Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2460296.2460337acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Formative assessment and learning analytics

Published: 08 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Learning analytics seeks to enhance the learning process through systematic measurements of learning related data, and informing learners and teachers of the results of these measurements, so as to support the control of the learning process. Learning analytics has various sources of information, two main types being intentional and learner activity related metadata [1]. This contribution aims to provide a practical application of Shum and Crick's theoretical framework [1] of a learning analytics infrastructure that combines learning dispositions data with data extracted from computer-based, formative assessments. The latter data component is derived from one of the educational projects of ONBETWIST, part of the SURF program 'Testing and Test Driven Learning'.

References

[1]
Buckingham, S. S. & Deakin, C. R. (2012). Learning Dispositions and Transferable Competencies: Pedagogy, Modelling and Learning Analytics. Proceedings LAK2012: 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 92--101. ACM Press: New York
[2]
SURF (2010). Programma Toetsing en Toetsgestuurd Leren. http://www.surf.nl/nl/themas/innovatieinonderwijs/toetsen/Documents/Projectplan%20PROGRAMMA%20TOETSING%20EN%20TOETSGESTUURD%20LEREN.pdf
[3]
Tempelaar, D. T., Kuperus, B., Cuypers, H., Van der Kooij, H., Van de Vrie, E. M., & Heck, A. (2012). "The Role of Digital, Formative Testing in e-Learning for Mathematics: A Case Study in the Netherlands". In: "Mathematical e-learning" {online dossier}. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal (RUSC), 9(1). UoC.
[4]
Verbert, K., Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., & Duval, E. (2012). Dataset-Driven Research to Support Learning and Knowledge Analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (3), 133--148.
[5]
Whitmer, J., Fernandes, K., & Allen, W. R. (2012). Analytics in Progress: Technology Use, Student Characteristics, and Student Achievement. EDUCAUSE Review Online, July.
[6]
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Revised and expanded third edition. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
[7]
Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Leerstijlen en sturen van leerprocessen in het Hoger Onderwijs. Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
[8]
Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413--440.
[9]
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315--34.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enhancing Workforce PreparednessRevitalizing Student Skills for Workforce Preparation10.4018/979-8-3693-3856-8.ch004(121-160)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Dispositional learning analytics and formative assessment: an inseparable twinshipInternational Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education10.1186/s41239-024-00489-821:1Online publication date: 9-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Using Large Language Models To Diagnose Math Problem-solving Skills At ScaleProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3657604.3664697(471-475)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Formative assessment and learning analytics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    LAK '13: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge
    April 2013
    300 pages
    ISBN:9781450317856
    DOI:10.1145/2460296
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 April 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. blended learning
    2. formative assessment
    3. learning analytics
    4. learning dispositions
    5. student profiles
    6. test directed learning

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • SURF foundation

    Conference

    LAK '13
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    LAK '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 16 of 58 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 236 of 782 submissions, 30%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)82
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Enhancing Workforce PreparednessRevitalizing Student Skills for Workforce Preparation10.4018/979-8-3693-3856-8.ch004(121-160)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Dispositional learning analytics and formative assessment: an inseparable twinshipInternational Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education10.1186/s41239-024-00489-821:1Online publication date: 9-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Using Large Language Models To Diagnose Math Problem-solving Skills At ScaleProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3657604.3664697(471-475)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Understanding online self-regulation: A data-driven approach to LMS interaction indicatorsEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-13136-6Online publication date: 13-Nov-2024
    • (2023)How Learning Analytics Can Help Orchestration of Formative Assessment? Data-Driven Recommendations for Technology- Enhanced LearningIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2023.326552816:5(804-819)Online publication date: Oct-2023
    • (2022)Building personalised homework from a learning analytics based formative assessment: Effect on fifth‐grade students' understanding of fractionsBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1329254:1(76-97)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Formative assessment strategies for students' conceptions—The potential of learning analyticsBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1328854:1(58-75)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Standing on the shoulders of giants: Online formative assessments as the foundation for predictive learning analytics modelsBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1327654:1(19-39)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
    • (2022)Assessing negotiation skill and its development in an online collaborative simulation game: A social network analysis studyBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1326354:1(222-246)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2022
    • (2022)Workplace health surveillance and COVID-19: algorithmic health discrimination and cancer survivorsJournal of Cancer Survivorship10.1007/s11764-021-01144-116:1(200-212)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media