Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2556420.2556820acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Values and negotiation in classification work

Published: 15 February 2014 Publication History

Abstract

My research interest is in the embodiment of community and personal values in knowledge organization systems. My dissertation research examines how classification workers make decisions in the context of conflicting user needs, author intent, and ethical implications. I am taking an ethnographic approach as a participant observer in a volunteer team of classification workers who create a "curated folksonomy" by linking together user-generated tags, and am planning interviews and comparison cases. By examining in detail the daily decisions made by classification workers, we can better understand the possibilities for the design of systems that embody values.

References

[1]
Bowker, G. and Star, S.L. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2012.
[2]
Bullard, J. Playfully serious information for serious play: the integration of community values in an information resource. Proc. iConference (2013), 389--397.
[3]
Feinberg, M. An examination of authority in social classification systems. Proc. ASIS&T SIG/CR Workshop, (2006).
[4]
Feinberg, M. How information systems communicate as documents: the concept of authorial voice. Journal of Documentation, 67, 6 (2011), 1016--1037.
[5]
Keshet, Y. Classification systems in the light of sociology of knowledge. Journal of Documentation, 67, 1 (2011), 144--158.
[6]
Mai, J-E. Classification in a social world: bias and trust. Journal of Documentation, 66, 5, (2010), 627--642.
[7]
Nov, O. What motivates Wikipedians? Communications of the ACM, 50, 11 (2007), 60--64.
[8]
Schmidt, K. and Wagner, I. Ordering systems: Practices and artifacts in architectural design and planning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 13, (2005), 349--408.
[9]
Thornton, K. and McDonald, D. Tagging Wikipedia: collaboratively creating a category system. Proc. ACM Group (2012), 219--228.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Tag analysis as a tool for investigating information behaviour: comparing fan-tagging on Tumblr, Archive of Our Own and EtsyJournal of Documentation10.1108/JD-05-2020-0089ahead-of-print:ahead-of-printOnline publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2018)Understanding tag functions in a moderated, user-generated metadata ecosystemJournal of Documentation10.1108/JD-09-2017-0134Online publication date: 8-Feb-2018
  • (2017)'Being in a knowledge space'Journal of Information Science10.1177/016555151665882143:5(649-664)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Values and negotiation in classification work

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW Companion '14: Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
    February 2014
    372 pages
    ISBN:9781450325417
    DOI:10.1145/2556420
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 February 2014

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. classification work
    2. design
    3. ethnography

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Conference

    CSCW'14
    Sponsor:
    CSCW'14: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
    February 15 - 19, 2014
    Maryland, Baltimore, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW Companion '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 88 of 497 submissions, 18%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Tag analysis as a tool for investigating information behaviour: comparing fan-tagging on Tumblr, Archive of Our Own and EtsyJournal of Documentation10.1108/JD-05-2020-0089ahead-of-print:ahead-of-printOnline publication date: 1-Jan-2021
    • (2018)Understanding tag functions in a moderated, user-generated metadata ecosystemJournal of Documentation10.1108/JD-09-2017-0134Online publication date: 8-Feb-2018
    • (2017)'Being in a knowledge space'Journal of Information Science10.1177/016555151665882143:5(649-664)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017
    • (2017)Warrant as a means to study classification system designJournal of Documentation10.1108/JD-06-2016-007473:1(75-90)Online publication date: 9-Jan-2017
    • (2016)Motivating Invisible ContributionsProceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work10.1145/2957276.2957295(181-193)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2016

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media