Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2187836.2187931acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Echoes of power: language effects and power differences in social interaction

Published: 16 April 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Understanding social interaction within groups is key to analyzing online communities. Most current work focuses on structural properties: who talks to whom, and how such interactions form larger network structures. The interactions themselves, however, generally take place in the form of natural language --- either spoken or written --- and one could reasonably suppose that signals manifested in language might also provide information about roles, status, and other aspects of the group's dynamics. To date, however, finding domain-independent language-based signals has been a challenge.
Here, we show that in group discussions, power differentials between participants are subtly revealed by how much one individual immediately echoes the linguistic style of the person they are responding to. Starting from this observation, we propose an analysis framework based on linguistic coordination that can be used to shed light on power relationships and that works consistently across multiple types of power --- including a more "static" form of power based on status differences, and a more "situational" form of power in which one individual experiences a type of dependence on another. Using this framework, we study how conversational behavior can reveal power relationships in two very different settings: discussions among Wikipedians and arguments before the U. S. Supreme Court.

References

[1]
K. Aronsson, L. Jönsson, P. Linell. The courtroom hearing as a middle ground: Speech accommodation by lawyers and defendants. J. Lang. and Social Psych., 6(2):99--115, 1987.
[2]
A. Bell. Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2):145--204, 1984.
[3]
J. Berger, B. P. Cohen, M. Zelditch Jr. Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37(3):241--255, 1972.
[4]
M. Billings, L. A. Watts. Understanding dispute resolution online: Using text to reflect personal and substantive issues in conflict. CHI, 1447--1456, 2010.
[5]
P. Bramsen, M. Escobar-Molana, A. Patel, R. Alonso. Extracting social power relationships from natural language. ACL HLT, 2011.
[6]
S. L. Bryant, A. Forte, A. Bruckman. Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. GROUP, 1--10, 2005.
[7]
M. Burke, R. Kraut. Mopping up: Modeling Wikipedia promotion decisions. CSCW, 27--36, 2008.
[8]
S. Chakrabarti. Mining the Web: discovering knowledge from hypertext data. Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.
[9]
M. D. Conover, J. Ratkiewicz, M. Francisco, B. Goncalves, A. Flammini, F. Menczer. Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM, 2011.
[10]
C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, M. Gamon, S. Dumais. Mark my words! Linguistic style accommodation in social media. WWW, 2011.
[11]
C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, L. Lee. Chameleons in imagined conversations: A new approach to understanding coordination of linguistic style in dialogs. ACL Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics Workshop, 2011.
[12]
M. De Choudhury, W. A. Mason, J. M. Hoffman, D. J. Watts. Inferring relevant social networks from interpersonal communication. WWW, 301--310, 2010.
[13]
C. P. Diehl, G. Namata, L. Getoor. Relationship identification for social network discovery. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Enhanced Messaging, volume 22, 546--552, 2007.
[14]
R. M. Emerson. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27:31--40, 1962.
[15]
B. Erickson, E. A. Lind, B. C. Johnson, W. M. O'Barr. Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of "powerful" and "powerless" speech. J. Experimental Social Psychology, 14(3):266 -- 279, 1978.
[16]
K. Faust, S. Wasserman. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press New York, 1994.
[17]
K. Ferrara. Accommodation in therapy. Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequences. Cambridge University Press, 1991.
[18]
E. Gilbert. Phrases that signal workplace hierarchy. CSCW, 2012.
[19]
E. Gilbert, K. Karahalios. Predicting tie strength with social media. CHI, 211--220, 2009.
[20]
H. Giles. Communication Accommodation Theory. Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives, 161--173. Sage Publications, Inc, 2008.
[21]
H. Giles, J. Coupland, N. Coupland. Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press, 1991.
[22]
J. Gregory, Stanford W., S. Webster. A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. J. Personality and Social Psych., 70(6):1231, 1996.
[23]
R. Guha, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, A. Tomkins. Propagation of trust and distrust. WWW, 403--412, 2004.
[24]
T. Hawes. Computational analysis of the conversational dynamics of the United States Supreme Court. Master's thesis, University of Maryland, 2009.
[25]
T. Hawes, J. Lin, P. Resnik. Elements of a computational model for multi-party discourse: The turn-taking behavior of Supreme Court justices. JASIST, 60(8):1607--1615, 2009.
[26]
S. C. Herring. Gender and power in on-line communication. The Handbook of Language and Gender, 202--228. 2003.
[27]
L. Huang, A. D. Galinsky, D. H. Gruenfeld, L. E. Guillory. Powerful Postures Versus Powerful Roles. Psychological Science, 22(1):95--102, 2011.
[28]
M. E. Ireland, R. B. Slatcher, P. W. Eastwick, L. E. Scissors, E. J. Finkel, J. W. Pennebaker. Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22:39--44, 2011.
[29]
P. Koehn. Statistical significance tests for machine translation evaluation. EMNLP, 388--395, 2004.
[30]
J. P. Kotter. Power, dependence, and effective management. Harvard Business Review, 125--136, July 1977.
[31]
D. Laniado, R. Tasso, Y. Volkovich, A. Kaltenbrunner. When the Wikipedians talk: Network and tree structure of Wikipedia discussion pages. ICWSM, 2011.
[32]
J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg. Governance in Social Media: A case study of the Wikipedia promotion process. ICWSM, 2010.
[33]
J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg. Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks. WWW, 641--650, 2010.
[34]
A. Liptak. Clarence Thomas Keeps 5-Year Supreme Court Silence. The New York Times, February 2011.
[35]
A. Livne, M. P. Simmons, E. Adar, L. A. Adamic. The party is over here: Structure and content in the 2010 election. ICWSM, 2011.
[36]
Y. Lu, P. Tsaparas, A. Ntoulas, L. Polanyi. Exploiting social context for review quality prediction. WWW, 691--700, 2010.
[37]
A. McCallum, X. Wang, A. Corrada-Emmanuel. Topic and role discovery in social networks with experiments on Enron and academic email. JAIR, 30(1):249--272, 2007.
[38]
M. Natale. Convergence of mean vocal intensity in dyadic communication as a function of social desirability. J. Personality and Social Psych., 32(5):790 -- 804, 1975.
[39]
K. G. Niederhoffer, J. W. Pennebaker. Linguistic style matching in social interaction. J. Lang. and Social Psych., 21(4):337--360, 2002.
[40]
J. Otterbacher, L. Hemphill. Learning the lingo? Gender, prestige and linguistic adaptation in review communities. Proceedings of CSCW, 2012.
[41]
J. W. Pennebaker, R. J. Booth, M. E. Francis. Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): A computerized text analysis program. http://www.liwc.net/, 2007.
[42]
R. Rowe, G. Creamer, S. Hershkop, S. J. Stolfo. Automated social hierarchy detection through email network analysis. Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis, 109--117, 2007.
[43]
A. Scalia. Interview with Justice Antonin Scalia (transcript). C-SPAN (2009-06--19), 2009.
[44]
A. J. Scholand, Y. R. Tausczik, J. W. Pennebaker. Social language network analysis. CSCW, 23--26, 2010.
[45]
R. L. Street, H. Giles. Speech accommodation theory. Social cognition and communication. Sage Publications, 1982.
[46]
D. Taraborelli, G. L. Ciampaglia. Beyond notability. Collective deliberation on content inclusion in Wikipedia. Second international workshop on quality in techno-social systems, 2010.
[47]
J. Thakerar, H. Giles, J. Cheshire. Psychological and linguistic parameters of speech accommodation theory. Advances in the Social Psychology of Language. Cambridge, 1982.
[48]
S. Thye. A status value theory of power in exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 65:407--432, June 2000.
[49]
S. Thye, D. Willer, B. Markovsky. From status to power: New models at the intersection of two theories. Social Forces, 84:1471--1495, 2006.
[50]
F. B. Viégas, M. Wattenberg, J. Kriss, F. van Ham. Talk before you type: Coordination in Wikipedia. HICSS, 78--78, 2007.
[51]
D. Willer. Network Exchange Theory. Praeger, 1999.
[52]
R. J. Wolfe, K. L. McGinn. Perceived relative power and its influence on negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 14:3--20, 2005.
[53]
F. Wu, B. A. Huberman. Opinion formation under costly expression. ACMTrans. Intelligent Systems and Technology, 1(1):1--13, 2010.
[54]
F. Wu, B. A. Huberman, L. A. Adamic, J. R. Tyler. Information flow in social groups. Physica A: Statistical and Theoretical Physics, 337(1--2):327--335, 2004.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Power and vulnerability: managing sensitive language in organizational communicationFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2023.126642514Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Ambiguous Status Relations and Complex Hierarchy among AdolescentsSocius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World10.1177/2378023124127267510Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Linguistically Differentiating Acts and Recalls of Racial Microaggressions on Social MediaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373668:CSCW1(1-36)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Echoes of power: language effects and power differences in social interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '12: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
    April 2012
    1078 pages
    ISBN:9781450312295
    DOI:10.1145/2187836
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • Univ. de Lyon: Universite de Lyon

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 April 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. accommodation
    2. coordination
    3. dependence
    4. language
    5. linguistic convergence
    6. linguistic style
    7. online communities
    8. power
    9. relations
    10. social status

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    WWW 2012
    Sponsor:
    • Univ. de Lyon
    WWW 2012: 21st World Wide Web Conference 2012
    April 16 - 20, 2012
    Lyon, France

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)240
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)49
    Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Power and vulnerability: managing sensitive language in organizational communicationFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2023.126642514Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Ambiguous Status Relations and Complex Hierarchy among AdolescentsSocius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World10.1177/2378023124127267510Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Linguistically Differentiating Acts and Recalls of Racial Microaggressions on Social MediaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373668:CSCW1(1-36)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Characterizing Developers' Linguistic Behaviors in Open Source Development across Their Social StatusesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373068:CSCW1(1-33)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Implicit relational aspects of the therapeutic relationship in psychoanalytic treatments: an examination of linguistic style entrainment over timePsychotherapy Research10.1080/10503307.2024.2341780(1-14)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Inherent linguistic preference outcompetes incidental alignment in cooperative partner choiceLanguage and Cognition10.1017/langcog.2024.27(1-18)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2024
    • (2023)Building a Multimodal Classifier of Email Behavior: Towards a Social Network Understanding of Organizational CommunicationInformation10.3390/info1412066114:12(661)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Enhancing structural balance theory and measurement to analyze signed digraphs of real-world social networksFrontiers in Human Dynamics10.3389/fhumd.2022.10283934Online publication date: 16-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Examining Homophily, Language Coordination, and Analytical Thinking in Web-Based Conversations About Vaccines on Reddit: Study Using Deep Neural Network Language Models and Computer-Assisted Conversational AnalysesJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/4188225(e41882)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2023
    • (2023)A Practical Guide to Conversation Research: How to Study What People Say to Each OtherAdvances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science10.1177/251524592311839196:4Online publication date: 13-Nov-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media