Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1040830.1040870acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Trust in recommender systems

Published: 10 January 2005 Publication History

Abstract

Recommender systems have proven to be an important response to the information overload problem, by providing users with more proactive and personalized information services. And collaborative filtering techniques have proven to be an vital component of many such recommender systems as they facilitate the generation of high-quality recom-mendations by leveraging the preferences of communities of similar users. In this paper we suggest that the traditional emphasis on user similarity may be overstated. We argue that additional factors have an important role to play in guiding recommendation. Specifically we propose that the trustworthiness of users must be an important consideration. We present two computational models of trust and show how they can be readily incorporated into standard collaborative filtering frameworks in a variety of ways. We also show how these trust models can lead to improved predictive accuracy during recommendation.

References

[1]
Alfarez Abdul-Rahman and Stephen Hailes. A distributed trust model. In New Security Paradigms 1997, pages 48--60, 1997.
[2]
Paolo Avesani, Paolo Massa, and Roberto Tiella. Moleskiing: a trust-aware decentralized recommender system. 1st Workshop on Friend of a Friend, Social Networking and the Semantic Web. Galway, Ireland, 2004.
[3]
John S. Breese, David Heckerman, and Carl Kadie. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In Gregory F. Cooper and Serafín Moral, editors, Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-98), pages 43--52, San Francisco, July 24-26 1998. Morgan Kaufmann.
[4]
Paul Cotter and Barry Smyth. Ptv: Intelligent personalised tv guides. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Twelfth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pages 957--964. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 2000.
[5]
Alan Smeaton et al. The físchlár digital video system: a digital library of broadcast tv programmes. Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries.
[6]
Jennifer Golbeck and James Hendler. Accuracy of metrics for inferring trust and reputation in semantic web-based social networks. In Proceedings of EKAW'04, pages LNAI 2416, p. 278 ff., 2004.
[7]
N. Kushmerick. Robustness analyses of instance-based collaborative recommendation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning, Helsinki, Finland., volume 2430, pages 232--244. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, 2002.
[8]
Shyong K. Lam and John Riedl. Shilling recommender systems for fun and profit. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 393--402. ACM Press, 2004.
[9]
Raph Levien. Attack resistant trust metrics. Ph.D Thesis, UC Berkeley.
[10]
S. Marsh. Formalising trust as a computational concept. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Stirling, 1994.
[11]
Paolo Massa and Paolo Avesani. Trust-aware collaborative filtering for recommender systems. To Appear in: Proceedings of International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, Agia Napa, Cyprus, 25 Oct-29 Oct 2004.
[12]
Paolo Massa and Bobby Bhattacharjee. Using trust in recommender systems: an experimental analysis. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Trust Managment, Oxford, England, 2004.
[13]
P. Melville, R. Mooney, and R. Nagarajan. Content-boosted collaborative filtering. In P. Melville, R. J. Mooney, and R. Nagarajan. Content-boosted collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 2001., 2001.
[14]
Miquel Montaner, Beatriz Lopez, and Josep Lluis de la Rosa. Developing trust in recommender agents. In Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pages 304--305. ACM Press, 2002.
[15]
D. Oard and J. Kim. Implicit feedback for recommender systems, 1998.
[16]
John O'Donovan and John Dunnion. A framework for evaluation of collaborative recommendation algorithms in an adaptive recommender system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (CICLing-04), Seoul, Korea, pages 502--506. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
[17]
Michael O'Mahony, Neil Hurley, Nicholas Kushmerick, and Guenole Silvestre. Collaborative rec-ommendation: A robustness analysis, url: citeseer.ist.psu.edu/508439.html.
[18]
Michael P. O'Mahony, Neil Hurley, and Guenole C. M. Silvestre. An attack on collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pages 494--503. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
[19]
Derry O'Sullivan, David C. Wilson, and Barry Smyth. Improving case-based recommendation: A collaborative filtering approach. In Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Case Based Reasoning., pages LNAI 2416, p. 278 ff., 2002.
[20]
Paul Resnick, Neophytos Iacovou, Mitesh Suchak, Peter Bergstrom, and John Riedl. Grouplens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of ACM CSCW'94 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Sharing Information and Creating Meaning, pages 175--186, 1994.
[21]
Rashmi Sinha and Kirsten Swearingen. The role of transparency in recommender systems. In CHI '02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 830--831. ACM Press, 2002.
[22]
B. Smyth, D. Wilson, and D. O'Sullivan. Improving the quality of the personalised electronic programme guide. In In Proceedings of the TV'02 the 2nd Workshop on Personalisation in Future TV, May 2002., pages 42--55, 2002.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Predicting Consumer Behavior in E-Commerce Using Recommendation SystemsInternational Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT19SEP1550(806-813)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
  • (2024)The transformative power of recommender systems in enhancing citizens’ satisfaction: Evidence from the Moroccan public sectorInnovative Marketing10.21511/im.20(3).2024.1820:3(224-236)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Identifying the Factors That Influence Trust in AI Code CompletionProceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on AI-Powered Software10.1145/3664646.3664757(1-9)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Trust in recommender systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IUI '05: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
    January 2005
    344 pages
    ISBN:1581138946
    DOI:10.1145/1040830
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 January 2005

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. collaborative filtering
    2. profile similarity
    3. recommender systems
    4. reputation
    5. trust

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    IUI05
    IUI05: Tenth International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
    January 10 - 13, 2005
    California, San Diego, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 746 of 2,811 submissions, 27%

    Upcoming Conference

    IUI '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)176
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Predicting Consumer Behavior in E-Commerce Using Recommendation SystemsInternational Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT19SEP1550(806-813)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
    • (2024)The transformative power of recommender systems in enhancing citizens’ satisfaction: Evidence from the Moroccan public sectorInnovative Marketing10.21511/im.20(3).2024.1820:3(224-236)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Identifying the Factors That Influence Trust in AI Code CompletionProceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on AI-Powered Software10.1145/3664646.3664757(1-9)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Where Are the Values? A Systematic Literature Review on News Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36548052:3(1-40)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Analysing the Effect of Recommendation Algorithms on the Spread of MisinformationProceedings of the 16th ACM Web Science Conference10.1145/3614419.3644003(159-169)Online publication date: 21-May-2024
    • (2024)Trust Exploitation in Graph based Social Recommender Systems : A Survey2024 Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ICETITE)10.1109/ic-ETITE58242.2024.10493384(1-9)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Exploration Principles for Decision-Making Systems with Binary Feedbacks2024 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon)10.1109/SysCon61195.2024.10553578(1-8)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Cold-Start and Data Sparsity Problems in a Digital Twin Based Recommendation System2024 IEEE 29th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)10.1109/ETFA61755.2024.10711105(01-08)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Does metaverse improve recommendations quality and customer trust? A user-centric evaluation framework based on the cognitive-affective-behavioural theoryJournal of Innovation & Knowledge10.1016/j.jik.2024.1005699:4(100569)Online publication date: Oct-2024
    • (2024)Incorporation of Two-Fold Trust in Group Recommender System to Handle Popularity BiasSN Computer Science10.1007/s42979-023-02576-55:2Online publication date: 10-Feb-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media