Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2971485.2971528acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Argument For Design Space Reflection

Published: 23 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

We argue that documenting, revisiting and reflecting on the design space of a project provides three important benefits. First it increases our awareness of the constraints introduced by particular design choices. Second, this qualifies our understanding of the way a design space has been filtered by design activities. Third we are prompted to challenge these constraints and reconsider disregarded opportunities. To support this argument, we revisit key activities from two projects in our interaction design lab's portfolio, selected because of the detailed documentation available. We also introduce SnapShot, the web-based tool we are developing for this method of design space reflection. Based on these examples, we present a critical discussion and outline areas of future research.

References

[1]
Basballe, D., and Halskov, K. Dynamics of research through design. In Proc. DIS'12 ACM Press (2012) 58--67
[2]
Beaudouin-Lafon, M., and Mackay, W. Prototyping tools and techniques. In The Human Computer Interaction Hanbook. J. Jacko, A. Sears, J. Jacko, & A. Sears (Eds.). Laurence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ. (2003) 1017--1040.
[3]
Biskjaer, M.M., Dalsgaard, P. and Halskov, K. A constraint-based understanding of design spaces. In Proc. DIS'14 ACM Press (2014) 453--462
[4]
Blinkenlights Project. Retrieved April 3, 2016, from http://blinkenlights.net/
[5]
Bowers., J. The logic of annotated portfolios: communicating the value of research through design. In Proc. DIS'12 ACM Press (2012 ) 68--77
[6]
Bullivant, L. Responsive environments: architecture, art and design. V&A. London. 2006
[7]
Card, S.K., Mackinlay, J.D. and Robertson, G.G. The design space of input devices. In Proc. CHI'90 ACM Press (1990). 117--124
[8]
Carroll, J.M. and Rosson, M.B. 2003. Design rationale as theory. In Carroll, J. (Ed.) HCI models, theories and rameworks: Towards a multidisciplinary science. Morgan Kaufmann. London. (2003) 431--461.
[9]
Dalsgaard, P. and Halskov, K. Reflective design documentation. In Proc. DIS'12 ACM Press (2012 ) 428--437.
[10]
Dalsgaard, P., Halskov, K. and Nielsen, R. Maps for design reflection. In Artefact, 2,3 (2008) 176--189.
[11]
Dix, A., Rodden, T., Davies, N., Trevor, J., Friday, A. and Palfreyman, K. Exploiting space and location as a design framework for interactive mobile systems. In ACM Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction, 7,3. ACM Press (2000) 285--321.
[12]
Feder, D. Automatic optical design. In Applied Optics. 2,12. (1963) 1209--1226.
[13]
Ferri, G., Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S. and Louraine, S. Analyzing critical designs: categories, distinctions, and canons of exemplars. In Proc. DIS'14 ACM Press (2014) 355--364.
[14]
Fitzmaurice, G., Ishii, H. and Buxton, W. Bricks: laying the foundations for graspable user interfaces. In Proc. CHI'95 ACM Press (1995) 442--449
[15]
Gärdenfors, P. Conceptual spaces as a framework for knowledge representation. In Mind and Matter. 2,2. (2004) 9--27.
[16]
Gärdenfors, P. Induction, conceptual spaces and AI. In Philosophy of Science. 57,1. (1990) 78--95.
[17]
Gaver, W. Making spaces: how design workbooks work. In Proc. CHI'11 ACM Press (2011) 1551--1560
[18]
Halskov, K. and Dalsgaard, P. Inspiration Card Workshops. In Proc. DIS'06 ACM Press (2006 ) 2--11
[19]
Heape, C. The Design Space: the design process as the construction, exploration and expansion of a conceptual space. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Southern Denmark. 2007
[20]
Hornecker, E. and Buur, J. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In Proc. CHI'06 ACM Press (2006) 437--446
[21]
Kollision. Retrieved April 3, 2016, from http://kollision.dk/en/lovedoodles
[22]
Korsgaard, H., Hansen, N.B., Basballe, D., Dalsgaard, P. and Halskov, K. Odenplan: a media façade design process. In Proc. MAB'12 (2012) 23--32
[23]
Lim, Y-K., Stolterman, E. and Tenenberg, J. The anatomy of prototypes. In ACM Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction. 15,2 (2008) 7:1--7:27.
[24]
MacLean, A., Young, R., Bellotti, V. and Moran, T. Questions, options and criteria: elements of Design Space Analysis. In Human-Computer Interaction, 6, (1991) 201--250.
[25]
McCullough, M. Digital Ground: Architecture, Pervasive Computing, and Environmental Knowing. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA. 2004
[26]
Nigay, L. and Coutaz, J. A design space for multimodal systems: concurrent processing and data fusion. In Proc. CHI'93 ACM Press (1993). 172--178
[27]
Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., Davidoff, S., Forlizzi, J., Dey, A. and Min, K.Y. A fieldwork of the future with user enactments. In Proc. DIS'12 ACM Press (2012) 338--347
[28]
Redström, J., Skog, T and Hallnäs, L. Informative art: using amplified artworks as information dispays. In Proc. DARE 2000. (2000) 103--114
[29]
Ritchie, G. The transformational creativity hypothesis. In New Generation Computing, (2006) 241--266.
[30]
Sanders, E. and Westerlund, B. Experiencing, exploring and experimenting in and with co-design spaces. In Proc. Nordes No 4. 2011
[31]
Schön, D.A. The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books. New York. 1983
[32]
Schön, D.A. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Iossy Bass. San Francisco 1987
[33]
Schmit, L. and Fox, R. An integrated approach to structural synthesis and analysis. In AIAA Journal, 3,6. (1965) 1104--1112
[34]
Sengers, P. and Gaver, B. Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In Proc. DIS'06 ACM Press (2006) 99--108
[35]
Shaw, M. The role of design spaces. In IEEE Software. 29,1 (2012) 46--50.
[36]
Stolterman, E., McAtee, J., Royer, D. and Thandapani, S. 2008. Designerly tools. In Proc. DRS'08 DRS (2008) 116/1--116/14
[37]
Warglien, M. and Gärdenfors, P. Semantics, conceptual spaces, and the meeting of minds. In Synthese, 190,2. (2013) 2165--2193.
[38]
Westerlund, B. Design space conceptual tool - grasping the design process. In Proc. Nordes 2005 (2005) D2.
[39]
Woodbury, R. and Burrow, A. Whither design space? In Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 20,2 (2006) 63--82.
[40]
Zimmerman, J., Forlizi, J. and Evensen, S. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proc. CHI'07 ACM Press (2007) 493--502

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Learning from Users: Everyday Playful Interactions to Support Architectural Spatial ChangesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770858:CHI PLAY(1-25)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
  • (2024)"I'm not alone in that battle": Designing Mobile AR for Mental Health Communication and Community ConnectednessProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661626(328-342)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)"Data Is One Thing, But I Want To Know The Story Behind": Designing For Self-Tracking and Remote Patient Monitoring In The Context Of Multiple Sclerosis CareProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661499(597-618)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. An Argument For Design Space Reflection

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    NordiCHI '16: Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    October 2016
    1045 pages
    ISBN:9781450347631
    DOI:10.1145/2971485
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 October 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Design space
    2. design documentation
    3. reflective practice

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • The Danish Innovation Foundation

    Conference

    NordiCHI '16

    Acceptance Rates

    NordiCHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 58 of 231 submissions, 25%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)103
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Learning from Users: Everyday Playful Interactions to Support Architectural Spatial ChangesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770858:CHI PLAY(1-25)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
    • (2024)"I'm not alone in that battle": Designing Mobile AR for Mental Health Communication and Community ConnectednessProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661626(328-342)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)"Data Is One Thing, But I Want To Know The Story Behind": Designing For Self-Tracking and Remote Patient Monitoring In The Context Of Multiple Sclerosis CareProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661499(597-618)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Form-From: A Design Space of Social Media SystemsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410068:CSCW1(1-47)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Opportunistic Nudges for Task Migration Between Personal DevicesExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651037(1-8)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-CreationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642400(1-26)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Designing Diverse Pathways for ParticipationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642240(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)A design space for automated material handling vehiclesFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2023.127625810Online publication date: 14-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Towards a Design Space for Storytelling on the Fashion Technology RunwayProceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3569009.3573899(1-15)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2023
    • (2022)I Just Can’t Believe These are not Fictitious: Vivifying design examples through narratives populated by existing artefactsProceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3569219.3569394(129-134)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media