Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3287324.3287422acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Academic Enhancement Program: Assessing Programs Designed to Support Student Success

Published: 22 February 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The Academic Enhancement Program (AEP) aims to help students succeed in their post-secondary studies by incorporating learning strategies and academic reflection activities into core first-year Computing Science (CS). Initially offered in a single CS course at our institution, the AEP has since been run as a required component in several CS courses. It has also been adapted collaboratively in other universities, and is customizable to other disciplines with plans to expand into other departments. We have regularly evaluated AEP based on students', academic advisors' and instructors' perceptions to support the continual improvement of the program. The current study relied on both students' self-perception and course performance data in two sections of the same course, with the same instructor, contents, and exams, where only students in one section participated in the program. Employing linear regression, this study sought to determine what non-trivial factors account for student success, measured by final exam scores. We determined that 22% of the variance in student success measured by final exam scores can be accounted for by basis of admission, admission GPA, number of credits registered in, and a newly defined construct embodying student CS programming background experience. While our model did not include AEP as a predictive factor, we are encouraged that 77% of AEP participants said that they would continue to use study skills learned in AEP in future courses. Implications for further investigation of learning support programs are discussed.

References

[1]
D. Arendale. 2002. History of supplemental instruction (SI): Mainstreaming of developmental education. In D. B. Lundell and J. L. Higbee (Eds.), Histories of Developmental Education. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy, General College, University of Minnesota, USA15--27
[2]
L.J. Barker, C. McDowell, K. Kalahar. 2009. Exploring Factors that Influence Computer Science Introductory Course Students to Persist in The Major. In Proceedings of SIGCSE '09, Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, Chatanooga, Tenessee, ACM, USA, 153--157.
[3]
P. Byrne, G. Lyons. 2001. The effect of Student Attributes on Success in Programming. Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, ACM. Canterbury, UK, 49--52
[4]
W. B. Cantwell, S. Shrock. 2001. Contributing to Success in an Introductory Computer Science Course: A study of Twelve Factors. Proceedings of SIGCSE 2001: Proceedings of the thirty-second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education, Charlotte, NC, USA: ACM, 184--188
[5]
M. Craig. 2018. Scholarly Evaluation of Teaching Interventions in Computer Science. (Keynote Presentation) WCCCE 2018, Western Canadian Conference on Computing Science Education. Victoria, B.C., Canada
[6]
D. Cukierman. 2015. Predicting Success in University First Year Computing Science Courses: The Role of Student Participation in Reflective Learning Activities and in I-clicker Activities. ITiCSE 2015: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM. Vilnius, Lithuania, 248--253
[7]
D. Cukierman, and D. McGee Thompson. 2009. 'The Academic Enhancement Program: Encouraging Students to Learn about Learning as Part of their Computing Science Courses", ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(3), 171--175, September 2009. Also Proceedings of ITICSE 2009, 14th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Paris, France, July 2009: ACM
[8]
R. Egan, D. Cukierman, and D. McGee Thompson. 2011. The Academic Enhancement Program in Introductory CS: A Workshop Framework Description and Evaluation. Proceedings of Iticse 2011, 16th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Darmstadt, Germany: ACM, 278--282
[9]
S. Guloy, F. Salimi, D. Cukierman, D. McGee Thompson. 2017. Insights on supporting learning during computing science and engineering students' transition to university: A design-oriented, mixed methods exploration of instructor and student perspectives. Higher Education Journal. Special Issue: Transition to Higher Education, Springer, 479--497
[10]
J.L. Higbee, D.R. Arendale, D.B. Lundell. 2005. Using theory and research to improve access and retention in developmental education. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2005(129), 5--15.
[11]
J. Malm, L. Bryngfors, L. L. Mörner. 2012. Supplemental instruction for improving first year results in engineering studies. Studies in Higher Education, 37(6), 655--666.
[12]
A. McCarthy, B. Smuts, M. Cosser. 1997. Assessing the effectiveness of supplemental instruction: A critique and a case study. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 221--231.
[13]
L. Porter, D. Zingaro, R. Lister.2014. Predicting student success using fine grain clicker data. ICER 2014 - Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research.
[14]
N. Rountree, J. Rountree, A. Robins, and R. Hanna . 2004. Interacting Factors that Predict Success and Failure in a CS1 Course. INROADS, The SIGCSE Bulletin. 36(4): ACM, 101--104
[15]
Simon, S. Fincher, A. Robins, B. Baker, I. Box, Q. Cutts, M. de Raadt, P. Haden, J. Hamer, M. Hamilton & R. Lister, M. Petre, K. Sutton, & D. Tolhurst, and J. Tutty. 2006. Predictors of Success in a First Programming Course. Proceedings of ACE 2006, Australasian Computing Education Conference, Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, 52: Australian Computer Society, Inc.189--196
[16]
Student Experience Initiative, Simon Fraser University. https://www.sfu.ca/vpacademic/SEI.html. Accessed 1 December 2018
[17]
T. J. Webster, K. C. Dee. 1998. Supplemental instruction integrated into an introductory engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 377--383.
[18]
G.E. Widmar. 1994. Supplemental Instruction: From small beginnings to a national program. In D. C. Martin & Arendale, D. R. (Eds.), Supplemental Instruction: Increasing achievement and retention. Jossey-Bass, 3--10.
[19]
D. Zingaro, M. Craig, L. Porter, B. A. Becker, Y. Cao, P. Conrad, D. Cukierman, A Hellas, D. Loksa, N. Thota. 2018. Achievement Goals in CS1: Replication and Extension, in Proceedings of SIGCSE 2018 the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, February 2018, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 687--692

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Study Behavior in Computing Education—A Systematic Literature ReviewACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/346912922:1(1-40)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
February 2019
1364 pages
ISBN:9781450358903
DOI:10.1145/3287324
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 February 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. introductory computing science
  2. learning support programs
  3. measuring programs success
  4. measuring student satisfaction
  5. predictors of course success
  6. student experience

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGCSE '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGCSE '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 169 of 526 submissions, 32%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,787 of 5,146 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE TS 2025
The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
February 26 - March 1, 2025
Pittsburgh , PA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Study Behavior in Computing Education—A Systematic Literature ReviewACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/346912922:1(1-40)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media