research-article

Open source communities of competitors

Authors:

Glenn McClementsAuthors Info & Claims

Interactions, Volume 20, Issue 6

Pages 54 - 59

https://doi.org/10.1145/2527191

Published: 01 November 2013 Publication History

Get Access

References

[1]

Shirky, C. Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age. Penguin Press, New York, 2010.

Google Scholar

[2]

Kelty, C. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Duke University Press, Durham NC, 2008.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

Crowston, K., Wei, K., Howison, J., and Wiggins, A. Free/Libre open-source software development: What we know and what we do not know. ACM Computing Surveys 44, 2 (2012).

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

Yeaton, T. Why you need open source for health exchange success. Wired Innovation Insights. 2012; http://www.wired.com/insights/2012/12/why-you-need-open-source-for-health-exchange-success/

Google Scholar

[5]

Becker, H. S. Art Worlds. University of California Press, Ewing, NJ, 2008.

Google Scholar

[6]

Kaptelinin, V. and Nardi, B. Affordances in HCI: Toward a mediated action perspective. Proc. CHI '12. 2012, 967--976.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

Imtiaz, S. and Raza, A. User centered design patterns and related issues: A review. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction 4, 1 (2013), 19--24.

Google Scholar

[8]

Feinberg, M. Writing the experience of information retrieval: Digital collection design as a form of dialogue. Proc. CHI '12. 2012, 357--366.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

Halpern, M., Erickson, I., Forlano, L., and Gay, G. Designing collaboration: Comparing cases exploring cultural probes as boundary-negotiating objects. Proc. CSCW '13. 2013, 1093--1102.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

Kelty, C. There is no free software. Journal of Peer Production, Issue 3, (2013); http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/debate/there-is-no-free-software/

Google Scholar

[11]

Ciborra, C. and Andreu, R. Sharing knowledge across boundaries. Journal of Information Technology 16 (2001), 73--81.

Crossref

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Yenişen Yavuz ERiehle D(2025)Why and how do organizations create user-led open source consortia? A systematic literature reviewInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107681181(107681)Online publication date: May-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107681
Newton OFiore S(2024)Understanding participation and corporatization in service of diversity in free/libre and open source software development projectsJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2024.112163217:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112163
Dolata U(2024)Industrieplattformen als Markt‑, Produktions- und Innovationsflächen. Feldvermessungen und theoretisch-konzeptionelle ÜberlegungenIndustrial platforms as market, production and innovation areas. Field survey and theoretical-conceptual considerationsBerliner Journal für Soziologie10.1007/s11609-024-00526-334:2(171-196)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-024-00526-3
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Open source communities of competitors
1. Information systems
  1. Information retrieval
  2. Information storage systems

Recommendations

The Value of Engaging with Open Source Communities
OpenSym '17: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration Companion

Organizational engagement with open source communities has become increasingly common. Open source is becoming a widely accepted and utilized form of innovation and product development. The fact that organizations extend their development efforts to ...
Volunteer management in open source communities
OpenSym '15: Companion to the Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Open Collaboration

Open source community management is largely ad-hoc and relies on practitioner guides. Yet there is a great deal of information about volunteer management in the general volunteering literature, open source literature and general volunteering guides ...
Sustainability of Open Source software communities beyond a fork

First comprehensive analysis of Open Source projects involving a fork.The LibreOffice project, which was forked from the OpenOffice.org project, shows no sign of long-term decline.LibreOffice has attracted the long-term and most active committers in ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Interactions Volume 20, Issue 6

November + December 2013

81 pages

ISSN:1072-5520

EISSN:1558-3449

DOI:10.1145/2532360

Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2013

Published in INTERACTIONS Volume 20, Issue 6

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Research-article
Popular
Pre-selected

Funding Sources

G@1122642
Division of Integrative Organismal Systems

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

18
Total Citations
View Citations
1,383
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)240
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24

Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Yenişen Yavuz ERiehle D(2025)Why and how do organizations create user-led open source consortia? A systematic literature reviewInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107681181(107681)Online publication date: May-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107681
Newton OFiore S(2024)Understanding participation and corporatization in service of diversity in free/libre and open source software development projectsJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2024.112163217:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112163
Dolata U(2024)Industrieplattformen als Markt‑, Produktions- und Innovationsflächen. Feldvermessungen und theoretisch-konzeptionelle ÜberlegungenIndustrial platforms as market, production and innovation areas. Field survey and theoretical-conceptual considerationsBerliner Journal für Soziologie10.1007/s11609-024-00526-334:2(171-196)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-024-00526-3
Yenişen Yavuz ERiehle DMehrotra A(2024)Why do companies create and how do they succeed with a vendor-led open source foundationEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-024-10588-930:1Online publication date: 13-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10664-024-10588-9
Conaldi GDe Vita RGhinoi SFoster D(2023)Virtual collaborative spaces: a case study on the antecedents of collaboration in an open‐source software communityR&D Management10.1111/radm.1259954:2(347-369)Online publication date: 11-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12599
Newton OFiore S(2023)Leveraging Corporate Engagement for Diversity in Free/Libre and Open Source Software Projects2023 IEEE/ACM 4th Workshop on Gender Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering (GEICSE)10.1109/GEICSE59319.2023.00010(41-48)Online publication date: May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/GEICSE59319.2023.00010
Butler SGamalielsson JLundell BBrax CSjoberg JMattsson AGustavsson TFeist JLonroth E(2021)On Company Contributions to Community Open Source Software ProjectsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2019.291930547:7(1381-1401)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2019.2919305
Daniel SJanansefat SDiamant ERen Y(2020)Single- and Double-Loop LearningACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/3433148.343315351:4(68-92)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3433148.3433153
Schwab BRiehle DBarcomb AHarutyunyan N(2020)The Ecosystem of openKONSEQUENZ, A User-Led Open Source FoundationOpen Source Systems10.1007/978-3-030-47240-5_1(1-13)Online publication date: 5-May-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47240-5_1
Hukal PBerente NGermonprez MSchecter A(2019)Bots Coordinating Work in Open Source Software ProjectsComputer10.1109/MC.2018.288597052:9(52-60)Online publication date: Sep-2019
https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.2885970
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Digital Edition

View this article in digital edition.

Digital Edition

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

The Value of Engaging with Open Source Communities

Volunteer management in open source communities

Sustainability of Open Source software communities beyond a fork

Comments

Information

Published In

Publisher

Publication History

Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

eReader

Digital Edition

HTML Format

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations