Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3207677.3277953acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Classification of Multiple Affective Attributes of Customer Reviews: Using Classical Machine Learning and Deep Learning

Published: 22 October 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Affective1 engineering is a methodology of designing products by collecting customer affective needs and translating them into product designs. It usually begins with questionnaire surveys to collect customer affective demands and responses. However, this process is expensive, which can only be conducted periodically in a small scale. With the rapid development of e-commerce, a larger number of customer product reviews are available on the Internet. Many studies have been done using opinion mining and sentiment analysis. However, the existing studies focus on the polarity classification from a single perspective (such as positive and negative). The classification of multiple affective attributes receives less attention. In this paper, 3-class classifications of four different affective attributes (i.e. Soft-Hard, Appealing-Unappealing, Handy-Bulky, and Reliable-Shoddy) are performed by using two classical machine learning algorithms (i.e. Softmax regression and Support Vector Machine) and two deep learning methods (i.e. Restricted Boltzmann machines and Deep Belief Network) on an Amazon dataset. The results show that the accuracy of deep learning methods is above 90%, while the accuracy of classical machine learning methods is about 64%. This indicates that deep learning methods are significantly better than classical machine learning methods.

References

[1]
Rosler, F., Battenberg, G., and Schüttler, F. 2009. Subjective perceptions and objective characteristics of control elements. ATZautotechnology, 9, 48--53.
[2]
Nagamachi, M. 1989. Kansei engineering approach to automotive. J. Soc. Autom. Eng. Jpn. 43 (1), 94--100.
[3]
Nagamachi, M. and Lokman, A. M. 2016. Innovations of Kansei engineering. CRC Press.
[4]
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G., and Tannenbaum, P. 1957. The measurement of meaning, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
[5]
Li, Z., Tian, Z. G., Wang, J. W., Wang, W. M., and Huang, G. Q. 2018. Dynamic mapping of design elements and affective responses: a machine learning based method for affective design. Journal of Engineering Design, 29(7), 358--380
[6]
Jiang, H., Kwong, C. K., Siu, K. W., and Liu, Y. 2015. Rough set and PSO-based ANFIS approaches to modeling customer satisfaction for affective product design. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29(3), 727--738.
[7]
Chou, J. R. 2016. A kansei evaluation approach based on the technique of computing with words. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 30(1), 1--15.
[8]
Kwong, C. K., Jiang, H., and Luo, X. G. 2016. AI-based methodology of integrating affective design, engineering, and marketing for defining design specifications of new products. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 47, 49--60.
[9]
Liu, B. 2012. Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
[10]
Wang, W. M., Li, Z., Liu, L., Tian, Z. G., and Tsui, E. 2018. Mining of affective responses and affective intentions of products from unstructured text. Journal of Engineering Design, 29(7), 404--429
[11]
Shieh, M. D., Yeh, Y. E., and Huang, C. L. 2016. Eliciting design knowledge from affective responses using rough sets and kansei engineering system. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 7(1), 107--120.
[12]
Fung, C. K. Y., Kwong, C. K., Chan, K. Y., and Jiang, H. 2014. A guided search genetic algorithm using mined rules for optimal affective product design. Engineering Optimization, 46(8), 1094--1108.
[13]
Hsiao, Y. H., Chen, M. C., and Liao, W. C. 2017. Logistics service design for cross-border e-commerce using kansei engineering with text-mining-based online content analysis. Telematics & Informatics. 34, 284--302
[14]
Wang, W. M., Li, Z., Tian, Z. G., Wang, J. W. and Cheng, M. N. 2018. Extracting and summarizing affective features and responses from online product descriptions and reviews: A Kansei text mining approach, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 73, 149--162
[15]
Wang, W. M., Cheung, C. F., Lee, W. B., and Kwok, S. K. 2008. Mining knowledge from natural language texts using fuzzy associated concept mapping. Information Processing & Management, 44(5), 1707--1719.
[16]
Bishop, Christopher M. 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.
[17]
Vapnik, V. 2006. Estimation of Dependences Based on Empirical Data. Springer New York.
[18]
Salakhutdinov, R. and Hinton, G. 2009. Deep boltzmann machines. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5(2), 1967--2006.
[19]
Hinton, G. 2009. Deep belief networks. Scholarpedia. 4 (5): 5947.
[20]
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., and Teh, Y. W. 2006. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural computation, 18(7), 1527--1554.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Natural language processing for analyzing online customer reviews: a survey, taxonomy, and open research challengesPeerJ Computer Science10.7717/peerj-cs.220310(e2203)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Bayesian-optimized extreme gradient boosting models for classification problems: an experimental analysis of product return caseJournal of Systems and Information Technology10.1108/JSIT-06-2020-0120Online publication date: 3-Sep-2024
  • (2023)A Brief Survey of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for E-Commerce ResearchJournal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research10.3390/jtaer1804011018:4(2188-2216)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Classification of Multiple Affective Attributes of Customer Reviews: Using Classical Machine Learning and Deep Learning

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CSAE '18: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
        October 2018
        1083 pages
        ISBN:9781450365123
        DOI:10.1145/3207677
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 22 October 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Affective analysis
        2. Customer reviews
        3. Kansei engineering
        4. deep belief network
        5. natural language processing
        6. restricted Boltzmann machines
        7. softmax regression
        8. support vector machine

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        CSAE '18

        Acceptance Rates

        CSAE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 189 of 383 submissions, 49%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 368 of 770 submissions, 48%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Natural language processing for analyzing online customer reviews: a survey, taxonomy, and open research challengesPeerJ Computer Science10.7717/peerj-cs.220310(e2203)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2024
        • (2024)Bayesian-optimized extreme gradient boosting models for classification problems: an experimental analysis of product return caseJournal of Systems and Information Technology10.1108/JSIT-06-2020-0120Online publication date: 3-Sep-2024
        • (2023)A Brief Survey of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for E-Commerce ResearchJournal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research10.3390/jtaer1804011018:4(2188-2216)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
        • (2022)Machine learning for engineering design toward smart customization: A systematic reviewJournal of Manufacturing Systems10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.10.00165(391-405)Online publication date: Oct-2022
        • (2022)Data-driven engineering designAdvanced Engineering Informatics10.1016/j.aei.2022.10177454:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2022
        • (2021)EMOTIONAL DESIGNHANDBOOK OF HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS10.1002/9781119636113.ch9(236-251)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2021

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media