience. Our analysis shows that more efforts need to be put into making such policy documents understandable by a broader audience, uncovering a need for standards and tools in this area.

References

[1]
Federal Trade Commission, "Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: A proposed framework for businesses and policymakers," 2010.
[2]
Plain Language Action and Information Network, "Federal Plain Language Guidelines," 2011.
[3]
R. Flesch, "A new readability yardstick.," J. Appl. Psychol., 1948.
[4]
R. Gunning, "The Fog Index After Twenty Years," J. Bus. Commun., 1968.
[5]
H. G. McLaughlin, "{SMOG} grading - a new readability formula," J. Read., pp. 639--646, May 1969.
[6]
C. Scott and J. Suchan, "Public sector collective bargaining agreements: How readable are they?," Public Pers. Manage., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 15--22, 1987.
[7]
M. McDonald, "Lawyers vs. language: Briefs are criminal," The News & Observer, Raleigh, NC, May-1992.
[8]
P. D. K. L. Bhatia, Textbook on Legal Language and Legal Writing. Universal Law Publishing, 2010.
[9]
N. Fairclough, Language and Power, Third Edit. New York: Pearson Education, 2001.
[10]
J. E. Howe and M. S. Wogalter, "The Understandability of Legal Documents: Are they Adequate?," Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet., vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 438--442, 1994.
[11]
A. E. Waldman, "A Statistical Analysis of Privacy Policy Design," Notre Dame Law Rev. Online, vol. 93, 2017.
[12]
T. M. DUFFY, "CHAPTER 6 -- Readability Formulas: What's the Use?," in Designing Usable Texts, 1985, pp. 113--143.
[13]
D. D. Dyson and K. Schellenberg, "Access to Justice: The Readability of Legal Services Corporation Legal Aid Internet Services," J. Poverty, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 142--165, 2017.
[14]
A. Kanapala, S. Pal, and R. Pamula, "Text summarization from legal documents: a survey," Artif. Intell. Rev., pp. 1--32, 2017.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Awareness and readability of privacy policy documents in mobile loan applications among undergraduate students in NigeriaJournal of Digital Educational Technology10.30935/jdet/141074:1(ep2403)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Low Literacy Levels Among U.S. Adults and Difficult Ballot PropositionsJournal of Learning Disabilities10.1177/0022219424124995857:6(339-349)Online publication date: 7-May-2024
  • (2023) College‐level reading is required to understand ChatGPT 's answers to lay questions relating to heart failure European Journal of Heart Failure10.1002/ejhf.308325:12(2336-2337)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Assessing the Readability of Policy Documents: The Case of Terms of Use of Online Services

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEGOV '18: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
      April 2018
      739 pages
      ISBN:9781450354219
      DOI:10.1145/3209415
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 04 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Analytics
      2. Education
      3. Open Data
      4. Policy
      5. Readability
      6. Terms of Service

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      ICEGOV '18

      Acceptance Rates

      ICEGOV '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 104 of 184 submissions, 57%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 350 of 865 submissions, 40%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)40
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Awareness and readability of privacy policy documents in mobile loan applications among undergraduate students in NigeriaJournal of Digital Educational Technology10.30935/jdet/141074:1(ep2403)Online publication date: 2024
      • (2024)Low Literacy Levels Among U.S. Adults and Difficult Ballot PropositionsJournal of Learning Disabilities10.1177/0022219424124995857:6(339-349)Online publication date: 7-May-2024
      • (2023) College‐level reading is required to understand ChatGPT 's answers to lay questions relating to heart failure European Journal of Heart Failure10.1002/ejhf.308325:12(2336-2337)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2023
      • (2021)E-Government und Datensouveränität – Einblicke und LösungsansätzeE-Government and Data Sovereignty – Insights and SolutionsHMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik10.1365/s40702-021-00766-4Online publication date: 19-Aug-2021
      • (2021)Privacy and modern cars through a dual lens2021 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW)10.1109/EuroSPW54576.2021.00022(136-143)Online publication date: Sep-2021

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media