Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2562059.2562118acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On approximation metrics for linear temporal model-checking of stochastic systems

Published: 15 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

This paper proposes criteria for metrics between stochastic systems with a focus on the task of linear temporal model-checking. It explicitly puts forward two metrics which partially satisfy those criteria, and discusses their connection with other metrics studied in the literature. In particular, the notion of coupling between stochastic processes is shown to be crucial: omitting the explicit choice of coupling may lead to conservative results. The theoretical claims in the paper are supported by numerical examples.

References

[1]
MoVeS website. http://www.movesproject.eu.
[2]
A. Abate. A contractivity approach for probabilistic bisimulations of diffusion processes. In Proceedings of the 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 28th Chinese Control Conference, pages 2230--2235, 2009.
[3]
A. Abate. Approximation metrics based on probabilistic bisimulations for general state-space markov processes: a survey. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Sciences, 2013. In Print.
[4]
A. Abate, J.-P. Katoen, J. Lygeros, and M. Prandini. Approximate model checking of stochastic hybrid systems. European Journal of Control, 16:624--641, 2010.
[5]
A. Abate, J.-P. Katoen, and A. Mereacre. Quantitative automata model checking of autonomous stochastic hybrid systems. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, HSCC '11, pages 83--92, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
[6]
A. Abate and M. Prandini. Approximate abstractions of stochastic systems: A randomized method. In Proceedings of the 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference, pages 4861--4866, 2011.
[7]
A. Abate, F. Redig, and I. Tkachev. On the effect of perturbation of conditional probabilities in total variation. Statistics & Probability Letters, 2014. In Press.
[8]
C. Baier and J.-P. Katoen. Principles of model checking. The MIT Press, 2008.
[9]
A. Dembo and O. Zeitouni. Large deviations techniques and applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010.
[10]
J. Desharnais, A. Edalat, and P. Panangaden. Bisimulation for Labelled Markov Processes. Information and Computation, 179(2):163--193, 2002.
[11]
J. Desharnais, V. Gupta, R. Jagadeesan, and P. Panangaden. Metrics for Labeled Markov Systems. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Concurrency Theory, CONCUR '99, pages 258--273, London, UK, 1999. Springer-Verlag.
[12]
J. Desharnais, V. Gupta, R. Jagadeesan, and P. Panangaden. Metrics for labelled Markov processes. Theoretical Computer Science, 318(3):323--354, 2004.
[13]
S. N. Ethier and T. G. Kurtz. Markov processes: characterization and convergence. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Probability and Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1986.
[14]
N. Ferns, P. Panangaden, and D. Precup. Bisimulation metrics for continuous Markov decision processes. SIAM Journal on Computing, 40(6):1662--1714, 2011.
[15]
A. L. Gibbs and F. E. Su. On choosing and bounding probability metrics. International Statistical Review, 70(3):419--435, 2002.
[16]
A. Girard and G. J. Pappas. Approximation metrics for discrete and continuous systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52(5):782--798, 2007.
[17]
A. Girard and G. J. Pappas. Approximate bisimulation: A bridge between computer science and control theory. European Journal of Control, 17(5-6):568--578, 2011.
[18]
A. Hinton, M. Kwiatkowska, G. Norman, and D. Parker. PRISM: A tool for automatic verification of probabilistic systems. In H. Hermanns and J. Palsberg, editors, Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, volume 3920 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 441--444. Springer Verlag, 2006.
[19]
A. A. Julius and G. J. Pappas. Approximations of stochastic hybrid systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 54(6):1193--1203, 2009.
[20]
O. Kallenberg. Foundations of modern probability. Probability and its Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997.
[21]
J.-P. Katoen, M. Khattri, and I. S. Zapreev. A Markov reward model checker. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, QEST '05, pages 243--244, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society.
[22]
K. G. Larsen and A. Skou. Bisimulation through probabilistic testing. Information and Computation, 94(1):1--28, 1991.
[23]
T. Lindvall. Lectures on the coupling method. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Probability and Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1992.
[24]
B. Øksendal. Stochastic differential equations: an introduction with applications. Universitext. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, sixth edition, 2003.
[25]
K. R. Parthasarathy. Probability measures on metric spaces. Probability and Mathematical Statistics, No. 3. Academic Press Inc., New York, 1967.
[26]
D. Revuz. Markov chains. North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, second edition, 1984.
[27]
R. Segala. A compositional trace-based semantics for probabilistic automata. In I. Lee and S. A. Smolka, editors, CONCUR '95: Concurrency Theory, volume 962 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 234--248. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1995.
[28]
B. K. Sriperumbudur, K. Fukumizu, A. Gretton, B. Schölkopf, and G. Lanckriet. On the empirical estimation of integral probability metrics. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 6:1550--1599, 2012.
[29]
P. Tabuada. Verification and control of hybrid systems: A symbolic approach. Springer Verlag, New York, 2009.
[30]
D. Thorsley and E. Klavins. Approximating stochastic biochemical processes with Wasserstein pseudometrics. Systems Biology, IET, 4(3):193--211, May 2010.
[31]
I. Tkachev and A. Abate. Formula-free finite abstractions for linear temporal verification of stochastic hybrid systems. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, HSCC '13, pages 283--292, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.
[32]
I. Tkachev, A. Mereacre, J.-P. Katoen, and A. Abate. Quantitative automata-based controller synthesis for non-autonomous stochastic hybrid systems. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, HSCC '13, pages 293--302, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.
[33]
Ilya Tkachev and Alessandro Abate. Characterization and computation of infinite-horizon specifications over markov processes. Theoretical Computer Science, 515(0):1--18, 2014.
[34]
F. van Breugel, S. Shalit, and J. Worrell. Testing labelled Markov processes. In Proceedings of the 29th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, ICALP '02, pages 537--548, London, UK, 2002. Springer-Verlag.
[35]
F. van Breugel and J. Worrell. Towards quantitative verification of probabilistic transition systems. In Proceedings of the 28th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, ICALP '01, pages 421--432, London, UK, 2001. Springer-Verlag.
[36]
M.Y. Vardi. Automatic verification of probabilistic concurrent finite state programs. In 26th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 327--338, 1985.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HSCC '14: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Hybrid systems: computation and control
April 2014
328 pages
ISBN:9781450327329
DOI:10.1145/2562059
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 April 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. approximate bisimulation
  2. finite abstractions
  3. stochastic hybrid systems

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

HSCC'14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

HSCC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 29 of 69 submissions, 42%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 153 of 373 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Mode Reduction for Markov Jump SystemsIEEE Open Journal of Control Systems10.1109/OJCSYS.2022.32126131(335-353)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2022)Similarity quantification for linear stochastic systems: A coupling compensator approachAutomatica10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110476144(110476)Online publication date: Oct-2022
  • (2015)Adaptive Aggregation of Markov Chains: Quantitative Analysis of Chemical Reaction NetworksComputer Aided Verification10.1007/978-3-319-21690-4_12(195-213)Online publication date: 16-Jul-2015
  • (2014)Probabilistic Model Checking of Labelled Markov Processes via Finite Approximate BisimulationsHorizons of the Mind. A Tribute to Prakash Panangaden10.1007/978-3-319-06880-0_2(40-58)Online publication date: 2014

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media