Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3003715.3005420acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigating Pressure Input and Haptic Feedback for In-Car Touchscreens and Touch Surfaces

Published: 24 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

The way drivers interact with in-car centre console controls is undergoing radical change as physical switchgear are replaced by virtual counterparts with the use of touchscreens. This provides the opportunity to design new input techniques to improve the way on-screen widgets are operated in driving situations. This paper investigates the effectiveness of pressure-based input with haptic feedback as an alternative touch modality for in-car interactions. Two user studies were conducted: one using a driving simulator and the other inside a vehicle driven on public roads, to evaluate two main pressure-based input techniques: positional and rate-based control. The results from a list-based targeting task showed that rate-based control performed well and was comparable to standard touch input and the physical dial while users had difficulties with positional pressure input. These findings from our studies will help engineers make more appropriate design decisions when developing in-car interactions with touchscreens and touch surfaces.

References

[1]
B. Lee, H. Lee, S. Lim, H. Lee, S. Han and J. Park. Evaluation of Human Tangential Force Input Performance. Proc. CHI 2012, 3121--3129.
[2]
S. Brewster and M. Hughes. Pressure-Based Text Entry for Mobile Devices. Proc. MobileHCI 2009, 1--4.
[3]
D.P. Brumby, S.C.E. Davies, C.P. Janssen and J.J. Grace. Fast or Safe? How Performance Objectives Determine Modality Output Choices While Interacting on the Move. Proc. CHI 2011, 473--482.
[4]
J. Cechanowicz, P. Irani and S. Subramanian. Augmenting the Mouse with Pressure Sensitive Input. Proc. CHI 2007, 1385--1394.
[5]
L. Diwischek and J. Lisseman. Tactile Feedback for Virtual Automotive Steering Wheel Switches. Proc. AutomotiveUI 2015, 31--38.
[6]
E. Hoggan, S.A. Brewster and J. Johnston. Investigating the Effectiveness of Tactile Feedback for Mobile Touchscreens. Proc. CHI 2008, 1573--1582.
[7]
E. Hoggan, C. Stewart, L. Haverinen, G. Jacucci and V. Lantz. Pressages: Augmenting Phone Calls with Non-Verbal Messages. Proc. UIST 2012, 555--562.
[8]
J.K. Holmen and M.H. Zadeh. Effects of Varying Haptic Feedback on Driver Distraction During Vehicular Window Adjustment. Proc. AutomotiveUI 2010, 88--91.
[9]
A. Lindgren, A. Angelelli, A.P. Mendoza and F. Chen. Driver behaviour when using an integrated advisory warning display for advanced driver assistance systems. IET Intelligent Transport Systems. 3, 4 (2009), 390--399.
[10]
R. McLachlan, D. Boland, and S. Brewster. Transient and Transitional States: Pressure as an Auxiliary Input Modality for Bimanual Interaction. Proc. CHI 2014, 401--410.
[11]
R. McLachlan and S. Brewster. Bimanual Input for Tablet Devices with Pressure and Multi-Touch Gestures. Proc. MobileHCI 2015, 547--556.
[12]
M.J. Pitts, G. Burnett, L. Skrypchuk, T. Wellings, A. Attridge and M. Williams. Visual-haptic feedback interaction in automotive touchscreens. Displays. 33, 1 (2012), 7--16.
[13]
M.J. Pitts, M.A. Williams and A. Attridge. Assessing Subjective Response to Haptic Feedback in Automotive Touchscreens. Proc. AutomotiveUI 2009, 11--18.
[14]
I. Politis, S.A. Brewster and F. Pollick. Evaluating Multimodal Driver Displays Under Varying Situational Urgency. Proc. CHI 2014, 4067--4076.
[15]
G. Ramos, M. Boulos and R. Balakrishnan. Pressure Widgets. Proc. CHI 2004, 487--494.
[16]
H. Richter, R. Ecker, C. Deisler and A. Butz. HapTouch and the 2+1 State Model: Potentials of Haptic Feedback on Touch Based In-Vehicle Information Systems. Proc. AutomotiveUI 2010, 72--79.
[17]
A. Rydström, C. Grane and P. Bengtsson. Driver Behaviour During Haptic and Visual Secondary Tasks. Proc. AutomotiveUI 2009, 121--127.
[18]
D.D. Salvucci. Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Human Factors. 48, 2 (2006), 362--380.
[19]
K. Shi, P. Irani, S. Gustafson and S. Subramanian. PressureFish: A Method to Improve Control of Discrete Pressure-Based Input. Proc. CHI 2008, 1295--1298.
[20]
D. Spelmezan, C. Appert, O. Chapuis and E. Pietriga. Side Pressure for Bidirectional Navigation on Small Devices. Proc. MobileHCI 2013, 11--20.
[21]
G. Wilson, S. Brewster, M. Halvey, A. Crossan and C. Stewart. The Effects of Walking, Feedback and Control Method on Pressure-Based Interaction. Proc. MobileHCI 2011, 147--156.
[22]
J.O. Wobbrock, L. Findlater, D. Gergle and J.J. Higgins. The Aligned Rank Transform for Nonparametric Factorial Analyses Using Only Anova Procedures. Proc. CHI 2011, 143--146.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Effects of Urgency and Cognitive Load on Interaction in Highly Automated VehiclesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042547:MHCI(1-20)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Augmenting On-Body Touch Input with Tactile Feedback Through Fingernail HapticsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581473(1-13)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2022)A Design Space for Human Sensor and Actuator Focused In-Vehicle Interaction Based on a Systematic Literature ReviewProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35346176:2(1-51)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Investigating Pressure Input and Haptic Feedback for In-Car Touchscreens and Touch Surfaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    Automotive'UI 16: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
    October 2016
    296 pages
    ISBN:9781450345330
    DOI:10.1145/3003715
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 October 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. In-car interactions
    2. Pressure-based input
    3. Touchscreen input
    4. Vibrotactile feedback

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    AutomotiveUI'16

    Acceptance Rates

    Automotive'UI 16 Paper Acceptance Rate 39 of 85 submissions, 46%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)57
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Effects of Urgency and Cognitive Load on Interaction in Highly Automated VehiclesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042547:MHCI(1-20)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Augmenting On-Body Touch Input with Tactile Feedback Through Fingernail HapticsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581473(1-13)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2022)A Design Space for Human Sensor and Actuator Focused In-Vehicle Interaction Based on a Systematic Literature ReviewProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35346176:2(1-51)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2022
    • (2022)HapWheel: In-Car Infotainment System Feedback Using Haptic and Hovering TechniquesIEEE Transactions on Haptics10.1109/TOH.2021.309576315:1(121-130)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
    • (2022)Augmented, Virtual and Mixed Reality Passenger ExperiencesUser Experience Design in the Era of Automated Driving10.1007/978-3-030-77726-5_17(445-475)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
    • (2021)Development of a Human-Display Interface with Vibrotactile Feedback for Real-World Assistive ApplicationsSensors10.3390/s2102059221:2(592)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2021
    • (2021)SwiVR-Car-SeatProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/34949685:4(1-26)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2021
    • (2020)Design Investigation of Embroidered Interactive Elements on Non-Wearable Textile InterfacesProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376692(1-10)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
    • (2019)A Theoretical Framework of Haptic Processing in Automotive User Interfaces and Its Implications on Design and EngineeringFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2019.0147010Online publication date: 26-Jul-2019
    • (2019)Challenges in passenger use of mixed reality headsets in cars and other transportationVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-019-00420-xOnline publication date: 18-Dec-2019
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media