Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2537052.2537056acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-devConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lowering the barrier: how the what-you-see-is-what-you-map paradigm enables people to contribute volunteered geographic information

Published: 06 December 2013 Publication History

Abstract

In developing countries, Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) can be a valuable source of information, as often no detailed geo-data is available. Furthermore, it enables to aggregate local knowledge that can only be provided by local stakeholders. However, due to the complexity of tools and workflows of VGI applications, the participation within VGI projects is typically limited to technically skilled persons. We propose to focus on task-specific interfaces to integrate inexperienced user groups in the data collection process. For the example of micro-mapping we show how What-You-See-Is-What-You-Map (WYSIWYM) interfaces can lower the technological barriers compared to generic user interfaces and allow the contribution of precise geometric geographic data even for technologically uneducated persons. We report on two user studies in two different settings: the first study compares the general quantitative and qualitative aspects of user-generated data of three different geographic data collection tools, and the second study investigates the robustness of these results with a focus on the technological barrier with technologically untrained farmers in rural Laos. We are able to show that WYSIWYM interfaces foster the contribution of data of promising quality and at the same time significantly lower the barrier of usage. Thus, WYSIWYM is well suited to integrate contributors with limited technological knowledge into VGI processes and enables crowdsourcing geographic information at a local level.

References

[1]
http://www.araelium.com/screen.
[2]
J. Biagioni and J. Eriksson. Map inference in the face of noise and disparity. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS 2012), Redondo Beach, California, 2012.
[3]
B. M. Chaudry, K. H. Connelly, K. A. Siek, and J. L. Welch. Mobile interface design for low-literacy populations. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium, pages 91--100. ACM, 2012.
[4]
D. M. Chen, G. Baatz, K. Koser, S. S. Tsai, R. Vedantham, T. Pylvanainen, K. Roimela, X. Chen, J. Bach, M. Pollefeys, et al. City-scale landmark identification on mobile devices. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 IEEE Conference on, pages 737--744. IEEE, 2011.
[5]
J. Cinnamon and N. Schuurman. Confronting the data-divide in a time of spatial turns and volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 78(4):657--674, 2013.
[6]
A. Coltekin, B. Heil, S. Garlandini, and S. I. Fabrikant. Evaluating the effectiveness of interactive map interface designs: a case study integrating usability metrics with eye-movement analysis. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 36(1):5--17, 2009.
[7]
S. Elwood. Volunteered geographic information: future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal, 72:173--183, 2008.
[8]
D. W. Farthing and J. M. Ware. When it comes to mapping developing countries, disaster preparedness is better than disaster response. In AGI Geocommunity '10: Opportunities in a Changing World, 2010.
[9]
J. Foley, A. van Dam, S. Feiner, J. Hughes, and R. Phillips. Introduction to Computer Graphics. Addison-Wesley Professional, 1993.
[10]
L. Frommberger, F. Schmid, and C. Cai. Micro-mapping with smartphones for monitoring agricultural development. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Computing for Development (DEV 2013), Bangalore, India, 2013.
[11]
M. Goodchild. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4):211--221, 2007.
[12]
H. Jenny, A. Neumann, B. Jenny, and L. Hurni. A wysiwyg interface for user-friendly access to geospatial data collections. Preservation in Digital Cartography, pages 221--238, 2010.
[13]
C. E. Jones and P. Weber. Towards usability engineering for online editors of volunteered geographic information: a perspective on learnability. Transactions in GIS, 16(4):523--544, 2012.
[14]
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/.
[15]
J. Luo, D. Joshi, J. Yu, and A. Gallagher. Geotagging in multimedia and computer vision - a survey. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 51:187--211, 2011.
[16]
N. Maisonneuve and B. Chopard. Crowdsourcing satellite imagery analysis: Study of parallel and iterative models. Geographic Information Science, pages 116--131, 2012.
[17]
http://www.mapkibera.org/.
[18]
I. Medhi, M. Lakshmanan, K. Toyama, and E. Cutrell. Some evidence for the impact of limited education on hierarchical user interface navigation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 2813--2822. ACM, 2013.
[19]
I. Medhi, S. Patnaik, E. Brunskill, S. Gautama, W. Thies, and K. Toyama. Designing mobile interfaces for novice and low-literacy users. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 18(1):1--28, 2011.
[20]
http://www.google.com/mobile/mytracks/.
[21]
J. Nielsen. Usability inspection methods. In Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, pages 413--414. ACM, 1994.
[22]
http://www.openseamap.org/.
[23]
http://www.openstreetmap.org/.
[24]
F. Ramm, J. Topf, and S. Chilton. OpenStreetMap --- Using and Enhancing the Free Map of the World. UIT Cambridge, 2010.
[25]
F. Schmid, C. Cai, and L. Frommberger. A new micro-mapping method for rapid VGI-ing of small geographic features. In Geographic Information Science: 7th International Conference (GIScience 2012), Columbus, Ohio, 2012.
[26]
F. Schmid, L. Frommberger, C. Cai, and C. Freksa. What you see is what you map: Geometry-preserving micro-mapping for smaller geographic objects with mapit. In Geographic Information Science at the Heart of Europe, pages 3--19. Springer International Publishing, 2013.
[27]
F. Schmid, O. Kutz, L. Frommberger, T. Kauppinen, and C. Cai. Intuitive and natural interfaces for geospatial data classification. In Workshop on Place-related Knowledge Acquisition Research, Kloster Seeon, Germany, 2012.
[28]
B. Schneiderman. Eight golden rules of interface design. In Designing the User Interdace. Addison Wesley, USA, 3rd edition, 1998.
[29]
G. Schroth, R. Huitl, D. Chen, M. Abu-Alqumsan, A. Al-Nuaimi, and E. Steinbach. Mobile visual location recognition. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 28(4):77--89, 2011.
[30]
C. L. Sidlar and C. Rinner. Utility assessment of a map-based online geo-collaboration tool. Journal of environmental management, 90(6):2020--2026, 2009.
[31]
C. Traynor and M. G. Williams. Why are geographic information systems hard to use? In Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, pages 288--289. ACM, 1995.
[32]
A. Turner. Introduction to neogeography. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2006.
[33]
http://www.wheelmap.org/.
[34]
D. White, J. Corson-Rikert, and M. Maizel. Wysiwyg map digitizing: Real time geometric correction and topological encoding. In Proceedings from Auto-Carto, volume 8, pages 739--743, 1987.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Satellite image analysis using crowdsourcing data for collaborative mapping: current and opportunitiesInternational Journal of Digital Earth10.1080/17538947.2018.1556352(1-16)Online publication date: 20-Dec-2018
  • (2016)Guided Classification System for Conceptual Overlapping Classes in OpenStreetMapISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi50600875:6(87)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2016
  • (2015)How to choose a mobile phone for an ICT4D projectProceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development10.1145/2737856.2737897(1-4)Online publication date: 15-May-2015
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Lowering the barrier: how the what-you-see-is-what-you-map paradigm enables people to contribute volunteered geographic information

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ACM DEV-4 '13: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Computing for Development
        December 2013
        176 pages
        ISBN:9781450325585
        DOI:10.1145/2537052
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 06 December 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. VGI
        2. natural interfaces
        3. task-specific interaction

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        ACM DEV-4
        ACM DEV-4: Annual Symposium on Computing for Development
        December 6 - 7, 2013
        Cape Town, South Africa

        Acceptance Rates

        ACM DEV-4 '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 14 of 42 submissions, 33%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 52 of 164 submissions, 32%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
        Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2018)Satellite image analysis using crowdsourcing data for collaborative mapping: current and opportunitiesInternational Journal of Digital Earth10.1080/17538947.2018.1556352(1-16)Online publication date: 20-Dec-2018
        • (2016)Guided Classification System for Conceptual Overlapping Classes in OpenStreetMapISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi50600875:6(87)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2016
        • (2015)How to choose a mobile phone for an ICT4D projectProceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development10.1145/2737856.2737897(1-4)Online publication date: 15-May-2015
        • (2014)Ambiguity and plausibilityProceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems10.1145/2666310.2666392(143-152)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2014
        • (2014)Data Quality Assurance for Volunteered Geographic InformationGeographic Information Science10.1007/978-3-319-11593-1_9(126-141)Online publication date: 2014

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media