research-article

A Typology of Design Ideas

Authors:

Peter DalsgaardAuthors Info & Claims

C&C '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition

Pages 393 - 406

https://doi.org/10.1145/3059454.3059464

Published: 22 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Design ideas are commonly used as an indicator of success of design methods and processes. Yet it is very rarely defined what precisely constitutes "an idea", and how such an idea manifests itself to the researcher. This paper presents an examination of design idea definitions based on a thorough study of 75 research contributions. We construct a typology of seven definitions of design ideas. The purpose of the typology is to offer shared definitions and descriptions of design ideas to design and creativity researchers, aiding a higher degree of specificity when studying and analyzing the emergence of ideas in design processes.

References

[1]

Ömer Akin and Cem Akin. 1996. Frames of reference in architectural design: analysing the hyperacclamation (Aha-!). Design Studies 17, 4: 341--361.

[2]

Katerina Alexiou, Theodore Zamenopoulos, J. H. Johnson, and S. J. Gilbert. 2009. Exploring the neurological basis of design cognition using brain imaging: some preliminary results. Design Studies 30, 6: 623--647.

[3]

Petra Badke-Schaub and Anja Gehrlicher. 2003. Patterns of decisions in design: leaps, loops, cycles, sequences and meta-processes. In DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm.

[4]

Alex Baker and André van der Hoek. 2010. Ideas, subjects, and cycles as lenses for understanding the software design process. Design Studies 31, 6: 590613.

[5]

Zafer Bilda and John S. Gero. 2008. Idea development can occur using imagery only. Design computing and cognition'08, pp. 303--320. Springer Netherlands.

[6]

Michael Biskjaer and Peter Dalsgaard. 2012. Toward A Constraint-Oriented Pragmatist Understanding of Design Creativity. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Design Creativity.

[7]

Michael Biskjaer, Peter Dalsgaard and Kim Halskov. 2010. Creativity Methods in Interaction Design. In Proceedings of DESIRE 2010: Creativity and Innovation in Design, Aarhus, Denmark.

Digital Library

[8]

Margaret A. Boden. 1995. The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Digital Library

[9]

Tone Bratteteig, Ole Kristian Rolstad, and Ina Wagner. 2016. The life and death of design ideas. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP '16), 259275. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978--3319--33464--6_16

[10]

Carlos Cardoso, Petra Badke-Schaub, and Ozgur Eris. 2016. Inflection moments in design discourse: How questions drive problem framing during idea generation. Design Studies 46: 59--78.

[11]

Hernan P. Casakin and Gabriela Goldschmidt. 2000. Reasoning by visual analogy in design problemsolving: the role of guidance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 27, 1: 105--119.

[12]

Aliana Colung and Linda B. Smith. 2003. The emergence of abstract ideas: Evidence from networks and babies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 358, 1435: 1205--1214.

[13]

Henri Hubertus Cornelis Maria Christiaans. 1992. Creativity in design: the role of domain knowledge in designing. TU Delft, Delft University of Technology.

[14]

Tim Coughlan and Peter Johnson. 2008. Idea management in creative lives. In CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 30813086. DOI=

Digital Library

[15]

Nigel Cross. 1997. Descriptive models of creative design: application to an example. Design Studies 18, 4: 427--440.

[16]

Darren W. Dahl and Page Moreau. 2002. The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. Journal of Marketing Research 39, 1: 47--60.

[17]

Peter Dalsgaard. 2009. Designing Engaging Interactive Environments: A Pragmatist Perspective. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University

[18]

Shanna R. Daly, Seda Yilmaz, James L. Christian, Colleen M. Seifert, and Richard Gonzalez. 2012. Design heuristics in engineering concept generation. Journal of Engineering Education 101, 4: 601.

[19]

R. Davies and R. J. Talbot. 1987. Experiencing ideas: Identity, insight and the imago. Design studies 8, 1: 1725.

[20]

Alan Dix and Layda Gongora. 2011. Externalisation and design. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design (DESIRE '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31--42. DOI=

Digital Library

[21]

Alan Dix, Tom Ormerod, Michael Twidale, Corina Sas, Paula Alexandra Gomes da Silva, and Lorna McKnight. 2006. Why bad ideas are a good idea. http://eprints.maynoothuniversity.ie/6040/

[22]

Kees Dorst and Nigel Cross. 2001. Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem--solution. Design studies 22, 5: 425--437.

[23]

Carlos Fernández, Daniel López, Agustín Yagüe, and Juan Garbajosa. 2011. Towards estimating the value of an idea. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Product Focused Software Development and Process Improvement (Profes '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 62--67.

Digital Library

[24]

Ronald A. Finke, Thomas B. Ward, and Steven M. Smith. 1992. Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications.

[25]

Fritz Fleischmann. 2006. Entrepreneurship as emancipation: The history of an idea. A lecture delivered at the Free University of Berlin Fletcher D. "Entrepreneurial process and the social construction of opportunity", Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 18, 5: 421--440.

[26]

Liane Gabora. 2002. Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Creativity & cognition (C&C '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 126--133.

Digital Library

[27]

John S. Gero. 2000. Computational models of innovative and creative design processes. Technological forecasting and social change 64, 2: 183--196.

[28]

Karan Girotra, Christian Terwiesch, and Karl T. Ulrich. 2010. Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea. Manage. Sci. 56, 4 (April 2010), 591--605.

Digital Library

[29]

Vinod Goel. 2014. Creative brains: designing in the real world?. Frontiers in human neuroscience 8: 241.

[30]

Jacob Goldenberg, Donald R. Lehmann, and David Mazursky. 2001. The idea itself and the circumstances of its emergence as predictors of new product success. Management Science 47, 1: 69--84.

Digital Library

[31]

Gabriela Goldschmidt. 1990. Linkography: assessing design productivity. In Proceedings of the Tenth European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research (Cyberbetics and System'90), 291--298. World Scientific, 1990.

[32]

Gabriela Goldschmidt and Anat Litan Sever. 2011. Inspiring design ideas with texts. Design Studies 32, 2: 139--155.

[33]

Gabriela Goldschmidt and Dan Tatsa. 2005. How good are good ideas? Correlates of design creativity. Design Studies 26, 6: 593--611.

[34]

Kim Halskov and Peter Dalsgaard. 2006. Inspiration Card Workshops. In Proceedings of DIS 2006. ACM, New York, pp. 2--11.

Digital Library

[35]

Kim Halskov and Peter Dalsgaard. 2007. The emergence of ideas: the interplay between sources of inspiration and emerging design concepts. CoDesign 3, 4: 185--211.

[36]

J. E. Holt, D. F. Radcliffe, and D. Schoorl. 1985. Design or problem solving--a critical choice for the engineering profession. Design Studies 6, 2: 107--110.

[37]

Thomas J. Howard, Stephen J. Culley, and Elies Dekoninck. 2008. Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design studies 29, 2: 160--180.

[38]

Thomas J. Howard, S. Culley, and Elies A. Dekoninck. 2011. Reuse of ideas and concepts for creative stimuli in engineering design. Journal of Engineering Design 22, 8: 565--581.

[39]

Norio Ishii and Kazuhisa Miwa. 2002. Interactive processes between mental and external operations in creative activity: a comparison of experts' and novices' performance. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Creativity & Cognition, pp. 178--185. ACM.

Digital Library

[40]

Ben Jonson. 2005. Design ideation: the conceptual sketch in the digital age. Design studies 26, 6: 613--624.

[41]

Jeff WT Kan, Zafer Bilda, and John S. Gero. 2006. Comparing entropy measures of idea links in design protocols. Design Computing and Cognition'06, pp. 265--284. Springer Netherlands, 2006.

[42]

Jeff WT Kan and John S. Gero. 2005. Can entropy indicate the richness of idea generation in team designing. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2005), New Delhi, India.

[43]

Andruid Kerne, Andrew M. Webb, Steven M. Smith, Rhema Linder, Nic Lupfer, Yin Qu, Jon Moeller, and Sashikanth Damaraju. 2014. Using metrics of curation to evaluate information-based ideation. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (ToCHI) 21, 3: 14.

Digital Library

[44]

EunJin Kim and KwanMyung Kim. 2015. Cognitive styles in design problem solving: Insights from network-based cognitive maps." Design Studies 40: 138.

[45]

David Kirsh. 2009. Projection, problem space and anchoring.

[46]

Lassi A. Liikkanen, Tua A. Björklund, Matti M. Hämäläinen, and Mikko P. Koskinen. 2009. Time constraints in design idea generation. In DS 58--9: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 9, Human Behavior in Design, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 24.-27.08.

[47]

Lassi A. Liikkanen and Matti Perttula. 2010. Inspiring design idea generation: insights from a memory-search perspective. Journal of Engineering Design 21, 5: 545560.

[48]

Samuel Loyd. 1914. Cyclopedia of puzzles. Lamb Publishing Company.

[49]

Kristine Lund, Guy Prudhomme, and Jean-Laurent Cassier. 2013. Pivotal moments for decision making in collaborative design: are they teachable?. In ComputerSupported Collaborative Learning at the Workplace, pp. 243--268. Springer US.

[50]

Mary Lou Maher and Josiah Poon. 1996. Modeling design exploration as co-evolution. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 11, 3: 195--209.

Digital Library

[51]

Naama Mayseless, Ayelet Eran, and Simone G. Shamay-Tsoory. 2015. Generating original ideas: The neural underpinning of originality. NeuroImage 116: 232--239.

[52]

Paul Murty and Terry Purcell. 2007. Latent Preparation - Do Great Ideas Come From Out-Of-The-Blue? http://papers.cumincad.org/cgibin/works/Show&_id=caadria2010_000&sort=DEFAU LT&search=series:caadria/Show?caadria2007_529

[53]

Brent A. Nelson, Jamal O. Wilson, David Rosen, and Jeannette Yen. 2009. Refined metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies 30, 6: 737--743.

[54]

Harold G. Nelson and Erik Stolterman. 2003. The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world: Foundations and fundamentals of design competence. Educational Technology.

Digital Library

[55]

Bernard A. Nijstad, Bernard and Wolfgang Stroebe. 2006. How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and social psychology review 10, 3: 186--213.

[56]

Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie and Rebecca Frels. 2016. Seven steps to a comprehensive literature review: A multimodal and cultural approach. Sage.

[57]

Matti Kalevi Perttula. 2006. Idea generation in engineering design: Application of a memory search perspective and some experimental studies. Helsinki University of Technology.

[58]

Matti Kalevi Perttula, Christina M. Krause, and Pekka Sipilä. 2006. Does idea exchange promote productivity in design idea generation? In CoDesign 2, 3: 125--138.

[59]

Matti Kalevi Perttula and Lassi A. Liikkanen. 2006. Exposure effects in design idea generation: Unconscious conformity or a product of sampling probability? In Development Process: From Idea to the World's First Bionic Prosthetic Foot.

[60]

Matti Kalevi Perttula and Pekka Sipilä. 2007. The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation. Journal of Engineering Design 18, 1: 93--102.

[61]

Sarkar Prabir and Chakrabarti Amaresh. 2007. Development of a method for assessing design creativity. In Guidelines for a Decision Support Method Adapted to NPD Processes.

[62]

A. T. Purcell and John S. Gero. 1998. Drawings and the design process: A review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology. Design studies 19, 4: 389--430.

[63]

Janet C. Read, Daniel Fitton, Gavin Sim, and Matt Horton. 2016. How Ideas make it through to Designs: Process and Practice. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 10 pages.

Digital Library

[64]

Christoph Riedl, Norman May, Jan Finzen, Stephan Stathel, Viktor Kaufman, and Helmut Krcmar. 2009. An idea ontology for innovation management. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5, 4: 1--18.

[65]

C. J. van Rijsbergen. 1979. Information retrieval 2.

Digital Library

[66]

Mike Scaife and Yvonne Rogers. 2005. External cognition, innovative technologies, and effective learning. In Cognition, education and communication technology: 181--202.

[67]

Marlene Scardamalia and Carl Bereiter. 2003. Beyond brainstorming: Sustained creative work with ideas. EDUCATION CANADA-TORONTO- 43, 4: 4--8.

[68]

Colleen M. Seifert, David E. Meyer, Natalie Davidson, Andrea L. Patalano, and Ilan Yaniv. 1994. Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared-mind hypothesis: 65. http://wesscholar.wesleyan.edu/div3facpubs/229/

[69]

Jami J. Shah, Santosh V. Kulkarni, and Noe VargasHernandez. 2000. Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Journal of mechanical design 122, 4: 377--384.

[70]

Jami J. Shah, Steve M. Smith, and Noe VargasHernandez. 2003. Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness." Design studies 24, 2: 111--134

[71]

Pao Siangliulue, Joel Chan, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, and Steven P. Dow. 2015. Providing Timely Examples Improves the Quantity and Quality of Generated Ideas. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 83--92.

Digital Library

[72]

Herbert A. Simon. 1973. The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial intelligence 4, 3--4: 181--201.

[73]

Dean Keith Simonton. 2013. What is a creative idea? Little-c versus Big-C creativity. Handbook of research on creativity: 69--83.

[74]

Ricardo Sosa and Andy Dong. 2013. The creative assessment of rich ideas. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition (C&C '13), Ellen Yi-Luen Do, Steven Dow, Jack Ox, Steve Smith, Kazushi Nishimoto, and Chek Tien Tan (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 328--331.

Digital Library

[75]

Ricardo Sosa, John S. Gero, and Kyle Jennings. 2009. Growing and destroying the worth of ideas. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition (C&C '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 295--304.

Digital Library

[76]

Basil Soufi and Ernest Edmonds. 1996. The cognitive basis of emergence: implications for design support. Design Studies 17, 4: 451--463.

[77]

Elizabeth Starkey, Christine A. Toh, and Scarlett R. Miller. 2016. Abandoning creativity: The evolution of creative ideas in engineering design course projects. Design Studies 47: 47--72.

[78]

Masaki Suwa, Terry Purcell, and John Gero. 1998. Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions. Design studies 19, 4: 455--483.

[79]

Masaki Suwa and Barbara Tversky. 2002. External representations contribute to the dynamic construction of ideas. In International Conference on Theory and Application of Diagrams, pp. 341--343. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Digital Library

[80]

Yoshifumi Tanaka, Sumio Nakamura, and Kazuya Takemata. 2009. Enhancing the creativity of engineers by idea drawing. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition (C&C '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 405--406.

Digital Library

[81]

Christine A. Toh and Scarlett R. Miller. 2015. How engineering teams select design concepts: A view through the lens of creativity. In Design Studies 38: 111--138.

[82]

Feichin Tschang. 2003. When does an idea become an innovation? The role of individual and group creativity in video game design. http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1443/

[83]

Ian Tseng, Jarrod Moss, Jonathan Cagan, and Kenneth Kotovsky. 2008. The role of timing and analogical similarity in the stimulation of idea generation in design. Design Studies 29, 3: 203--221.

[84]

Remko van der Lugt. 2001. Sketching in design idea generation meetings. TU Delft, Delft University of Technology.

[85]

Remko van der Lugt. 2003. Relating the quality of the idea generation process to the quality of the resulting design ideas. In DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm.

[86]

Remko van der Lugt and Anne van der Graaf. 2002. Context Indicators for Determining Links Between Design Ideas. In DS 30: Proceedings of DESIGN 2002, the 7th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik.

[87]

Ilse M. Verstijnen, Cees van Leeuwen, G. Goldschmidt, Ronald Hamel, and J. M. Hennessey. 1998. Sketching and creative discovery. Design studies 19, 4: 519--546.

[88]

Graham Wallas. 1976. Stages in the creative process. The creativity question: 69--73.

[89]

Stefan Wiltschnig, Bo T. Christensen and Linden J. Ball. 2013. Collaborative problem--solution coevolution in creative design. Design Studies 34, 5: 515542.

[90]

Stefan Wiltschnig and Balder Onarheim. 2010. Insights into insight-How do in-vitro studies of creative insight match the real-world complexity of in-vivo design processes. In Design Research Society International Conference.

[91]

Stefan Wiltschnig, Balder Onarheim, and Bo T. Christensen. 2010. Shared insights in design processes--a discussion of in-vivo evidence in and beyond existing creativity frameworks. In DS 66--2: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2010).

[92]

Eiko Yamamoto, Futoshi Mukai, Nor Fasiha Mohd Yusof, Toshiharu Taura, and Yukari Nagai. 2009. A method to generate and evaluate a creative design idea by focusing on associative process. In ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 1003--1011. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

[93]

S. Yilmaz, Colleen M. Seifert, and R. Gonzalez. 2010. Cognitive heuristics in design: Instructional strategies to increase creativity in idea generation." Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 24, 3: 335--355.

Digital Library

Cited By

Xu XPalani SMunkhbat ALee TDow S(2024)Idea-Centric Search: Four Patterns of Information Seeking During Creative IdeationProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656193(280-291)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635636.3656193
Zhu DAl Mahmud ALiu W(2023)A Taxonomy of Idea Management Tools for Supporting Front-End InnovationApplied Sciences10.3390/app1306357013:6(3570)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063570
Malhotra AKubowicz Malhotra C(2023)Searching for ideas from creative Crowds: The role of examples in problem statementsJournal of Business Research10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113963164(113963)Online publication date: Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113963
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

A Typology of Design Ideas
1. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

Understanding Creativity Methods in Design
DIS '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems

This paper contributes an analytical framework to improve understanding of the composition of recognized creativity methods used in design. Based on an extensive literature review, our framework synthesizes key concepts from design and particularly ...
Environments for creative interaction design processes
DIS Companion '14: Proceedings of the 2014 companion publication on Designing interactive systems

The theme of the workshop is to examine the nature of creative processes as part of designing interactive systems. In particular, the workshop will focus on how to organize design sessions to improve creative processes, for instance by setting up ...
Creative Computing for Bespoke Ideation
COMPSAC '15: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 39th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference - Volume 01

Today, idea generation is an extremely important activity for both academic researchers and industrial groups. A considerable number of applications and research studies have been made in the past years in order to increase the effectiveness of idea ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

C&C '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition

June 2017

584 pages

ISBN:9781450344036

DOI:10.1145/3059454

General Chairs:
David A. Shamma
Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI)
,
Jude Yew
National University of Singapore
,
Program Chair:
Brian Bailey
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Copyright © 2017 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 June 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

CIBIS: Creativity in Blended Interaction Spaces

Conference

C&C '17

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

C&C '17: Creativity and Cognition

June 27 - 30, 2017

Singapore, Singapore

Acceptance Rates

C&C '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 27 of 94 submissions, 29%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 371 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

12
Total Citations
View Citations
621
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)51
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 02 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Xu XPalani SMunkhbat ALee TDow S(2024)Idea-Centric Search: Four Patterns of Information Seeking During Creative IdeationProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656193(280-291)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635636.3656193
Zhu DAl Mahmud ALiu W(2023)A Taxonomy of Idea Management Tools for Supporting Front-End InnovationApplied Sciences10.3390/app1306357013:6(3570)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063570
Malhotra AKubowicz Malhotra C(2023)Searching for ideas from creative Crowds: The role of examples in problem statementsJournal of Business Research10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113963164(113963)Online publication date: Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113963
Inie NFrich JDalsgaard PMaiden NSas C(2022)How Researchers Manage IdeasProceedings of the 14th Conference on Creativity and Cognition10.1145/3527927.3532813(83-96)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3527927.3532813
Wakkary ROogjes DBehzad A(2022)Two Years or More of Co-speculation: Polylogues of Philosophers, Designers, and a Tilting BowlACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/351423529:5(1-44)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3514235
Sun ZWang SLiu CMa X(2022)Metaphoraction: Support Gesture-based Interaction Design with Metaphorical MeaningsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/351189229:5(1-33)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3511892
Delcourt CCharmaraman LDurrani SGu QXiao L(2022)Innovating Novel Online Social Spaces with Diverse Middle School GirlsProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517576(1-16)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3517576
Koch JTaffin NBeaudouin-Lafon MLaine MLucero AMackay W(2020)ImageSense: An Intelligent Collaborative Ideation Tool to Support Diverse Human-Computer PartnershipsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33928504:CSCW1(1-27)Online publication date: 29-May-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3392850
Andersen M(2019)Gatekeeping within the simplicity regime: evaluative practices in television idea developmentMedia, Culture & Society10.1177/016344371986730042:4(571-587)Online publication date: 18-Aug-2019
https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719867300
Frich JBiskjaer MMacDonald Vermeulen LRemy CDalsgaard PDow SMaher MKerne ALatulipe C(2019)Strategies in Creative Professionals' Use of Digital Tools Across DomainsProceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition10.1145/3325480.3325494(210-221)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3325480.3325494
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents