Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/11/25
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Outside of project scope, not used in any Wiki articles Liance (talk) 03:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 14:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Rest of user's uploads have been copyright violations of various memes. While I can't pinpoint this one specifically, there is very little chance this is the uploader's own work. No likely educational use even if it was. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Its a picture of my young wippet puppy showing distinct markings InternetScavenger89 (talk) 02:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & copyvio the last time. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Personal file that violates COM:NOTWEBHOST SounderBruce 03:13, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Contributers2020Talk to me here 03:14, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
File is Deleted by AntiCompositeNumber for the rationale Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Contributers2020Talk to me here 04:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
most likely a copyviolation as per the numerous other notices on that user's page; the same photo (cropped) was used in this 6 November 2020 article: https://www.teaomaori.news/maori-party-gains-extra-mp-shane-reti-loses-seat Schwede66 03:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Two more similar files to add for deletion claimed as own work, but likely not:
Deleted: per nomination, obvious case. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:19, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
most likely a copyvio as per all this user's other uploads Schwede66 03:46, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious case. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
most likely a copyvio as per all this user's other uploads Schwede66 03:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious case. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:19, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio (taken from Facebook) Schwede66 17:53, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:48, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
most likely a copyvio as per all this user's other uploads Schwede66 03:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious case. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:19, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
copyvio; the file name even gives attribution to the photographer Schwede66 03:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious case. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:19, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
most likely a copyvio as per all this user's other uploads Schwede66 03:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious case. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
most likely a copyvio as per all this user's other uploads Schwede66 03:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
copyvio; the uploader even states where they helped themselves from in their edit summary Schwede66 03:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious case. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
"Uploaded a work by NZ National Party from https://shanereti.national.org.nz/" was the edit summary; they don't have an open license on that website Schwede66 03:53, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no brainer. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Video was uploaded under CC-BY by Chaka Khan, not Dickens himself. Despite being the recipient of this video message, it is unlikely she is the copyright holder, since the video was recorded by Dickens. Yeeno (talk) 17:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah that's fair BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 19:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per G7, uploader request. Yeeno (talk) 20:52, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Pivalate-ion-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination, I have nominated the wrong (my own) file for deletion. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:23, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Picture taken from Facebook. There is no clear indication of this image being free of copyright, nor is there any proof of permission for using the photo. Victor P. (talk) 14:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 15:05, 25 November 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: The file is a Facebook profile pciture https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=197388145722704 --Krdbot 20:52, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
An upload of a copyrighted work. Suugaapio (talk) 22:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted License claim unsupported by source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:54, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
It is highly unlikely that the user is the copyright holder. As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ghafari1.png. Mhhossein talk 11:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 20:40, 25 November 2021 UTC: Media missing permission as of 17 November 2021 --Krdbot 03:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
pr issue Reiro (talk) 04:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:44, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
She is alive;This pic cannot be used as fair use and cc without permission Reiro (talk) 04:46, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
pr issue Reiro (talk) 04:47, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Lol, horse + flowers in soft focus = Facebook... https://www.facebook.com/countrylivinn/photos/a.205907812952698/1437386549804812/?type=3 Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Lo subí por error LG UltraLink (talk) 19:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work: photograph includes a movie poster as a prominent part. MKFI (talk) 13:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Poster itself is a copyvio Timtrent (talk) 09:36, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nissan2020 (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]Nonsense maps that reference fictional comic book groups. They have no basis in either the fictional or real universes. Unused and out of project scope.
- File:Gentlemen (Cobra and Decepticons) - Philippine map.png
- File:World Map of Cobra and Decepticons.png
IronGargoyle (talk) 05:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete all as contributions of a sockpuppet — Nissan2020 is highly probable to be NissanGTRz (talk · contribs) — Teamayuiyui (talk · contribs) and their sock accounts. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Info the uploader just contributed another file of similar nature:
- File:Gentlemen Start Your Engines (Cobra and Decepticons) - Indonesia.png
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:29, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nissan2020 (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Contributed files by notorious sockpuppet / vandal of Philippine maps. Similar case on their now-blocked sock account: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Emperor1991z#Files uploaded by Emperor1991z (talk · contribs) 4 and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by 雷電1990#Files uploaded by 雷電1990 (talk · contribs) 1.
- File:BBC Radyo Asenso Map.png
- File:IBC Radyo Budyong Map.png
- File:RPN Radyo Ronda Map.png
- File:PBS Radio Map.png
- File:MBC Radio Map.png
- File:ABS-CBN Radio Map.png
- File:Radio GMA Map.png
- File:Radyo5 Map.png
- File:BBC Television Map.png
- File:IBC Television Map.png
- File:RPN Television Map.png
- File:PTV Television Map.png
- File:MBC and MBC Regional Map.png
- File:TV5 and Regional5 Map.png
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nissan2020 (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]Likely not own works od Nissan2020. Three of their other uploads of images of police tape were just grabbed from unfree sources. TinEye and reverse Google Images did not detect anything for these two, but these are suspected copyvios.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Pivalate-ion-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:04, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete no need to keep this poor quality chemical diagram while a better replacement exists. Wostr (talk) 15:51, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Redundant to File:I-90.svg. This file is of little use when the SVG exists, the only difference is a slightly different font. AntiCompositeNumber talk 03:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - The font used is incorrect per MUTCD spec. SounderBruce 03:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AMB STACKZ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Large volume of promotional material for a non-notable musician. Out of Commons project scope. Commons is not a free webhost.
- File:AMBSTACKZ.jpg
- File:Kick off your shoes AMB STACKZ.jpg
- File:Hip Hop AMB STACKZ.jpg
- File:Shittyboyz AMB STACKZ.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ Recording.jpg
- File:Logo AMB STACKZ.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ bio.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ trapgod.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ hits.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ streets.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ spots.jpg
- File:Lil bro AMB STACKZ.jpg
- File:Fuck chrome hearts shoot.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ lockz.jpg
- File:Get STACKZ RECORDING ENT.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ Atlanta.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ Apple Music.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ reviews.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ goat.jpg
- File:Ready or not AMB STACKZ.jpg
- File:GET STACKZ RECORDING ENT.jpg
- File:Released album AMB STACKZ.png
- File:AMB STACKZ Mixtape.jpg
- File:The gutta.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ Trapping.jpg
- File:Throwing up my STACKZ Shit AMB.jpg
- File:Chill wit AMB STACKZ.jpg
- File:St.Louis AMB STACKZ.jpg
- File:Casino AMB STACKZ.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ Detroit.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ live.png
- File:AMB STACKZ hot.png
- File:AMB STACKZ take it.png
- File:AMB STACKZ yop.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ juice.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ.png
- File:AMB STACKZ greatz.jpg
- File:AMB STACKZ.jpg
IronGargoyle (talk) 04:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Glenkwhite (talk · contribs)
[edit]A bunch of promotional how-to guides about cooling pillow cases. Completely out of Commons project scope.
- File:How The Bamboo Cool Pillow Case or Gel-Infused Pillow.pdf
- File:How The Best Bamboo Cooling Pillow Case or Gel-Infused Pillow.pdf
- File:How The Best Cool Bamboo Pillow Case or Gel-Infused Pillow.pdf
- File:How The Best Cooling Pillow Case or Gel-Infused Pillow (1).pdf
- File:How The Best Cooling Pillow Case or Gel-Infused Pillow.pdf
- File:How to Take Proper Care of Bamboo Best Pillows for side sleeper.pdf
- File:How to Take Proper Care of Bamboo Best Pillows Canada.pdf
IronGargoyle (talk) 04:12, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Glenkwhite (talk · contribs)
[edit]content probably taken from somewhere else.
- File:How to choose the best cervical pillow for neck (1).pdf
- File:Choose the best orthopedic neck pillow.pdf
- File:Choose the best cervical pillow.pdf
- File:Choose the cervical neck pillow.pdf
- File:Explain How to choose the best cervical pillow for neck.pdf
- File:How to choose the best cervical pillow for neck.pdf
- File:How to choose the best orthopedic pillow for neck.pdf
- File:How to choose the best orthopedic cervical pillow for neck pain.pdf
- File:How to choose the best best orthopedic pillow for neck pain.pdf
- File:How to choose the best cervical pillow for neck pain.pdf
Orizan (talk) 22:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete blatant long-term spam of well-known pattern where they put spam links in the pdf. I think the user can also be blocked as promotion-only at this point.-BRP ever 09:43, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Michael-Moates (talk) 05:10, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment In use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:50, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Yann. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Michael-Moates (talk) 05:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Michael-Moates (talk) 05:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; OOS unused user photo, deletion requested by user -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:49, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:REDUNDANT to File:06412jfBarangay Santa Cruz South Avenue Manila South Cemetery Makati Cityfvf 16.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
File:06527jfKalayaan Avenue Santa Cruz Olympia Bel-Air Nicanor Garcia Street Makati Cityfvf 23.jpg
[edit]Too dark and the wording on the street sign is almost unreadable (due to darkness). COM:NOTUSED. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
File:06527jfKalayaan Avenue Santa Cruz Olympia Bel-Air Nicanor Garcia Street Makati Cityfvf 04.jpg
[edit]A trivial piece of a plain fence wall. COM:REDUNDANT to both File:06527jfKalayaan Avenue Santa Cruz Olympia Bel-Air Nicanor Garcia Street Makati Cityfvf 03.jpg and File:06527jfKalayaan Avenue Santa Cruz Olympia Bel-Air Nicanor Garcia Street Makati Cityfvf 01.jpg which really show the wider street scenery. Another contribution by now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Image has large, destructive watermark, is unused, and has questionable educational utility. Out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT. May also fulfill COM:Derivative works as it is a banner with some designs. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Bulletin - United States National Museum (1926) (14783715852) (cropped).jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:33, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Bulletin - United States National Museum (1926) (14783715852) (cropped2).jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:46, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:33, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Bulletin - United States National Museum (1926) (14783715852) (cropped2).jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:47, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Dupe of File:Bulletin - United States National Museum (1926) (14783715852) (cropped3).jpg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:33, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deniz Karahan (talk · contribs)
[edit]All the materials uploaded by users are to promote the organization they represent with little to no educational use. Out of commons' scope.
- File:Proptech innovation label.png
- File:Deniz Karahan PropTech Switzerland.jpg
- File:Deniz Karahan PropTech Pioneer.png
- File:Deniz Karahan PropTech Innovation Label.jpg
- File:Deniz Karahan PropTech Expert.jpg
- File:Deniz Karahan International PropTech Standards.jpg
- File:Deniz Karahan PropTech Academy.jpg
- File:Deniz Karahan Real Estate Expert.jpg
- File:Deniz Karahan Digital Real Estate.jpg
- File:Deniz Karahan PropTech Strategist.jpg
- File:Deniz Karahan PropTech Book Author.jpg
- File:Deniz Karahan is PropTech pioneer and the author of the first PropTech Book.jpg
- File:PropTech Academy is competence center of property technology.png
- File:PropTech Academy build a better future with property technology.png
- File:PropTech Academy Development Goals.png
BRP ever 13:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Self-promotion images. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 13:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 04:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MG Amis Zed Official (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files with no educational use. Likely just for spam/self-promotion. Out of our scope.
- File:MG Amis Zed Zambian Musical Artist.jpg
- File:MG Amis Zed Pictures.jpg
- File:MG Amis Zed Music.jpg
- File:MG Amis Zed The Rapper.jpg
- File:Musical Artist - MG Amis Zed.jpg
- File:MG Amis Zed. KamaNormalWamaDizzy.jpg
- File:MG Amis Zed. 2021.jpg
- File:MG Amis Zed .2020.jpg
- File:MG Amis Zed Official.jpg
- File:MG Amis Zed the Rapper.jpg
- File:MG Amis Zed The Zambian Musical Artist.jpg
- File:MG Amis Zed.jpg
- File:MG Amis Zed the Zambian Rapper.jpg
- File:MG Amis Zed Musical Artist.jpg
BRP ever 13:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 04:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 04:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Grupo BlueBay (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Pictures not used for any educational purpose, likely promotional.
Yeeno (talk) 18:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 04:11, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leehnetinka2021 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Photos not used for educational purposes on any project, likely promotional.
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-48.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-47.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-46.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-45.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-44.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-43.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-42.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-41.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-40.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-39.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-38.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-37.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-36.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-34.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-35.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-33.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-32.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-31.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-30.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-29.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-28.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-27.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-26.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-25.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-24.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-23.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-22.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-21.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-20.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-19.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-18.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-17.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-15.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-16.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-12.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-14.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-13.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-10.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-9.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-11.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-8.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-7.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-6.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-4.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-3.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-5.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-1.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO-2.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Darkstore Founder and CEO.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-50.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-49.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-48.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-47.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-46.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-45.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-44.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-43.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-42.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-41.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-40.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-39.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-38.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-37.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-36.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-35.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-34.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-32.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-33.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-31.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-30.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-29.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-28.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-27.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-26.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-25.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-24.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-23.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-22.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-21.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-20.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-18.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-19.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-17.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-16.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-15.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-14.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-12.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-13.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-11.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-10.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-9.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-4.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-7.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-8.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-5.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-6.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-2.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Founder and CEO of Darkstore-3.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-19.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-2.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Founder and CEO - Darkstore.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-4.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-5.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-6.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-7.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-8.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-9.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-11.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-13.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-12.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-20.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-14.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-16.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-15.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-17.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore-18.jpg
- File:Lee-Hnetinka-Founder-and-CEO-Darkstore.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Darkstore CEO and Founder.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka - Founder and CEO - Darkstore, Inc.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka Darkstore CEO.jpg
- File:Darkstore CEO and founder Lee Hnetinka.jpg
- File:Lee Hnetinka CEO of Darkstore.jpg
Yeeno (talk) 18:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, plus missing permission from Author. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 04:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Images not used on any projects, likely promotional.
- File:Sandro Salsano, boarding.jpg
- File:Mr Sandro Salsano, traveling.jpg
- File:Sandro Salsano, chairman Salsano Family Office 4.jpg
- File:Sandro Salsano, Chairman Salsano Family Office - 2.jpg
- File:Sandro Salsano, Chairman Salsano Family Office - 3.jpg
- File:Sandro Salsano, Chairman Salsano Family Office.jpg
Yeeno (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:34, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
This image is still copyright protected (creator deceased in 1985). The Pedagogical Institute of Greece has the right to reproduce the image in its own materials, but it is not the copyright owner. Flashdart2 (talk) 13:16, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
This image is still copyright protected (creator deceased in 1985). The "owners" of this piece of art should clearly show that they have also the copyright for reproduction. Flashdart2 (talk) 13:19, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:30, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
This image is still copyright protected (creator deceased in 1985). The "owners" of this piece of art should clearly show that they have also the copyright for reproduction. Flashdart2 (talk) 13:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:29, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate Chaturaji (talk) 11:42, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
duplicate Chaturaji (talk) 02:00, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate of File:Chaturanga Chess Set.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Highly unlikely own work of a single creator. File sizes are very small, and it's all single topic, possible promotionalism.
- File:Chillons Reyes Televisa.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes Televisa Mexicali canal 4.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes reportero Televisa Mexicali.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes reportero Televisa Mexicali canal 4.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes reportero Televisa Canal 4.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes Noticieros Televisa.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes Noticieros Televisa Mexicali.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes Noticieros Televisa 1.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes nadador medalla.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes Mexicali Televisa.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes illuminati.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes de Televisa entrevista Jorge Hank.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes Conductor Televisa.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes con Maricel Alvarez Soto.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes con Alberto Plata Televisa.jpg
- File:Chillons Reyes border USA.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ario Frouzanfar (talk · contribs)
[edit]None of these images seem to be by the uploader: Old photos, many facebook size images, maps, etc.
- File:آب گرم معدنی فردوس.jpg
- File:انار شیشه گپ.jpg
- File:مدرسه نجفی.jpg
- File:خانه افراشته.jpg
- File:Iran-Ghurids1.jpg
- File:Iran-kharazmshahids.jpg
- File:Tmp 13190-124377425.jpg
- File:امامزاده سلطان عابد.png
- File:محمد منتظر قائم.png
- File:امیر الهامی.png
- File:محمد رضا امیرحسنخانی.png
- File:کوشک حاجی آباد.png
- File:سید محمود نجفی فردوسی.jpg
- File:فریدون سعادت قدسی نیا.jpg
- File:هدایت الله شهاب فردوسی.jpg
- File:محمد جعفر یاحقی.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:07, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Uploader stated that the image was released through Creative Commons but image cannot be found on said website Centcom08 (talk) 14:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 04:02, 12 December 2021 UTC: No permission since 3 December 2021 --Krdbot 06:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
planetarium in Volgograd was completed in 1954 ([1]), so it's unlikely that the statue doesn't violate Russian FoP rules — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Official logo of Waukegan.jpg
- File:Official logo of waukegan.jpg
- File:Waukegan city logo.jpg
- File:Official Lake county, IL, flag.jpg
- File:Lake county flag 20201.jpg
- File:Lake county, IL, official flag.jpg
- File:Lake county IL emblem.jpg
- File:Lake County, IL word mark.png
- File:The official seal of Lake County, IL.gif
- File:Waukegan City logo.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:18, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Small images without metadata, last remaining pictures, very unlikely to be own works.
- File:Waukegan city sign.jpg
- File:Waukegan harbor.jpg
- File:Naval station Great Lakes.jpg
- File:Skyline of Waukegan.jpg
- File:Downtown Waukegan skyline.jpg
- File:Waukegan from above.jpg
- File:Downtown chicago seen from Waukegan.jpg
- File:Chicago seen from Waukegan.jpg
- File:Waukegan downtown.jpg
- File:Waukegan theatre.jpg
- File:Hotel Waukegan downtown.jpg
- File:Waukegan City hall.jpg
- File:Waukegan welcome sign.jpg
- File:Chicago skyline seen from Waukegan harbor.jpg
- File:Chicago skyline from Waukegan Harbor.jpg
- File:Downtown Waukegan.jpg
Yann (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:18, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Original source(s) needed. Current source(s) provided states that files were derived from elsewhere.
- File:Official Waukegan City Logo.jpg
- File:Highwood City Seal.png
- File:Highland Park City Seal.png
- File:Grayslake Village Flag.png
- File:Lake Forest City Seal.png
- File:North Chicago City Seal.png
- File:Zion city seal.jpg
- File:City of Waukegan official Seal.png
- File:Official Waukegan City Seal.jpg
- File:Illinois Beach State Park Resort & Conference Center.jpg
- File:Six Flags great America.jpg
- File:Official Waukegan City Flag.png
- File:Official Waukegan City Seal.png
- File:City of Waukegan Seal.png
- File:City of Waukegan logo.jpg
- File:Waukegan city seal.png
- File:Seal of Waukegan.gif
- File:Waukegan city flag.gif
- File:Lake county seal.jpg
- File:Authentic lake county flag.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:21, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:32, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
What looks like a photocopy of a photograph clipped from somewhere. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: definitely not an own work, portrayed person died in 1987. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 09:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
What appears to be a photograph of a paper photocopy of a photograph. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 09:43, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture of an Israeli businessman and the photographer is mentioned in the file's EXIF. The picture appears in several places on the web (such as this one). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 12:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: name of the author (according to EXIF) is different from the name of the uploader: OTRS is needed. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 09:49, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused placeholder image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 09:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Visit the deletion requests subpage and place the following code:
subpage
[edit]reason Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 23:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
subpage
[edit]reason Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The text made to this image is no longer in use and I wish no longer to have these private images on display online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamavial (talk • contribs) 19:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: the (un)willingness of the uploader to keep this picture online does not matter. However, this is not the photograph but rather a collage of two pictures portraying the same person as a child and as a young adult; copyright status of original photographs is unclear. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 10:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 10:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Some doubt about the claimed ownership for this image by Flickr-user (and depicted person) Ryan Vasquez, as metadate state "Photographer=FRANCISCO DAS CHAGAS / Copyright=ACRITICA DE HUMAITA". -- Túrelio (talk) 16:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 10:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 17:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: semi-official picture of Czech schoolchildren, might be used somehow. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 10:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Toy copyrights 191.125.51.81 01:04, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept appears to be generic "teddy bear" of type mass produced for more than a century -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BullsFan44 (talk · contribs)
[edit]South African rugby logos. This article suggests that South Africa has a low threshold of originality for copyright.
- File:Toyota-Challenge.jpg
- File:2017 Currie cup logo.webp
- File:Bankfin Currie Cup 1997 logo.webp
- File:Bankfin Currie Cup 1991 logo.webp
- File:Santambank-Currie Cup 1986 logo.webp
- File:Currie Cup 1984 logo.webp
- File:Currie Cup 1983 Datsun logo.webp
- File:SAB Currie Cup 1981 logo.webp
IronGargoyle (talk) 04:37, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Copyright violations, false licenses, false claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Unfree logo. Unlikely to be own work. Used only for promotional purposes and out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:23, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo of non-notable company, clearly only uploaded for the purpose of self-promotion. Out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:14, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:24, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Not likely own work. Velma (talk) 08:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted clear CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Very poor quality, inferior to basically any other file on the subject. Commons is not an amateur porn site. Dronebogus (talk) 12:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, the video quality is not that great but it shows it is spontaneous and not staged. It is real and not intended to be presented as porn. Do as you see fit with it and thank you. Midget Skeeter (talk) 21:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- The quality is worse than “not great”. It’s so poor you can hardly tell what’s going on. Not very useful for illustrating its subject. Dronebogus (talk) 22:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. Grainy video screenshot -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Văn Trung Hoàng Anh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Beautiful picture of Van Trung Hoang Anh.jpg
- File:Handsome portrait picture of Van Trung Hoang Anh.jpg
- File:Ảnh chụp.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:03, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Văn Trung Hoàng Anh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:Scope: unused personal images and videos. Subjects (and likely uploader) look like minors.
- File:Funny boy in the love.ogg
- File:Sad boy in love.webm
- File:Bad boy.ogg
- File:Tran Nhat Quoc.jpg
- File:Hot boy Trần Nhật Quốc.jpg
- File:Adsense.ogg
MKFI (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom (also likely DW cartoon characters in several) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Poor quality, virtually un-useable Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
This page says that the photo is from 2000. Since it's a photography of a photograph, there should be EXIF data. Likely it's taken from somewhere else. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:35, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
file in copyviol, cf. Google Images — danyele 00:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
probably copyviol / a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 photo — danyele 17:21, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 17:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
original photowork, not under the threshold of originality — danyele 00:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation: Ryōhei Koiso died on 1988. Therefore, the copyright of Koiso is under protection in Japan. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 01:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Ryōhei Koiso died on December 16, 1988. Therefore, the copyright is under protection. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 01:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Team7042 (talk) 02:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Missvain (talk) 16:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused, likely unfree logo. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Promotional artwork and copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Produit de Saarstahl.jpg and other files from saarstahl.de
[edit]- File:Production Saarstahl AG.jpg
- File:Produit de Saarstahl AG.jpg
- File:Appareil production.jpg
- File:Transport de produit.jpg
- File:Lignes de production.jpg
- File:Appareil de production Saarstahl AG.jpg
- File:Appareil de production.jpg
- File:Usine de production.jpg
- File:Employé Saarstahl.jpg
- File:Employé Saarstahl à son poste.jpg
- File:Produit manutentionné.jpg
Source site does not allow modifications and commercial use ("The right to use the photos optimised for printing or for the internet, without modification, for journalistic purposes is granted free of charge. It is subject to the condition that a free copy of the edition is sent to us free of charge or, in the case of online usage, we are informed of the URL of the corresponding website.") - incompatible with CC-4. Retired electrician (talk) 02:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- There are a few other files from JessicaBeckerSR coming from the same company website :
- There are also other files from the same user mentioning the company but without links to any source or any authorization... --NicoV (talk) 08:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete unless JessicaBeckerSR can provide proof that the copyright holder agreed to license the file under CC-BY-SA. Most of her other uploads face the same problem. Andel (talk) 09:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete same --NicoV (talk) 12:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Please use mass deletion in the future. Also please nominate any other files needing review - not my role as a reviewer to wade through uploads to find them. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo. Out of Commons project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also above COM:TOO logo. Contributers2020Talk to me here 03:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The source of the file gives a 404 error. Wayback Machine gives out a access denied. [https://tineye.com/search/34e2f044d919e931548d540f5bc4ebdb5855e464?sort=score&order=desc&page=1 TinEye also gives out only Commons. Unless we don't have the proof this is made from the source of Marine cops, PD can't be proved and resulting into deletion.
1) File:050426-M-0502A-019 - HM3 (FMF) Emily A. Dooley, USN.jpg
2) File:050515-M-0502A-005 - Fleet Marine Force Enlisted Warfare Specialist Insignia.jpg
3) File:110608-M-8715L-003 - HM2 (FMF) Sarah Moore, USN.jpg
4) File:110719-M-UK709-048 - LCpl Chandra Francisco, USMC.jpg
5) File:050221-A-6862C-001 - SGT Dan A. Ruggiero treats young boy in Afghanistan.jpg
6) File:120316-M-3612M-002 - HM3 (FMF) Sinthia Gomez works on dental records.jpg
7) File:120316-M-3612M-004 - HM3 (FMF) Sinthia M. Gomez works on dental records.jpg
8) File:120717-M-DM345-001 - James F. Amos pins a Purple Heart on Sgt. Shane Fredericks during a visit.jpg
9) File:1909 International Auto Wagon USMC-101018-M-7753H-150.jpg
10) File:2002 Chevrolet Corvette at an autocross event hosted by the Single Marine Program.jpg
11) File:Andrew MacMannis USMC-100617-M-7799V-187.jpg
12) File:Andrew MacMannis USMC-110622-M-VX252-029.jpg
13) File:Andrew MacMannis USMC-16244.jpg
14) File:Anne Andrew and Thomas Negus USMC-100821-M-9206G-033.jpg
15) File:Annette Conway and Liz Kent speak with military spouses, 2010.jpg
16) File:Annette Conway congratulates Gen. James F. Amos, 2010.jpg
17) File:Annette Conway speaks with members of the Exceptional Family Member Program, 2010.jpg
18) File:Annette Conway speaks with military spouses, March 5, 2010.jpg
19) File:Annette Conway speaks with wives of Marines and sailors, 2010.jpg
20) File:Annette Conway, a former special education teacher, 2010.jpg
Deleted: In future, please do not put the nominated files in a dropdown by number. It's not easy to process (it breaks mass process, basically). Copyvio - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
copyvio; artist d. 2006; no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 03:23, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- What is the argument for deletion? I took a picture of this work which belongs to me. It's legitimate. Frontloop71 (talk) 07:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wenn Du ein Werk fotografierst, reicht es nicht, dass das Bild Dir gehört, Du müstest auch die Erlaubnis des Urhebers des Werks haben bzw., wenn der Urheber weniger als 70 Jahre tot ist, die Erlaubnis des Rechteinhabers. Vermutlich bist Du das in diesem Falle selbst, da der Urheber Dein Vater war. Am besten schreibst Du eine E-Mail an das Support-Team (siehe de:Wikipedia:Support-Team), um das nachzuweisen. Perrak (talk) 18:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Promotional use. Kevin Lupión is an author at webpage Nexel. MexTDT (talk) 03:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - promotional. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Abkhaz State Philharmonic
[edit]There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Abkhazia. The building was built in 1947 and designed by architects Цинцабадзе С. and Камоев Н. (source) who might not be dead for more than 70 years. Using Georgian freedom of panorama is of no use too as it is also non-commercial, but non-commercial license is not accepted on Commons.
- File:Абхазская государственная филармония 01.jpg
- File:Абхазская государственная филармония 10.jpg
- File:Абхазская государственная филармония 11.jpg
- File:Абхазская государственная филармония 5.jpg
- File:Абхазская государственная филармония 7.jpg
- File:Абхазская государственная филармония 8.jpg
- File:Абхазская государственная филармония 9.jpg
- File:Абхазская государственная филармония.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Malena2004 (talk · contribs)
[edit]A series of Covid memes and images, unlikely to be own work or educational in scope.
- File:Barbijo.jpg
- File:Tareas en pandemia.jpg
- File:El covid ataca.jpg
- File:Uso del barbijo.jpg
- File:Vencer al covid.jpg
- File:Barbijo con estilo.jpg
- File:Gel antibacterial y barbijo.jpg
- File:Classroom para seguir estudiando.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unfree soccer logos. Unlikely to be own work
IronGargoyle (talk) 06:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
youtube license is not valid. it's what you call license laundering. just because a random user reuploads a video they don't own with cc license to youtube does not mean that footage has free license now. Tehonk (talk) 06:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Claiming to be the flag of a Native American tribe, this was never the flag or symbol of the Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana. FrancisWolfMT34 (talk) 07:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete – All sources I find feature a design with a buffalo on it (for example: https://tribalnations.mt.gov/_images/ls_emblem_120.gif), not the abstract geometric design uploaded to Commons. Senator2029 21:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Fake flag - out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Found online incl https://www.clmt.com.my/revamp/3damansara.html - this is an architects conceptual drawing and we need OTRS to confirm that uploader has permission Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
This has never been the flag or symbol of the Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana FrancisWolfMT34 (talk) 07:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete – All sources I find feature a design with a buffalo on it (for example: https://tribalnations.mt.gov/_images/ls_emblem_120.gif), not the abstract geometric design uploaded to Commons. Senator2029 21:23, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Fake flag, out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chroma42653 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work, one found here https://twitter.com/justinhmin/status/1373272378986336260 before upload - needs OTRS
Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emma Prévieux (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artworks by a living artist (b1961) Needs artist permission
- File:JWH121-Névache Fontcouverte-1.jpg
- File:JWH146-Le souffle de la montagne.jpg
- File:JWH018-Pivoine III.jpg
- File:JWH164-L'Âme.jpg
- File:JWH047-Fraterie.jpg
- File:JWH124-Linaigrette au bord du lac.jpg
- File:JWH069-Au galop.jpg
- File:JWE006-Tigre II.jpg
- File:JWE003-Aigle III.jpg
- File:JWE104-Iris.jpg
- File:JWE044-Le mélèze roux.jpg
- File:JWE097-En route vers le sommet.jpg
- File:JWE121-L'enfant et ses chiens.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mikailbekar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Same as the insta profile pic https://www.instagram.com/mikailbekar/ - uploader claims to be in the photo. We need OTRS
Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Per watermark unlikely own work by uploader.-- Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Điện gió Ea Nam (thôn 5) thuộc tập đoàn Trung Nam được chụp từ FlyCam.jpg
- File:Điện giò eanam.jpg
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No exif, looks like it was taken from insta https://www.instagram.com/stories/juliabelard/2713919338805955421/?hl=en Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No exif, border looks like it was cropped from a still or something. Unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The Author attribution suggests this to be a picture of Sosa.
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright).
In addition there are no camera details. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 09:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nominaetch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.
Timtrent (talk) 09:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Superfluous TimedText file for the .ogv file with pronunciation without any sense Pacha Tchernof (talk) 09:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- As I learnt recently, there is a {{Pronunciation file}} template with IPA field for this kind of transcription. In my humble opinion, the subtitles shouldn't be used in the way to show IPA instead of that field in the mentionned template. ― Pacha Tchernof (talk) 10:14, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The file is the National Symbols of the Republic of Namibia Act, 2018, as published on gazette in 2018. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Namibia#General rules, government works, including laws, do not immediately enter Namibian public domain, and will enter local public domain in 2068 (2018+50) after its publication. As a result, the copyright tag itself is insufficient (as it don't address local copyright), and is copyrighted and unfree locally.
The file also needs to be arranged for moving to English Wikisource locally. 廣九直通車 (talk) 09:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
špatně jsme si rozuměli se zdrojovým archivem... GALAXY 2018 A7 (talk) 09:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
NEMAŽTE TENTO SOUBOR!!! --GALAXY 2018 A7 (talk) 13:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The file is the National Anthem of the Republic of Namibia Act, 1991, as published on gazette. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Namibia#General rules, government works, including laws, do not immediately enter Namibian public domain, and will enter local public domain in 2051 (1991+50) after its publication. As a result, the copyright tag itself is insufficient (as it don't address local copyright), and is copyrighted and unfree locally.
The file also needs to be arranged for moving to English Wikisource locally. 廣九直通車 (talk) 09:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
I believe this does meet the threshold of originality, as the LG symbol on this logo is reasonably complex. Thus, I believe it is copyrighted. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - See Category:LG logos --Sreejith K (talk) 15:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: This appears to be an un-used personal image of a non-contributer. Subject appears to be non-notable (at least unidentified). El Grafo (talk) 09:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
{{Duplicate|Queen Christina (Sébastien Bourdon) - Nationalmuseum - 18075.tif}} Ambrosiani (talk) 09:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, as the JPEG-version is retouched, while the TIFF-version is not. --Túrelio (talk) 14:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per User:Túrelio - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Aagam Manthan and Translation Research under Ganadhipati Gurudev Shree Tulsi , Acharya Shree Mahapragya , Acharya Shree Mahashraman and Sadhvi Pramukha Shree Kanakprabha Ji.jpg
[edit]Uploader seems to claim authorship for the original photograph. That seems questionable, given that this was clearly digitized from some kind of industrialized print (e.g. a book). El Grafo (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- This is true that I haven't taken the photograph because it is a very old one !
- This picture is scanned from a Book that is publicly available and the original photographer is unknown
- This photograph and the book are available in many magazines,articles,and newspapers both online and offline !!
- As a novice editor when I uploaded I wasn't able to find any suitable section under which I can place this picture on Wikimedia Commons ,
- So I placed it under own work section since there was no other suitable section that I can place it to.
- One think I can assure is that it is copyright free since it is already in use from decades in books,articles etc with no mention about the photographer
- Further I found many more photographs on commons lablelled as own work which actually are very old and either scanned or digitalised from various online sources,So as a newbie I thought that if their is no other option we have to by default put it in the OWN WORK section
- I request you, with all sincerity if possible you can chnage authorship to any relevant section or suggest me a section so that I can edit the authorship ,by your experience and guidance ,instead of deleting a valuable and historically important asset from Wikimedia.
- I have said all I can,and I assure that whatever may be the decision which respected administrators take regarding this photograph, I will abide by it and even if they need to suspend/ban my account I will accept their decision with utmost respect .
- Michhami Dukkadam
- Peace !! RDJain (talk) 11:19, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history (several outright netcopyvios) 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Felipekarate (talk · contribs)
[edit]There is either an image destroying SPAM watermark or this is a copyrighted image taken from an alibaba website.
Ies (talk) 11:04, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement Kotofey2016 (talk) 11:14, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: clear copyright violation.--Renvoy (talk) 08:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo of copyrighted software, used for arvertising in ruwiki. Drakosh (talk) 11:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: OUt of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Ich habe die Datei versehentlich ein zweites mal hochgeladen. Sie ist jetzt doppelt. Siehe "Silberpfeil von oben (35974677130).jpg (Datei)" Bitte löschen. Vielen Dank! Vogtt (talk) 11:28, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion - happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Governança em TI
[edit]Simple tables should be made in HTML, complex ones are probably under a copyright. Also these are probably out of scope if not used in a Wikimedia project.
- File:AdquirirManterInfraestruturaTecnologia.jpg
- File:AdquirirManterSoftwareAplicativo.jpg
- File:AdquirirRecursosTI.jpg
- File:Apresentacao objetivos metricas.png
- File:AssegurarConformidadeRequisitosExternos.jpg
- File:AssegurarContinuidadeServicos.jpg
- File:AvaliarGerenciarRiscosTI.jpg
- File:Categorias Habilidades COBIT5.jpg
- File:Ciclo Informacao Metadados COBIT5.jpg
- File:ComunicarMetasDiretrizesGerenciais.jpg
- File:ConduzirAquisicoes.jpg
- File:ControlarAquisicoes.jpg
- File:ControlarComunicacoes.jpg
- File:ControlarCronograma.jpg
- File:ControlarCustos.jpg
- File:ControlarEngajamentoPartesInteressadas.jpg
- File:ControlarEscopo.jpg
- File:ControlarQualidade.jpg
- File:ControlarRiscos.jpg
- File:CriarEAP.jpg
- File:DefinicaoEscalasImpactos.jpg
- File:Definindo objetivos ti arquitetura empresa ti.jpg
- File:DefinirArquiteturaInformacao.jpg
- File:DefinirAtividades.jpg
- File:DefinirEscopo.jpg
- File:DefinirGerenciarNiveisServico.jpg
- File:DefinirPlanoEstrategicoTI.jpg
- File:DefinirProcessosOrganizacaoRelacionamentosTI.jpg
- File:DesenvolverCronograma.jpg
- File:DesenvolverEquipeProjeto.jpg
- File:DesenvolverPlanoGerenciamentoProjeto.jpg
- File:DesenvolverTermoAbertura.jpg
- File:DeterminarDiretrizesTecnologia.jpg
- File:DeterminarOrcamento.jpg
- File:DiferenciacaoPlanoDocumentosGerenciamentoProjeto.jpg
- File:Dimensoes maturidade cobit.png
- File:EducarTreinarUsuarios.jpg
- File:EncerrarAquisicoes.jpg
- File:EncerrarProjetoFase.jpg
- File:EstimarCustos.jpg
- File:EstimarDuracoesAtividades.jpg
- File:EstimarRecursosAtividades.jpg
- File:Familia Produtos COBIT5.jpg
- File:Fronteiras negocios contoles gerais de aplicativos cobit.png
- File:GarantirSegurancaSistemas.jpg
- File:Gerenciamento controle alinhamento monitoramento cobit.png
- File:Gerenciamento de informacoes cobit.png
- File:Gerenciando recursos ti para entregar objetivos cobit.png
- File:GerenciarAmbienteFisico.jpg
- File:GerenciarCentralServicoIncidentes.jpg
- File:GerenciarComunicacoes.jpg
- File:GerenciarConfiguracao.jpg
- File:GerenciarDados.jpg
- File:GerenciarDesempenhoCapacidade.jpg
- File:GerenciarEngajamentoPartesInteressadas.jpg
- File:GerenciarEquipeProjeto.jpg
- File:GerenciarInvestimentoTI.jpg
- File:GerenciarMudancas.jpg
- File:GerenciarOperacoes.jpg
- File:GerenciarProblemas.jpg
- File:GerenciarProjetos.jpg
- File:GerenciarQualidade.jpg
- File:GerenciarRecursosHumanosTI.jpg
- File:GerenciarServicosTerceirizados.jpg
- File:Governanca Gestao TI COBIT5.jpg
- File:Habilitador COBIT5 Cultura Etica Comportamento.jpg
- File:Habilitador COBIT5 Estrutura Organizacional.jpg
- File:Habilitador COBIT5 Informacao.jpg
- File:Habilitador COBIT5 Pessoas Habilidades Competencias.jpg
- File:Habilitador COBIT5 Principios Politicas Modelos.jpg
- File:Habilitador COBIT5 Processos.jpg
- File:Habilitador COBIT5 Servicos Infraestrutura Aplicativos.jpg
- File:Habilitadores Corporativos COBIT5 Genericos.jpg
- File:Habilitadores Corporativos COBIT5.jpg
- File:HabilitarOperacaoUso.jpg
- File:IdentificarAlocarCustos.jpg
- File:IdentificarPartesInteressadas.jpg
- File:IdentificarRiscos.jpg
- File:IdentificarSolucoesAutomatizadas.jpg
- File:InstalarHomologarSolucoesMudancas.jpg
- File:Interacoes Governanca Gestao.jpg
- File:InteracoesGerenciamento.jpg
- File:Mapeamento Objetivos Corporativos COBIT5 Objetivos TI.jpg
- File:MobilizarEquipeProjeto.jpg
- File:Modelo cobit areas foco da governanca cobit.png
- File:Modelo controle cobit.png
- File:Modelo Referencia Processo COBIT5.jpg
- File:Modelo Unico Integrado COBIT5.jpg
- File:MonitorarAvaliarControlesInternos.jpg
- File:MonitorarAvaliarDesempenhoTI.jpg
- File:MonitorarControlarTrabalhoProjeto.jpg
- File:Navegacao cobit.png
- File:Objetivo Governanca Criacao Valor COBIT5.jpg
- File:Objetivos Corporativos COBIT5.jpg
- File:Objetivos TI COBIT5.jpg
- File:OrganizacaoFuncional.jpg
- File:OrganizacaoMatricialBalanceada.jpg
- File:OrganizacaoMatricialForte.jpg
- File:OrganizacaoMatricialFraca.jpg
- File:OrganizacaoProjetizada.jpg
- File:OrientarGerenciarTrabalhoProjeto.jpg
- File:Perguntas Governanca Gestao TI COBIT5.jpg
- File:PlanejarGerenciamentoAquisicoes.jpg
- File:PlanejarGerenciamentoComunicacoes.jpg
- File:PlanejarGerenciamentoCronograma.jpg
- File:PlanejarGerenciamentoCustos.jpg
- File:PlanejarGerenciamentoEscopo.jpg
- File:PlanejarGerenciamentoPartesInteressadas.jpg
- File:PlanejarGerenciamentoQualidade.jpg
- File:PlanejarGerenciamentoRH.jpg
- File:PlanejarGerenciamentoRisco.jpg
- File:PlanejarRespostaRisco.jpg
- File:Possivel nivel maturidade processo cobit.png
- File:Principais Areas Governanca COBIT5.jpg
- File:Principais Funcoes Atividades Relacionamentos COBIT5.jpg
- File:Principios basicos cobit.png
- File:Principios COBIT5.jpg
- File:ProverGovernancaTI.jpg
- File:Quatro dominios cobit.png
- File:RealizarAnaliseQualitativaRiscos.jpg
- File:RealizarAnaliseQuantitativaRiscos.jpg
- File:RealizarControleIntegradoMudancas.jpg
- File:RealizarGarantiaQualidade.jpg
- File:Relacionamento de objetivos cobit.png
- File:Relacionamento processos objetivos metricas cobit.png
- File:Relacionamentos cobit.png
- File:Representacao grafica modelos maturidade cobit.png
- File:Requisitos de negocios cobit.png
- File:Resumo Modelo Capacidade Processo COBIT5.jpg
- File:ValidarEscopo.jpg
- File:Visao Geral Cascata Objetivos COBIT5.jpg
- File:Visao geral do modelo cobit.png
- File:VisaoGeralGerenciamento.jpg
- File:VisaoGeralGerenciamentoAquisicao.jpg
- File:VisaoGeralGerenciamentoComunicacoes.jpg
- File:VisaoGeralGerenciamentoCustos.jpg
- File:VisaoGeralGerenciamentoEscopo.jpg
- File:VisaoGeralGerenciamentoIntegracao.jpg
- File:VisaoGeralGerenciamentoPartesInteressadas.jpg
- File:VisaoGeralGerenciamentoQualidade.jpg
- File:VisaoGeralGerenciamentoRH.jpg
- File:VisaoGeralGerenciamentoRisco.jpg
- File:VisaoGeralGerenciamentoTempo.jpg
- File:Áreas de foco Governança TI.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Very poor quality, inferior to basically any other file on the subject. Commons is not an amateur porn site. Dronebogus (talk) 12:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry it does not measure up to standards in video quality and content. Please remove it. Midget Skeeter (talk) 20:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
El usuario usa una Samsung en otras fotos. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.119.69.77 (talk) 13:28, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yo no hablo español. The other photos are better, what’s your point? Dronebogus (talk) 01:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Kantharaja Vamathevan - THE CEO OF STAR RAJA SOLUTIONS 191.119.69.77 12:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Kantharaja Vamathevan - THE ULTIMATE LEGENDE in facebook 191.119.69.77 12:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement https://muzeolog.com/rossiya/vesegonskiy-kraevedcheskiy-muzey.html 89.179.104.231 13:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC) + see also File:Экспозиция Весьегонского краеведческого музея.jpg --Drakosh (talk) 14:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Image taken from https://www.hkolimpija.si/en/2019/08/page/3/, no source that this user "HK Olimpija" is actually associatied with this team and that he took the picture Snowflake91 (talk) 13:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement https://www.culture.ru/events/1124203/noch-muzeev-v-krasnokholmskom-kraevedcheskom-muzee 89.179.104.231 13:35, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, very small resolution thumbnail. MKFI (talk) 13:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
A book cover, and while based on a public domain art (The Scream), I believe this still meets COM:Threshold of originality. MKFI (talk) 13:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Ltn12345 (2)
[edit]- File:DSC01886 (32880618675).jpg
- File:DSC01888 (32037862664).jpg
- File:DSC01889 (32066177233).jpg
- File:DSC02256 (31706895664).jpg
- File:DSC02258 (31738477793).jpg
- File:DSC02260 (32428015841).jpg
- File:DSC02261 (32397936302).jpg
- File:DSC02262 (32626163216).jpg
- File:DSC02263 (32397942262).jpg
- File:DSC02264 (32171458520).jpg
- File:DSC02266 (32171470370).jpg
- File:DSC02269 (32509725066).jpg
- File:DSC02273 (32532601365).jpg
- File:DSC02274 (32171478710).jpg
- File:DSC02275 (32428056231).jpg
- File:DSC02278 (32491681266).jpg
- File:DSC02279 (32534824145).jpg
- File:DSC02280 (32412306771).jpg
- File:DSC02284 (32428065341).jpg
- File:DSC02286 (32428075461).jpg
- File:DSC02287 (32550818145).jpg
- File:DSC02288 (31706887604).jpg
- File:DSC02290 (32398000052).jpg
- File:DSC02293 (32398009262).jpg
- File:DSC02298 (32428112371).jpg
- File:DSC02300 (32428128631).jpg
- File:DSC02301 (32412370841).jpg
- File:DSC02321 (31709161764).jpg
- File:DSC02321 (32491678856).jpg
- File:DSC02324 (32511989966).jpg
- File:DSC02325 (31824041404).jpg
- File:DSC02327 (32287717880).jpg
- File:DSC02344 (31824032104).jpg
- File:DSC02346 (32513843022).jpg
- File:DSC02348 (31854555163).jpg
- File:DSC02352 (32513967592).jpg
- File:DSC02357 (32287867460).jpg
- File:DSC02362 (32626336726).jpg
- File:DSC02365 (32626341016).jpg
- File:DSC02390 (31854688353).jpg
- File:DSC02410 (31722947684).jpg
- File:DSC02411 (31722937614).jpg
- File:DSC02413 (32384371412).jpg
- File:DSC02416 (31722972084).jpg
- File:DSC02424 (31722977554).jpg
- File:DSC02436 (31755029703).jpg
- File:DSC02459 (32288164870).jpg
- File:DSC02465 (32626557016).jpg
- File:DSC02467 (32626564076).jpg
- File:DSC02470 (31854917083).jpg
- File:DSC02477 (32181171930).jpg
- File:DSC02486 (32288177230).jpg
- File:DSC02504 (32288109800).jpg
These images were all uploaded by myself. I transferred from Flickr via #flickr2commons. At first, I batch uploaded photos by Tran Anh Khoa (zorrotran) because I thought most of those are images of inanimate objects. I didn't expect there were so many photographs of people. While I don't think there are copyright issues, I think there might be some ethical issues. Some of these pictures might also be out of scope. There are more pictures like these in Category:Files uploaded by Ltn12345/Flickr/Anh Khoa (zorrotran)/1 (around 150), the images I listed here are just some examples. --Ltn12345 (talk) 14:10, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Related discussions Ltn12345 (talk) 00:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ltn12345 This is a dubious mass nomination. Photos don't have ethical issues just because they depict identifiable people; I cannot see what the ethical issues are in this case. If you have specific ethical or scope concerns with some files, you should create specific deletion requests explaining them. At least one of the nominated files, DSC02413 (32384371412).jpg, does not depict people and is clearly in scope. Brianjd (talk) 08:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Trusting the nominator on this one. All files are unused. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Still under copyright, Claire Falkenstein died 1997 Bahnmoeller (talk) 14:28, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Still under copyright, Claire Falkenstein died 1997 Bahnmoeller (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- The brooch is an utilitarian object, that falls under Commons:UA --Sailko (talk) 14:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Definitely not. Sculptures, paintings, action figures, and (in many cases) toys and models do not have utilitarian aspects and therefore in the United States (where Commons is hosted) such objects are generally considered protected as copyrighted works of art. Its not in a shop, but a museum. --Bahnmoeller (talk) 17:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Well, it could have been in a shop too, as furniture, clothing and accessories... all stuff that I can also find in museum exhibitions, and all Utilitarian objects we widely have in Commons. This is not a sculpture, a painting, and action figure or a toy, it is a brooch, that was created in multiple copies, so it falls under Commons:UA, otherwise I would not have uploaded it. --Sailko (talk) 22:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- This discussion has a duplicate here, as opening a multiple deletion request was maybe too difficult. --Sailko (talk) 22:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Well, it could have been in a shop too, as furniture, clothing and accessories... all stuff that I can also find in museum exhibitions, and all Utilitarian objects we widely have in Commons. This is not a sculpture, a painting, and action figure or a toy, it is a brooch, that was created in multiple copies, so it falls under Commons:UA, otherwise I would not have uploaded it. --Sailko (talk) 22:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Definitely not. Sculptures, paintings, action figures, and (in many cases) toys and models do not have utilitarian aspects and therefore in the United States (where Commons is hosted) such objects are generally considered protected as copyrighted works of art. Its not in a shop, but a museum. --Bahnmoeller (talk) 17:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I concur with the nominator. Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Still under copyright, Claire Falkenstein died 1997 Bahnmoeller (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- The brooch is an utilitarian object, that falls under Commons:UA --Sailko (talk) 14:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Definitely not. Sculptures, paintings, action figures, and (in many cases) toys and models do not have utilitarian aspects and therefore in the United States (where Commons is hosted) such objects are generally considered protected as copyrighted works of art. --Bahnmoeller (talk) 17:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Well, it could have been in a shop too, as furniture, clothing and accessories... all stuff that I can also find in museum exhibitions, and all Utilitarian objects we widely have in Commons. This is not a sculpture, a painting, and action figure or a toy, it is a brooch, that was created in multiple copies, so it falls under Commons:UA, otherwise I would not have uploaded it. PS: what is the purpouse of having a double discussion also in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Claire falkenstein, spilla, 1948 ca.jpg? You could not open a multiple deletion request and you argue to be expert of Commons rules? --Sailko (talk) 22:53, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Sailko Stay COM:MELLOW; I do not see anyone claiming to be an expert in Commons rules here. Brianjd (talk) 08:15, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Well, it could have been in a shop too, as furniture, clothing and accessories... all stuff that I can also find in museum exhibitions, and all Utilitarian objects we widely have in Commons. This is not a sculpture, a painting, and action figure or a toy, it is a brooch, that was created in multiple copies, so it falls under Commons:UA, otherwise I would not have uploaded it. PS: what is the purpouse of having a double discussion also in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Claire falkenstein, spilla, 1948 ca.jpg? You could not open a multiple deletion request and you argue to be expert of Commons rules? --Sailko (talk) 22:53, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Definitely not. Sculptures, paintings, action figures, and (in many cases) toys and models do not have utilitarian aspects and therefore in the United States (where Commons is hosted) such objects are generally considered protected as copyrighted works of art. --Bahnmoeller (talk) 17:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree with the nominator. Brooches are not "utilitarian" so to say. I have brooches by artists and creators that are copyrighted. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright 2019. All rights reserved. 191.119.69.77 14:44, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright 2019. All rights reserved. + https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GoodVibesV/sandbox 191.119.69.77 14:47, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
معلومات منقوصة صفوان العباس (talk) 14:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope promotional image - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
There is no reason to repeat the pronounced word in the TimedText file. And if there is a reason to show up the reading of the pronounced word, there is a special {{Pronunciation file}} template on Commons which contains an IPA field for adding the IPA transcription for the word. Pacha Tchernof (talk) 15:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- As I learnt recently, there is a {{Pronunciation file}} template with IPA field for this kind of transcription. In my humble opinion, the subtitles shouldn't be used in the way to show IPA instead of that field in the mentionned template. ― Pacha Tchernof (talk) 10:14, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blanc miss ndatang (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Blancmiss6.jpg
- File:Blancmiss7.jpg
- File:Blancmiss5.jpg
- File:Blancmiss2.jpg
- File:Blancmiss3.jpg
- File:Blancmiss.jpg
- File:Blancmiss1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused placeholder image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dmytro Maletych (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The same photograph can be found here. Really the own work of the uploader? The username on this blog is different from the commons user. Mosbatho (talk) 16:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bobrondatr (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yogadetoxtherapy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Uploader is claiming "public domain in the United States because it was published in the United States between 1926 and 1977", but then says the source is the 1978 Alcornite yearbook. 1978 is not between 1926 and 1977, making the license incorrect/void. Elisfkc (talk) 16:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I misread the regulation. Please delete. Rikster2 (talk) 17:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
unused logo with no evidence of importance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 17:21, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
It is me on the picture and i o not want this picture on the internet. info@thereseklompenhouwer.com 185.97.229.7 13:50, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The picture looks fine to me, I could see if it was a deliberately unflattering image. --RAN (talk) 23:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
verry old picture 2A02:A213:2742:2580:E8A9:206F:26FB:36BD 17:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep No valid reason for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 08:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep (also for the crop!) I don't agree, what's the point? Pictures turn old over the years. I don't see any offend. Nice smile. But we also have other portraits of her at "official" happenings. --Rafael Zink (talk) 10:13, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
It is my on the picture and i do not want this on the internet info@thereseklompenhouwer.com 185.97.229.7 13:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
verry old picture 2A02:A213:2742:2580:E8A9:206F:26FB:36BD 17:23, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep No valid reason for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 08:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Some doubt about authorship-claim by uploader, as metadata contains Facebook/Instagram code. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Some doubt about "own work"-claim by uploader, as metadata contain Facebook/Instagram code. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- I collected the photo directly from Dr. Monira Qais, and I am her daughter. So we have the copyright. 2001:A61:24F2:E001:58CF:78E2:CF52:46EB 17:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Ok. In such cases it is necessary that either the photographer or the legal rightsholder send a confirmation of the choosen license to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). For a template of the permission-text see Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file. --Túrelio (talk) 17:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Logos not used for any educational purpose, likely promotional.
- File:360º MENA Brand Uplift - April 2020 05.png
- File:360º MENA Brand Uplift - April 2020 04.png
- File:360º MENA Brand Uplift - April 2020 01.png
- File:360º MENA Brand Uplift - April 2020 02.png
- File:360º MENA Brand Uplift - April 2020 03.png
Yeeno (talk) 17:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Contrary to uploader's claim, the metadata state that the photographer is not "Frankie Fouganthin" (who has his own account on Commons), but "Magnus Liljegren/Regeringskansliet" and that the image cannot be used commercially, making it unsuitable for Commons. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom QubeCube (talk) 23:08, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:16, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal image - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
obvious non-free image, taken from the ICC's twitter account Lugnuts (talk) 18:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Screencap from YouTube video [2] about 9 seconds in. Uploader has uploaded multiple other files that were blatant copyright violations. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- La mayoría de archivos de Wikipedia son capturas de pantalla, no mames con eso de que ahora quieren quitar todas las imágenes que hay en la pagina web, el usuario que dices que subió el video a dis que YouTube en ningún momento dijo que ese video tiene copyright, así que no lo tiene, pienso poner una denuncia con la organización Wikimedia en caso de que quitaras la imagen okey?? y tomate aunque sea la molestia de escribir un mensaje en ESPAÑOL para una persona que vive en Mexico, Gracias y buenas noches 187.169.78.142 02:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Este archivo es una violación de los derechos de autor, por lo que está listado para ser eliminado. Wikimedia Commons es para imágenes con licencia libre solomente. Mira Licencias y Trabajos derivados. Gracias por su atención. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:44, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
1972 or 2021? Could be a copyright violation. Xocolatl (talk) 18:26, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Still under copyright - Aksel Jørgensen died 1957 Bahnmoeller (talk) 18:26, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- I'm still quite new to wikipedia and therefore don't know exactly why my picture should be deleted. I have the written consent of the National Gallery Oslo (the owner of the picture) to be able to use the picture. In addition, she sent me this high-resolution picture of the painting. They are happy, that on this way the painting can be shown to the public! Maybe you can help me. Sincerely, JB JoBu1999 (talk) 20:29, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- JoBu1999, the problem is not with the rights of the gallery. There is the copyright of the painter protected until 70 years after his death. So legally you can upload this picture after January 1 of 2028, not earlier, - or provide the permission from the painters heir whoever he or she is. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 10:48, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- I am aware of the 70 year rule. I not only have the approval of the respective museums. I also have the written declaration of consent from L. Hansen, the painter's granddaughter. She holds all image rights. She was very pleased that someone was digitizing her grandfather's work and gave me the full approval to upload the pictures. If you want, please feel free to contact me privately. I would be happy to put you in contact with Ms. Hanson, who will confirm my statements. Kind regards. JoBu1999 (talk) 14:21, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Andrei Romanenko I am therefore very sure that there will be no copyright infringement. JoBu1999 (talk) 14:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- I am aware of the 70 year rule. I not only have the approval of the respective museums. I also have the written declaration of consent from L. Hansen, the painter's granddaughter. She holds all image rights. She was very pleased that someone was digitizing her grandfather's work and gave me the full approval to upload the pictures. If you want, please feel free to contact me privately. I would be happy to put you in contact with Ms. Hanson, who will confirm my statements. Kind regards. JoBu1999 (talk) 14:21, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- JoBu1999, the problem is not with the rights of the gallery. There is the copyright of the painter protected until 70 years after his death. So legally you can upload this picture after January 1 of 2028, not earlier, - or provide the permission from the painters heir whoever he or she is. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 10:48, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- @JoBu1999: If you have permission from the heirs of the artist to share under free license, please forward copy as detailed at COM:VRT, thanks. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope personal image that is unused. Riley Huntley (talk) 01:03, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:12, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Could be copyright violation. Xocolatl (talk) 18:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 18:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdf882c25e08d9ba219fe33f17591fe (talk · contribs)
[edit]All software screenshots. A claim made on all of them is that "Logos shown are the intellectual property of their respective owners and are reproduced here under fair use", but fair use cannot be claimed on commons, per COM:FAIRUSE.
- File:Clicking Upload button on abovetopsecret triggers clickjacking warning on NoScript 141201-cropped.png
- File:Clicking Upload button on abovetopsecret triggers clickjacking warning on NoScript 141201.png
- File:Clicking Upload button on abovetopsecret triggers clickjacking warning on NoScript 141128-cropped.png
- File:Clicking Upload button on abovetopsecret triggers clickjacking warning on NoScript 141128.png
- File:Screengrab of 'Disconnect', (an internet-browser addon), visualizing the many trackers on the website 'abovetopsecret' (on 141127)-cropped.png
- File:Screengrab of 'Disconnect', (a free internet-browser addon), visualizing the many trackers on the website 'abovetopsecret' (on 141127).png
- File:Screengrab of Mozilla's 'Lightbeam' (addon for FireFox) on 141127 showing 100 trackers on the 'abovetopsecret' website.png
Lord Belbury (talk) 18:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Own work? Really? Xocolatl (talk) 18:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 16:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Images not used on any projects, likely promotional.
- File:Fabiola Mora y Carlo Di Domenico se unen para ayudar a víctimas de terremoto en Ecuador.jpg
- File:Fabiola Mora nombra Embajador de la Moda Solidaria al diseñador de alta costura Carlo Di Domenico.jpg
- File:Fabiola Mora recorre Ecuador de la mano de Diseñadores y Modelos del Mundo.jpg
- File:Fabiola Mora.jpg
- File:Reunión con la Directiva del Greater Bogotá Convention Bureau.jpg
- File:Lanzamiento de Solidaridad de la Moda con Carlo Di Domenico.jpg
- File:Gira de Medios Internacionales Solidaridad de la Moda, Del Mundo para Ecuador.jpg
Yeeno (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal images - out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, no EXIFs, other uploads from the user already deleted Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Historical image, bogus license Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Herodian quarter plans
[edit]- File:Jerusalem-Herodian-Quarter-527.jpg
- File:Jerusalem-Herodian-Quarter-536.jpg
- File:Jerusalem-Herodian-Quarter-579.jpg
Uploader's request - copyright issue. Bukvoed (talk) 19:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
I am not the copyright holder of this file Dennis the mennis (talk) 19:28, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm not the copyright holder of this file Dennis the mennis (talk) 19:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Have better version File:Məmməd Sadıq Aranın məzarı.jpg Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Superceded - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Seems to be on the net since 2012 according to TinEye, possible advertising CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:07, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
This is plainly the SpaceX livestream, not the (possibly public domain) NASA livestream. Leijurv (talk) 20:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- File:Q5A3931.jpg Count this image too because it's the same person — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etoza (talk • contribs) 20:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope; no perceived educational value and unused. Etoza (talk) 20:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by HapHaxion as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 20:47, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 17:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope; low quality, unused image Etoza (talk) 20:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope; no realistic educational use Etoza (talk) 20:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Looks like a cropped screenshot from an Indian TV show. Out of scope. Etoza (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Oznaka_pripadnosti_maskirna.svg) Savasampion (talk) 21:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: They are not duplicates. They are two different images. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 17:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
UK MOD Crown Copyright media with no indication of an Open Government Licence release in the file metadata or at the original Royal Navy news article (Royal Marines Band recruits complete Initial Military Training) - refer to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brigadier Giles Hill.jpg for further information r.e. the operation of the Open Government Licence in general and in the particular context of UK MOD media. Dvaderv2 (talk) 22:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleting that file would be a great loss. It is a result of a request made here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gaia_Octavia_Agrippa#RM_photographs It is one of a few photographs of RMBS personnel wearing uniforms other than the ceremonial one.
It is the only close shot of the dark blue and red beret worn by the RM and RM cadets. That photograph would have to be replaced in the United Kingdom section of the Military beret article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_beret by this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Andy_Salmon_Michael_Oates_Basra_Handover.jpg which is not as close. --Dreddmoto (talk) 19:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
And so it would be. Alas, copyright law isn't exactly written from the perspective of those who want to make Wikipedia articles look as clear, informative, and visually appealing as possible...
(By the way, you did head over to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brigadier Giles Hill.jpg to see just why holding onto this image would be problematic from a copyright POV, right?)
Theoretically, this would fall under WP:FREER, but then that'd likely be interpreted in a way that supports deletion and would thus require a Wikipedia/Wikimedia contributor to acquire a dark blue Royal Marines beret, photograph it, and publish the photo on Wikipedia/Wikimedia (I've just hopped onto eBay and can see several examples for under £20 - money's a bit tight on my end at the moment, so unfortunately I can't personally help out) or some British Armed Forces militaria collector with a dark blue Royal Marines beret to publish photos of their wares under a Wikimedia-compatible licence (and if that was the case for at least one such collector, there'd be far, far more photos of British military kit on this site...).
And there's always the supererogatory step of heading over to the Parliament petitions website, asking for all Crown works to be filed under the OGL without exception/to be filed under a Creative Commons licence that permits modifications and commercial use, again without exception/to be stripped of copyright completely a la US Government works, and hoping enough people sign the petition to trigger a governmental response and/or Parliamentary debate, but like I said, that's supererogatory.--Dvaderv2 (talk) 06:37, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Dvader2, I saw the copyright information in the discussion at the link above. Choosing images is not simple as it would appear. I have more to learn about that.
Perhaps the best thing to do will be to write a request somewhere for a new photograph of such beret, one that is not likely to be deleted. Where should that request go? --Dreddmoto (talk) 18:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Been almost a month, no resolution. Better safe than sorry. Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
while the YouTube video is appropriately license, South Korea does not have any freedom of panorama so this is still a copyrighted image Masem (talk) 22:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; unlikely the YouTube user has authority to grant license on the character image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:56, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Uploader has previously also made several questionable uploads. — BriefEdits (talk) 17:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 89.179.104.231 22:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: violation of COM:DW--Renvoy (talk) 08:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement. Author died in 1991 Kotofey2016 (talk) 23:07, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement. author died in 1991 Kotofey2016 (talk) 23:07, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:55, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as Unfree Flickr file (Unfree Flickr file) and the most recent rationale was: Unfree. Was never reviewed at time of transfer (2014), should be checked if it was previously free. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Missvain at 17:00, 23 December 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:1973 Ford Ranchero 500.jpg --Krdbot 19:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Smokyskies as Fair use (non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- The logo is trademarked in Mongolia under registration number - MN 40-2015-0016668, which passed the threshold of originality, according to the Article 5 of Law of Mongolia on Trademarks and Geographical indications.
- On the topic of fair use, Article 39.2 of Law of Mongolia on Copyright /Revised edition/ dictates that use of copyrighted/trademarked content is allowed for information and educational uses, provided that the copyright and trademark owner is credited. Smokyskies (talk) 12:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note that we don't care about trademarks; see COM:NCR. The question is whether this has successfully been registered for copyright in Mongolia. Fair use is not permitted on Commons, so we must determine whether this logo is copyrightable in Mongolia. (It is definitely not copyrightable in the US, so if this is deleted from Commons it can be uploaded as a free image to Wikipedia.) -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:35, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Status in source country uncertain; no proof of being free licensed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:04, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Motherland Calls 12
[edit]See previous nominations. A copyrighted public work that was unveiled in 1967. Its authors: Yevgeny Vuchetich (1908–1974) and Nikolay Nikitin (1907–1973). Russian freedom of panorama for works of art (sculptures, monuments, murals etc.) is noncommercial, thus unacceptable. COM:VRT authorization from the heirs of the sculptors is required.
- File:Мамаев курган (3).jpg ‐ cannot be COM:DM as the statue is the intended focus here.
- File:Родина Мать зовет.jpg
- File:Скульптура «Родина-мать зовет!» 3.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:59, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:09, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Motherland Calls 13
[edit]violating FoP rules of Russia (Category:Russian FOP cases/The Motherland Calls); de minimis not applicable
- File:Volgograd. Mamayev Kurgan memorial complex in winter.jpg
- File:Волгоград - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Скульптура «Родина-мать зовет!».jpg
- File:Скульптура Родина-мать зовет!.jpg
— Draceane talkcontrib. 11:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Missvain. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Zeitz Museum
[edit]- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 103.jpg
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 104.jpg
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 112.jpg
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 113.jpg
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 114.jpg
- File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 115.jpg
- File:Zeitz Museum of Contemporary Art Africa, Cape Town ( 1050775).jpg
- File:Zeitz Museum of Contemporary Art Africa.jpg
No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The building was constructed in the 1920s, so is out of copyright. The later modifications don't change that. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:48, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The photo is depicting architecture modified in 2017, IMO they are still subject to copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:10, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: I've merged these discussions together so we can just have 1 discussion rather than 8, I hope that's OK. The architecture was modified, but it's not a new build, so I don't think that should create a new copyright. These are also wide shots that show the whole building, if they were zoom in photos on just the modified parts of the architecture than I might agree with you. I hope that others can also comment here: if consensus is that the modifications are copyrighted, then I can upload versions that blank out the modified parts of the structure. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:43, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- Calling @JWilz12345 and Clindberg: for comments as they are more knowledgeable on FOP. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:15, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: I don't have adequate knowledge whether if a "renovation" (if substantial) can be considered original in South Africa. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:44, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Calling @JWilz12345 and Clindberg: for comments as they are more knowledgeable on FOP. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:15, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: I've merged these discussions together so we can just have 1 discussion rather than 8, I hope that's OK. The architecture was modified, but it's not a new build, so I don't think that should create a new copyright. These are also wide shots that show the whole building, if they were zoom in photos on just the modified parts of the architecture than I might agree with you. I hope that others can also comment here: if consensus is that the modifications are copyrighted, then I can upload versions that blank out the modified parts of the structure. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:43, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The photo is depicting architecture modified in 2017, IMO they are still subject to copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:10, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- Info @Mike Peel: if you wish you may want to add to your watchlist the meta:Wikimedia South Africa/Copyright Amendement Bill, outlining the efforts of the South African Wikipedians to have FOP introduced there (with support from various sectors there) and the progress of introducing it. But like any other initiatives, this is full of obstacles, with significant opposition against FOP in that country, backed by various groups like America's International Intellectual Property Alliance. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I've been aware of WMSA's efforts and sending them good vibes for a while now, but thanks for the link, which I hadn't seen before! I really hope they get FOP in SA, it would be great step forward. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- South Africa does have FoP for videos actually, just not photos. The photos look like they are focusing on the building to me, except probably File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 114.jpg, which is a bit wider scene. However... if the building is from the 1920s, it would only be elements added later which would have a longer copyright -- the copyright on the entire building doesn't get extended. What were the 2017 modifications? If a photo is focusing on those modifications, then it could be a problem it sounds like. But if not, then technically a photo of the otherwise-PD building could be a "wider scene" itself which unavoidably captures those modifications ("incidental"). Do we know the architect of the building? Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: Basically anything glass is new (replacing older concrete surfaces). I think the metal structure in File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 114.jpg is old as well, but I'm not 100% sure. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: Architect is Thomas Heatherwick.--A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: Oops, was mainly asking about the architect of the original building, to see if that had expired or not. Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: Then I don't know sorry. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:15, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: Oops, was mainly asking about the architect of the original building, to see if that had expired or not. Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: Architect is Thomas Heatherwick.--A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: Basically anything glass is new (replacing older concrete surfaces). I think the metal structure in File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 114.jpg is old as well, but I'm not 100% sure. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- Presuming the original building is out of copyright, I would probably keep most. Copyright cases of building photos being ruled derivative are few and far between, though we know of at least one, so they do exist. However, they would seem pretty much on the edge of how far copyright extends. I don't know of any court case examples of photos of buildings where only renovations are under copyright, though if a photo is focusing on those in particular, it's a reasonable case to be made. But we often do keep photos which are of a larger scene, where the copyrightable work is just an unavoidable part (there have been rulings along those lines). As such, to me, any photo which is mainly focusing on the building, and not the renovations in particular, we should probably keep. You could make the case for deletion on File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 103.jpg, and maybe File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 112.jpg and File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 113.jpg, as focusing more on the new windows, but I would Keep the rest. If the original building is still under copyright, probably everything except File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 114.jpg would be a problem unfortunately. South Africa is 50pma, but if the architect is anonymous, it would have expired 50 years after it was built, so in the 1970s, so the architect's name would have had to be known before that time in order for it to be based on their lifetime. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:07, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- Probably URAA applies to the rest if they are built during 1926~1929 (because in these cases, the public domain date for them are after 1 Jan 1996). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Photos of buildings are not derivative works in the U.S. so the URAA is not relevant here. These photos would be fine on en-wiki if they are not OK here. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Probably URAA applies to the rest if they are built during 1926~1929 (because in these cases, the public domain date for them are after 1 Jan 1996). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - THe recent work is obvious and certainly copyrighted. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: How, exactly, is a 1920's building still copyrighted? Mike Peel (talk) 20:38, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Raised at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Commons:Deletion_requests/Zeitz_Museum. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Reopened per Jim at 22:19, 7 November 2021: "I'm fine with restoring them all and then reopening the DR." -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Permalink to the undeletion request discussion. Thanks for reopening this. Mike Peel (talk) 07:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The older portion of the museum is out of copyright but the glass expansion, which is a major component (exceeding COM:DM) of each of these photos except perhaps File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 104.jpg and File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 114.jpg, is a new creative work and has its own copyright. The first two sentences of COM:Derivative works describe this exact situation: Many creative works are derivative works of something else, entitled to their own copyright. A derivative work is one which is not only based on a previous work, but which also contains sufficient new, creative content to entitle it to its own copyright. -M.nelson (talk) 19:10, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Addendum to above - keep File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 104.jpg, File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 114.jpg, and File:Zeitz Museum of Contemporary Art Africa.jpg per discussion below -M.nelson (talk) 23:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- I agree it's a derivative work, but more than simple de minimis. Per the Ets-Hokin decision, a photograph would not be derivative (of the windows) unless it was actually focusing on them. In that decision, a photograph of a bottle would not be derivative of a copyrightable label on the bottle, unless focusing on the label in particular. I think that is the situation here for several of the photos -- yes the additions would have their own copyright, and photos focusing on them are not OK (and there are a couple of those too), but (similar to the French cases), a photograph of a wider scene which happens to contain a copyrighted object is still OK, even if prominent. A photograph of the full building would then be a "wider scene" to me, with the windows being "incidental". We mention this on Commons:De minimis, particularly in the French section, but it's a different concept than actual legal de minimis (since copyrighted elements can be front and center, and far from de minimis, in such photos yet still be OK). Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:49, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- In my opinion the entire upper half is part of the new architects' creative work; for example, though the grid is original, they made an architectural choice to leave it and juxtapose it with the central segments, resulting in a new design not created by the original architect. So IMO any photos which have the upper half as a primary element exceed COM:DM. All photos above, except for File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 104.jpg and File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 114.jpg (and perhaps File:Zeitz Museum of Contemporary Art Africa.jpg), are focused on the upper half. -M.nelson (talk) 21:36, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- In general, you only get a copyright for expression you add -- leaving someone else's work there is still someone else's work. It may be a choice, but that's not what creates copyright. From the U.S. Copyright Office, The copyright in a derivative work covers only the additions, changes, or other new material appearing for the first time in the work. Protection does not extend to any preexisting material, that is, previously published or previously registered works or works in the public domain or owned by a third party. It's hard to argue a selection and arrangement copyright either, since the placement of the existing work stayed the same. Similarly, just changing a color might be a choice, but it's not a copyrightable change either. The visual impact of a work is also not used in determining a copyright -- only the expression that they actually added. From the same document, the use of the public domain material in a derivative work will not prevent anyone else from using the same public domain work for another derivative work. So using existing parts may make the new building look more attractive, but it can't prevent someone else from using the older parts as, say, part of their photograph either. The older parts are not part of the new author's expression. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:50, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, seems I'm wrong about the borders. However I still believe the new component is more significant than de minimis, making up the majority of the surface area of the central focus of most of these images (excluding the 3 I mentioned above).
Re: "it can't prevent someone else from using the older parts" - this is true only if it's possible to use the older parts without infringing on the newer parts. In effect it's similar to if a large professional mural were drawn on the building - photos in which the mural is a significant component won't be allowed, even if the building might be PD and if a similarly framed photo would have been OK prior to the mural. -M.nelson (talk) 23:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)- I agree it's more than de minimis. However, the situation in the French photographs, and the Ets-Hokin decision, were a different legal theory than de minimis. They are basically saying there is a balance between the photographer's rights versus those of the underlying works -- there is a dividing line between what is a derivative photograph, under control by another author, versus one that simply happens to contain another work but which is not "based" on it enough to be derivative. We do not delete pictures of people wearing clothes which have a copyrightable pattern on them, for example. The French case was pretty much exactly that -- the copyrighted building was a significant part of the photo (more than de minimis), but since the photo was of a larger subject where the building was unavoidably contained, it was not a derivative photo. There was a somewhat related discussion recently, at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/11#Misuse_of_de_minimis_on_Commons. Nothing in this area is easy, but all the cases I know of follow roughly that distinction -- a photo of a larger subject (bottle, street, motorcycle) means items which are unavoidably present (label, building, artwork), do not cause the photo to be derivative even if fairly prominent. A photographer should have the right to make a photo of a PD building, even if certain elements are newer and still under copyright. For photos focusing on a copyrighted work in particular, or going out of their way to intentionally include a copyrighted element (even if not so prominent), those can be problems. I just don't see it here, other than the three that I mentioned that seem to be focusing on the windows themselves -- most seem to be of a larger subject than the new works. In your example, if the photo was focusing on the murals, then sure. If not, it's not so clear. Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:14, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Interesting, @LPfi: poked me elsewhere that the Not OK COM:FOP South Africa "only affects the artworks, but doesn't affect buildings". Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ahh I suddenly know where LPfi said so, the Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bloukrans Bridge-001.jpg which is requested undeletion (and successed) by them. (PS: Merry Xmas to all participants) Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- I agree it's more than de minimis. However, the situation in the French photographs, and the Ets-Hokin decision, were a different legal theory than de minimis. They are basically saying there is a balance between the photographer's rights versus those of the underlying works -- there is a dividing line between what is a derivative photograph, under control by another author, versus one that simply happens to contain another work but which is not "based" on it enough to be derivative. We do not delete pictures of people wearing clothes which have a copyrightable pattern on them, for example. The French case was pretty much exactly that -- the copyrighted building was a significant part of the photo (more than de minimis), but since the photo was of a larger subject where the building was unavoidably contained, it was not a derivative photo. There was a somewhat related discussion recently, at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/11#Misuse_of_de_minimis_on_Commons. Nothing in this area is easy, but all the cases I know of follow roughly that distinction -- a photo of a larger subject (bottle, street, motorcycle) means items which are unavoidably present (label, building, artwork), do not cause the photo to be derivative even if fairly prominent. A photographer should have the right to make a photo of a PD building, even if certain elements are newer and still under copyright. For photos focusing on a copyrighted work in particular, or going out of their way to intentionally include a copyrighted element (even if not so prominent), those can be problems. I just don't see it here, other than the three that I mentioned that seem to be focusing on the windows themselves -- most seem to be of a larger subject than the new works. In your example, if the photo was focusing on the murals, then sure. If not, it's not so clear. Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:14, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, seems I'm wrong about the borders. However I still believe the new component is more significant than de minimis, making up the majority of the surface area of the central focus of most of these images (excluding the 3 I mentioned above).
- In general, you only get a copyright for expression you add -- leaving someone else's work there is still someone else's work. It may be a choice, but that's not what creates copyright. From the U.S. Copyright Office, The copyright in a derivative work covers only the additions, changes, or other new material appearing for the first time in the work. Protection does not extend to any preexisting material, that is, previously published or previously registered works or works in the public domain or owned by a third party. It's hard to argue a selection and arrangement copyright either, since the placement of the existing work stayed the same. Similarly, just changing a color might be a choice, but it's not a copyrightable change either. The visual impact of a work is also not used in determining a copyright -- only the expression that they actually added. From the same document, the use of the public domain material in a derivative work will not prevent anyone else from using the same public domain work for another derivative work. So using existing parts may make the new building look more attractive, but it can't prevent someone else from using the older parts as, say, part of their photograph either. The older parts are not part of the new author's expression. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:50, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- In my opinion the entire upper half is part of the new architects' creative work; for example, though the grid is original, they made an architectural choice to leave it and juxtapose it with the central segments, resulting in a new design not created by the original architect. So IMO any photos which have the upper half as a primary element exceed COM:DM. All photos above, except for File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 104.jpg and File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 114.jpg (and perhaps File:Zeitz Museum of Contemporary Art Africa.jpg), are focused on the upper half. -M.nelson (talk) 21:36, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- From my review, I would support Delete the 5th File:At Cape Town (MP) 2018 114.jpg and last one File:Zeitz Museum of Contemporary Art Africa.jpg due to a non-free sculpture, and Keep the rest. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:44, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: What sculpture are you talking about? There is a metal industrial element attached to the building, but it was apparently part of the original grain silo workings -- there is a 1924 photo on this page which shows it there, so it has simply been preserved. So it's old, and not a sculpture. And even if it was, the same principle would apply -- the photos are not focusing on that item, so it's just part of a wider scene I would think. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:19, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: most per Carl Lindberg (though most of his arguments seem to be based on US precedents, but do we have any better?), deleted the three he mentioned. I couldn't find the architect of the original building, so I'm not sure if it is still protected or not. South Africa has 50 years pma though, which means {{PD-old-assumed}} is 100 years instead of the usual 120, so I'll go with that instead. --Rosenzweig τ 19:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)