Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

A no-reference metric for evaluating the quality of motion deblurring

Published: 01 November 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Methods to undo the effects of motion blur are the subject of intense research, but evaluating and tuning these algorithms has traditionally required either user input or the availability of ground-truth images. We instead develop a metric for automatically predicting the perceptual quality of images produced by state-of-the-art deblurring algorithms. The metric is learned based on a massive user study, incorporates features that capture common deblurring artifacts, and does not require access to the original images (i.e., is "noreference"). We show that it better matches user-supplied rankings than previous approaches to measuring quality, and that in most cases it outperforms conventional full-reference image-similarity measures. We demonstrate applications of this metric to automatic selection of optimal algorithms and parameters, and to generation of fused images that combine multiple deblurring results.

References

[1]
Bradley, R. A., and Terry, M. E. 1952. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39, 3/4.
[2]
Cadik, M., Herzog, R., Mantiuk, R., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H.-P. 2012. New measurements reveal weaknesses of image quality metrics in evaluating graphics artifacts. ACM Trans. Graphics 31, 6 (Nov.).
[3]
Chen, X., Golovinskiy, A., and Funkhouser, T. 2009. A benchmark for 3D mesh segmentation. ACM Trans. Graphics 28, 3.
[4]
Cho, S., and Lee, S. 2009. Fast motion deblurring. ACM Trans. Graphics 28, 5.
[5]
Cho, T. S., Paris, S., Horn, B., and Freeman, W. 2011. Blur kernel estimation using the Radon transform. In Proc. CVPR 2011.
[6]
Cole, F., Sanik, K., DeCarlo, D., Finkelstein, A., Funkhouser, T., Rusinkiewicz, S., and Singh, M. 2009. How well do line drawings depict shape? ACM Trans. Graphics 28, 3.
[7]
Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., and Egiazarian, K. 2007. Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 16, 8.
[8]
Fergus, R., Singh, B., Hertzmann, A., Roweis, S. T., and Freeman, W. T. 2006. Removing camera shake from a single photograph. ACM Trans. Graphics 25, 3.
[9]
Field, D. J., and Brady, N. 1997. Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes. Vision Research 37, 23.
[10]
Goldstein, A., and Fattal, R. 2012. Blur-kernel estimation from spectral irregularities. In Proc. ECCV 2012.
[11]
Gupta, A., Joshi, N., Zitnick, L., Cohen, M., and Curless, B. 2010. Single image deblurring using motion density functions. In Proc. ECCV 2010.
[12]
Hassen, R., Wang, Z., and Salama, M. 2010. No-reference image sharpness assessment based on local phase coherence measurement. In Proc. ICASSP 2010.
[13]
Hilbe, J. M. 2009. Logistic Regression Models. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
[14]
Ji, H., and Wang, K. 2012. A two-stage approach to blind spatially-varying motion deblurring. In Proc. CVPR 2012.
[15]
Joshi, N., Szeliski, R., and Kriegman, D. 2008. PSF estimation using sharp edge prediction. In Proc. CVPR 2008.
[16]
Joshi, N., Zitnick, C., Szeliski, R., and Kriegman, D. 2009. Image deblurring and denoising using color priors. In Proc. CVPR 2009.
[17]
Kendall, M. G. 1938. A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30, 1/2.
[18]
Köhler, R., Hirsch, M., Mohler, B., Schölkopf, B., and Harmeling, S. 2012. Recording and playback of camera shake: Benchmarking blind deconvolution with a real-world database. In Proc. ECCV 2012.
[19]
Krishnan, D., and Fergus, R. 2009. Fast image deconvolution using hyper-Laplacian priors. In Proc. NIPS 2009.
[20]
Krishnan, D., Tay, T., and Fergus, R. 2011. Blind deconvolution using a normalized sparsity measure. In Proc. CVPR 2011.
[21]
Levin, A., Fergus, R., Durand, F., and Freeman, W. T. 2007. Image and depth from a conventional camera with a coded aperture. ACM Trans. Graphics 26, 3.
[22]
Levin, A., Weiss, Y., Durand, F., and Freeman, W. 2011. Efficient marginal likelihood optimization in blind deconvolution. In Proc. CVPR 2011.
[23]
Mantiuk, R., Kim, K. J., Rempel, A. G., and Heidrich, W. 2011. HDR-VDP-2: A calibrated visual metric for visibility and quality predictions in all luminance conditions. ACM Trans. Graphics 30, 4.
[24]
Marziliano, P., Dufaux, F., Winkler, S., and Ebrahimi, T. 2004. Perceptual blur and ringing metrics: Application to JPEG2000. Signal Processing: Image Communication 19, 2.
[25]
Masia, B., Presa, L., Corrales, A., and Gutierrez, D. 2012. Perceptually optimized coded apertures for defocus deblurring. Computer Graphics Forum 31, 6.
[26]
Mittal, A., Moorthy, A. K., and Bovik, A. C. 2012. Automatic parameter prediction for image denoising algorithms using perceptual quality features. In Proc. SPIE, vol. 8291.
[27]
Mittal, A., Moorthy, A., and Bovik, A. 2012. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 21, 12.
[28]
Mittal, A., Soundararajan, R., and Bovik, A. 2012. Making a "completely blind" image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal Processing Letters PP, 99.
[29]
Moorthy, A., and Bovik, A. 2010. A two-step framework for constructing blind image quality indices. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 17, 5.
[30]
Narvekar, N., and Karam, L. 2011. A no-reference image blur metric based on the cumulative probability of blur detection (CPBD). IEEE Trans. Image Processing 20, 9.
[31]
Pérez, P., Gangnet, M., and Blake, A. Poisson image editing. ACM Trans. Graphics 22, 3.
[32]
Saad, M., Bovik, A., and Charrier, C. 2010. A DCT statistics-based blind image quality index. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 17, 6.
[33]
Samadani, R., Mauer, T. A., Berfanger, D. M., and Clark, J. H. 2010. Image thumbnails that represent blur and noise. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 19, 2 (Feb.).
[34]
Schuler, C. J., Hirsch, M., Harmeling, S., and Schölkopf, B. 2012. Blind correction of optical aberrations. In Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Computer Vision - Volume Part III, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Proc. ECCV 2012, 187--200.
[35]
Secord, A., Lu, J., Finkelstein, A., Singh, M., and Nealen, A. 2011. Perceptual models of viewpoint preference. ACM Trans. Graphics 30, 5.
[36]
Shan, Q., Jia, J., and Agarwala, A. 2008. High-quality motion deblurring from a single image. ACM Trans. Graphics 27, 3.
[37]
Sheikh, H., and Bovik, A. 2006. Image information and visual quality. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 15, 2. Spearman, C. 1904. The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American journal of psychology 15, 1.
[38]
Tang, H., Joshi, N., and Kapoor, A. 2011. Learning a blind measure of perceptual image quality. In Proc. CVPR 2011.
[39]
Teo, P., and Heeger, D. 1994. Perceptual image distortion. In Proc. ICIP 1994, vol. 2.
[40]
Trentacoste, M., Mantiuk, R., and Heidrich, W. 2011. Blur-Aware Image Downsizing. In Proc. Eurographics.
[41]
Wang, Z., Bovik, A., Sheikh, H., and Simoncelli, E. 2004. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 13, 4.
[42]
Whyte, O., Sivic, J., Zisserman, A., and Ponce, J. 2010. Non-uniform deblurring for shaken images. In Proc. CVPR 2010.
[43]
Xu, L., and Jia, J. 2010. Two-phase kernel estimation for robust motion deblurring. In Proc. ECCV 2010.
[44]
Ye, P., Kumar, J., Kang, L., and Doermann, D. 2012. Unsupervised feature learning framework for no-reference image quality assessment. In Proc. CVPR 2012.
[45]
Yuan, L., Sun, J., Quan, L., and Shum, H.-Y. 2007. Image deblurring with blurred/noisy image pairs. ACM Trans. Graphics 26, 3.
[46]
Zhu, X., and Milanfar, P. 2009. A no-reference sharpness metric sensitive to blur and noise. In Quality of Multimedia Experience 2009.
[47]
Zhu, X., and Milanfar, P. 2010. Automatic parameter selection for denoising algorithms using a no-reference measure of image content. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 19, 12.
[48]
Zoran, D., and Weiss, Y. 2011. From learning models of natural image patches to whole image restoration. In Proc. ICCV 2011.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Adaptive Structure and Texture Similarity Metric for Image Quality Assessment and OptimizationIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2023.333320826(5398-5409)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)IMU-Assisted Accurate Blur Kernel Re-Estimation in Non-Uniform Camera Shake DeblurringIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2024.341181933(3823-3838)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Improved weed segmentation in UAV imagery of sorghum fields with a combined deblurring segmentation modelPlant Methods10.1186/s13007-023-01060-819:1Online publication date: 22-Aug-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A no-reference metric for evaluating the quality of motion deblurring

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
    ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 32, Issue 6
    November 2013
    671 pages
    ISSN:0730-0301
    EISSN:1557-7368
    DOI:10.1145/2508363
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 November 2013
    Published in TOG Volume 32, Issue 6

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. deblurring
    2. image quality metric
    3. no-reference
    4. percetually-validated

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Adaptive Structure and Texture Similarity Metric for Image Quality Assessment and OptimizationIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2023.333320826(5398-5409)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)IMU-Assisted Accurate Blur Kernel Re-Estimation in Non-Uniform Camera Shake DeblurringIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2024.341181933(3823-3838)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
    • (2023)Improved weed segmentation in UAV imagery of sorghum fields with a combined deblurring segmentation modelPlant Methods10.1186/s13007-023-01060-819:1Online publication date: 22-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Simulating human visual perception behaviors for video quality assessmentJournal of Electronic Imaging10.1117/1.JEI.32.6.06250832:06Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Revisiting the Regularizers in Blind Image Deblurring With a New OneIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2023.328035832(3994-4009)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Blurry Facial-Image Deconvolution via Model-Guided Deep Neural Network Inspired From Edge RegularizationIEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems10.1109/TCDS.2022.315776615:1(285-297)Online publication date: Mar-2023
    • (2023)An effective interpretation of defocusing and the corresponding defocus convolution kernelOptics & Laser Technology10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.109035160(109035)Online publication date: May-2023
    • (2023)Image deblurring to improve the grain monitoring in a rice combine harvesterSmart Agricultural Technology10.1016/j.atech.2023.1002194(100219)Online publication date: Aug-2023
    • (2023)An Improved Blind Deconvolution for Restoration of Blurred Images Using Ringing Removal ProcessingProceedings of Fourth International Conference on Computer and Communication Technologies10.1007/978-981-19-8563-8_34(357-366)Online publication date: 30-Mar-2023
    • (2022)Noise-Adaptive Non-Blind Image DeblurringSensors10.3390/s2218692322:18(6923)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media