Commons:Candidatas a imagens especiais
A página de projeto Candidatas a imagens especiais noutras línguas: Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/− |
Estas imagens são as candidatas para se tornarem em Imagens especiais. Por favor note que isto não é a mesma coisa que a imagem do dia.
Para ver o arquivo de nomeações prévias veja: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
Formalidades
[edit]Nomeação
[edit]Se acha que encontrou ou criou uma imagem que possa ser considerada especial, então por favor adicione-a em baixo na secção de nomeações, no topo da página, editando este link.
Mas antes de o fazer, assegure que a imagem tem uma descrição apropriada e licenciamento.
Por favor vote ao usar a palavra na sua linguagem nos modelos em baixo:
- Concordar (a favor) — {{Sim}}, {{Amei}} (gostou muito), {{Support}}, {{Yes}}, {{Ja}}, {{Oui}}, {{Sí}}, {{Kyllä}} etc.
- Discordar (contra) — {{Não}}, {{Oppose}}, {{No}}, {{Nein}}, {{Non}}, {{Ei}} etc.
Política de candidatura a imagem especial
[edit]- Período de votação de 9 dias. O resultado será determinado no 10º dia após a nomeação.
- As nomeações feitas por anónimos são bem vindas.
- As contribuições para a discussão feitas por anónimos são bem vindas.
- Votos de anónimos não são contados.
- As nomeações não contam como votos. O voto deve ser feito usando o modelo de voto.
A imagem candidata passará a ser uma imagem especial de acordo com as seguintes condições:
- Licença apropriada.
- Pelo menos 5 votos positivos.
- A relação de votos positivos/votos negativos terá de ser pelo menos 2/1 (uma maioria de dois terços, ou seja pelo menos 67% de apoio).
Para ver instruções sobre como lidar com nomeações antigas, veja Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished.
Propostas
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 20:23:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Austria
- Info A risky nomination and I don't know what you'll think to this. But there is something about the composition that I find really interesting and I like it more the longer I look at it. I think it's the warm and inviting light, the leading lines from the sweep of the road and the brickwork, the rich colours, and the contrast between the almost aggresive regularity of the brickwork and the repeating patterns in the roofs, compared with the somewhat eclectic architecture of the house. Anyway, it's subtle, but this is IMO a really good example of how to shoot a street in a small town. created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 20:23:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Russia
- Info I love the golden winter lighting in this photo of a lesser known religious building. Created by Саня Новиков - uploaded by Саня Новиков - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 19:32:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 19:10:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info created by KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC) - uploaded by KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC) - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the shadows and the light. Subtle and pretty. Cmao20 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco (المدرسة البوعنانية, ⴰⵙⵉⵏⴰⵏ ⴱⵓ ⵉⵏⴰⵏⵉⵢⴰ).jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 18:45:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco, my shot. -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Interesting, but I miss the corner at the bottom . Cmao20 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking of Appias galba (Wallace, 1867) - Indian Orange Albatross WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 13:40:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info create, uploaded, and nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 13:21:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 395954
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522234
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522275
|
- Support -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Beautiful but IMO oversharpened (haloes). Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 12:29:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
- Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- An aerial view of Kounos, Mani, Greece, a village populated with tower houses, some up to five stories high, built by families to protect them from thieves or hostile families. Support -- C messier (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 09:39:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
- Info High altar at the parish church Schönbach, Lower Austria. Anonymous master, around 1490. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Cesenatico - Museo della Marineria di Cesenatico - Sezione galleggiante - Barche storiche - 2024-09-18 19-09-09 001.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 19:14:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Sailing_ships
- Info In the center is the Maritime Museum of Cesenatico, on the left you can see the historic boats of the Adriatic Sea, the only floating museum in Italy located on the oldest and most evocative part of the Leonardo's canal port of Cesenatico. This Museum Is the custodian of the maritime history of sailing boats coming from the north of the Adriatic Sea. C.U.N. by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, colorful -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 15:40:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info Schneespitze in the Stubai Alps seen on the ascent from the Magdeburg hut. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 12:14:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
- Info created by NASA ESA CSA / Science leads and image processing: M. McCaughrean S. Pearson, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support Huge resolution image of the Orion Nebula and Trapezium Cluster by the James Webb Space Telescope. -- Yann (talk) 12:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Hard to say no to JWST Cmao20 (talk) 20:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_indoors
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 10:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good picture of this famous statue. Yann (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment With respect to the original photograph, there are some artifacts introduced by removing the background: the tail shows a double contour, what seems a casting defects has been removed from the right-hand leg, and three cusps are present below the neck. I added three notes about them. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done thanks Wilfredor (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Reminded me of this, pretty hilarious! --Gnosis (talk) 22:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Yerpo — Yerpo Eh? 10:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm not always that keen on birds on wires but this one is very sharp and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 22:16:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#France
- Info The one and only quality image of this building is from 2006 so I tried to catch the current look with current technical quality. The shape of the building is a truncated cone, which means that the vertical lines in the photo cannot be exactly vertical. Created/uploaded/nominated by Lynx1211 -- Lynx1211 (talk) 22:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ah, sod it - yes, I support. I was going to oppose it when I saw the thumbnail, as I thought of it as "just another windmill", but after looking at the full size, I think the technical quality is very high and the light is just right for the composition.--Peulle (talk) 10:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 15:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Peulle. Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 13:10:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective (left is leaning in), and I think it's also a bit too soft, looking at the mountain in particular.--Peulle (talk) 10:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for your feedback! I've uploaded a new version with corrected perspective (you may need to use SHIFT+Reload to see the changes), not much I can do about the sharpness. --Kabelleger (talk) 10:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Colors seem a little too saturated and overall, the image appears dark. Consider lightening to increase detail in the mid-tones. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 22:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
- Info created by KaiBorgeest - uploaded by KaiBorgeest - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Please check the crop at the left, some background is visible --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, it is hard to recognize on a white background, I have fixed it.--KaiBorgeest (talk) 17:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC) - Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 12:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Could be a bit sharper, but v picturesque and lovely Cmao20 (talk) 19:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 20:37:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
- Info Interior of the church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Butuceni, Orhei, Moldova. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Image full of details, without noise and well defined despite obvious difficulties due to the side lighting alone. -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Me gusta mucho esta foto y siento que deberia ser destacad, vi la luz entrando por la ventana y pense WOW que hermoso esos rayos de luz pero luego subi a la esquina superior derecha y veo como la contaminacion luminica impide ver los detalles del fresco de las paredes (se ve enblanquecido), pienso que puede solucionarse en lightroom (algo inverso al proceso de corregir vigneting) --Wilfredor (talk) 17:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A beautiful religious space. I could quibble about a couple of things e.g. the top crop but I am willing to accept them as part of the compromises needed to capture this lovely space in a single frame. Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 14:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 17:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very high resolution, good focus, feeling of space with this large background -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 07:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, a clear FP.--Peulle (talk) 10:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 10:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Woah. This is one of the best images of an African antelope I've ever seen. Everything is timed to perfection. Huge congratulations to the photographer of this high-caliber, educational, and valuable piece of art. Wolverine XI 15:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support of course Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 12:39:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Portraits
- Info created by crommelincklars - uploaded by Cybertrip - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Something different --Wilfredor (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Visibly heavily JPEG artefacted (see her neck and chin - compression artefacts are v obvious). Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Carnivora_(Carnivores)
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Grand. Epic. Cinematic. Wanderer above the sea of fog vibes Henrysz (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not FP-standards in my heavily biased opinion. Wolverine XI 15:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- all the opinions are welcome :) Wilfredor (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great, and please do not lower the highlights on the snow - snow should be this blindingly white. Cmao20 (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:37:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Emydidae (Pond Turtles)
- Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Dragon? --Yann (talk) 11:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Missing location --A.Savin 15:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, where was this picture taken? Poco a poco (talk) 16:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ukraine, Vinnytsia. Exotic animals exhibition -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- "Exotic animals exhibition"? That's not nice... --A.Savin 20:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Why not? We have many FP from zoos. In this photo the background look like natural, not distracting, the animal's behavior is natural -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I presume that in these temporary or touring exhibitions, they treat the animals worse than in a zoo. --A.Savin 17:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stricking image (please improve description and add a location category). --C messier (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Li Phi falls with colorful sky from elevated zip line platform at sunset in Don Khon Si Phan Don Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 05:52:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 00:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exquisite Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 04:22:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Switzerland
- Info Zernez, decoration on the vaults of the Reformed Church San Mauritius. The church can first be seen at the end of the 13th century. These rich decorations were probably applied from 1609 onwards. See Reformierte Kirche Zernez
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Unexceptional subject for me. Roughly made and not well painted -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, we can no longer hold the craftsmen of the year 1609 accountable for the (in your eyes) poor work they delivered.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately not everything was spectacular at this time, and not all the craftmen were prodigies like Michael Angelo :-) Ordinary architectural element in my view (also for the period). Nothing special, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Am I mispercieving this or is the image tinted yellow? Henrysz (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. I can possibly make the photo a little less yellow.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:41, 16 September 2024(UTC)
- @Henrysz: I have reduced the yellow color, Thanks for your comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry but I agree with Basile this time. Good QI and nice colours but IMO not outstanding enough for FP, an interesting motif but far from an extraordinary one. Cmao20 (talk) 19:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
- Info created by Tracychapmanfan5 - uploaded by Tracychapmanfan5 - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Crop too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Superb subject, great interplay of light and shadows, but I must agree with Basile that the top crop is very tight. Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:22:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
- Info created by National Institute for Fusion Science - uploaded by National Institute for Fusion Science - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Stricking image but the out of focus portion on the upper right is too distracting. Sorry. Also, IMHO too strong contrast (there are both burnt whites and pitch blacks) and a bit small. --C messier (talk) 12:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Cool abstract and was worth a try, but a bit small and not convinced by the strong contrast and blown highlights. Cmao20 (talk) 19:52, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Water reflection of a boy feeding hay to a cow in a paddy field at golden hour in Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 20:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Of course --Wilfredor (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice golden hour light -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captured the moment. --Tagooty (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice! BigDom (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Awesome action shot Henrysz (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 07:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support So many of your photos have a really picturesque, painterly touch and this is no exception. Cmao20 (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 19:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info created and uploaded by Bruno Tamm, nominated by me. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Perspective correction required. ★ 19:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Corrected. ★ 01:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- wide-angle don't need perspective fix, you changed it to another image completely different from the original author conception, IMHO, should be uploaded in another image Wilfredor (talk) 02:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous colors and light Henrysz (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There seems to be 2 dust spots in the sky. Notes added -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Coordinates and English description should be added. --Milseburg (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
- Info created by Charles Marville (1813–1879), restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann, after a suggestion of LucaLindholm
- Support Old picture of Paris, before the time of Haussman's renovation. -- Yann (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, Thank you so much for having done it by yourself. In the last two weeks I switched to Mac from Windows and I'm also developing also a little web site, so I was mentally occupied with those and other things. ;D LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support V nice - an old photo that really feels like you can step inside it. Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:23:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Caprimulgidae_(Nightjars)
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 12:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cute and good quality Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 11:50:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
- Info Mark Twain photo portrait. Created by Unknown - uploaded by Grendelkhan - partially restored by Yann - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Calling for Adam Cuerden to help to complete this restoration. -- ★ 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sure why I would want to support something that the nominator does not think is FP and not sure why the nomination has been created hoping that another user will spare the time to fix it. Cmao20 (talk) 19:49, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 06:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
- Info Kasbah Amridil, Marocco (قصبة امريديل), old Fortress in Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captures the large subject in a single exposure without artifacts or atmospheric distortion. The only things missing from the image are Joe Strummer, Mick Jones, Paul Simonon and Topper Headon. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good one. Nice colours, composition + sharpness. Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 21:45:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support If it were better developed this image would really be a gem, but due to the size of the JPG and evaluating what the RAW would be like, this photo should have greater potential. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate further. Wolverine XI 13:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- If I understand well, Wilfredor is not very happy that the image wheighs "only" 16.11 MB and is saying that I should have uploaded a version that weighs more MB. It is true that I uploaded a version that was compressed with Photoshop to a quality of 11 out of 12. But I strongly disagree with his statement for many reasons :
- 1) The rules don't forbid small jpg compression (they only forbid strong compression). Actually the rules even recommend using a jpg compression of minimum 80 or 90% and this is what was done here with a 92% compression ;
- 2) A compression of 11 out of 12 has a result of pratically no difference compared to a 12/12 quality export. Even zooming at 200% and comparing pixel by pixel I never saw any difference between the two with the naked eye ;
- 3) Usually I only do the 11/12 instead of letting the 12/12 when the image size is above 20 MB. Excessive file sizes are bad for many reasons ;
- 4) Wiki Commons has available storage issues and uploading files with excessive size will only make it worse ;
- 5) Excessive file size will take a lot longer to load for people with slow internet ;
- 6) Excessive file size might make some old smartphones crash when opening the file ;
- 7) Excessive file size is bad for bandwidth and will slow down the server ;
- 8) Many of my images have been loaded more than 1 million times per file, if you multiply this number with excessive file size it would be a waste of bandwidth. Examples : 4M views in 4 years, 2.6M views in 1 year, 1.4M views in 1 year, 2.1M views in 1 year 2.3M views in 1 year, etc.
- 9) If there was a policy of only accepting only loseless uploads we would only be uploading PNG format, which is not the case here and is on the contrary to be avoided.
- Best regards, -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that this is the case and also every photographer should be free to edit their photos as they see fit, and we enter a grey area where it can be a decision of the photographer or a technical error according to some. Destructive editing does not only involve compression of JPGs, but also very strong noise reduction or sharpness filters, or saturation or color changes that were not real (except for black and white images or specific cases). I come from Venezuela, a country with very limited internet access where almost no one can see our work even with the highest compressions, but should we limit ourselves in an attempt to be inclusive?, This is just a image, imagine all the bandwidth that is spent on watching streaming videos, which is becoming more common every day. IMHO As a general rule, I always suggest uploading the best possible version of your work, because the quality in which you share it today will be how it’s remembered tomorrow. If someone prefers a smaller version, there are several size options available on the image description page, but that should not be your limitation when creating. Don’t set up barriers that others can easily overcome. Show your art in all its splendor and detail. You might think now that it’s enough to upload an optimized or more modest version, but I assure you, over time, you’ll regret it. Technology and quality standards advance quickly. The best way to contribute your work to humanity is by sharing it in the highest quality possible. In the end, it’s a matter of respecting your own creation and those who will enjoy it Wilfredor (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I had no access to the file lately and so I thought that I had done the 11/12 that I sometimes do but guess what I just checked and I didn't even do it on this picture! The original file size when exported out of Lightroom was only 13.7 MB (max setting). But after applying Denoise and Sharpen, the file size always increases in unecessary proportion, which then led the file to beeing 25.2 MB. After Denoise and Sharpen it always changes very slightly the overall color of the image making it a +1 greener in the green-violet spectrum so I always cancel with Lightroom making it a +1 more violet again and reexporting (in max setting) which then made this file of 16.11 MB that was finally not even compressed. Moral of the story : it's just Denoise and Sharpen that add unnecessary weight to the file and that get's deleted anyway when making any export at max setting with Lightroom or Photoshop -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that this is the case and also every photographer should be free to edit their photos as they see fit, and we enter a grey area where it can be a decision of the photographer or a technical error according to some. Destructive editing does not only involve compression of JPGs, but also very strong noise reduction or sharpness filters, or saturation or color changes that were not real (except for black and white images or specific cases). I come from Venezuela, a country with very limited internet access where almost no one can see our work even with the highest compressions, but should we limit ourselves in an attempt to be inclusive?, This is just a image, imagine all the bandwidth that is spent on watching streaming videos, which is becoming more common every day. IMHO As a general rule, I always suggest uploading the best possible version of your work, because the quality in which you share it today will be how it’s remembered tomorrow. If someone prefers a smaller version, there are several size options available on the image description page, but that should not be your limitation when creating. Don’t set up barriers that others can easily overcome. Show your art in all its splendor and detail. You might think now that it’s enough to upload an optimized or more modest version, but I assure you, over time, you’ll regret it. Technology and quality standards advance quickly. The best way to contribute your work to humanity is by sharing it in the highest quality possible. In the end, it’s a matter of respecting your own creation and those who will enjoy it Wilfredor (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate further. Wolverine XI 13:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 22:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fine, nice colors. --Mile (talk) 09:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PierreSelim (talk) 13:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 18:20:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
- Info created by FBilula - uploaded by FBilula - nominated by FBilula (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Good composition, but DoF too small. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 💬 09:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good lighting and composition. The leading (meandering) line of the path towards the steep hill in the background adds invokes, to me at least, a parallel to the myth of Sisyphus. A compelling image --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 12:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Shallow DoF is IMO fine here seeing subject is in focus. Superb composition and colours. Cmao20 (talk) 19:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 17:44:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, considering it was taken from a cell phone. ★ 17:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with ★. --Mile (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Really nice composition, but details looks flat (due to taking with a cell phone) --XRay 💬 09:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The composition is very nice, but I agree with XRay about the level of detail and the resolution is rather small in this day and age. BigDom (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose with respect to the author who has presented at least a high quality QI, but I don't think 'considering it was taken from a cell phone' is the right attitude. Either it's good enough for FP or it's not, we shouldn't make allowances for the quality of equipment. I love the motif but I'm not convinced by the level of detail at this relatively small resolution (less than 6 megapixels) and I don't think the bottom crops in the corners are perfect. Cmao20 (talk) 19:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes bharata C. & R. Felder, 1867 - Indian Nawab 10.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 13:04:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose You present an impressive collection of beautiful butterfly images here but in this case I think the detail is not at FP level. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment IQ is fine, but position and left crop - more space. --Mile (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good for me considering high resolution and high pixel level detail. I feel like if we say this one isn't good enough, we are getting close to mandating focus-stacking for this kind of image. There is a bit of colour noise but it's not enough to put me off too much. Cmao20 (talk) 19:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Spain
- Info View of the Alcázar of Segovia during sunrise, Segovia, Castile and León, Spain. The UNESCO World Heritage Site dates from the 12th century and has been home to twenty-two kings. The Alcazar of Segovia has made its mark on cinema and popular culture. It was used by Orson Welles in the film "Chimes at Midnight" and served as inspiration for Cinderella castle in the Walt Disney movie and also in the Disneyworld sites. It's one of the most renowed medieval castles in the world and one of the most visited landmarks in Spain. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the best perspective, IMO. Wolverine XI 16:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good interplay of light, clouds and the building.--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose the composition feels aimless. The lighting makes the castle appear flat Henrysz (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting to see a different perspective of a much-photographed building, but the lighting here isn't really working for me, sorry. I agree with Henrysz regarding the 'flat'ness. BigDom (talk) 02:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I am fine. Would say fort is very good and sharp. I wish other around could be similar sharp. Those 2-3 storks on trees solved. --Mile (talk) 09:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the light and the perspective/angle. ★ 22:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing and clearly FP to me. Very sharp on the building. Lovely light and colours. I think there is possibly a point in that this is the duller side of the castle to photograph and a lot of it is featureless wall. But still very good and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 19:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Ravenna - Basilica di Sant'Apollinare in Classe - Vista esterna - 2024-09-13 23-38-55 001.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 22:19:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info The Basilica of Sant'Apollinare in Classe, located in Ravenna, is truly a jewel surrounded by greenery. Internally, the mosaic of the apse also depicts Sant'Apollinare in a lush green lawn, surrounded by trees, flowers and animals, creating an atmosphere of peace and serenity. This scenario symbolizes heaven and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
* Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find both versions attractive, but I personally like this one better. The group of sculptures on the left adds to the overall appeal of the scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, you are right. I decided to upload a new version in order to preserve the full scenery. I will correlate the two images as other version. I also really like this image, but I decided to opt for the alternative image because the depiction being too broad becomes difficult to interpret and perhaps even distracting. Terragio67 (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find the original more balanced. Cmao20 (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative cropped version
[edit]- Info I decided to crop the left part of the image above to give centrality and the right importance to the basilica immersed in the greenery of nature, trying in the same way to represent an atmosphere of peace and serenity, similar to the [internal mosaic of the apse] where the tone of the colors resemble each other. This scenario symbolizes paradise and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. Created, 2nd version uploaded, and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me this crop is better.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, clearly better than the original crop. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Would be support if I'd not seen the original but it's just better. In the original we have the gentle sweep across the scene with the trees getting larger and drawing the eye towards the basilica, plus the carved animal figures all pointing in the same direction that give a sense of movement as we look across the frame. The alternative lacks any of this and feels comparatively static. Cmao20 (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 08:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A little bit dark but interesting and high quality. Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 11:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting devices
- Info Lantern in Prelate's courtyard of former Gaming Charterhouse, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but several things serve to ruin this one for me: the modern lightbulb in contrast to the older lamp and wall; the difference in the shadow vs. the lamp; the crack in the lamp glass... I'm just not feeling it.--Peulle (talk) 11:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, the composition with the prominent shadows works very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like it too. --BigDom (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yep. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, the shadow makes it. Have taken the liberty to change the gallery link to the Lighting devices section where most similar FPs are collected. – Aristeas (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, that fits perfectly! --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support :-) --XRay 💬 08:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Joalpe (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- SupportGood geometrical projection. It's hilarious for me, that "Gaming" exists as a village :). Many older Bavarians may refer to this name than for the term "Gaming" of playing video games --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin, but the framing is a bit too large in my view Still better too large than too tight :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool minimalism. Very sharp and good composition. I agree with Basile about the framing but not enough to oppose. Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:03:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Croatia
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A simple photo, but the colors and the atmosphere make this photo special to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yes, too simple in terms of subject, lighting, compo, I don't believe this is one of our finest shots, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 07:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Refurbished clocktower VS unrefurbished buildings: I like this contrast. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the colours and the leading lines. Maybe not obviously that wow-y, but still good IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 19:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:01:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This photo deserves a little love. Yes, at the first glance the lateral view of the façade appears unusual and somewhat irritating. But (a) sometimes a little irritation is good, it shakes us out of our well-meaning lethargy and makes us look closer; (b) the lateral view reveals parts of the domes of the church which are shining in the sunlight; (c) this way we get a beautiful contrast between the shady, bluish piazza and the warm light on the domes. All in all I learn much about the location and the beauty of the church from this photo, much more than from the usual symmetric frontal view, and therefore the photo is IMHO successful and deserves the star. – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose composition feels unbalanced Henrysz (talk) 21:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks too distorted and unnatural in my eyes, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit distorted, but IMO a dynamic and well composed photograph that shows this church well. Cmao20 (talk) 19:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 16:38:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
- Info Art on Nubian house, Nagaa Suhayl Gharb, Egypt. My shot. Previous was on right side. -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For a moment I thought it was the Virgin of Guadalupe --Wilfredor (talk) 23:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nubians are of Islam religion. Saw 2 mosques near, will try edit some in future. Nubians are very friendly, one invited me to coffee at his house. Very nice interior, like museum. --Mile (talk) 07:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Coffee is that coffee that is heated with sand? I hope you also enjoyed the cult Wilfredor (talk) 22:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It was in his house, it was "normally" - in dzezva. Sand perhaps in desert, on dry camels waste. --Mile (talk) 08:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool variant of pop art with traditional elements and refreshing subject. – Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 15:04:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent sharpnes --Wilfredor (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness is fine but the setup, environment with humanmade elements spoils it to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful. Would prefer a natural environment, too, but we live in a world dominated by human beings, so IMHO it’s just realistic that even nature photos show human artefacts, too. – Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing puddling position of Graphium antiphates (Cramer, 1775) - Five-bar Swordtail WLB MG 2022.jpg
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 14:56:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Zzzs (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per below. --Zzzs (talk) 22:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting background, I'm afraid that the third butterfly spoils it Poco a poco (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kritzolina (talk) 05:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco. Good effort but not quite there. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)