The gospel of knowledge management in and out of a professional community
Pages 197 - 206
Abstract
Knowledge management (KM) remains an anomaly in most corporations today. Critics call KM a fad of the 1990s, whereas supporters claim KM is actively evolving. Our work examines the disciplinary rhetoric of KM: how is it that practitioners of KM seek to legitimize their field in the corporate world? We focus on practitioners in the aerospace industry and their forum. We argue that this forum serves as a hub for constructing KM's legitimacy. Our two year ethnography traces the rhetorical strategies utilized by informants in and out of a professional community to legitimize KM as discipline in the aerospace industry.
References
[1]
22CFR125, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 22, Chapter 1, Part 125, 2001. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_01/22cfr125_01.html (visited May 17, 2007).
[2]
Develop a National Plan for Revitalization of the Aerospace Workforce, 2003. http://www.aia-aerospace.org/issues/topten_2003/workforce.pdf (visited May 17, 2007).
[3]
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Career Guide to Industries, Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing, 2006-07.
[4]
D. Bell. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 1979.
[5]
M. Callon. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay. In J. Law, editor, Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, pages 67--78. Routledge, London, UK, 1996.
[6]
C. W. Choo. The Knowing Organization: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge, and Make Decisions. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2006.
[7]
G. Cooper and J. Bowers. Representing the User: Notes on the Disciplinary Rhetoric of HCI. In P. J. Thomas, editor, The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces, pages 49--66. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
[8]
P. Dourish and G. Button. On Technomethodology: Foundational Relationships between Ethnomethodology and System Design. Human-Computer Interaction, 13(4):395--432, 1998.
[9]
P. Drucker. Landmarks of Tomorrow. Harper & Row, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1959.
[10]
M. S. Elliott and W. Scacchi. Free Software Developers as an Occupational Community: Resolving Conflicts and Fostering Collaboration. In Proc. of GROUP'03, pages 21--30, 2003.
[11]
M. S. Feldman and J. G. March. Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2):171--186, 1981.
[12]
W. Ives, B. Torrey, and C. Gordon. Knowledge Management: An Emerging Discipline with a Long History. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(4):269--274, 1998.
[13]
B. Latour. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
[14]
J. Lave and E. Wenger. Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991.
[15]
M. A. Lorell, J. Lowell, R. M. Moore, V. Greenfield, and K. Vlachos. Going Global? U.S. Government Policy and the Defense Aerospace Industry.
[16]
J. V. Maanen and S. R. Barley. Occupational Communities: Culture and Control in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6:287--365, 1982.
[17]
H. Mintzberg. Structure in 5's: A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design. Management Science, 26(3):322--341, 1980.
[18]
I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi. A Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. International Journal of Technology Management, 11(7/8):833--845, 1996.
[19]
J. Orr. Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Cornell University Press, Itacha, NY, USA, 1996.
[20]
T. J. Pinch and W. E. Bijker. The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might benefit Each Other. In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. MIT Press, 1987.
[21]
M. Polanyi. The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
[22]
L. Prusak. Where did knowledge management come from? IBM Systems Journal, 40(4):1002--1007, 2001.
[23]
D. Robey, H. Khoo, and C. Powers. Situated Learning in Crossfunctional Virtual Teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(1):51--66, 2000.
[24]
A. Strauss and J. Corbin. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications, London, UK, 1998.
[25]
K.-E. Sveiby. The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1997.
[26]
E. Wenger. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
[27]
K. M. Wiig. Knowledge Management: Where Did It Come From and Where Will It Go? Expert Systems With Applications, 13(1):1--14, 1997.
[28]
T. D. Wilson. The nonsense of 'knowledge management'. Information Research, 8(1), 2002.
[29]
S. Woolgar. Opening the Black Box: Logic, Reason and Rules. In Science: The Very Idea. Routledge, London, UK, 1988.
Index Terms
- The gospel of knowledge management in and out of a professional community
Recommendations
Community of Practice Application in Knowledge Management
Knowledge Management KM on its surface may appear to be a dichotomous dis-synchronization with Community of Practice CoP development. KM is systematic and intentional, and presumes the defined body of facts. CoP, on the other hand, is based, as its name ...
The IT professional and knowledge management: researching the Irish perspective
This paper is aimed principally at practitioners in the areas of Knowledge Management (KM), Knowledge Management Systems (KMS) and Information Technology (IT). A survey addressing KM perception, understanding, practice and implementation was distributed ...
What drives members to continue sharing knowledge in a virtual professional community? the role of knowledge self-efficacy and satisfaction
KSEM'07: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Knowledge science, engineering and managementThe present research explains members' intention to continue sharing knowledge in a virtual community in terms of knowledge self-efficacy and satisfaction. The research model was tested with the current users of a virtual professional community (Hong ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2007 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 04 November 2007
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
GROUP07: ACM 2007 International Conference on Supporting Group Work
November 4 - 7, 2007
Florida, Sanibel Island, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 125 of 405 submissions, 31%
Upcoming Conference
GROUP '25
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 740Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)3
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View allView Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in