Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2554850.2554878acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

From ratings to trust: an empirical study of implicit trust in recommender systems

Published: 24 March 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Trust has been extensively studied and its effectiveness demonstrated in recommender systems. Due to the lack of explicit trust information in most systems, many trust metric approaches have been proposed to infer implicit trust from user ratings. However, previous works have not compared these different approaches, and oftentimes focus only on the performance of predictive item ratings. In this paper, we first analyse five kinds of trust metrics in light of the properties of trust. We conduct an empirical study to explore the ability of trust metrics to distinguish explicit trust from implicit trust and to generate accurate predictions. Experimental results on two real-world data sets show that existing trust metrics cannot provide satisfying performance, and indicate that future metrics should be designed more carefully.

References

[1]
A. Abdul-Rahman and S. Hailes. Supporting trust in virtual communities. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2000.
[2]
C. Castelfranchi and R. Falcone. Trust Theory: A socio-cognitive and computational model. Wiley, 2010.
[3]
J. Golbeck and J. Hendler. Filmtrust: Movie recommendations using trust in web-based social networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), 2006.
[4]
G. Guo. Integrating trust and similarity to ameliorate the data sparsity and cold start for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys), 2013.
[5]
G. Guo, J. Zhang, and D. Thalmann. A simple but effective method to incorporate trusted neighbors in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP), 2012.
[6]
G. Guo, J. Zhang, and N. Yorke-Smith. A novel bayesian similarity measure for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2013.
[7]
C.-S. Hwang and Y.-P. Chen. Using trust in collaborative filtering recommendation. In New Trends in Applied Artificial Intelligence. 2007.
[8]
A. Jøsang. A logic for uncertain probabilities. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 9(03): 279--311, 2001.
[9]
N. Lathia, S. Hailes, and L. Capra. Trust-based collaborative filtering. In Trust Management II, 2008.
[10]
N. Lathia, S. Hailes, and L. Capra. The role of trust in collaborative filtering. http://www0.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/l.capra/publications/lathia_recsys_handbook09.pdf, 2009. online; accessed at Sep 3, 2013.
[11]
P. Massa and P. Avesani. Trust-aware recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys), 2007.
[12]
J. O'Donovan and B. Smyth. Trust in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), 2005.
[13]
M. Papagelis, D. Plexousakis, and T. Kutsuras. Alleviating the sparsity problem of collaborative filtering using trust inferences. In Trust management. 2005.
[14]
T. Peng and S. Chou. iTrustU: a blog recommender system based on multi-faceted trust and collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC), 2009.
[15]
G. Pitsilis and L. Marshall. A model of trust derivation from evidence for use in recommendation systems. Technical Report. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 2004.
[16]
Q. Shambour and J. Lu. A trust-semantic fusion-based recommendation approach for e-business applications. Decision Support Systems, 54: 768--780, 2012.
[17]
A. Sotos, S. Vanhoof, W. Van Den Noortgate, and P. Onghena. The transitivity misconception of pearson's correlation coefficient. Statistics Education Research Journal, 8(2): 33--55, 2009.
[18]
W. Yuan, L. Shu, H. Chao, D. Guan, Y. Lee, and S. Lee. itars: trust-aware recommender system using implicit trust networks. Communications, IET, 4(14): 1709--1721, 2010.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SAC '14: Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
March 2014
1890 pages
ISBN:9781450324694
DOI:10.1145/2554850
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 March 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ratings
  2. recommender systems
  3. similarity
  4. trust metrics

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

SAC 2014
Sponsor:
SAC 2014: Symposium on Applied Computing
March 24 - 28, 2014
Gyeongju, Republic of Korea

Acceptance Rates

SAC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 218 of 939 submissions, 23%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,650 of 6,669 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)49
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Trust Exploitation in Graph based Social Recommender Systems : A Survey2024 Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ICETITE)10.1109/ic-ETITE58242.2024.10493384(1-9)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2024
  • (2024)A Telic Theory of Trust10.1093/9780191982460.001.0001Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Rethinking Health Recommender Systems for Active Aging: An Autonomy-Based Ethical AnalysisScience and Engineering Ethics10.1007/s11948-024-00479-z30:3Online publication date: 27-May-2024
  • (2024)Time Aware Implicit Social Influence Estimation to Enhance Recommender Systems PerformancesResearch in Computer Science10.1007/978-3-031-63110-8_2(15-29)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2024
  • (2024)A survey of the state‐of‐the‐art approaches for evaluating trust in software ecosystemsJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.2695Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Suspiciousness and Fast and Slow Thinking Impact on Trust in Recommender SystemsProceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence10.2478/picbe-2023-009917:1(1103-1118)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2023
  • (2023)The Role of Software Trust in Selection of Open-Source and Closed Software2023 IEEE/ACM 11th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems and Software Ecosystems (SESoS)10.1109/SESoS59159.2023.00010(30-37)Online publication date: May-2023
  • (2023)A systematic literature review on trust in the software ecosystemEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-022-10238-y28:1Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2022)Privacy and Trust in eHealth: A Fuzzy Linguistic Solution for Calculating the Merit of ServiceJournal of Personalized Medicine10.3390/jpm1205065712:5(657)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2022
  • (2022)Clustering sequence graphsData & Knowledge Engineering10.1016/j.datak.2022.101981138:COnline publication date: 12-May-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media