Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3176349.3176379acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Looking for the Movie Seven or Sven from the Movie Frozen?: A Multi-perspective Strategy for Recommending Queries for Children

Published: 01 March 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Popular search engines are usually tuned to satisfy the information needs of a general audience. As a result, non-traditional, yet active groups of users, such as children, experience challenges composing queries that can lead them to the retrieval of adequate results. To aid young users in formulating keyword queries that can facilitate their information-seeking process, we introduce ReQuIK, a multi-perspective query suggestion system for children. ReQuIK informs its suggestion process by applying (i) a strategy based on search intent to capture the purpose of a query, (ii) a ranking strategy based on a wide and deep neural network that considers both raw text and traits commonly associated with kid-related queries, (iii) a filtering strategy based on the readability levels of documents potentially retrieved by a query to favor suggestions that trigger the retrieval of documents matching children»s reading skills, and (iv) a content-similarity strategy to ensure diversity among suggestions. For assessing the quality of the system, we conducted initial offline and online experiments based on 591 queries written by 97 children, ages 6 to 13. The results of this assessment verified the correctness of ReQuIK»s recommendation strategy, the fact that it provides suggestions that appeal to children and ReQuIK»s ability to recommend queries that lead to the retrieval of materials with readability levels that correlate with children»s reading skills.

References

[1]
Ubersuggest. http://ubersuggest.io, Accessed: 2017-05--18.
[2]
J. Albright, C. de Guzman, P. Acebo, D. Paiva, M. Faulkner, and J. Swanson. Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice. Applied Nursing Research, 9(3):139--143, 1996.
[3]
A. Anagnostopoulos, L. Becchetti, C. Castillo, and A. Gionis. An optimization framework for query recommendation. In ACM WSDM, pages 161--170, 2010.
[4]
Backlinco. How to find long tail keywords. http://backlinko.com/ long-tail-keywords, Accessed: 2017-05--18.
[5]
D. Bilal and R. Ellis. Evaluating leading web search engines on children's queries. In Human-Computer Interaction. Users and Applications, pages 549--558. Springer, 2011.
[6]
J. S. Chall and E. Dale. Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula. Brookline Books, 1995.
[7]
H.-T. Cheng, L. Koc, J. Harmsen, T. Shaked, T. Chandra, H. Aradhye, G. Anderson, G. Corrado, W. Chai, M. Ispir, et al. Wide&deep learning for recommender systems. In Deep Learning for Recommender Systems workshop, pages 7--10, 2016.
[8]
Dogo. News, book, and movie reviews for kids by kids. https://www.dogonews. com, 2017.
[9]
N. Dragovic, I. Madrazo Azpiazu, and M. S. Pera. Is sven seven?: A search intent module for children. In ACM SIGIR, pages 885--888, 2016.
[10]
A. Druin, E. Foss, L. Hatley, E. Golub, M. L. Guha, J. Fails, and H. Hutchinson. How children search the internet with keyword interfaces. In SIGCHI, pages 89--96, 2009.
[11]
S. Duarte Torres, D. Hiemstra, and P. Serdyukov. An analysis of queries intended to search information for children. In IIiX, pages 235--244, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[12]
S. Duarte Torres, D. Hiemstra, I. Weber, and P. Serdyukov. Query recommendation for children. In ACM CIKM, pages 2010--2014, 2012.
[13]
C. Eickhoff, T. Polajnar, K. Gyllstrom, S. D. Torres, and R. Glassey. Web search query assistance functionality for young audiences. In Advances in Information Retrieval, pages 776--779. Springer, 2011.
[14]
C. Eickhoff, P. Serdyukov, and A. P. de Vries. Web page classification on child suitability. In ACM CIKM, pages 1425--1428. ACM, 2010.
[15]
R. Flesch. A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3):221, 1948.
[16]
E. Foss, A. Druin, R. Brewer, P. Lo, L. Sanchez, E. Golub, and H. Hutchinson. Children's search roles at home: Implications for designers, researchers, educators, and parents. JASIST, 63(3):558--573, 2012.
[17]
T. Gossen, J. Höbel, and A. Nürnberger. A comparative study about children's and adults' perception of targeted web search engines. In SIGCHI, pages 1821--1824, 2014.
[18]
L. Graham and P. T. Metaxas. Of course it's true; i saw it on the internet!: critical thinking in the internet era. Communications of the ACM, 46(5):70--75, 2003.
[19]
J. Gwizdka and D. Bilal. Analysis of children's queries and click behavior on ranked results and their thought processes in google search. In ACM CHIIR, pages 377--380, 2017.
[20]
A. Halavais. Search engine society. John Wiley&Sons, 2013.
[21]
S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735--1780, 1997.
[22]
Ilp2. Search engine. http://www.Ilp2.com, 2017.
[23]
K. in mind. Data source for kids. https://www.kids-in-mind.com, 2017.
[24]
S. Karimi and M. S. Pera. Recommendations to enhance children web searches. ACM RecSys, 2015.
[25]
L. Keating. Kiddle search engine is the google for kids. http://www.techtimes. com/articles/136639/20160225/kiddle-search-engine-kids.htm, Accessed: 2017- 05--18.
[26]
Kidrex. Safe search for kids. http://www.KidRex.org, 2017.
[27]
A. kids. Search engine. http://www.askkids.com, 2017.
[28]
E. Kids. Data source for kids. http://www.edutainingkids.com, 2017.
[29]
KidzSearch. Web search engine for kids. http://www.kidzsearch.com, 2017.
[30]
Kidzvuz. Data source for kids. https://www.kidzvuz.com, 2017.
[31]
D. Kingma and J. Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
[32]
A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1097--1105, 2012.
[33]
S. Lai, L. Xu, K. Liu, and J. Zhao. Recurrent convolutional neural networks for text classification. In AAAI, pages 2267--2273, 2015.
[34]
Y. Li, D. McLean, Z. A. Bandar, J. D. O'shea, and K. Crockett. Sentence similarity based on semantic nets and corpus statistics. IEEE TKDE, 18(8):1138--1150, 2006.
[35]
C. D. Manning, M. Surdeanu, J. Bauer, J. Finkel, S. J. Bethard, and D. McClosky. The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In ACL System Demonstrations, pages 55--60, 2014.
[36]
J. Palotti, G. Zuccon, and A. Hanbury. The influence of pre-processing on the estimation of readability of web documents. In ACM CIKM, pages 1763--1766, 2015.
[37]
RaisingChildren. Data source for kids. http://raisingchildren.net.au, 2017.
[38]
M. Shaikh, M. S. Pera, and Y.-K. Ng. Suggesting simple and comprehensive queries to elementary-grade children. In IEEE/WIC/ACM WI-IAT, volume 1, pages 252--259, 2015.
[39]
G. Spache. A new readability formula for primary-grade reading materials. The Elementary School Journal, 53(7):410--413, 1953.
[40]
Spaghetti. Book reviews by kids for kids. http://www.spaghettibookclub.org, 2017.
[41]
Sweetsearch. A search engine for students. http://www.sweetsearch.com, 2017.
[42]
S. D. Torres, D. Hiemstra, I. Weber, and P. Serdyukov. Query recommendation in the information domain of children. JASIST, 65(7):1368--1384, 2014.
[43]
Toyinsider. Data source for kids. http://www.thetoyinsider.com, 2017.
[44]
A. Usta, I. S. Altingovde, I. B. Vidinli, R. Ozcan, and Ö. Ulusoy. How k-12 students search for learning?: analysis of an educational search engine log. In ACM SIGIR, pages 1151--1154, 2014.
[45]
N. Vanderschantz, A. Hinze, and S. J. Cunningham. "sometimes the internet reads the question wrong": Children's search strategies&difficulties. JASIST, 51(1):1--10, 2014.
[46]
I. B. Vidinli and R. Ozcan. New query suggestion framework and algorithms: A case study for an educational search engine. Information Processing&Management, 52(5):733--752, 2016.
[47]
A. Wood and Y.-K. Ng. Orthogonal query recommendations for children. In iiWAS, pages 298--302, 2016.
[48]
Yahoo! Academic Relations. L13 - yahoo! search query tiny sample. http:// webscope.sandbox.yahoo.com/catalog.php.
[49]
H. Zamani, M. Bendersky, X. Wang, and M. Zhang. Situational context for ranking in personal search. In WWW, pages 1531--1540, 2017.
[50]
Z. Zhang and O. Nasraoui. Mining search engine query logs for query recommendation. In WWW, pages 1039--1040, 2006.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Kid Query: Co-designing an Application to Scaffold Query FormulationProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3659402(828-833)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Children’s conversational voice search as learning: a literature reviewInformation and Learning Sciences10.1108/ILS-10-2023-0133Online publication date: 17-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Does conversation lead to better searches? Investigating single-shot and multi-turn spoken searches with childrenInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.10066841(100668)Online publication date: Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Looking for the Movie Seven or Sven from the Movie Frozen?: A Multi-perspective Strategy for Recommending Queries for Children

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHIIR '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval
    March 2018
    402 pages
    ISBN:9781450349253
    DOI:10.1145/3176349
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 March 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. children
    2. dataset
    3. query suggestions
    4. search intent

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CHIIR '18
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHIIR '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 22 of 57 submissions, 39%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 163 submissions, 34%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1,279
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Kid Query: Co-designing an Application to Scaffold Query FormulationProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3659402(828-833)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Children’s conversational voice search as learning: a literature reviewInformation and Learning Sciences10.1108/ILS-10-2023-0133Online publication date: 17-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Does conversation lead to better searches? Investigating single-shot and multi-turn spoken searches with childrenInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.10066841(100668)Online publication date: Sep-2024
    • (2024)Not Just Algorithms: Strategically Addressing Consumer Impacts in Information RetrievalAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-031-56066-8_25(314-335)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2024
    • (2023)Into the Unknown: Exploration of Search Engines’ Responses to Users with Depression and AnxietyACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/3580283Online publication date: 18-Jan-2023
    • (2023)“Who are you?”: Identifying Young Users from a Single Search QueryAdjunct Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3563359.3596992(305-310)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Multi-Perspective Learning to Rank to Support Children's Information Seeking in the Classroom2023 IEEE International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT)10.1109/WI-IAT59888.2023.00050(311-317)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Where a Little Change Makes a Big Difference: A Preliminary Exploration of Children’s QueriesAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-031-28238-6_43(522-533)Online publication date: 2-Apr-2023
    • (2022)Informing Age-Appropriate AI: Examining Principles and Practices of AI for ChildrenProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502057(1-29)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2022)Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious: Why Using the “Right” Readability Formula in Children’s Web Search MattersAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-030-99736-6_1(3-18)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media