Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2481334acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

All the news that's fit to read: a study of social annotations for news reading

Published: 27 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

As news reading becomes more social, how do different types of annotations affect people's selection of news articles? This paper reports on results from two experiments looking at social annotations in two different news reading contexts. The first experiment simulates a logged-out experience with annotations from strangers, a computer agent, and a branded company. Results indicate that, perhaps unsurprisingly, annotations by strangers have no persuasive effects. However, surprisingly, unknown branded companies still had a persuasive effect. The second experiment simulates a logged-in experience with annotations from friends, finding that friend annotations are both persuasive and improve user satisfaction over their article selections. In post-experiment interviews, we found that this increased satisfaction is due partly because of the context that annotations add. That is, friend annotations both help people decide what to read, and provide social context that improves engagement. Interviews also suggest subtle expertise effects. We discuss implications for design of social annotation systems and suggestions for future research.

References

[1]
Abdi, H. Holm's sequential bonferroni procedure. Encyclopedia of research design (N. Salkind, D. M. Dougherty, and B. Frey, eds.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, California (2010), 573--577.
[2]
Allison, P. D. Missing Data. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2001.
[3]
Altman, I., Vinsel, A., and Brown, B. Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation. Advances in experimental social psychology 14 (1981), 107--160.
[4]
Bao, S., Xue, G., Wu, X., Yu, Y., Fei, B., and Su, Z. Optimizing web search using social annotations. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, ACM (2007), 501--510.
[5]
Cialdini, R. Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control. Psychometrika 72, 2 (2007), 263--268.
[6]
Cosley, D., Lam, S., Albert, I., Konstan, J., and Riedl, J. Is seeing believing?: how recommender system interfaces affect users' opinions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2003), 585--592.
[7]
Diakopoulos, N., De Choudhury, M., and Naaman, M. Finding and assessing social media information sources in the context of journalism. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2012), 2451--2460.
[8]
Fogg, B. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity 2002, December (2002), 5.
[9]
Goffman, E. The presentation of self in everyday life. 1959. Garden City, NY (1959).
[10]
Golbeck, J., and Fleischmann, K. Trust in social q&a: the impact of text and photo cues of expertise. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 47, 1 (2010), 1--10.
[11]
Google. Introducing google social search: I finally found my friend's new york blog! http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/introducing-google-social-search-i.html, 2009.
[12]
Hermida, A. Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism Practice 4, 3 (2010), 297--308.
[13]
Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Radlinski, F., and Gay, G. Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM Transactions on Information systems 25, 2 (2007).
[14]
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Sharma, N., Hansen, D., and Alter, S. Impact of popularity indications on readers' selective exposure to online news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 49, 3 (2005), 296--313.
[15]
Komanduri, S., Fang, L., Huffaker, D., and Staddon, J. Around the water cooler: Shared discussion topics and contact closeness in social search. In Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2012).
[16]
Lampe, C., Ellison, N., and Steinfield, C. A familiar face (book): profile elements as signals in an online social network. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2007), 435--444.
[17]
Langsrud, Ø. Anova for unbalanced data: Use type ii instead of type iii sums of squares. Statistics and Computing 13, 2 (2003), 163--167.
[18]
Lee, A., and Bruckman, A. Judging you by the company you keep: dating on social networking sites. In Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work, ACM (2007), 371--378.
[19]
Li, L., Chu, W., Langford, J., and Schapire, R. A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, ACM (2010), 661--670.
[20]
Masli, M., and Terveen, L. Evaluating compliance-without-pressure techniques for increasing participation in online communities. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2012), 2915--2924.
[21]
Muralidharan, A., Gyongyi, Z., and Chi, E. H. Social annotations in web search. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12) (New York, NY, 2012), 1085--1094.
[22]
Nelson, L., Held, C., Pirolli, P., Hong, L., Schiano, D., and Chi, E. With a little help from my friends: examining the impact of social annotations in sensemaking tasks. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2009), 1795--1798.
[23]
Palen, L., and Dourish, P. Unpacking privacy for a networked world. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2003), 129--136.
[24]
Raghubir, P., and Srivastava, J. Monopoly money: The effect of payment coupling and form on spending behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 14, 3 (2008), 213.
[25]
Reeves, B., and Nass, C. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Chicago, IL, US: Center for the Study of Language and Information; New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[26]
Sundar, S., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., and Hastall, M. News cues: Information scent and cognitive heuristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 3 (2007), 366--378.
[27]
Sundar, S., and Nass, C. Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication 51, 1 (2006), 52--72.
[28]
Zanardi, V., and Capra, L. Social ranking: uncovering relevant content using tag-based recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems, ACM (2008), 51--58.
[29]
Zhen, Y., Li, W., and Yeung, D. Tagicofi: tag informed collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems, ACM (2009), 69--76.
[30]
Zhu, H., Huberman, B., and Luon, Y. To switch or not to switch: understanding social influence in online choices. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2012), 2257--2266.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)EduLive: Re-Creating Cues for Instructor-Learners Interaction in Educational Live Streams with Learners' Transcript-Based AnnotationsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869608:CSCW2(1-33)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2023)Scim: Intelligent Skimming Support for Scientific PapersProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3581641.3584034(476-490)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Supporting Online Learning and Teaching with Social AnnotationsCompanion Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work10.1145/3565967.3571751(42-44)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. All the news that's fit to read: a study of social annotations for news reading

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2013
    3550 pages
    ISBN:9781450318990
    DOI:10.1145/2470654
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 27 April 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. experiment
    2. news reading
    3. recommendations
    4. social annotation
    5. social computing
    6. user study

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '13
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 392 of 1,963 submissions, 20%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI '25
    CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)EduLive: Re-Creating Cues for Instructor-Learners Interaction in Educational Live Streams with Learners' Transcript-Based AnnotationsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869608:CSCW2(1-33)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2023)Scim: Intelligent Skimming Support for Scientific PapersProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3581641.3584034(476-490)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Supporting Online Learning and Teaching with Social AnnotationsCompanion Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work10.1145/3565967.3571751(42-44)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2023
    • (2022)Understanding the Effects of Structured Note-taking Systems for Video-based Learners in Individual and Social Learning ContextsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34928406:GROUP(1-21)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2022
    • (2021)You Recommend, I BuyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34491415:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
    • (2021)NoteCoStruct: Powering Online Learners with Socially Scaffolded Note Taking and SharingExtended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411763.3451694(1-5)Online publication date: 8-May-2021
    • (2021)Towards accessible news reading design in virtual reality for low visionMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-021-10899-9Online publication date: 16-May-2021
    • (2020)Exploring the Design of History-Enriched Floor Interfaces for Asynchronous Navigation SupportProceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3357236.3395496(1391-1403)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2020
    • (2019)Talking Back to TextsMarginalia in Modern Learning Contexts10.4018/978-1-5225-7183-4.ch001(1-16)Online publication date: 2019
    • (2019)Charting Subtle Interaction in the HCI LiteratureProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300648(1-15)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media