Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
short-paper

The power of partial power of two choices

Published: 21 December 2011 Publication History

Abstract

It is well known that the expected waiting time for customers routed to several parallel queues decreases dramatically when customers are routed to the shortest of two randomly chosen queues, rather than being arbitrarily assigned to one of the queues, and that the further improvement when there are three queues to choose from is much less than the improvement when moving from one to two queues (the power of two [5]). We consider the power of two effect when a subset of customers are flexible, and can choose the shortest of two queues, while the remainder are dedicated, and have no routing choice. We show that the stationary expected waiting time is decreasing and convex in the proportion of flexible customers. Our results show that having a small proportion of flexible customers has nearly as much benefit as having full power of two choices.

References

[1]
O. T. Akgun, R. Righter, and R. Wolff. Multiple server system with flexible arrivals. Adv. Appl. Probab., to appear.
[2]
O. T. Akgun, R. Righter, and R. Wolff. Understanding the marginal impact of customer flexibility. Queueing Syst., to appear.
[3]
D. J. Daley and T. Rolski. Finiteness of waiting-time moments in general stationary single server queues. Ann. Appl. Probab., 2:987--1008, 1992.
[4]
Y. T. He and D. Down. On accommodating customer flexibility in service systems. INFOR., 47:289--295, 2009.
[5]
M. Mitzenmacher. The power of two choices in randomized load balancing. IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distrib. Syst., 12:1094--1104, 2001.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)STAR and RATS: Multi-level Dispatching Policies2020 32nd International Teletraffic Congress (ITC 32)10.1109/ITC3249928.2020.00018(81-89)Online publication date: Sep-2020

Index Terms

  1. The power of partial power of two choices

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
    ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review  Volume 39, Issue 3
    December 2011
    163 pages
    ISSN:0163-5999
    DOI:10.1145/2160803
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 December 2011
    Published in SIGMETRICS Volume 39, Issue 3

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. JSQ
    2. majorization
    3. stochastic convexity

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)STAR and RATS: Multi-level Dispatching Policies2020 32nd International Teletraffic Congress (ITC 32)10.1109/ITC3249928.2020.00018(81-89)Online publication date: Sep-2020

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media