Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2645710.2645721acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automating readers' advisory to make book recommendations for K-12 readers

Published: 06 October 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The academic performance of students is affected by their reading ability, which explains why reading is one of the most important aspects of school curriculums. Promoting good reading habits among K-12 students is essential, given the enormous influence of reading on students' development as learners and members of society. In doing so, it is indispensable to provide readers with engaging and motivating reading selections. Unfortunately, existing book recommenders have failed to offer adequate choices for K-12 readers, since they either ignore the reading abilities of their users or cannot acquire the much-needed information to make recommendations due to privacy issues. To address these problems, we have developed Rabbit, a book recommender that emulates the readers' advisory service offered at school/public libraries. Rabbit considers the readability levels of its readers and determines the facets, i.e.,appeal factors, of books that evoke subconscious, emotional reactions on a reader. The design of Rabbit is unique, since it adopts a multi-dimensional approach to capture the reading abilities, preferences, and interests of its readers, which goes beyond the traditional book content/topical analysis. Conducted empirical studies have shown that Rabbit outperforms a number of (readability-based) book recommenders.

Supplementary Material

JPG File (p9-sidebyside.jpg)
MP4 File (p9-sidebyside.mp4)

References

[1]
R. Benjamin. Reconstructing Readability: Recent Developments and Recommendations in the Analysis of Text Difficulty. Ed. Psych. Review, 24:63--88, 2012.
[2]
C. Coulter and M. Smith. The Construction Zone: Literary Elements in Narrative Research. Educational Researcher, 38(8):577--590, 2009.
[3]
A. Cox and K. Horne. Fast-Paced, Romantic, Set in Savannah: A Comparison of Results from Readers' Advisory Databases in the Public Library. Public Library Quarterly, 31(4):285--302, 2012.
[4]
S. Givon and V. Lavrenko. Predicting Social-Tags for Cold Start Book Recommendations. In ACM RecSys, pages 333--336, 2009.
[5]
N. Hollands. Improving the Model for Interactive Readers' Advisory Service. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 45(3):205--212, 2006.
[6]
J. Koberstein and Y.-K. Ng. Using Word Clusters to Detect Similar Web Documents. In KSEM, pages 215--228, 2006.
[7]
M. Koolen, J. Kamps, and G. Kazai. Social Book Search: Comparing Topical Relevance Judgments and Book Suggestions for Evaluation. In ACM CIKM, pages 185--194, 2012.
[8]
G. Linden, B. Smith, and J. York. Amazon.com Recommendations: Item-to-Item Collaborative Filtering. IEEE Internet Computing, 7(1):76--80, 2003.
[9]
N. Manouselis, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, and E. Duval. Recommender Systems for Learning. Springer Briefs in Electr. and Comp. Eng., 2013.
[10]
J. Oakhill and K. Cain. The Precursors of Reading Ability in Young Readers: Evidence From a Four-Year Longitudinal Study. SSR, 16(2):91--121, 2012.
[11]
B. Pang and L. Lee. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. FTIR, 2(1--2):1--135, 2008.
[12]
M. Pera. Using Online Data Sources to Make Recommendations on Reading Materials for K-12 and Advanced Readers. PhD thesis, BYU, April 2014.
[13]
G. Pirro and J. Euzenat. A Feature and Information Theoretic Framework for Semantic Similarity and Relatedness. In ISWC, pages 615--630, 2010.
[14]
J. Saricks. Readers' Advisory Service in the Public Library, 3rd Ed. ALA Store, 2005.
[15]
R. Shaban. A Guide to Writing Book Reviews. JEPHC, 4(3):Article 11, 2006.
[16]
A. Sieg, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke. Improving the Effectiveness of Collaborative Recommendation with Ontology-based User Profiles. In ACM HetRec, pages 39--46, 2010.
[17]
C. Yang, B. Wei, J. Wu, Y. Zhang, and L. Zhang. CARES: a Ranking-oriented CADAL Recommender System. In ACM/IEEE JCDL, pages 203--212, 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Investigating the Use of Deep Learning and Implicit Feedback in K12 Educational Recommender SystemsIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2023.327342217(112-123)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Textual form features for text readability assessmentNatural Language Processing10.1017/nlp.2024.50(1-42)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Book recommendation system: reviewing different techniques and approachesInternational Journal on Digital Libraries10.1007/s00799-024-00403-725:4(803-824)Online publication date: 14-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Automating readers' advisory to make book recommendations for K-12 readers

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      RecSys '14: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems
      October 2014
      458 pages
      ISBN:9781450326681
      DOI:10.1145/2645710
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 06 October 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. books
      2. k-12
      3. readers' advisory
      4. recommendation system

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      RecSys'14
      Sponsor:
      RecSys'14: Eighth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
      October 6 - 10, 2014
      California, Foster City, Silicon Valley, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      RecSys '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 35 of 234 submissions, 15%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 1,295 submissions, 20%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
      Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Investigating the Use of Deep Learning and Implicit Feedback in K12 Educational Recommender SystemsIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2023.327342217(112-123)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
      • (2024)Textual form features for text readability assessmentNatural Language Processing10.1017/nlp.2024.50(1-42)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
      • (2024)Book recommendation system: reviewing different techniques and approachesInternational Journal on Digital Libraries10.1007/s00799-024-00403-725:4(803-824)Online publication date: 14-May-2024
      • (2024)Going Beyond Passages: Readability Assessment for Book-Level Long TextsChinese Computational Linguistics10.1007/978-981-97-8367-0_26(434-450)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2024
      • (2024)Not Just Algorithms: Strategically Addressing Consumer Impacts in Information RetrievalAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-031-56066-8_25(314-335)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2024
      • (2023)Covering Covers: Characterization Of Visual Elements Regarding SleevesAdjunct Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3563359.3597404(28-33)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2023
      • (2023)Introduction to this special issue on intelligent systems for people with diverse cognitive abilitiesHuman–Computer Interaction10.1080/07370024.2023.225196939:1-2(1-7)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2023
      • (2022)A fuzzy content-based group recommender system with dynamic selection of the aggregation functionsInternational Journal of Approximate Reasoning10.1016/j.ijar.2022.08.015Online publication date: Sep-2022
      • (2022)Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious: Why Using the “Right” Readability Formula in Children’s Web Search MattersAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-030-99736-6_1(3-18)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2022
      • (2021)Content-based group recommender systems: a general taxonomy and further improvementsExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115444(115444)Online publication date: Jun-2021
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media