Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2908812.2908926acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving the Canny Edge Detector Using Automatic Programming: Improving Non-Max Suppression

Published: 20 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we employ automatic programming, a relatively unknown evolutionary computation strategy, to improve the non-max suppression step in the popular Canny edge detector. The new version of the algorithm has been tested on a dataset widely used to benchmark edge detection algorithms. The performance has increased by 1.9%, and a pairwise student-t comparison with the original algorithm gives a p-value of 6.45 x 10-9. We show that the changes to the algorithm have made it better at detecting weak edges, without increasing the computational complexity or changing the overall design.
Previous attempts have been made to improve the filter stage of the Canny algorithm using evolutionary computation, but, to our knowledge, this is the first time it has been used to improve the non-max suppression algorithm.
The fact that we have found a heuristic improvement to the algorithm with significantly better performance on a dedicated test set of natural images suggests that our method should be used as a standard part of image analysis platforms, and that our methodology could be used to improve the performance of image analysis algorithms in general.

References

[1]
P. Arbelaez, M. Maire, C. Fowlkes, and J. Malik. Contour detection and hierarchical image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 33:898--916, 2011.
[2]
H. Berg, R. Olsson, T. Lindblad, and J. Chilo. Automatic design of pulse coupled neurons for image segmentation. Neurocomputing, 71(10--12):1980--1993, 2008. Neurocomputing for Vision Research; Advances in Blind Signal Processing.
[3]
J. Canny. A computational approach to edge detection. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, (6):679--698, 1986.
[4]
L. Ding and A. Goshtasby. On the canny edge detector. Pattern Recognition, 34(3):721--725, 2001.
[5]
A. V. Goldberg and R. Kennedy. An efficient cost scaling algorithm for the assignment problem. Mathematical Programming, 71(2):153--177, 1995.
[6]
C. Harris and B. Buxton. Evolving edge detectors with genetic programming. In Proceedings of the 1st annual conference on genetic programming, pages 309--314. MIT Press, 1996.
[7]
Y.-K. Huo, G. Wei, Y.-D. Zhang, and L. nan Wu. An adaptive threshold for the canny operator of edge detection. In Image Analysis and Signal Processing (IASP), 2010 International Conference on, pages 371--374, April 2010.
[8]
K. Larsen, L. V. Magnusson, and R. Olsson. Edge pixel classification using automatic programming. Norsk Informatikkonferanse (NIK), 2014.
[9]
C. Linnaeus. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae secundum classes, ordines, genera, species,..., volume 1. impensis Georg Emanuel Beer, 1788.
[10]
L. V. Magnusson and R. Olsson. Improving graph-based image segmentation using automatic programming. In Applications of Evolutionary Computation, pages 464--475. Springer, 2014.
[11]
R. Milner, M. Tofte, R. Harper, and D. MacQueen. The Definition of Standard ML - Revised. The MIT Press, 1997.
[12]
R. Olsson. Inductive functional programming using incremental program tranformation. Artificial Intelligence, 74:55--81, 1995.
[13]
R. Olsson. Population management for automatic design of algorithms through evolution. In Evolutionary Computation Proceedings, 1998. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence., The 1998 IEEE International Conference on, pages 592--597. IEEE, 1998.
[14]
R. Poli. Genetic programming for feature detection and image segmentation. In Evolutionary Computing, pages 110--125. Springer, 1996.
[15]
C. J. V. Rijsbergen. Information Retrieval. Butterworth-Heinemann, Newton, MA, USA, 2nd edition, 1979.
[16]
B. Wang and S. Fan. An improved canny edge detection algorithm. In 2009 second international workshop on computer science and engineering, pages 497--500. IEEE, 2009.
[17]
R. Xiaofeng and L. Bo. Discriminatively trained sparse code gradients for contour detection. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 584--592, 2012.
[18]
Y. Zhang and P. I. Rockett. Evolving optimal feature extraction using multi-objective genetic programming: a methodology and preliminary study on edge detection. In Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, pages 795--802. ACM, 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Meta-Analysis to Prognosis Myocardial Infarction Using 12 Lead ECGHigh Performance Computing and Networking10.1007/978-981-16-9885-9_39(473-488)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2022
  • (2020)An experimental study of stunned state detection for broiler chickens using an improved convolution neural network algorithmComputers and Electronics in Agriculture10.1016/j.compag.2020.105284170(105284)Online publication date: Mar-2020

Index Terms

  1. Improving the Canny Edge Detector Using Automatic Programming: Improving Non-Max Suppression

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '16: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2016
      July 2016
      1196 pages
      ISBN:9781450342063
      DOI:10.1145/2908812
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 20 July 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. edge detection
      2. evolutionary computation
      3. heuristic
      4. metaheuristic

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      GECCO '16
      Sponsor:
      GECCO '16: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 20 - 24, 2016
      Colorado, Denver, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      GECCO '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 137 of 381 submissions, 36%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2022)Meta-Analysis to Prognosis Myocardial Infarction Using 12 Lead ECGHigh Performance Computing and Networking10.1007/978-981-16-9885-9_39(473-488)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2022
      • (2020)An experimental study of stunned state detection for broiler chickens using an improved convolution neural network algorithmComputers and Electronics in Agriculture10.1016/j.compag.2020.105284170(105284)Online publication date: Mar-2020

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media