User talk:Kneiphof

Hello Kneiphof, welcome on commons :-)
Do you know Commons:Babel? --:Bdk: 22:20, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thank you a lot for welcome. --Kneiphof 23:27, 26 Nov 2004 (CET)

Hi. I think plural/singular categories are both useful. Singular categories have articles related to the general topic (i.e. in Category: Plane about wings, airflow, etc), and the plural has specific instances (i.e. category:Planes: Boeing 747, Airbus A300, Cessna...). What do you think -- Chris 73 04:33, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Glad that you agree. I contacted you because you requested a singular category for deletion. There is a related discussion going on about this, and singular categories sometimes get deleted, while I rather prefer to keep them (e.g category:Religion in addition to category:Religions). -- Chris 73 09:31, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hallo Kneiphof! I´m not sure about language policy here, I thought original orthography is used. There are now 2 articles about Pushkin, your Aleksandr Pushkin, my Александр Сергеевич Пушкин. Which one should be kept? By the way, I created 6 more articles in Russian orthography, all of them in Category:Writers. Greetings, --Gabor 17:14, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

My greetings to you too! As far as I know, the naming conventions, aspecially usage of non-ANSII code characters, like cyrillic letters, are still under debate. So so far I've used latin characters for naming a page for Alexandr Pushkin, but I hope the usage of original characres (cyrillics in this case) will become Commons convention lately Kneiphof 22:01, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hallo Волков, Op de Nederlandse tram-pagina zag ik dat je een foto van een tram in Rome (RomeTram3.jpg) hebt geplaatst. Ik kon de verleiding niet weerstaan deze foto hier op Commons een beetje op te poetsen. Als het resultaat je niet zou aanstaan, kun je met een druk op de knop "revert" je eigen versie weer terugzetten. Groeten, Mark Voorendt, 19:51, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC).

You are now an admin here on Commons. Congratulations! villy 12:42, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This image is missing all info about license status and such, please add them. As you are an admin here and your older images seem OK, you where probably going to do that anyway. But please note that people are patrolling Special:Newimages for images missing information - uploading images without adding a description imidiately always means work to us. So, please add at least rudementary information (Subject, Author, Source, License) on the upload form. This is also important so that such info is recorded in the image file history, not just the description page. Thank you! -- Duesentrieb 13:11, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Normally, I upload about 10 pictures, and than I put detailed descriptions. But next time, I will put some rudimentary information while uploading the picture. Thanks for remark!Kneiphof 13:23, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Пожалуйста, давайте файлам имена, которые полнее отражают их содержимое. Спасибо. --EugeneZelenko 14:24, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо и за это замечание. Впредь буду стараться выбирать имена по-лучше. Kneiphof 14:28, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I m belgium I ll try to speak English :

I see you ve modified some category in "cities and villages in belgium" : good job . We had some talks about the right way to define categories in "cities and villages in belgium" (see : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Cities_and_villages_in_Belgium) .

But another user "Jean Pol Grandmont" changes the category of his pictures despite we ask him to follow the "guideline" of this category.

We are not sure it's right to set a category inside the same... category :/ Could you (I see you re an admin) say your opinion in the talk page of this category (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Cities_and_villages_in_Belgium) ? is it right ?

In french (version longue) :

J'ai vu que vous avez modifié la catégorie de certaines photos de la catégorie "cities and villages in belgium", c'est parfait, je ne savais quelle catégorie mettre à certaines photos, vous m'avez "appris" en le faisant : bravo ;)

Mais un autre utilisateur "Jean Pol Grandmot" modifie la catégorie de ses photos malgré qu'on lui ait demandé de suivre la façon dont on défini une catégorie à l'intérieur de "cities and villages in belgium".

Nous ne sommes pas certains de la marche à suivre : nous préférons mettre chaque photo dans une sous catégorie uniquement. Mais cet utilisateur veut constamment mettre ses photos dans une double catégorie : la principale et la sous catégorie du village.

Nous ne sommes pas certains qu'il s'agisse de la bonne façon de fair : pouvez vous nous donner votre avis dans la page de discussion ? est ce correct ? qu'en pensez vous ?

Merci beaucoup , excusez moi puor ce message "bizarre"

Best regards

Dear Kneiphof, got your welcome. Thank you! I added the information you asked for to the uploads.

Friedrich Tellberg 20:35, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Пожалуйста, в случаях, подобных файлам от User:Yelzin добавляйте {{Incomplete license}}. Ведь про источник в описании ничего не говорилось. --EugeneZelenko 03:31, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yes, the notice is GFDL. I write the code in Image:Ribeira 040825 GDFL1.jpg. Thanks

Hi,

This image seems to be a scan of a copyright-protected post card from Germany - it should be removed thus. Thanks for watching out!

Greetings, --Kjunix 09:08, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your message. I'm on wikipedia (french) and so, adding some pics in here. I'm not sure to have understood exactly how wikicommons works, but I'll learn. all the best. Clipper 08:58, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

В знак победы Де Голля над Зигфридом :) (извините меня, если я помешала) - Bepa - Introvert ^{talk ?en ?ru} 03:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Спасиб' :-) Kneiphof 18:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you have a source who can verify that this photo is PD? Thuresson 23:16, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

According to Polish Wikipedia, image was publishied in 1978 issue of Polish Morze magazine. According to Polish law, all images published before 1994 without clear copyright notice, are public doamin. This picture has no such notice, therefore it is PD Kneiphof 16:17, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your very nice welcome! I hope to soon be able to upload more images. When I took the pic of that tram some 26 years ago I didn't even dream that I might once use it for the public! All this wiki stuff is wonderful! I love to contribute as much info as possible! :D

--MaxM 23:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, and have a happy new year 2006! :D

Happy new year for you too ! I'm intrested in trams myself (see my gallery), so I try to spot all the new tram images and put them into the categories. I hope to see more tram pictures from you soon :-) Enjoy wiki! Kneiphof 00:00, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your change of the copyright template on Image:BicycleWomanStereo1900.jpg as that template assume knowledge of the date of death of the author, which I have no information on from the original printed work in my own collection I scanned it from. If you have such information, please share it. See Image talk:BicycleWomanStereo1900.jpg. Thank you. -- Infrogmation 04:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Answer given on image discussion page Kneiphof 09:52, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your contributions! I found them when I was uploading a train picture you'd posted on Flickr under CC, only to find it already here. Now to write the en-wiki articles to go with your images ... Morven 01:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for nice words! I'm gonna upload more train pictures in the coming days (to here as well as to Flickr) so chek my galleries Kneiphof 19:24, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I write under the name "Моисей" in Russian version of wiki. During my editing of one of the articles there I found that you have blocked me. I admire wikipedia and would like to finish the articles I have begun, so your blocking came to me as a surprise. Please unblock me, and explain why you did it.

Dear Моисей, I deeply regret that you aren't able to edit wiki. But I haven't blocked you, as you can see from the block list. I also can't find your account in block log, most probably your accont isn't blocked. I suppose you face problems because I had to block

a lot of Isreali dinamic IP's because of vandalism. Please try to log in again, if it'll not work, ask me, and I'll ask oter admins how to solwe problem.

Best regards, Kneiphof 10:45, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change the license on Image:M1000.jpg and others from http://www.infotren.com ? The website has the cc-sa-2.5 license. ed g2s • talk 17:46, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The site mentions cc-sa, but the photos come from Flickr account. If you'll chek it, you'll see for yourself that a majoraty of pic from this account are actually cc-nc. I could find the photo you've pointed (it wasn't so easy since no exact source link is provided) and it seems to be cc-sa-2.5. But I'm sure that it wasn't so when I've put noncommercial license. I suppose license was changed on flickr. Kneiphof 22:10, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've cheked the copyright status of all the pictures uploaded by User:Chisno from www.infotren.com. So, here are the results:

1. OK (cc-sa license): Image:M1000.jpg, Image:M2100.jpg, Image:M3000.JPG, Image:M4000.JPG, Image:M5000.jpg

1. not on the site anymore (at least, I could not find them): Image:ChWiki.jpg Image:Renfe talgo 01.jpg, Image:Renfe talgo 04.jpg.

1. Non-commercial licence: Image:Renfe talgo 02.jpg, Image:Renfe talgo 03.jpg Image:Renfe talgo 05.jpg

Kneiphof 22:38, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you remove the Ryazan Oblast category from the Ryazan city article? Isn't it logical to list the city under the state? Your edit makes no sense to me, and I'm hoping you can explain. I left a detailed note on Max' talk page explaining to him my logic. Would you please explain yours? Rklawton 16:07, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've answered on Max talk pageKneiphof 17:46, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Случайно наткнулся на неплохие коллекции отечественных и прочих локомотивов, лицензированных на условиях {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}}. Мне кажется, что эти изображения не помешают в Commons. К сожалению, я небольшой специалист в этой области (в детстве локомотивы знал гораздо лучше :-). Если у Вас будет время и желание, пожалуйста, загрузите. --EugeneZelenko 03:32, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за ссылки! Правда загрузить фотографии не получилось: хотел заняться этим в воскресенье (то есть сегодня), но товарищ User:Duncharris меня опередил Kneiphof 11:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making the cat: Category:J. Henry Dunant III (ship) and placing my images there! Vdegroot 07:56, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you maybe know what kind of ship this is and/or what they are doing? Is there any article with this kind of ships? Vdegroot 13:09, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know what this ship is doing myself... The ship itself looks like ordinary merchant river ship of Low Lands. Kneiphof 13:10, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kneiphof, Stunteltje created a page at the Dutch wikipedia where this image is used. Vdegroot (talk) 10:18, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not manually redirect categories because it does not work for images located there or add to this category despite the redirect. Please mark emptied obsolete/outdated cats for deletion or use {{Category redirect|new cat}} See Category:Swedish ships, it may also be deleted if not needed anymore. --Denniss 06:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You opened the category Trams in Ausburg. That's the wrong writing because the city is called Augsburg. I moved the category, please think it better through next time. --Thgoiter 21:09, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out my mistake. Plase note that mistyping one letter can happen with everybody. Kneiphof 21:24, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The trams in Alicante and Valencia cities belongs to the same network, called en:Ferrocarrils de la Generalitat Valenciana. As you can see on their webpage specific for trams, where it also have another line between en:El Campello and en:Dénia wich is not electrified. So, I think it's reasonable to group in this category. In spite of it, if in the future it's uploading several images of each city, It's also reasonable to create separate categories, one for Alacant and another for Valencia, but both category would be under the same category "Trams in Land of Valencia". But, at the moment, here aren't enough quantity of files in order to create separete categories. --Joanot Martorell ✉ 11:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC) PD: Category:Trams in Land of Valencia is already a subcategory of Category:Trams in Spain.[reply]

Thanks for your explanation. I've already knew that Alicante tram was converted from non-electrified narrow gauge railway, but I didn't know that that was also the case for Valencia tram. I've looked on the map, and since both cities ware located far from each other, I thought that they could not belong to the same system.

Still some moments are not yet really clear for me. Both trams are operated by the came company, but are they connected physically? Can tram travel from one city to another?

In each case, I have no objections against your proposals on categories. Kneiphof 16:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, It isn't possible to travel from Alacant to Valencia in tram. So, under your viewpoint, these are different networks. Altough of it, I've respected each category, but making these as subcategories in "Trams in Land of Valencia". --Joanot Martorell ✉ 20:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kneiphof,
you've uploaded the copy of Image:Gueterstrassenbahn CarGoTram Dresden VWBahn.jpg. But there is the same image without the cutted edges (Image:VW-Cargotram-Dresden.jpg). Right now your (cutted) version is not used anymore. I would suggest to delete it. Do you agree? - Then you may put a {{duplicate|Image:VW-Cargotram-Dresden.jpg}}-tag on the image page. Thanks -- burts ∞ 13:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've deleated cutted image, since version uploaded by you is better. Thanks! Kneiphof 13:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is kind of ambulans. It was made in the 1st world war in Łódź. HuBar 19:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kneiphof,

as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.

If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence 23:08, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your have wrote on my talksite for image license. Now, i search that image. On my de.WP-Sites, i have giving a license for this image. --Mäfä 03:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This images has been nominated for Commons:Quality Images If know of any other images that that meet the guidelines please nominate them at Commons:Quality images candidates ...

Please, read this text and make the corrections which you consider to be necessary. --Panther 17:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BVSstoomloco1-1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Thanks for contributing the image. I think big part of your contributions is likely to become QI :) --Wikimol 20:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for such an appreceation of my humble work :) Kneiphof 23:47, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've sent you your account information through the Wikimedia e-mail gateway. Let me know if you didn't get it. Thanks,--Eloquence 17:32, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Попросили осовременить. Не знаю, будет ли время, да и переводчик из меня не сильный, так что если будет время и желание, помоги. Спасибо. Набросал черновики: Template:Welcome/ru/new, MediaWiki talk:Uploadtext/ru#Новая редакция. --EugeneZelenko 02:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shizhao 02:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC) P.S.: Pardon if this is a repeat (bot debugging...)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pantserkruiser Aurora.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Samulili 15:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Authorship information was removed by User:Fisss for unknown reason. It've been restored now. Kneiphof 20:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as PD-Soviet is no more accepted, this image should be deleted Kneiphof 16:33, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Katyusha.ogg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Samulili 08:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics by M. Isakovski, music by M. Blanter. Preformed by Tamara Sinyavskaya. I think this file should be deleated now, as PD_Soviet is no more accepted.

Best regards, Kneiphof 21:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Zlatoust-1910.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. — Timichal 12:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the picture by Сергей Михайлович Прокудин-Горский, from his series of colour photograps of Russian Empire. ASAIK, they are concidered to be in public domain, or at least it was the assumption when I uploaded the picture. Kneiphof 14:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Karelia old houses.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. MECU≈talk 16:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken this image from Flickr. It was was licensed as cc-by then. It seems that the photographer is not more active on Flickr, so copyright status can not be reviewed now. Kneiphof 12:34, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Здравтвуйте, я заметил, что вы загружете фотки судов. По этому поводу у меня два предложения. 1. Я как коренной волгарь периодически загружаю фотки судов на комонс. Поэтому я бы хотел ознакомится с принципами по которым классифицируют их изображения, а также с классификациями судов чуть крупнее ОМ и Москва. (кажется по ним ничего нет в английской вике) 2. Не могли бы вы загрузит фотки судов типа Валериан Куйбышев, а лучше всего - Александра Суворова. Про тип Дунай - фотка из Болгара содержит одно татарское судно (Павел Миронов) и одно башкирское, название которо не помню. Если я правильно понял, Павел Миронов -- тип Дунай?.

с уважением, --Untifler 15:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LartiguelevelCrossing.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yonatan ^talk 20:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence that author has been dead for more than 70 years. The fact the original photo was taken in 1920 is pretty much irrelevant. Author can easily been alive for e.g. 60 years ago. Therefore PD-old cannot apply without further documentation. --|EPO| 13:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LartigueFrance.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rama 21:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 21:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wappen Vatikanstadt.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Michelet-密是力 12:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

См. ответ: User talk:Limych#Храм Христа-Спасителя в Москве --Андрей Хроленок 20:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you could add the russian translations to the explantion of my pictures? I will check your pictures for spelling mistakes in return and add some more languages if possible. Greetings, Endlezz 00:33, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch

Dear Kneiphof. I am writing to you to inform you that because of inactivity, you may lose your adminship on Commons.

Commons has a new policy on admin activity, Commons:Administrators/De-adminship, taken into use on June 13, 2007 (after a two-week poll on the proposed policy's talk page).

If you want to keep your adminship, you have to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days. Note that if you don't make 5 admin actions in the following 5 months, you will then lose the adminship anyways.

Thank you,
abf /talk to me/ 18:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kneiphof. Thanks for signing at this page. Please note that your sysop-rights will be removed the next time we run an inactivity-section without any new notice, if you do not do 5 admin-actions till then.
Thank you for your long and helpfull work on Commons! abf /talk to me/ 12:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Привет, земляк! Добавляй категорию, плиз, Category:Kharkov--194.44.82.211 09:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I notice an IP creating Kharkov categories in place of Kharkiv ones. As an example the media in Category:Trams in Kharkiv has been moved to Category:Trams in Kharkov. I am unsure what is "correct" but felt you should know, regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kharkiv is Ukrainian name of the city, while Kharkov is Russian name. The majoraty of Kharkiv population speak Russian, but since Ukrainian is the only official language in Ukraine, Ukrainian name would be preferable for Commons, I guess. It is also the name English wikipedia uses as an article title. Regards, Kneiphof 12:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But I'm not expert in this matter, so I don't really know wich name would be preferable.Kneiphof 12:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Altstadt.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 11:16, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Autobus limoges.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jodo (talk) 22:25, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

russavia (talk) 05:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

russavia (talk) 05:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Teofilo (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Teofilo (talk) 15:10, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

-- Jmabel ! talk 06:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch

Dear Kneiphof. I am writing to you to inform you that because of inactivity, you may lose your adminship on Commons.

Commons has a new policy on admin activity, Commons:Administrators/De-adminship, taken into use on June 13, 2007 (after a two-week poll on the proposed policy's talk page).

If you want to keep your adminship, you have to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days. Note that if you don't make 5 admin actions in the following 5 months, you will then lose the adminship anyways.

Thank you — Mike.lifeguard 16:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing to let you know that as you did not sign the page mentioned above within the permitted 30 day period your admin rights have been removed for inactivity, as required by our policy. We very much appreciate the work you have done here, and hope you will feel free to re-apply for admin rights if at some time in the future you feel able to contribute again. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 14:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Прошу помочь в разрешении ситуации с англоязычным админом. Суть дела в том, что я разместил изображение - обложку музыкального компакт-диска. Права на обложку принадлежат музыкальному коллективу, в состав которого вхожу и я. Кроме того, лично я являюсь соавтором обложки. Я слал письмо в OTRS, судя по ответу англоязычного админа этот ответ либо не дошел, либо был проигнорирован. Пожалуйста, объясните мне на русском языке где я не прав и дайте знать своему коллеге, что он не прав, если с моей стороны все условия выполнены аккуратно.

Предмет обсуждения: File:Cover_kubikmaggi.jpg Переписка с админом: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Eusebius (в конце страницы).

Спасибо.

то что в Одесской Области. А в Одессе случаме не был? Я к тому что ты там сфотографировал Судно На Подводных Крыльях (Hydrofoil)

• я кстати говоря, подумываю о Лондоне

GK tramrunner229 (talk) 02:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

---

Hello, Kneiphof!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:Kaliningrad 2003 lifting bridge.jpg is uncategorized since 20 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Deadrail5.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Koeningsburg-831.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Deadrail3.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Bolnitsa.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Deadrail6.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Reduit.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Deadrail2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:WallsOfGate.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Novostroiki.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Deadrail.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Kaliningrad 750 years stamp.jpg was uncategorized on 9 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:46, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:KaliningradLesnaya41-53.jpg was uncategorized on 12 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:KaliningradFormerSchool.jpg was uncategorized on 12 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lyon tram perrache.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Leoboudv (talk) 02:59, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PetrozavodskBus1946.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--sугсго 07:57, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PetrozavodskLeninprospekt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--sугсго 07:57, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moskva most 1948.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--sугсго 10:01, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sfrancisco trolley.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--- Zil (d) 16:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Raversiede (6).JPG, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 18:23, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:Stoomlokomotief.jpg
• File:Tramway Strasbourg Broglie.jpg
• File:Raversiede (6).JPG

BotMultichillT 20:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jelcz_pr110e.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jelcz_pr110e.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Masur (talk) 18:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 21:20, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ussr0519.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Blacklake (talk) 20:17, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ussr0199.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Blacklake (talk) 20:20, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ussr0178.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Blacklake (talk) 20:26, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ussr0425.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Blacklake (talk) 20:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]