Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature

Published: 01 December 2011 Publication History

Abstract

As online and blended learning has become common place educational strategy in higher education, educators need to reconceptualise fundamental issues of teaching, learning and assessment in non traditional spaces. These issues include concepts such as validity and reliability of assessment in online environments in relation to serving the intended purposes, as well as understanding how formative assessment functions within online and blended learning. This article provides a systematic qualitative review of the research literature on online formative assessment in higher education. As an integrative narrative review, the method applied in this review entailed systematic searching, reviewing, and writing this review of the literature to bring together key themes and findings of research in this field. The authors applied qualitative thematic criteria in selecting and reviewing the available literature from which they focused on identifying and analyzing the core themes that are central to the concept of formative assessment with a key focus on application of formative assessment within blended and online contexts. Various techniques were identified for formative assessment by the individual, peers and the teacher, many of which were linked with online tools such as self-test quiz tools, discussion forums and e-portfolios. The benefits identified include improvement of learner engagement and centrality in the process as key actors, including the development of a learning community. The key findings are that effective online formative assessment can foster a learner and assessment centered focus through formative feedback and enhanced learner engagement with valuable learning experiences. Ongoing authentic assessment activities and interactive formative feedback were identified as important characteristics that can address threats to validity and reliability within the context of online formative assessment.

References

[1]
Online and blended communities of inquiry: exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. v10 i6. 65-83.
[3]
Introduction to E-learning Research. In: Andrews, R., Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.), The sage handbook of E-learning research, Sage Publication Ltd, London. pp. 1-59.
[4]
Does regular online testing enhance student learning in the numerical sciences? Robust evidence from a large data set. British Journal of Educational Technology. v40 i2. 255-272.
[5]
Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment. Evaluation & Accountability. v21 i1. 5-31.
[6]
Developing digital literacies and professional identities: the benefits of ePortfolios in graduate education. Journal of Literacy & Technology. v10 i1. 40-68.
[7]
How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded ed.). National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
[8]
E-learning-an introduction. In: Heather, F., Ketteridge, S., Stephanie, M. (Eds.), A Handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: enhancing academic practice, Routledge, New York. pp. 85-98.
[9]
Committing to quality learning through adaptive online assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. v30 i5. 519-527.
[10]
An exploratory study of a novel online formative assessment and instructional tool to promote students' circuit problem solving. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment. v5 i6. 1-27.
[11]
The dynamics of two communities of practice: the program Team and the online course community. Distance Education. v29 i3. 289-306.
[12]
The development of a formative scenario-based computer assisted assessment tool in psychology for teachers: the PePCAA project. Computers & Education. v50 i4. 1509-1526.
[13]
. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
[14]
Implementing formative assessment in engineering education: the use of the online assessment system Etude. European Journal of Engineering Education. v29 i2. 259-266.
[15]
The use of qualitative research criteria for portfolio assessment as an alternative to reliability evaluation: a case study. Medical Education. v39. 214-220.
[16]
An exploration of student nurses' experiences of formative assessment. Nurse Education Today. v29 i6. 654-659.
[17]
Teacher learning of technology enhanced formative assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology. v17 i1. 82-99.
[18]
Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of social and behavioural sciences. Pyrczak publishing, Los Angeles.
[19]
Role of instructional technology in the transformation of higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. v21 i1. 19-30.
[20]
Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. American Journal of Distance Education. v21 i3. 117-132.
[21]
Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research. v75 i1. 27-61.
[22]
Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students' perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences. v36. 431-443.
[23]
Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education. v24 i10. 355-392.
[24]
Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. v5 i3. 101-117.
[25]
Digital technologies in higher Education:sweeping expectations and actual effects. Nova Science Publishers Inc, NewYork.
[26]
Towards meaningful learning through digital video supported, case based teaching. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. v23 i1. 87-109.
[27]
The validity of collaborative assessment for learning. Assessment in education: principles. Policy & Practice. v14 i2. 185-199.
[28]
Assessment. In: McCulloch, G., Crook, D. (Eds.), The Routledge international encyclopedia of education, Routledge, New York. pp. 37-38.
[29]
Hassall, L. (2007). Multiple purposes of ePortfolios in higher education: a case study of one department. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Iowa State University.
[30]
The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. v77 i1. 81-112.
[31]
Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology. v19 i1. 59-79.
[32]
Authentic tasks Online: a synergy among learner, task and technology. Distance Education. v27 i2. 233-247.
[33]
Unfulfilled promise: formative assessment using computer-aided assessment. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. v1 i1. 67-80.
[34]
Assessment in schools, methods of assessment. In: Postlethwaite, Husen, Torsten, Neville, T. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education, vol. 1. Pergamon Press, Oxford. pp. 362-370.
[35]
Being online: social presence as subjectivity in online learning. London Review of Education. v8 i1. 39-50.
[36]
Assessing student achievement and progress with online examinations: some pedagogical and technical issues. International Journal on E-Learning. v7 i3. 383-402.
[37]
Assessment and student learning: a fundamental relationship and the role of information and communication technologies. Open Learning. v23 i1. 5-16.
[38]
Refocusing formative feedback to enhance learning in pre-registration nurse education. Nurse Education in Practice. v8 i4. 223-230.
[39]
Going the distance with online education. Review of Educational Research. v76 i4. 567-605.
[40]
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching. A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London: Routledge.
[41]
Laurillard, D. (2007). Pedagogical forms of mobile learning: Framing research questions. In N. Pachler (Ed.), Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda (pp. 153-175). London: WLE Centre.Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom assessment: Minute by minute, day by day. Educational Leadership 63(3).
[42]
Practical strategy for assessing the quality of collaborative learner engagement. In: Spratt, C., Lajbcygier, P. (Eds.), E-Learning technologies and evidence based assessment approaches, pp. 254-269.
[43]
Preservice teachers' learning experiences of constructing e-portfolios online. Internet and Higher Education. v11 i3. 194-200.
[44]
Learner support services for online students: scaffolding for success. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning. v4 i1. 1-15.
[45]
Virtual learning and real communities: online professional development for teachers. In: Stacey, E., Gerbic, P. (Eds.), Effective blended learning practices: evidence-based perspectives in ICT-facilitated education, Information Science Reference, Hershey. pp. 163-181.
[46]
Interconnecting networks of practice for professional learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. v12 i3. 1-18.
[47]
Internet based formative prior knowledge assessment. Studies In Educational Evaluation. v26 i3. 245-258.
[48]
E-learning. In: McCulloch, G., Crook, D. (Eds.), The Routledge international encyclopedia of education, Routledge, New York. pp. 219-220.
[49]
Formative assessment and self-regulated learning; A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education. v31 i2. 199-218.
[50]
Niles, L. H. T. (2007). Engineering faculty members' beliefs and practices in a technologically equipped classroom. Unpublished PhD disseratation, Iowa State University.
[51]
Validity. In: Linn, R. (Ed.), Educational measurement, Macmillan, New York. pp. 13-103.
[52]
Assessing learners online. Pearson, New Jersey.
[53]
Formative e-assessment: Practitioner cases. Computers & Education. v54. 715-721.
[54]
Preparing literature reviews: qualitative and quantative approaches. 2008. 3rd ed. Pyrczak Publishing, Glendale, California.
[55]
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In J. C. Smart & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research: (Vol. 17). New York: Agathon Press.
[56]
Evaluation strategies for open and distributed learning environments. In: Spratt, C., Lajbcygier, P. (Eds.), E-Learning technologies and evidence based assessment approaches, Information Science Reference, New York. pp. 234-253.
[57]
Learning, reflection, and electronic portfolios: Stepping toward an assessment practice. JGE: The Journal of General Education. v57 i1. 31-50.
[58]
The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher. v29 i7. 4-14.
[59]
How does student performance on formative assessments relate to learning assessed by exams?. Journal of College Science Teaching. v36 i7. 28-34.
[60]
Networked eLearning and collaborative knowledge building: design and facilitation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. v4 i4. 446-455.
[61]
Investigating knowledge building dialogues in networked communities of practice. A collaborative learning endeavor across cultures. Interactive Educational Multimedia. v10. 50-60.
[62]
Tracing the evolution of validity in educational measurement: Past issues and contemporary challenges. research matters. A Cambridge Assessment Publication.
[63]
Costs and benefits of electronic portfolios in teacher education: faculty perspectives. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education. v24 i4. 135-142.
[64]
Teaching courses online: a Review of the research. Review of Educational Research. v76 i1. 93-135.
[65]
What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research. v81 i1. 4-28.
[66]
Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review. v4 i3. 356-367.
[67]
The potential impact of computer-aided assessment technology in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education. v21 i6. 686-695.
[68]
Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies.
[69]
The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Computers & Education. v51 i4. 1804-1817.
[70]
Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. v39 i3. 309-328.
[71]
Comprehensive assessment of student collaboration in electronic portfolio construction: an evaluation research. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning. v53 i1. 58-66.
[72]
Designing a web-based assessment environment for improving pre-service teacher assessment literacy. Computers & Education. v51 i1. 448-462.
[73]
Evaluation. In: McCulloch, G., Crook, D. (Eds.), The Routledge international encyclopedia of education, Routledge, New York. pp. 236-238.
[74]
Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[75]
Meanings and consequences: a basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment. British Educational Research Journal. v22 i5. 537-548.
[76]
Efficacy of instructor feedback on written work in an online program. International Journal on ELearning. v7 i2. 311-329.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Examining change in students’ self-regulated learning patterns after a formative assessment using process mining techniquesComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.108061152:COnline publication date: 14-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Supporting project-based learning for students’ oral English skill and engagement with immersive virtual realityEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12433-w29:11(14127-14150)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Reforming higher education with ePortfolio implementation, enhanced by learning analyticsComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2022.107449138:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      Publisher

      Elsevier Science Ltd.

      United Kingdom

      Publication History

      Published: 01 December 2011

      Author Tags

      1. Assessment
      2. Blended learning
      3. Formative assessment
      4. Higher education
      5. Innovative pedagogical strategy
      6. Online learning

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Examining change in students’ self-regulated learning patterns after a formative assessment using process mining techniquesComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.108061152:COnline publication date: 14-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Supporting project-based learning for students’ oral English skill and engagement with immersive virtual realityEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12433-w29:11(14127-14150)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
      • (2023)Reforming higher education with ePortfolio implementation, enhanced by learning analyticsComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2022.107449138:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2023
      • (2023)Digital-based formative assessment to support students’ learning of organic chemistry in selected secondary schools of Nyarugenge District in RwandaEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-11599-728:9(10995-11025)Online publication date: 10-Feb-2023
      • (2023)A Project-Based Learning Approach to the Teaching of ‘Information Systems’ to Fourth Year Students of ICT Engineering Through a ‘Quasi-MSc Format’Proceedings of TEEM 202310.1007/978-981-97-1814-6_85(874-883)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2023
      • (2023)Towards Disruptive and Dialogic Assessment Systems Supported by TechnologyProceedings of TEEM 202310.1007/978-981-97-1814-6_117(1197-1206)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2023
      • (2022)A Qualitative Study of Experienced Course Coordinators’ Perspectives on Assessment in Introductory Programming Courses for Non-CS MajorsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/351713422:4(1-29)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2022
      • (2022)Exploring Peer Feedback on Writing Assignments in an Online Learning EnvironmentProceedings of the 2022 13th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning10.1145/3514262.3514294(203-208)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2022
      • (2022)Theoretical model of investigating determinants for a successful Electronic Assessment System (EAS) in higher educationEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11098-127:9(12543-12566)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2022
      • (2021)Using Formative Assessment in a Blended EFL Listening CourseInternational Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching10.4018/IJCALLT.202107010211:3(17-38)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media